The Club! | Page 915 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Help Me Establish The GbpUsd After Dinner Club 40 replies

Attachments: The Club!
Exit Attachments

The Club!

  • #18,281
  • Mar 23, 2015 1:47am Mar 23, 2015 1:47am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Hi Schickeria, with time it is a bit annoying, really. Let me address a few points: there are some Elliotticans who try their best to constantly deliver counts. Most of them publish their counts regularly in Blogs etc., so that the world can see if they are right or wrong. To constantly attack the people by calling them "Schncounter" etc., is not very constructive. May I invite you to put only your counts for a while in a separated thread so that we can easily see if "Schickeria-counting" is superior to "Schn-counting"? It is also not very...
The rules are more than clear here! OR?

All levels are respected!
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: EU.JPG Size: 179 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: EU2.JPG Size: 140 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: start end.JPG Size: 44 KB
  • #18,282
  • Mar 23, 2015 1:55am Mar 23, 2015 1:55am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Hi Lavanda, the high was around 1040 on Netdania, on Dukascopy I had 1035. There is no need about to be religious with EXACT levels. I had this discussion over and over with Schickeria. Sometimes EXACT fib-levels are hit, other times not (undershoot/overshoot). There is simply nowhere in the world scientific proof that fib-levels have to work, not to speak about "hits to the pip". When there would be such kind of "need" in the fibs, some clever programmer or multi-billion banks would have been able to decode the...
anyway

i don't get better price (spread) on AU and EU 1.08825 has been claculated

if i get S/O i don't have a problem
Attached Images
  • #18,283
  • Mar 23, 2015 1:59am Mar 23, 2015 1:59am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Hi Schickeria, with time it is a bit annoying, really. Let me address a few points: there are some Elliotticans who try their best to constantly deliver counts. Most of them publish their counts regularly in Blogs etc., so that the world can see if they are right or wrong. To constantly attack the people by calling them "Schncounter" etc., is not very constructive. May I invite you to put only your counts for a while in a separated thread so that we can easily see if "Schickeria-counting" is superior to "Schn-counting"? It is also not very...

NO one can say my count is wrong until now!!!! Nothing against the rules!!!! Last week irregular flat ----> more than clear!

Invalidation is clear!

Or do you prefer this scenario ----> http://www.insidefutures.com/article...enario%20.html
  • #18,284
  • Mar 23, 2015 2:07am Mar 23, 2015 2:07am
Quoting Schickeria
{quote} The rules are more than clear here! OR? All levels are respected! {image} {image} {image}


maybe, maybe not, because waves are fractal. Meaning, you will find very often good fib-relationships in all the waves

I am saying not that you are wrong on this one.

But since you criticized others on Schön-counting, I gave examples where Schickeria-counting also failed, and where you also thought that the "rules" where clear.

And again: a fib-expansion is nowhere a rule in EWP. Maybe in Schickel-wave
  • #18,285
  • Mar 23, 2015 2:12am Mar 23, 2015 2:12am
Quoting Schickeria
{quote} NO one can say my count is wrong until now!!!! Nothing against the rules!!!! Last week irregular flat ----> more than clear! Invalidation is clear! Or do you prefer this scenario ----> http://www.insidefutures.com/article...enario%20.html

No, it is surly not the 1-2, 1-2 count, but the alternative ABC is valid, since the movement from the very low to the 1.10x top is in no way an impulse
  • #18,286
  • Edited 3:32am Mar 23, 2015 2:18am | Edited 3:32am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} maybe, maybe not, because waves are fractal. Meaning, you will find very often good fib-relationships in all the waves I am saying not that you are wrong on this one. But since you criticized others on Schn-counting, I gave examples where Schickeria-counting also failed, and where you also thought that the "rules" where clear. And again: a fib-expansion is nowhere a rule in EWP. Maybe in Schickel-wave
yes you are right - no one is perfect!!!

failure @ Schickeria is also on the cards - but i have clear levels what i'm trading.

Watch gregors count bullish possible and bearisch possible what should we trade now long or short????

It would be better to show a chart with clear levels one bullish and one bearish with levels and we can discuss about the trade.

Sorry this is for me schncounting! After the facts he can say yes i was right - has been predicted before - WTF ????
  • #18,287
  • Mar 23, 2015 2:34am Mar 23, 2015 2:34am
Quoting Schickeria
{quote} yes you are right - no one is perfect!!! failure @ Schickeria is also on the cards - but i have clear levels what i'm trading. Watch gregors count bullish possible and bearisch possible what should we trade now long or short???? It would be better to show a chart with clear levels one bullish and one bearisch with levels and we can discuss about the trade. Sorry this is for me schncounting! After the facts he can say yes i was right - has been predicted before - WTF ????

Hi Schickeria,

the problem nowadays with various Elliotticans is, they have lost their balls.

I see so many charts with labels of more than 1 alternative count. And no one is saying, what he thinks how high the probability will be for this or that or that count.

EWI is such of an EW outlet. They constantly show in their various outlets kind of contradicting counts. When one of the counts get right, they brag about it, and are silent about the one which failed.

