Spider's Den | Page 1120 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread
Attachments: Spider's Den
Exit Attachments

Spider's Den

  • #22,381
  • Jan 11, 2016 1:20pm Jan 11, 2016 1:20pm
thank you so much. its [email protected] I follow the webinar every week im a huge fan and your trades are very helpful for all us just learning to trade.
  • #22,382
  • Jan 11, 2016 2:26pm Jan 11, 2016 2:26pm
Quoting pr0voked
thank you so much. its [email protected] I follow the webinar every week im a huge fan and your trades are very helpful for all us just learning to trade.
Thank you and you are welcome. Feel free to ask if anything is not clear or whenever you need an advice.
  • #22,383
  • Jan 11, 2016 3:34pm Jan 11, 2016 3:34pm
Quoting T@rantula
{quote} OK. First of all, who are you to come here acting insolently without any professional attitude acting like a supreme court or whatever? Who are you to evaluate systems or traders or analysis. What are you? A dictator, supreme ruler or king, What is that tone of your voice? Let me teach you some manners because you probably missed it in your childhood- First get to know who I am and who I provide my analysis for and ONLY then I might dignify yourself to even ask for your name. I don't think any trader should live up to your demands. Who gives...
Good work, T. Some frustrated unsuccessful envious (maybe) ex-trader playing Forex cop God, how many of them, God?
Ionut
  • #22,384
  • Jan 11, 2016 5:55pm Jan 11, 2016 5:55pm
Consumers have a right to be informed about the products they buy. The manufacturer of the product may or may not provide information about the product but more and more government is intervening and requiring companies to provide information on their products. Traders thinking about buying a product/s from a commercial member who makes outright claims or underlying assumptions that the product will result in profit have a right to know whether or not the trading product has in fact a record of profit.

So as I have already shown there will be commercial members who refuse to provide performance data on the products they sell to aspiring traders and there will be commercial members who are willing to provide such data. The prospective buyers of these products have a right to know which type of commercial member they are dealing with. A transparent one that provides past and ongoing performance or one that is secretive and refuses.

It's a no brainer to me.
  • #22,385
  • Jan 11, 2016 10:19pm Jan 11, 2016 10:19pm
Quoting Winston Reed
Consumers have a right to be informed about the products they buy. The manufacturer of the product may or may not provide information about the product but more and more government is intervening and requiring companies to provide information on their products. Traders thinking about buying a product/s from a commercial member who makes outright claims or underlying assumptions that the product will result in profit have a right to know whether or not the trading product has in fact a record of profit. So as I have already shown there will be commercial...

winston pretty frankly your focus is on the wrong direction... (and i am not talking only in regards of this "thread")

before asking -more or less accuse- someone you should have gone through the whole past of a threads' posts

if you find specific things making you believe its on the wrong direction you should specifically go "against" them, argue ask for analysis and analyse

you dont even use the Socratic method (which creates tension and conflict but a positive one which ALWAYS leads in the right direction)

at the end ALL OF US i am 100% tarantula as well we were deceived in some way at the past and we are most likely to be deceived in the future these things make us wiser (its part of the "process")... let it be this sector or others (try a walk at the supermarket...you will be amazed -i am sure you dont ask for comments from each product/service over there)....

thats my 0.02 greek euros
  • #22,386
  • Jan 11, 2016 10:19pm Jan 11, 2016 10:19pm
Quoting Winston Reed
Consumers have a right to be informed about the products they buy. The manufacturer of the product may or may not provide information about the product but more and more government is intervening and requiring companies to provide information on their products. Traders thinking about buying a product/s from a commercial member who makes outright claims or underlying assumptions that the product will result in profit have a right to know whether or not the trading product has in fact a record of profit. So as I have already shown there will be commercial...

Amigos, please leave this thread and return when we will call you.... or better say NEVER. We are very happy without you.
  • #22,387
  • Jan 11, 2016 10:48pm Jan 11, 2016 10:48pm
actually I too think Winston may have jumped the gun and chosen the wrong thread to criticize, I know Nenad personally and have been good trading partners / friends for over 5 years
he has a long standing profitable record. besides his service offering has made it clear of the risk involved to his readers, if only people read. also Nenad's webinar has risk disclaimers actually telling people that not all trades are profitable.

but I personally think its not so much that the Commercial Members should validate themselves by showing track records,
Readers on this forum already know of the risk they are taking in reading posts by members with "commercial" status.

Instead, what amateur readers here are most prone to are the posts where "some" red flagged high influencing members who simply screen cap trades and proclaim they have closed trades for profits, but you never get to see any proof of that.
very often they only screen cap a single trade that may have hit take profit, but what is to say that they do not have 99 other trades that got their Stop losses hit for much more loss??

