Candle Martingale + EA | Page 33 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Martingale, Anti-martingale, and Compounding 40 replies

Martingale, Reverse Martingale, Modified Martingale, Maths 1 reply

Martingale Calculation EA (also reverse martingale) 3 replies

How to change this Martingale to Reverse Martingale ? 3 replies

Martingale vs. Non Martingale (Simplified RoR vs Profit) 1 reply

Attachments: Candle Martingale + EA
Exit Attachments

Candle Martingale + EA

  • #641
  • Aug 31, 2016 2:36pm Aug 31, 2016 2:36pm
what does it mean the variable Top/Down Period? in what sense it opening a position?
making money is easy in forex, losing money is even easier...
  • #642
  • Aug 31, 2016 2:51pm Aug 31, 2016 2:51pm
Quoting MathTrader7
Version 1.72 of the EA released (I updated Post 1). In this version there is a separate grid size input parameter for the anti-martingale functionality. The backtest is based on Bollinger Bands and the input settings is attached to this post. {file} {image}
I just did a few BT using your setting on M30 EURUSD within a 90% modelling quality.
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2013-2014.png Size: 131 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: 2014-2015.png Size: 132 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: 2015-2016.png Size: 131 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: 2016-present.png Size: 131 KB
  • #643
  • Aug 31, 2016 2:57pm Aug 31, 2016 2:57pm
Quoting ibermex
{quote} I just did a few BT using your setting on M30 EURUSD within a 90% modelling quality. {image} {image} {image} {image}
My backtests are just to test the functionality of the EA, not to make it holy grail! There is no guarantee that the settings would be profitable.
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...
  • #644
  • Aug 31, 2016 3:03pm Aug 31, 2016 3:03pm
Quoting MathTrader7
{quote} My backtests are just to test the functionality of the EA, not to make it holy grail! There is no guarantee that the settings would be profitable.
I´m not criticizing your EA or your EA settings. I´m just posting the results that I´ve got using the last version and the last setting that you have posted.
  • #645
  • Aug 31, 2016 3:08pm Aug 31, 2016 3:08pm
sometimes backtest doesnt mean anything, even forward test using demo account may not reflect how the EA works in real account.
if you really want to know how it works you need to test in real account with small deposit, like $100 in cent account.
and like MathTrader said, dont expect holy grail in forex, at some point EA will fail because the market condition change.
making money is easy in forex, losing money is even easier...
  • #646
  • Aug 31, 2016 3:53pm Aug 31, 2016 3:53pm
Quoting gugun555
sometimes backtest doesnt mean anything, even forward test using demo account may not reflect how the EA works in real account. if you really want to know how it works you need to test in real account with small deposit, like $100 in cent account. and like MathTrader said, dont expect holy grail in forex, at some point EA will fail because the market condition change.
So if the BT doesn´t mean anything, what´s the point of doing it? Or if sometimes it means anything and sometimes don´t, how do you separate the times that it means and the times that it doesn´t?

BT with a high quality modelling is the only way to test if a EA works or not. You will need years of real cent account testing to decide if the EA it worth to invest a nice amount of money.

To be clear, I´m not expecting the holy grail from this EA or from any other, and I never criticized Mathtrader work. I´m just posting the results of the EA with a 90% modelling quality, nothing else than that.
  • #647
  • Aug 31, 2016 4:06pm Aug 31, 2016 4:06pm
@ibermex

Ok, ok ... bro you showed us "the results of the EA with a 90% modelling quality, nothing else than that." Nice to have them !

So now you may start your forward tests .... demo or live what ever you want mate !!! Do it ... or leave it it's your choice ... so: no offense - noone will force you to use this EA !

Btw you in person wrote it right: "BT with a high quality modelling is the only way to test if a EA works or not .... "
  • #648
  • Aug 31, 2016 4:29pm Aug 31, 2016 4:29pm
Quoting DerBerliner
@ibermex Ok, ok ... bro you showed us "the results of the EA with a 90% modelling quality, nothing else than that." Nice to have them ! So now you may start your forward tests .... demo or live what ever you want mate !!! Do it ... or leave it it's your choice ... so: no offense - noone will force you to use this EA ! Btw you in person wrote it right: "BT with a high quality modelling is the only way to test if a EA works or not .... "
So now it´s wrong updating the BT results? LOL.

As I said you will need years in demo or real to prove that any EA works in long term periods...I won´t do it until I get a good result in BT testing it from many years...so no offense, you may start posting your BT results as well.
  • #649
  • Aug 31, 2016 10:00pm Aug 31, 2016 10:00pm
Noob question, please teach me.