I think it is OK and also welcome to show on one chart your main count, and also the next best alternative count. Because EW is not about certainty, it is all about probability.

All who thinks EW is about certainty will get burned sooner or later.


But it would be nice to know/hear, why the author of the count chose the main or alternative count.

My experience with EW is, that especially at the beginning or end of bigger moves the pattern get more and more unclear. But I think that is the nature of the waves, to inflict pain to most market participants.
  • #18,288
  • Mar 23, 2015 2:43am Mar 23, 2015 2:43am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} No, it is surly not the 1-2, 1-2 count, but the alternative ABC is valid, since the movement from the very low to the 1.10x top is in no way an impulse
i think we see now a strong wave Z down - but a little ranging market not unexpected - while irregular wave with 261.8% -

before and after (my last week count)

all fib's going hand in hand and nothing is wrong for me.
Attached Images
  • #18,289
  • Mar 23, 2015 2:52am Mar 23, 2015 2:52am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Hi Schickeria, the problem nowadays with various Elliotticans is, they have lost their balls. I see so many charts with labels of more than 1 alternative count. And no one is saying, what he thinks how high the probability will be for this or that or that count. EWI is such of an EW outlet. They constantly show in their various outlets kind of contradicting counts. When one of the counts get right, they brag about it, and are silent about the one which failed. I think it is OK and also welcome to show on one chart your main count, and also...
my last week entry on 1.0612

may be wee see a running flat now / triangle - with ranging market
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: arato.png Size: 62 KB
  • #18,290
  • Mar 23, 2015 2:59am Mar 23, 2015 2:59am
Quoting Schickeria
{quote} i think we see now a strong wave Z down - but a little ranging market not unexpected - while irregular wave with 261.8% - before and after (my last week count) all fib's going hand in hand and nothing is wrong for me. {image} {image}

I play this scenario:



btw: have you noticed, that the 1.10x was the 61.8% retracement of the move down from the 1.13x to the very low?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Chart_EUR_USD_4 Hours_snapshot.png Size: 63 KB
  • #18,291
  • Mar 23, 2015 3:05am Mar 23, 2015 3:05am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} I play this scenario: btw: have you noticed, that the 1.10x was the 61.8% retracement of the move down from the 1.13x to the very low? {image}
Red WXY count is possible to 1.1290/1.1315 but no one bullish setup has worked since 1.3993 drop - all fail. I'm prefering strong shorting atm..
  • #18,292
  • Mar 23, 2015 3:07am Mar 23, 2015 3:07am
Elliott Wave Forex


find the count you love

they offer all


http://www.elliottwaveforex.com/2015...th-march-2015/
  • #18,293
  • Mar 23, 2015 3:09am Mar 23, 2015 3:09am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} I play this scenario: btw: have you noticed, that the 1.10x was the 61.8% retracement of the move down from the 1.13x to the very low? {image}
if you count your red 4 to 5 you will see a clear 1-2-3-4-5 (extended wave 1)
Attached Image
  • #18,294
  • Mar 23, 2015 3:16am Mar 23, 2015 3:16am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} I play this scenario: btw: have you noticed, that the 1.10x was the 61.8% retracement of the move down from the 1.13x to the very low? {image}
Be sure i noticed that
  • #18,295
  • Mar 23, 2015 3:22am Mar 23, 2015 3:22am
Quoting Schickeria
{quote} my last week entry on 1.0612 may be wee see a running flat now / triangle - with ranging market {image}
Eu is going to 1.0744 first and 1.0744 is keypoint for today
  • #18,296
  • Mar 23, 2015 3:32am Mar 23, 2015 3:32am
Quoting Schickeria
{quote} Eu is going to 1.0744 first and 1.0744 is keypoint for today

yep, it is so to say double 50% retracement of two waves
  • #18,297
  • Mar 23, 2015 3:47am Mar 23, 2015 3:47am
Quoting Schickeria
{quote} my last week entry on 1.0612 may be wee see a running flat now / triangle - with ranging market {image}
TOP: 1.1042 is blue 0

and we can see now 3 scenarios

- double three
- irregular flat
- triangle
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Zig Zag Double Three.png Size: 44 KB
Attached Images
  • #18,298
  • Mar 23, 2015 3:53am Mar 23, 2015 3:53am
Quoting Schickeria
{quote} anyway i don't get better price (spread) on AU and EU 1.08825 has been claculated if i get S/O i don't have a problem {image} {image}

closing here one short 1.0774
  • #18,299
  • Mar 23, 2015 4:02am Mar 23, 2015 4:02am
Looking to short EU 810-830 zone with LL preffered on m5.
  • #18,300
  • Mar 23, 2015 5:52am Mar 23, 2015 5:52am
Quoting janpec1000
Looking to short EU 810-830 zone with LL preffered on m5.
Didnt get LL so no entry. Dollar getting hammered today again. It seems like easy ride on EU downwards has stoped. Structurally it is no go for easy shorts anymore.
27 traders viewing now