Quoting BenQDislikedCan you post a .gif of the graph that comes with the statement? Thx.Ignored
Attached File(s)
Firebird 30-300.zip
14 KB
|
336 downloads
Mono
Firebird EA - fixed version - 2,217 replies
Anyone Can help me about Firebird EA ,please!!! 0 replies
Firebird V1.0 an amazing EA ! 33 replies
Going live with Firebird 38 replies
My firebird is a roast cornish game hen 3 replies
Quoting BenQDislikedCan you post a .gif of the graph that comes with the statement? Thx.Ignored
Quoting monoDislikedHere you goIgnored
Quoting BenQDislikedThx. I notice that some of your swaps are quite high. There's a couple instances in your open trades where the swap fees are pretty high compared to a 30 pip profit target.
If you hold on to those trades for much longer, very soon the swap fees will outweigh potential profit. What's your plan in those instances?Ignored
Quoting monoDislikedYou are correct, I have coded into another firebird test, swap management where if the swap gets to a certain level, start looking to close it at the lowest losing margin.
Example. If I have a buy trade and my swap limit is set to -$11, when my trade <= -$11 it then waits for CCI(377) on 30min setting to reach -180 then closes the trade. If the trade is not closed by the next day the next CCI level is set to -160 then -140 and so on until it closes.
MonoIgnored
Quoting monoDislikedHi Guys
Firebird reached its 200th milestone and continues its impressive record, which stands at 202/1. Floats did reach -$2200 but a few days later came down to -$750, picking up wins along the way.
MonoIgnored
Quoting monoDislikedHi Guys
End of week 4 of testing and results (Firebird 30-300) are showing that this is a boring EA. All it wants to do is win.
W/L Record stands at 171/1 with -$600 in floats.
Stats for the week
Trades Open = 42
Trades Closed = 45
Trades Open & Closed = 31
Floats = 11
I have also started another test ( Firebird 30-300 Test2) with the same setting, just to see if its a fluke. And W/L results are 29/0 with 14 Floats
Another Test is based on 15Min settings ( Firebird 15-150) and the W/L results are 65/1 with 12 Floats.
I will be starting another test (Firebird 300-30 Test3) with same settings @ market open and running it for 4 weeks, but with Money Management and a close trade feature(yet to be determined).
I have also been running 2 tests of Phoenix, but results and settings will be placed in the Phoenix thread.
All Results and settings are below.Ignored
Quoting cgldsmthDislikedGuys'n'gals,
today I got a cable trade closed by the server for a loss of $740, with the comment "Firebirdv63G(99.5%)".
Is this a margin call that erased 3 days of no losses? If so that's a good lesson learnt!Ignored
Quoting rtxDislikedHi boys, please can you help me ?
I have copied ***mq4 to /experts/indicators to my Metatrader folder, in Metatrader I have firebird, but I cant use it. "cry"
Please can you help me what I did wrong ?
ThanksIgnored
Quoting ForexWinnieDislikedMono, I think I found the answer: V63G. Please correct if it's wrong.
*********************************
Mono -
I've been reading the threads and the record is too strong to be ignored. I'd like to test it but I forgot to log down which version of the Firebird you're testing with these settings. Can you please either post or send me a link to that EA?
Thanks.
FWIgnored
Quoting wackenaDislikedMono,
Impressive.
This could be one way to control the float. you can control the float by limiting the max open orders per chart. I used 2 below. This will reduce the overall number of trades, but will help your exposure.
Put this in the input section of the code.
extern int MaxOpenOrders = 2; //max open orders per chart
Put this somewhere up near the top, under the MAIN PROGAM LOOP.
if( MyOrdersTotal() >= MaxOpenOrders) return(0);
Then compile the EA.
Good luck,
WackenaIgnored
Quoting monoDislikedThanks for that, I'll keep it it mind. The way I see it at the moment is that floats are your friend (Not so much as the float size, but the trade numbers).
I expect my float size to increase as my lotsize increases.
I am patiently waiting for my next loss.
MonoIgnored