Disliked{quote} May be i should define a zone for that, rather than a fixed values??, eg. within 5-10% lower than B(3) or Higher than C(4), be accepted valid??Ignored
Wait, or you will be slaughtered!
My new journey with Wolfe Waves... 6 replies
Elliot Waves/Demark Waves 2 replies
about Wolfe Wave theory? 3 replies
Traders who completed the Wolfe Wave course already. 0 replies
Help needed to build a Wolfe Waves Expert Advisor EA 3 replies
Disliked{quote} May be i should define a zone for that, rather than a fixed values??, eg. within 5-10% lower than B(3) or Higher than C(4), be accepted valid??Ignored
Disliked{quote} Bravo Parviz! Thank you A couple of questions: 1) Is there an easy way to replace the zigzag you are using and replace it with the one that shows the "pips/candles" like the one I have on the post#1 template, or will that mess up the way the indicator is works? 2) If so, is there a way to re-position the X(1) A(2)......values so they are directly above/below the zigzag point enough distance so one can see the pip/candle values? I can always change the "extdepth" on the ZigZag that shows the pips/candles to match whatever the value is on...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I respectfully disagree. On a daily chart we may be talking anywhere from 20-100 pips or more for 5-10%. Lower lows, higher highs was the original principle behind the WW. However, Bill Wolfe did show examples where the XB line was horizontal (the parallel WW which probably should be called the horizontal WW) Point being, this may be a Pandora's box. Where does it end? Why not 12%, etc ,etc. Especially considering any new traders that may be starting their new WW journey. Just more confusion if they have perused the other free online resources...Ignored
Disliked{quote} 1)I should read its code to see how it would be possible. 2)Each item on the chart has a time and a price dimension, price axis scale change exponentially, so ten pip higher on higher places on chart is equal sometimes to 100 pips in some places lower on the same chart so with different price variation on different charts the location of the X,A,B,C,D text will change, so i decided to put it right were the price is and only shift the time value to the right, for location to be fixed, for all kind of price movement within the visible chart...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Agree Expo, I am also looking from an Elliott Wave perspective, which makes it valid for me. Cheers, U2Ignored
Disliked{quote} Bravo Parviz! Thank you A couple of questions: 1) Is there an easy way to replace the zigzag you are using and replace it with the one that shows the "pips/candles" like the one I have on the post#1 template, or will that mess up the way the indicator is works? 2) If so, is there a way to re-position the X(1) A(2)......values so they are directly above/below the zigzag point enough distance so one can see the pip/candle values? I can always change the "extdepth" on the ZigZag that shows the pips/candles to match whatever the value is on...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I respectfully disagree. On a daily chart we may be talking anywhere from 20-100 pips or more for 5-10%. Lower lows, higher highs was the original principle behind the WW. However, Bill Wolfe did show examples where the XB line was horizontal (the parallel WW which probably should be called the horizontal WW) Point being, this may be a Pandora's box. Where does it end? Why not 12%, etc ,etc. Especially considering any new traders that may be starting their new WW journey. Just more confusion if they have perused the other free online resources...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Agree Expo, I am also looking from an Elliott Wave perspective, which makes it valid for me. Cheers, U2Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi : Just i want to mention few thing about the charts that you are sharing. 1) I believe the way you count the waves is a problem, you mixes waves of different fractal levels in counting. 2) The HEW as far as i Know, usually moves in a channel, the first wave 1 , comes from a point outside the channel (point X) to form the first impulse wave #1 , then it retrace forms #2, after that another usually the largest wave #3 and so on to the fifth wave, the fifth wave, in 50% of the HEW, may not rich the upper channel line, and is referred to...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Agree Expo, I am also looking from an Elliott Wave perspective, which makes it valid for me. Cheers, U2Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Parvis, The Elliott Wave I follow is called Harmonic Elliott Wave. It differs from Traditional Elliott Wave. It simplifies the wave count, and clears up some of the ambiguities of Elliott Wave. There are no failed fifth waves in HEW, or channel constraints. Easiest way to understand it would be to watch the introduction video. http://www.harmonic-ewave.com/ Cheers, U2Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Expo : 1) Find this part of the code near the end of program: else LabelPos = Low[ib]; , it has been repeated two times. 2) change both of them with this code : else LabelPos = NormalizeDouble(Low[ib]-0.5*iATR(NULL,0,10,ib),Digits); 3)Now compile it and use, problem solved. 4) you can change the position vertically, by modifying the 0.5 coefficient to other numbers, there are four of them 2 for High's and 2 for Low's.Ignored
Disliked{quote} It is really coded in a very hard way, and does not have any comments, but anyhow try this if it would be of any help: double ZigZag2[100]; double LastOne2[2]; int i=0; double Temp=0; for(int Count=0;Count<=99;Count++) { Temp=iCustom(NULL,0,"ZigZag",12,5,3,0,Count) if(Temp != EMPTY_VALUE) { LastOne2[i]=Temp; i++; } }Ignored
Disliked{quote} thanks! But it's not working.... retruned with a critical error in EA void Zigzag2() { for(int Count=0;Count<=99;Count++) { Temp=iCustom(NULL,0,"ZigZag",12,5,3,0,Count); if(Temp != EMPTY_VALUE) { LastOne2[i2]=Temp; i2++; } } double ZigValue=LastOne2[0]; double ZigValue1=LastOne2[1]; checkCreateHorizontalLine(0, objectsName + "ZZHigh", 0, ZigValue, clrGray); checkCreateHorizontalLine(0, objectsName + "ZZLow", 0, ZigValue1, clrGray); }Ignored
Disliked{quote} OH , no this is the code of your zigzag indicator, not mine. i have changed it and it takes only less than 5 minute and it will work like a charm. Here it is, i have changed it already, just compile and run. {file}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks. Sorry, hanging out at my daughter's kindergarten class all day makes me scatter brainedIgnored