There are plenty of these red flagged members in threads like the EURUSD thread... and poor amateur traders are simply desperate enough to follow these screen capped trade only to get hurt....
We live in a finite world with infinite possibilities.
FxTyrant M-Series (Live - Darwinex) All Time Return: 0.7%
  • #22,388
  • Jan 12, 2016 12:10am Jan 12, 2016 12:10am
Quoting T@rantula
The AUDUSD managed to recover after a big drop caused by equities, Chinese market and Yuan devaluation. As we know, Chinese markets correlate to AUD and a possible loss of competitiveness in Chinese export market is also negative for AUD. Technically AUDUSD is sitting at POC 0.7005-15 (H3, DPP, 50.0) and it could reject towards 0.6950. The problem is that Equidistant channel is out of sync with price which is caused by a bullish divergence. That could spike the price up towards 0.7040 zone (H4,E89,78.6) and the price should reject towards 0.6950....
+75 pips pool currently and dropping. Pay attention to 0.6950. A strong close or momentum below will pull the pair further down.
  • #22,389
  • Edited 12:33am Jan 12, 2016 12:18am | Edited 12:33am
Yesterday Session Recap EURUSD setup. Protect the trade if you are in. The Recorded Webinar is HERE

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: EURUSD.jpg Size: 102 KB
  • #22,390
  • Jan 12, 2016 2:05am Jan 12, 2016 2:05am
Another Session Recap winner

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: AUDUSD.jpg Size: 110 KB
  • #22,391
  • Jan 12, 2016 4:49am Jan 12, 2016 4:49am
GBPUSD is -20/25 If anyone traded it. Lets see if UJ and UC make it to POC. I warned on tweeter to be careful with GBPUSD. SO far EURUSD is +40/45 AUDUSD is +30 to 40 and GBPUSD is -25

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: GBPUSD.jpg Size: 107 KB
  • #22,392
  • Jan 12, 2016 5:38am Jan 12, 2016 5:38am
USDJPY analysis READ IT HERE

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2016-01-12_USDJPY.jpg Size: 295 KB
  • #22,393
  • Jan 12, 2016 6:22am Jan 12, 2016 6:22am
Quoting T@rantula
USDJPY analysis READ IT HERE {image}
Hi Nenad, which periods settings you use for Camarilla in what timeframe?
  • #22,394
  • Jan 12, 2016 6:24am Jan 12, 2016 6:24am
Quoting Dedalus
{quote} Hi Nenad, which periods settings you use for Camarilla in what timeframe?
Hi Dedalus,

With H1 I use Daily Pivots, with H4 I use Weekly Pivots. The only exception is when L5/H5 are overshot then I move to 1 Pivot timeframe higher. E.G. If we use H4 and weekly PP are above/below H5/L5 I put Monthly PP then.
  • #22,395
  • Jan 12, 2016 6:52am Jan 12, 2016 6:52am
USDCAD +40 on a successful retest before the drop - protect your profits.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: USDCAD.jpg Size: 100 KB
  • #22,396
  • Jan 12, 2016 7:09am Jan 12, 2016 7:09am
Quoting T@rantula
{quote} Hi Dedalus, With H1 I use Daily Pivots, with H4 I use Weekly Pivots. The only exception is when L5/H5 are overshot then I move to 1 Pivot timeframe higher. E.G. If we use H4 and weekly PP are above/below H5/L5 I put Monthly PP then.
​Thank You.
  • #22,397
  • Jan 12, 2016 7:14am Jan 12, 2016 7:14am
Quoting T@rantula
USDCAD +40 on a successful retest before the drop - protect your profits. {image}
+50 now!
  • #22,398
  • Jan 13, 2016 1:52am Jan 13, 2016 1:52am
ACCU PP for today valid 24h


Attached Image

Attached Image
  • #22,399
  • Jan 13, 2016 7:08am Jan 13, 2016 7:08am
USDCAD is very bullish and we can see a strong uptrend within the equidistant channel. The price is zig zagging making bullish patterns, but we definitely need to pay attention to technical levels and zones as the pair is very susceptible to OIL movements.
The first POC comes within 1.4180-4090 zone. As I already suggested on Session Recap webinars, +250 pips which the analysis was good for has already been made so the price is in retracement mode again. After making a new high in 1.4315 zone, the price is dropping towards first POC so we will either see a bounce or if the price breaks 1.4150 it should drop towards POC2 1.4080-90. So our focus is on POC first (EMA89, 50.0,historical buyers). ONLY if the price breaks 1.4340 with a huge momentum or we get 4h close above H4-1.4340 we should see 1.4500.
However if the pair drops to POC2 (88.6,historical buyers, T-89 pattern) it should stay above 1.4050 and bounce towards 1.4180 again. If it fails we should see a short breakout towards L4 1.3955.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2016-01-13_15-42-52.jpg Size: 277 KB
  • #22,400
  • Edited 7:43am Jan 13, 2016 7:33am | Edited 7:43am
This was fast +60 pips again

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2016-01-13_16-33-34.jpg Size: 262 KB
10 traders viewing now