No bash intended but you're kidding, right? 2 weeks winning means JACK.
I've designed EA's that are extremely profitable for YEARS of back testing but then they miserably fail. Oh, and "optimization" is curve-fitting's brother. Trust me, I've been into this for way too long. Show us a back test that is successful for a period of 10 years with 99%+ modeling-quality data and then you are a winner/hero ;-) M1 systems MUST be tested with extremely high-quality data otherwise the tests are no good.
Again, I'm not bashing anyone.
I've designed EA's that are extremely profitable for YEARS of back testing but then they miserably fail. Oh, and "optimization" is curve-fitting's brother. Trust me, I've been into this for way too long. Show us a back test that is successful for a period of 10 years with 99%+ modeling-quality data and then you are a winner/hero ;-) M1 systems MUST be tested with extremely high-quality data otherwise the tests are no good.
Again, I'm not bashing anyone.
Disliked{quote} lol You are comparing the quality of backtests on what has admittedly not been optimized. I'm not even sure which EA you have your "Quality Backtests", run on. In any case. The triggering and trend definition on MyENT is a little different than what I currently have in test on a Correlation EA and has been testing live for the last couple weeks. I found a little something interesting when I started playing with the ideas put by Fxenthropy and decided to partially incorporate the ideas into my core bot and released the unfiltered for...Ignored