DislikedHope am not the only one looking at this. I think it has everything we need. {image} {image}Ignored
Am I right with this parameters of entry and sl tp?
Just an opinion. Based on research 
FX trading places in the Middle-east 0 replies
Orders triggered in the middle of nowhere! 1 reply
Crisis in the middle east 2 replies
DislikedHope am not the only one looking at this. I think it has everything we need. {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I think that what you'll find is that certain timeframes will display certain types of alternating patterns. Not all pairs are the same. Let me know if you start experimenting with Uneven TZs, eg. one side greater than the other. You'll find these at tops and bottoms. Middle ones are constant.Ignored
DislikedNot only Middle? Dear friends, please correct me if I understand the rules wrong. We buy if the focus candle forms middle TZ and closes higher then it. SL = parabolic's point under the focus candle. TP = what I wantBut. Can we formalize the vice versa rule? ------------ We sell if the focus candle forms top TZ and closes lower then it ---------------- As I can see at history of your screenshots, it can be rule. Please, correct, me.
Ignored
DislikedHope am not the only one looking at this. I think it has everything we need. {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Can you please explain what you mean. Trying to understand what you mean.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I mean to sell if the candle closed lower then topTZ (it's not middleTZ). I think I saw lots of examples of this situation at other users screenshots. {image}Ignored
DislikedAnother example of what i mean. However this is not to derail us from the Potential MTZ's that we are trading. In this example I will be looking for buy opportunities. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Please that is wrong and very much against our rules. We take trades in the direction of the potential MTZ's, hoping that they will remain confirmed MTZ's. Now with that in mind we have confidence that we are in the right direction. Trading against the potential is for another thread. We always trade in the direction of the Potential MTZ.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Sure! I just ask, is it right idea that comes from and vice versa general MTZ? It's not a proble m for me to start a new thread, but I just try to get know before - basing at your experience - is this vice-versa-strategy still works at 97%?Ignored
DislikedHi, Albertdkpllh I am new in this thread ....This system does not use the level of Psychology ----> to see and prepare planning before prices move in future prices. and oscalator to look over sell, or over buy. this is example : {image}
Ignored
DislikedHi, Albertdkpllh I am new in this thread ....This system does not use the level of Psychology ----> to see and prepare planning before prices move in future prices. and oscalator to look over sell, or over buy. this is example : {image}
Ignored