Forex Level II (Market Depth) follow me with order book

Bids: 1.1010, 1.1040, 1.1075, 1.1115
Offers: 1.1375, 1.1215, 1.1190

offers: 1.1215 , 1.1190, 1.1165, 1.1150
Bids: 1.1090/95, 1.1045, 1.1000, 1.0960

offers 1.1155

+5 and BE

GOOD JOB!

offers: 1.1175 , 1.1190, 1.1215, 1.1110
bids: 1.1085, 1.1065, 1.1035, 1.1000

in the skype room we short at 1.1100

+5 out at BE

we just missed going short at the offers at 1.1110 miss a very nice trade

Hello, FF will tag any FF user, who tries to guide readers to his own websites or communities, as commercial member regardless his true intention. Even the member "trading for charity" was identified as Commercial member by FF.

Hi forexpervert,
I am not on Skype but I will be following this thread.
Thankyou for your posts, please keep them going.
Cheers
Coastie

new bids and offers will be posted soon

well i do this for free i have my own reasons for it, almost 130 people on my skype know the reason.but i guess the problem with Fx Trading or any tpe of trading is , you always find road blocks,either its a broker or a nice website such as forexfactory giving people such a great information,but at the end of the day they have their own rules since they need to make money too and come up with their own restrictions.and Retail trader finds themselves in many road blocks from accessing proper information unless they pay a big fee.

Bids: 1.1055/60 , 1.1035, 1.0970
offers: 1.1080, 1.1110, 1.1150 ,1.1200

Hi, where do you get those levels sir? TQ.

Reading the thread will give you the answer ...

Cheers Mate

I've read the thread, still I can't get how someone could use this market approach by his own (according to the author you can't) and following just signals on a long term it's simply not doable.

is marker Rigged?
First it was the regulators, now here come the clients. Several big banks in the United States have settled claims by customers over currency market rigging, raising the question of whether similar cases could arise in trading hubs like London and Hong Kong. Yet sizing up the damage suffered by clients is far from an exact science.
The first challenge is to identify manipulation of rates. Odd FX swings which occurred for no apparent rhyme or reason in the run up to benchmark currency rate-setting times look like a good place to start. Financial consultancy Fideres says it identified anomalous moves during 20 percent to 30 percent of the month-end benchmark setting days between 2007 and 2013.
Such analysis will strip out moves triggered by breaking news, but may struggle to take into account some other, perfectly legal transactions. Lumpy foreign exchange flows can be related to mergers and acquisitions, or to asset managers’ dealings in foreign currency bonds or equities. In fact, a Bank for International Settlements paper in 2013 showed that foreign exchange market moves almost seemed to be a by-product of what was happening in stocks or bonds.
If potential victims of FX rigging go far enough down the legal process, they could, of course, obtain the sort of data which might help them determine whether there were any attempts to manipulate exchange rates. This includes trading flows as well as dealers’ communications. Even then, a couple of problems arise.
One is that it might be difficult to show exactly how much money a client lost because of market manipulation. Only part of a currency move might be due to attempted tinkering. Second, a potential victim would have to do a lot of currency trading – sometimes, tens or hundreds of billions of dollars worth – to suffer really significant losses, experts say.
Finally, currency manipulation might cost investors money one day, but make them money another. Banks are unlikely to use this as a defence, of course. They are more concerned about their reputation and the amount of time and money taken up by investigating rigging claims. Drawing a line under the whole rigging scandal is probably more important than ensuring the line is drawn in the right place.

I understand what you are saying, but if you ask people in the room they tell you the results, it is doable that's all i can say.and not trying to convince ou or anything.everyone have to take responsibility and try it and judge the results themselves.
again this approach not 100% grantee but works for me and another 120 people in the room.at least you get your eyes opened tot he truth in the FX market.
I'm not trying to prove anything or disprove the concept.
all i can say is about 12% of our trade goes to target with 0 pip going against us. 20% of trades has about 5 pip draw down. and the rest about 5 to 10 pips.
so i personally think this wont be doable without using order flow.
at the end anything is possible my friend.one has to look for it.