Analysis vs Trading

10 points and a sub to anyone who can differentiate with conviction between the 2

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K9WOBsPVjFE

You can do analysis all day long, that doesn't mean you're actually trading.

Ok ok thanks for the opening bid but what we are looking for is a little bit more in the way of girth

But good first call, i can see you keep the ace up the sleeve

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bm6NuJvRqJM

Im doubtful anyone even knows the REAL difference

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PANEcjhSfv4

u should done your analysis on demand and support zone i hope u will get
profit by your analysis.

A analyst is like a consultant, knows how to do it but cant get it up.

Analysis requires "Critical Thinking"........Trading does not.

i.e. ...Entering a trade on the visual crossing of two lines, or entering a trade on price visually crossing a line hardly involves "Critical Thinking"...
i.e. .. Pattern Recognition........does not involve the use of "Critical Thinking"

Analysis is the process to explain what/why the market has done and what/why the market may likely do in the near future.

Trading is the process of executing trade entry, exit, sl, tp.....

Analysis -> after the fact
Trading -> in the moment

Alex

Analysis is thinking
Trading is doing . . .

Analysis is some kind of price anticipation based on historical factors. It gives you an edge of 50%-spread if you not overcomplicate it. If you do, then its less.
Trading is following price.

Trading is so much more than that. Its having control over your position, its having discipline to execute correctly without hesitation. Its knowing your edge and your capabilities well. Trading your trading will break the 50% barrier.

TRD

Analysis vs Trading.......hmmmmm

Analysis is figuring STUFF out

Trading is buying/selling/shifting/exchanging STUFF

Analyst= The formulation of an opinion about the market. including targets stop exits and take profits.
Trading = the execution of buying and selling financial instruments in the market.

The Analyst
It's an idea nothing more. The analyst takes whatever information he has and makes an evaluation based on his own perceptions, dependent largely upon his own experience and knowledge. The end result is an idea. The analyst will typically point to some direction but the market as we know full well never moves in a straight line. This is the reason the analyst is a poor execution of his/her own ideas, the ideas. The Analysts ideas are confirmed only when it is too late to act. After direction has been confirmed, the opportunity's gone.

The Trader
Completely different as touched upon in previous posts by others. Trading involves working with the analysts ideas and exploiting them for profit or limiting damage through risk control. The trader therefore, must run with the analysts ideas but in a way that promotes opportunity. The traders task is to employ metrics that give them an ideal scenario whereby they can exploit potential market movement but in a way that limits risk as much as possible.

Apart from the psychological addition on the traders part, the trader must be the opportunist. So what is a market and how does one profit consistently? This is the core question the trader must address. In order to succeed the trader needs to trade against the majority successfully. In a way a trader should be called the "Fader". He/she needs to be buying when the market is wrongly selling and selling when the market is wrongly buying. Second to this the trader must learn good timing and know his price points. The trader is in the "now", and for this reason the trader is a poor Analyst

In this way the trader must identify opportunity when the market is going against the ideas of the analyst. If he/she waits for the market to run inline with the analysts direction possibly this is too late and more opportune prices have been missed.

In Summary
The Analyst is in the "all", the Trader is in the "now". The analyst does not deal with the important and critical questions that the trader does (or should) as the analyst is only concerned with structural movement and overall resulting direction in line with various scenarios. The Analyst is typically a poor trader because his/her ideas are confirmed only when it is too late too act. The Trader is poor Analyst because he is focused on the now and needing to base this notion upon the ideas of the Analyst.

In a nutshell when the analyst trades, expect losses so too when the trader analyses, expect poor analysis. It sounds quite simple in theory but it is actually profound in the way of mindset in the event of successful differentiation between the two. The two parties need to work together as a team to produce the results both desire and act accordingly.

Analysis is finding the right way to trade market, while another hand trading is the execution of your analysis.

analysis is the history, trading is the now.

I'd rather say that it's like theory and practice. They are both important but used by different people.
Though, all of us are a bit analysts.

Yeah...! They are both different but interconnected topics. You need a good analysis of market to perform a successful trade. It is like a planning process of Forex Trading.

If you ever want a chance to ever make money at trading you must stop analyzing.

The clue is in the word itself

Anal-ysis
You can pick at it, but you will find out very quickly that it really stinks-
And if you pick at someone else's anal-ysis, it stinks even more !

You're a pretty good writer when you're sober!