Mobile Supergrid EA | Page 3 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Best Mobile for MT4 mobile platform? 14 replies

MT4 mobile can use to mobile phone with OS android, or iphone or blackberry? 5 replies

MT4 Mobile vs. MT4 Mobile SE - Significant difference? 0 replies

Mobile trader on HP-iPAQ, windows mobile 5.0 6 replies

MetaTrader 4 Mobile? 5 replies

Attachments: Mobile Supergrid EA
Exit Attachments

Mobile Supergrid EA

  • #41
  • May 5, 2015 7:02pm May 5, 2015 7:02pm
Quoting fredgold3434
with default setting i got very bad result for a year back test . {image}
Thanks for the post. It looks like the test lost just over $300. That shouldn't necessarily be an account ending loss. I would say it's reasonable to sustain 10 or 11 losses max. Starting with 0.01 lots you should be able to trade further into a sequence than that with an account balance of $10,000. Maybe your leverage is an issue.

Also, to the thread: I don't know how to program it, but maybe an idea is to wait for a series of loss leaders (maybe 3 or 4) of 0.01 lots and then go to 0.10 or 0.20 (or bigger) lots to complete the sequence. This way a trader could sustain 14 or 15 losses, which would be, in my opinion, kind of ridiculous if that happened.
  • #42
  • May 5, 2015 8:56pm May 5, 2015 8:56pm
Quoting Fxentropy
i trade some high capacity account where my DD is very strict and i aim for 4-5% per month in terms of profit.
A little something, I've been working on with a friend..

The gains aren't that impressive, though they have hit inside of your 4-5%. (Not a true martingale, but a cost averaging increment on trigger.)

What is worthy of note...96% wins.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: AFriend.png Size: 56 KB
Money Can't Buy Happiness. Poverty Can't Buy SHIT! You Choose!
  • #43
  • May 6, 2015 4:19am May 6, 2015 4:19am
hello I do not understand I board install EA Mobile Supergrid but it takes no trades ??
Thank you in advance
  • #44
  • May 6, 2015 4:51am May 6, 2015 4:51am
grid EAs are good if you have $100 000 base capital and you start with 0.01.

You can outlive the market... and still have a decent monthly income...
practising coitus interruptus
  • #45
  • May 6, 2015 5:07am May 6, 2015 5:07am
Quoting avibe
grid EAs are good if you have $100 000 base capital and you start with 0.01. You can outlive the market... and still have a decent monthly income...
Would you risk 100.000 for such kind of EA ?
  • #46
  • May 6, 2015 5:19am May 6, 2015 5:19am
If $100 000 is all i have front and back.. then no...

and if i did... i would be a neurotic mess..

still the secret to marti..is constant withdrawal... or add extra logic e.g marti based on MACD or SAR or something.. to make it abit trend following..

the TMA idea is good..
practising coitus interruptus
  • #47
  • May 6, 2015 5:45am May 6, 2015 5:45am
Quoting Magix
{quote} A little something, I've been working on with a friend.. The gains aren't that impressive, though they have hit inside of your 4-5%. (Not a true martingale, but a cost averaging increment on trigger.) What is worthy of note...96% wins. {image}
Those are very impressive results Magix. In my view, what gets most people in trouble is that they are not happy with the 5%, they all want 50%+ returns in a week. So if they martingale, they juice up the multiplier and then wonder how a margin call happened. That being said, account size is a factor relative to the strategy. Martingale only augments the P/L factor of a strategy. It does not turn a losing strategy into a winner nor should it be a strategy in itself. I always liked the slogan - Slow and steady wins the race :-)
It does.
Best,
Josh
  • #48
  • May 6, 2015 6:02am May 6, 2015 6:02am
Quoting JoshuaHope
{quote} Those are very impressive results Magix. In my view, what gets most people in trouble is that they are not happy with the 5%, they all want 50%+ returns in a week. So if they martingale, they juice up the multiplier and then wonder how a margin call happened. That being said, account size is a factor relative to the strategy. Martingale only augments the P/L factor of a strategy. It does not turn a losing strategy into a winner nor should it be a strategy in itself. I always liked the slogan - Slow and steady wins the race :-) It does. Best,...
We said Joshua.

Most account holders with small capital.. tend to use cent accounts... e.g $1000 ... can easily be $100 000 cents.. good enough for marti...
practising coitus interruptus
  • #49
  • May 6, 2015 6:20am May 6, 2015 6:20am
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Supergrid 0506.jpg Size: 905 KB
  • #50
  • May 6, 2015 6:38am May 6, 2015 6:38am
Quoting MasterGuru
{image}
I will test on my VPS, see how she does. MasterGuru, are you running with default settings?
Best, Josh
  • #51
  • May 6, 2015 9:08am May 6, 2015 9:08am
Quoting JoshuaHope
{quote} Those are very impressive results Magix. In my view, what gets most people in trouble is that they are not happy with the 5%, they all want 50%+ returns in a week. So if they martingale, they juice up the multiplier and then wonder how a margin call happened. That being said, account size is a factor relative to the strategy. Martingale only augments the P/L factor of a strategy. It does not turn a losing strategy into a winner nor should it be a strategy in itself. I always liked the slogan - Slow and steady wins the race :-) It does. Best,...
There is nothing wrong with dreaming...I have a couple of EAs that can still relatively churn a 100% over the course of a month...but they have to be run in cycle to maximize on the possibilities and minimize on the probabilities of blowing up an account.

