To all of the snowflakes complaining about MFF's misleading marketing, were you ever denied a payout from MFF that you rightfully deserved before the CFTC forced them to shutter?
Most of the traders here do not care about the misleading marketing nonsense because it just didn't matter. Traders were still getting paid, and most of us already knew what was really going on behind the scenes and we were okay with it. Is it right to mislead consumers? No. But does it mean that MFF were frauds? No.
For all we know, the whole idea of 'we win, you win' could have been something that someone thought was clever, but had no real meaning or intention behind it, and like most things on their website, were never changed or given more thought about.
Anyone that honestly thought that their trades were actually getting A-booked as soon as they passed a 2-phase challenge that could be completed in a few hours, probably needs to get scammed so that they can learn to not be so naive.
Any talk of gang-mentality here is nonsense. If someone says something stupid or false, then people are likely to call you out on it. If several members seem to be 'ganging up' on you, it is probably because you said something stupid or false, not because you are not in their gang.
This idea of forex-is-king is also nonsense. Many traders here have already made the jump to futures. Anyone with experience knows that you must be willing and able to adapt to market changes, as well as practice risk-mitigation by way of diversification.
What I see here, are a few members that like to make up stories and ideas, for whatever reason, as if saying them, actually makes them true. I see a lot of assumptions and baseless claims being made, seemingly attempting to create an argument out of thin air, hoping that someone will take the bait.
I have been tempted, several times, to put a handful of people on ignore here, simply because most of their contributions provide no value, whatsoever, and are oftentimes either provocative in nature, or, are complete nonsense. I see some people pretending to be experts and talking out of their butt-holes. Some just complain about props and look for every opportunity to call them frauds, and then wonder why their comments are not well-received in a thread that advocates for props.
If what I say offends you, then please put me on ignore; I really do not care.
Most of the traders here do not care about the misleading marketing nonsense because it just didn't matter. Traders were still getting paid, and most of us already knew what was really going on behind the scenes and we were okay with it. Is it right to mislead consumers? No. But does it mean that MFF were frauds? No.
For all we know, the whole idea of 'we win, you win' could have been something that someone thought was clever, but had no real meaning or intention behind it, and like most things on their website, were never changed or given more thought about.
Anyone that honestly thought that their trades were actually getting A-booked as soon as they passed a 2-phase challenge that could be completed in a few hours, probably needs to get scammed so that they can learn to not be so naive.
Any talk of gang-mentality here is nonsense. If someone says something stupid or false, then people are likely to call you out on it. If several members seem to be 'ganging up' on you, it is probably because you said something stupid or false, not because you are not in their gang.
This idea of forex-is-king is also nonsense. Many traders here have already made the jump to futures. Anyone with experience knows that you must be willing and able to adapt to market changes, as well as practice risk-mitigation by way of diversification.
What I see here, are a few members that like to make up stories and ideas, for whatever reason, as if saying them, actually makes them true. I see a lot of assumptions and baseless claims being made, seemingly attempting to create an argument out of thin air, hoping that someone will take the bait.
I have been tempted, several times, to put a handful of people on ignore here, simply because most of their contributions provide no value, whatsoever, and are oftentimes either provocative in nature, or, are complete nonsense. I see some people pretending to be experts and talking out of their butt-holes. Some just complain about props and look for every opportunity to call them frauds, and then wonder why their comments are not well-received in a thread that advocates for props.
If what I say offends you, then please put me on ignore; I really do not care.
1
6