|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
DislikedI understand! Good confirmation method there! Do you still enter on the 5m timeframe?Ignored
DislikedI'm with you Yelena. I'm loving this system and getting more comfortable using it, little by little. The recent updates to the matrix, signals and your insight are making it a wonderful way to trade.
Thanks to everyone who spends their precious time contributing to this thread. It's become a great place to hang out.
Have a restful weekend everyone.
DislikedAnd I bet you that the ratios those computers use are based on the same ratios and fib points....Also, it really does not matter because you can calculate almost to the pip the past two years market movements and they tie perfectly to those very Elliot ratios and fib retracement levels.
But as I said before...your posts make me think you are a ''glass is half empty'' kinda guy.
DislikedGreat trading Yelena, I cant believe you traded the news. I was only able to take 2 trades today, one at BE and the other(AUD/USD) for 30 pips. Thus my weekly running total so far is 252+30 = 282 pipsIgnored
Dislikedi am yet to migrate to 1.9. if anyone has successfully mimicked the signals produced by 1.7 in M5 chart with settings 1,3,2 and 20,5, would you be so kind to post your template?
Dislikedi wont paste my old trades coz you will ask me again why i did what i did.(some of the positions i took where experiments of applying pivots and S&R - i will share them when i have sufficient experience to share)
if you want to better understand the trades made click my name and scroll down. im running a demo account named pareto. the entry positions are there. open both your M5 and verify if you received a signal around that time in M5. if you dont have a log, get a copy of the LFH simulator and run M5 to see if signaler 1.7 [b](signals not...Ignored
Dislikedi attached the 1.9 to 5m and checked the signals this week. i think the confirmation rows takes affect for the signal. if i switched them off the signal appears earlier then if i'm switched them on (not included the STOX, because there i know that this effect the signal) It is only a guess and i will verify this next week, when i run 1.9 simultaniosly. if i could have a look into the code i could tell it immediatly. hihiIgnored
DislikedHere is a template for testing of Yelena approach with Signaler 1.9Beta.Ignored
DislikedAs a trading advice i would not blindly trade the ever first H1+M5 because it is often that all entry criterias are meet in H1 and when 5M meets too it is very late. wait for the first retrace and trade the second 5M signal as confirmation.Ignored
DislikedOf course if you enable the Stocx as a trigger, you will only get a signal when the stochs are going the same direction as the signal.
Example : If H1 are blue, M5 are blue but stochs are going down you won't have a signal. If the stochs are going also up you will get a signal.
If you disable one of the confirmations, they aren't calculated. I mean the code function isn't called.Ignored
Dislikedthanks. i will post results.
was this awfully firing sell signals for EU and AU through out the trade earllier? like 27 sell signals for EU?Ignored
DislikedSir Nick, you can. But just take 1 M5 signal per 1 H1 bar. if there's only 30mins left to the H1 bar, wait for the next H1 bar.Ignored
Dislikedyes, the technic with STOCH i know. what i thought was, that the others are only for visibility.
that means it will also only show a short if price is below MA200 and the other 4 symphonies are also short biased?Ignored
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|