If you have a look around this and other martingale threads, hell, even just regular EA/auto trading threads, their is a real and definite pattern on why folk continue to blow their shit up once going to live...

Account size.

You can test an EA on a 10k account with upto 1000:1, and hell, a lot of folk will even push this to the 100k accounts and it still trades under the same leverage. But...typically, no broker allows this shit. Once you hit that 10k mark, depending on the broker, your leverage starts to drop to typically less than half of what was being tested.

So...those results on the 10k accounts = bullshit!
Anything higher, is feeding the pipe dream but will NEVER materialize.

Move past that, when some see that they can double a 10k account and unleash these beasts on the $2k accounts, they wonder why they have nothing left by end of week.

The group that I work with, I encourage them all to start off with a reasonable sized account and add in reasonable expectations. Why test on an account that will not produce anything that resembles a market possibility? Total fucking waste of time...

So, over the years I have been playing these fields, I have been continuously dropping the size of accounts that these test in, both live and demo. Reason being...If I can take a $1000 account and double it, I can do the math on what it will take to run on anything and everything larger to have the chance of producing the same results. If the account doesn't survive, I can still go back and analyze the trade pairs to see where my best chances are in letting the logic continue, instead of simply throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Statistically testing for the highest probabilities is where people will find their answers.

Blanket testing on bullshit sized accounts, will continue to feed the market with newbie money.
Money Can't Buy Happiness. Poverty Can't Buy SHIT! You Choose!
  • #52
  • May 6, 2015 9:26am May 6, 2015 9:26am
Quoting Magix
{quote} A little something, I've been working on with a friend.. The gains aren't that impressive, though they have hit inside of your 4-5%. (Not a true martingale, but a cost averaging increment on trigger.) What is worthy of note...96% wins. {image}
Can you show

Profit Factor
Standard Deviation
Sharpe Ratio
Expectancy

thx
"What would you attempt to do, if you knew your success was a certainty?"
  • #53
  • May 6, 2015 9:30am May 6, 2015 9:30am
Quoting Fxentropy
{quote} Can you show Profit Factor Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio Expectancy thx
2 Versions in flight

LINK <-High Risk

LINK <- Medium Risk
Money Can't Buy Happiness. Poverty Can't Buy SHIT! You Choose!
  • #54
  • May 6, 2015 10:56am May 6, 2015 10:56am
The EA has suddenly stopped issuing new trades, so there are no more updates...
  • #55
  • May 8, 2015 6:11am May 8, 2015 6:11am
Quoting Magix
{quote} 2 Versions in flight LINK <-High Risk LINK <- Medium Risk
quite good, will follow them for a while ...

is this a free EA or commercial one?
"What would you attempt to do, if you knew your success was a certainty?"
  • #56
  • May 8, 2015 6:51am May 8, 2015 6:51am
Quoting Fxentropy
is this a free EA or commercial one?
Neither.

Private project I am working on with a friend.

After the GBP move yesterday, I was interested to see how it would handle the load and was actually surprised. Like a fucking CHAMP!

I did find one issue with the Entry Logic on Shorts but didn't really notice until after the big move. Need to get this corrected and probably reload for a more accurate depiction. One little error and the DD on this would actually be a little better and may be holding a lot less in the basket of opens.

In any case...

Stats wise...would seemingly handle the same load for an incremental add on a smaller account, but left as it were, should definitely allow for steady gains without hitting the pant shittingly high levels and DD.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: high.png Size: 52 KB
Money Can't Buy Happiness. Poverty Can't Buy SHIT! You Choose!
  • #57
  • May 8, 2015 7:04am May 8, 2015 7:04am
This is the free version that has been shared.

Though it isn't running under a martingale premise, it has the ability...entries just aren't as stellar and it is a single trigger trade logic to play counter trend. Still...not fucking terrible...

Given the 92% net wins on over 300 trades and gains that have double the DD...as far as EAs go and as far as freeware goes...I'm pretty proud of this little project too.

Default - Dynamic
http://widgets.myfxbook.com/widgets/1222976/large.jpg

myfxbook LINK
Money Can't Buy Happiness. Poverty Can't Buy SHIT! You Choose!
  • #58
  • May 8, 2015 12:20pm May 8, 2015 12:20pm
Quoting Magix
{quote} Neither. Private project I am working on with a friend. After the GBP move yesterday, I was interested to see how it would handle the load and was actually surprised. Like a fucking CHAMP! I did find one issue with the Entry Logic on Shorts but didn't really notice until after the big move. Need to get this corrected and probably reload for a more accurate depiction. One little error and the DD on this would actually be a little better and may be holding a lot less in the basket of opens. In any case... Stats wise...would seemingly handle...
profit factor is very good, but SHARPE IS UNBELIEVABLE !!

very nice!

where i could get the freeware version please?
"What would you attempt to do, if you knew your success was a certainty?"
  • #59
  • May 8, 2015 12:30pm May 8, 2015 12:30pm
Quoting Fxentropy
{quote} profit factor is very good, but SHARPE IS UNBELIEVABLE !! very nice! where i could get the freeware version please?
The age of the account is also good!
  • #60
  • May 8, 2015 12:31pm May 8, 2015 12:31pm
Quoting mvp77
{quote} The age of the account is also good!
mean less than 1 month?
"What would you attempt to do, if you knew your success was a certainty?"
0 traders viewing now