Thank you I shall continue to help the real players on FF if I can.
Have a great weekend everybody.
Have a great weekend everybody.
3
Request for a little bit of help with some Broker info - MT4 49 replies
A little more give back 20 replies
Does an EA license Give You the Right to Give Signals? 2 replies
Give me premise or give me death.... 15 replies
Are charts a little bit deceiving? 9 replies
Disliked{quote} Raedmaa please review the attachment showing an expansion beside a retracement. As you can see you did not plot the 200% level on the retracement tool but lept directly to 2.618 which created the error cheers Nut. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} It's not the tool or using it the wrong way. We really have different data. Our measured swing is larger, that's the problem. Many thanks Nut, I appreciate your work! {image}Ignored
DislikedThank you I shall continue to help the real players on FF if I can. Have a great weekend everybody.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I agree I have shown you an easy method but I cannot and will not define your trading style. Without wishing to sound abrupt you can define your own style logically using the Fib expansion or spend good money on a crap book and let somebody else define you. I shall attach a chart that may spark some ideas that fit with the basic model. Between the -100 and zero line can you spot any opportunities to enter positions in line with the model. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Nut, Do you measure from swing low to previous swing high? I still think its not clear how you are choosing your initial points. In some posts you use swing in others you just use the range of last candle like in the picture?? Are you able to provide some clarity please {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I've only been trading since 2006 (joined FF in 2009) - a novice compared to you but in that time I have managed to create a trading style - without buying any crap books too. I look at FF (amongst other sites) quite often whilst waiting for trading opportunities to occur - using my trading styles of course. I rarely comment on the vast array of other people's trading ideas that crop up here on FF - but it is fun reading them, helps to pass the time and great entertainment at times. As I said, I thought your contribution was an interesting...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I agree I have shown you an easy method but I cannot and will not define your trading style. Without wishing to sound abrupt you can define your own style logically using the Fib expansion or spend good money on a crap book and let somebody else define you. I shall attach a chart that may spark some ideas that fit with the basic model. Between the -100 and zero line can you spot any opportunities to enter positions in line with the model. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Let me give a try, when price bounced off the -61.8 line a few times indicating support, we can enter a long. But I am not sure which Fib level we shld target, I guess the minimum would be the 38.2 line.Ignored
DislikedSo now after the golden mean in the last chart it is reasonable to expect a further 38.2 expansion from the golden mean. The expansion can be seen in this chart. Price has become trapped at this level as the sheep stealers and horse rustlers battle it out. This 38.2% level is the defining point between the uptrend or downtrend. Have I cleared things up or baffled everybody. No offence intended but it may take a little time for the concept take hold. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} It's not the tool or using it the wrong way. We really have different data. Our measured swing is larger, that's the problem. Many thanks Nut, I appreciate your work! {image}Ignored
Dislikedhi Nut, what do you mean with 'keeping the measurement horizontal'? measuring the lenght of swing is vertical for me, i don't get it measuring the lenght of a swing or a candle (last one including shadows) seems doesn't matter?Ignored