IC Markets - public statements vs individual traders

That Press release announcement is fake, it is not true. I'm being a victim of persecution by IC Markets because negative balance.

Although I am well protected and with a solid defense, any help will be greatly appreciated.

1. Remember reading about this on forexsignals.com but too bad Nick there already deleted the thread. Some other guy I think dupapa for one (cant remember the others) there faced same problem? Maybe you can ask him whether they waived his negative balance?

2. You should report to ASIC and FOS like the rest of us are doing. Dont see why you should foot those negative balances, which are due to icmarket's incompetency in handling the issue.

Thank you MaryAnne,

May be we should open a new thread as the early forexsignals, to bring together all concerned traders that did not received any satisfactory solution, amendment or fairly negotiation from IC Markets, even after the press release. Then, we could organize all as a block to take actions with the best support for our defense. I already contacted some others fellow big traders, but we will add more traders (the more the best).

I like negotiation and friendly dispute resolution. I hope that we do not need to take higher instances, I hope IC Markets do the right thing, but we are well prepared if they decide don't honor the press announcement to all clients the same(there are proofs and some clear and solid arguments for defense and claim, thereof by which the other big brokers decided cover all negative balances of their clients).

Regarding ASIC and FOS, I'm waiting few days more to see if IC Markets give me a reasonable proposal, as i saw they did with other clients. It is certainly discriminatory conduct, that cover the balance to some customers and not others. So, if they are not minded to negotiate and prefer to get other outside dispute resolution, we are ready to do this, by sending the case to all higher instances, in addition to reporting on all forums and press, informing the true about this issue.

1. From what I noticed, people under their biggest IBs got priority in having balances adjusted favorably (Nick's thread in forexsignals.com) so maybe thats why the thread there was finally deleted so that icmarkets can continue having their "good" name since evidence of the thread now exists only in screenshots taken and in cached copies? And yes, Angus was even there replying directly to them though he didnt give our traders here the same honor... if this isnt discrimination, idk what it is.

2. I agreed with your standing on this matter. Please let me know so I can contact the other victims I am in touch with too who do not have accounts in this forum. would be happy to add my evidences to yours.

3. Dont take too long to report since there is actually time expiry for eligibility of cases. best imho to report when massive amounts of people are doing so -> higher chance regulators will look into the matter and investigate asap. if we report as 1 or 2 individuals sporadically, it becomes low urgency issue from regulators POV.