DislikedThe video is old, 30 years, but they had touch screen technology even then. Imagine what they have access to today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNmbjQhTHnEIgnored
- #2,581
- Apr 9, 2016 3:25am Apr 9, 2016 3:25am
- Joined Oct 2014 | Status: lonely | 2,261 Posts | Online Now
- #2,584
- Apr 10, 2016 9:25am Apr 10, 2016 9:25am
hi guys... my analysis and a likely scenario about GU from my point of view. any comments? {image}
- #2,586
- Apr 11, 2016 3:26am Apr 11, 2016 3:26am
There's the shotgun approach like FX and TRD
There's the sniper approach like TRD also, Steve showed some, Kova and others
lets combine the shotgun and sniper for an alternative:
1. Predict or confirm the new swing with stuff here
2. stack the sniper (tight stops) entry shared also here or based on one personal experience or research
3. loss trade will be many but survivors recover it all plus some more
maybe can be called bullpup approach
anyway just snatched 60 from EU think its gonna switch back to bull
There's the sniper approach like TRD also, Steve showed some, Kova and others
lets combine the shotgun and sniper for an alternative:
1. Predict or confirm the new swing with stuff here
2. stack the sniper (tight stops) entry shared also here or based on one personal experience or research
3. loss trade will be many but survivors recover it all plus some more
maybe can be called bullpup approach
anyway just snatched 60 from EU think its gonna switch back to bull
In the end its just a stupid numbers game
- #2,589
- Apr 11, 2016 5:24am Apr 11, 2016 5:24am
- Joined Feb 2015 | Status: Who Dares Wins | 1,710 Posts
This was shoot with a machine gun
"What would you attempt to do, if you knew your success was a certainty?"
- #2,594
- Apr 11, 2016 2:11pm Apr 11, 2016 2:11pm
{quote} Nice, very nice congrats!
{quote} How did you find out which pair to trade? I have problem of going through 28 pairs, because I have only 1 laptop screen xDDD
- #2,595
- Apr 11, 2016 2:22pm Apr 11, 2016 2:22pm
I still think that the pattern will work, but maybe tomorrow... {image}
- #2,596
- Apr 11, 2016 2:36pm Apr 11, 2016 2:36pm
- | Joined Oct 2012 | Status: in between fear and euphoria | 830 Posts
{quote} considering once more, maybe this is exactly the way what banksters want us to think. a lot of traders might have seen what I saw and longed the pair putting the stops below the point X. and tomorrow when price falls further they will all be wiped out. I think I'm getting paranoid...
- money management - be gentil on double bottoms
, when it leaks and you suspect it's a stop hunt - load in hard - requires lower TF's to spot a bouncing pattern.
{quote} yeah, thanks michael...
Thank you for your answer =) I just wanted to know which pair is likely to move
And see if anyone had the answer ;P
- #2,598
- Apr 11, 2016 2:58pm Apr 11, 2016 2:58pm
- | Joined Oct 2012 | Status: in between fear and euphoria | 830 Posts
{quote} yeah, thanks michael...
- #2,599
- Apr 12, 2016 12:34am Apr 12, 2016 12:34am
{quote} If they don't want retailers riding with them - they will not create double bottom. If they create double bottom - then it's "we will hunt your stops very soon"