I keep doing BTs, some do wonderfully and many others go bust right at the end, why?


Thanks
  • #650
  • Aug 31, 2016 10:02pm Aug 31, 2016 10:02pm
Quoting DerBerliner
@ibermex Ok, ok .. ! Btw you in person wrote it right: "BT with a high quality modelling is the only way to test if a EA works or not .... "

That's funny

Model quality dont really matter... BT just gives u an idea of how it will perform.

Run the ST, find a setting it comes up with, then back test it from year 2001 in groups of 3 years... then run it for the entire span of years to current date.. what ever setting it gives you for your lot sizes, or what ever, reduce it.. then forward test it.

I did over 4 weeks of BT, now im live, and up 4.1k now, just doing 0.03 lots at 100$ TP
Advanced Price Action Trader -MY STUFF IS FREE! JOIN ME!
  • #651
  • Aug 31, 2016 11:56pm Aug 31, 2016 11:56pm
Quoting FXCyborg
{quote} . I did over 4 weeks of BT, now im live, and up 4.1k now, just doing 0.03 lots at 100$ TP
Hi Cyborg
Would you please show your result and your deposit to up 4.1 k
I think If we based on BT with N/a or 59,58% (My BT result) modern quality it's not good
I agree with @ Ibermex.
Beside BT to test how the EA work. We must test result of EA for a long time
+ Modern quality >90% good MT4 data, BT EA for good result ---> This EA for sell ^^
  • #652
  • Sep 1, 2016 1:07am Sep 1, 2016 1:07am
Hi Mathtrader,

First i would like to thank you for sharing this wonderful EA. I noticed that the first martingale position is equal to the initial lot. Is there a setting to make the 1st martingale equal to initial lot multiplied by martingale multiplier. Thank you very much.
  • #653
  • Edited 3:08am Sep 1, 2016 2:28am | Edited 3:08am
- 9 orders open now DD 0.9 %
  • #654
  • Sep 1, 2016 2:32am Sep 1, 2016 2:32am
Quoting MathTrader7
Version 1.72 of the EA released (I updated Post 1). In this version there is a separate grid size input parameter for the anti-martingale functionality. The backtest is based on Bollinger Bands and the input settings is attached to this post. {file} {image}
Good ea..would you change break even with trailing stop..thanks
  • #655
  • Edited 4:40am Sep 1, 2016 4:03am | Edited 4:40am
- today not bad -like all days-

- open now 3 Orders DD 0.2% / all closed now, not one order open

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: MATHTRADER01.09.png Size: 38 KB
  • #656
  • Edited 7:03am Sep 1, 2016 5:58am | Edited 7:03am
Version 1.75 of the EA released (I updated Post 1).
- Anti-martingale function is removed due to the bugs that I will fix in the next versions.
- MA Over trade logic was removed.
- Move to Break Even was removed.
- Trailing Stop is now implemented.
- A new section opened for general filters that apply to all trading strategies, if they are enabled.
- ADX filter added to the general filters section.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: mt7_candlemarti_bt_v175.png Size: 51 KB
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...
  • #657
  • Sep 1, 2016 6:24am Sep 1, 2016 6:24am
... any short Explanation available, why these two features have been removed ?

(I planned perhaps to use anti-martingale instead of martingale .... )
  • #658
  • Sep 1, 2016 6:26am Sep 1, 2016 6:26am
DerBerliner: einfache Antwort: Anti Martingale wenn Martingale trading ?? 0 x 0 = 0

@MathTrader7: please the settings from the backtest, thank you
  • #659
  • Edited 7:09am Sep 1, 2016 6:38am | Edited 7:09am
Quoting ghostbiker
DerBerliner: einfache Antwort: Anti Martingale wenn Martingale trading ?? 0 x 0 = 0 @MathTrader7: please the settings from the backtest, thank you

THIS IS ESPECIALLY FOR ROSWITHA !


Why the hell do you post these damn german remarks ?


This is an English Forum !!!


So once more: all posts in english plz !
  • #660
  • Sep 1, 2016 6:46am Sep 1, 2016 6:46am
Quoting DerBerliner
... any short Explanation available, why these two features have been removed ? (I planned perhaps to use anti-martingale instead of martingale .... )
Hi DerBerliner,

Due to some bugs in the anti-martingale code, I removed this feature in this version. I will fix and add this feature back in the next versions.
Do you need MA Over trade logic?

Best,
Math
Trading is the hardest way to make easy money...
0 traders viewing now