I am new to the forum, It took me a week to read all the threads and as an experienced FF person it did not surprise me at all that some one try to cash in his experience and knowledge. As long as ur honest and open with it there is no problem with that. This is a pyschological game, if you are mentally strong and execute trades at the right time (providing right MM) you make money by trading and most probably keep it to your self, if ur not mentally strong you can make money by teaching technical or fundamental analysis. Think about a doctor given you advise about healthy leaving but can not practise it himself or an economy professor can not stand the stress and could not execute trades. FF is a great platform to attract straggling traders looking for answers. As far as mehdi concern he is just trying to cash in years of his hard work.
Lower risk, stress free TDI system
- #5,364
- Dec 6, 2016 5:05am Dec 6, 2016 5:05am
- Joined Jan 2014 | Status: Trader | 1,783 Posts
This thread and many others, but especially the TDI based ones make me laugh.
All of you for some inexplicable reason seem to think that an oscillator has superior information rather than the chart itself. You need to realize that oscillator information is essentially chart information, therefore all you are doing is trusting the oscillator instead of the chart which makes no sense to me at all.
I think that there is only one use that any oscillator may offer, and that is identifying divergence to price, and even that is far from guaranteed.
My advice to those interested, is to quickly abandon oscillator/second-hand indicators and use the chart information instead. Here for example is a trade I'm involved with on a basic chart, and has nothing more than 2 MA's and a bar chart, and this tells me all I need to know without duplicating the information via additional and potentially confusing oscillators, which as I said proliferates so many threads and particularly the TDI based ones it seems.
Btw, I tend to agree with some of the comments made concerning useless information/poor signals/dodgy analysis etc etc,, (although delivery of their sentiment could be improved lol), and it looks to me like a case of the blind leading the blind so far as I can see, but at least as English has said in his unigue way, he has taken the lid off of a nonsense system which has no better track record of success than any other imo.
LL
All of you for some inexplicable reason seem to think that an oscillator has superior information rather than the chart itself. You need to realize that oscillator information is essentially chart information, therefore all you are doing is trusting the oscillator instead of the chart which makes no sense to me at all.
I think that there is only one use that any oscillator may offer, and that is identifying divergence to price, and even that is far from guaranteed.
My advice to those interested, is to quickly abandon oscillator/second-hand indicators and use the chart information instead. Here for example is a trade I'm involved with on a basic chart, and has nothing more than 2 MA's and a bar chart, and this tells me all I need to know without duplicating the information via additional and potentially confusing oscillators, which as I said proliferates so many threads and particularly the TDI based ones it seems.
Btw, I tend to agree with some of the comments made concerning useless information/poor signals/dodgy analysis etc etc,, (although delivery of their sentiment could be improved lol), and it looks to me like a case of the blind leading the blind so far as I can see, but at least as English has said in his unigue way, he has taken the lid off of a nonsense system which has no better track record of success than any other imo.
LL
- #5,365
- Dec 6, 2016 6:56am Dec 6, 2016 6:56am
- Joined Jan 2015 | Status: Never underestimate value of an pip | 4,683 Posts
Musl is disappeared after my lesson with REAL proof...i'm the best 
ps: come on guys...i want to see other great method as this using old & unnecessary chart as Meddi do. I want to see other thread! I want to earn easy money!
ps: come on guys...i want to see other great method as this using old & unnecessary chart as Meddi do. I want to see other thread! I want to earn easy money!
- #5,370
- Dec 6, 2016 10:47am Dec 6, 2016 10:47am
- Joined Jan 2015 | Status: Never underestimate value of an pip | 4,683 Posts
Musl is disappeared after my lesson with REAL proof...i'm the best
- #5,372
- Dec 6, 2016 11:32am Dec 6, 2016 11:32am
{quote} Oh oh oh...finally the truth comes out...the "smart & clever" Medhi has posted here a fake method using old charts and now that I have unmasked him, he try to sell his fake product via SkypeI will not notice this ridicolous thing to FF administrator because stupid people (hi TheRock) always deserve a lesson but someone will notice your FRAUD fake Medhi. I am very honored to be the one who unmasked you...I expect the apologies from some stupid users.... "Dear" medhi (muslim?)...I'm too smart for you
ps: We...
- #5,373
- Dec 6, 2016 11:38am Dec 6, 2016 11:38am
{quote} I think that English555 is right,the answers of medhi are always senseless. I am a newbie ok but he is not able to give the right answers as other users and his first two live "signal" are failed. Is this a coincidence? I think not regardas guys
- #5,374
- Dec 6, 2016 11:52am Dec 6, 2016 11:52am
This thread and many others, but especially the TDI based ones make me laugh. All of you for some inexplicable reason seem to think that an oscillator has superior information rather than the chart itself. You need to realize that oscillator information is essentially chart information, therefore all you are doing is trusting the oscillator instead of the chart which makes no sense to me at all. I think that there is only one use that any oscillator may offer, and that is identifying divergence to price, and even that is far from guaranteed. My...
- #5,375
- Dec 6, 2016 12:18pm Dec 6, 2016 12:18pm
- Joined Jan 2014 | Status: Trader | 1,783 Posts
{quote} how it comes that you dont trust oscillators but trust divergence by oscillators????
Read the context properly, not just the parts you choose to suit yourself in order to try to make an illogical comment!
- #5,376
- Dec 6, 2016 12:33pm Dec 6, 2016 12:33pm
- Joined Jan 2015 | Status: Never underestimate value of an pip | 4,683 Posts
Sweet 80 pips predicted by MACD i think is an oschilator..... 
- #5,380
- Dec 6, 2016 4:39pm Dec 6, 2016 4:39pm
- Joined Dec 2011 | Status: Trader | 1,798 Posts
Have a nice day