Both trades violate rule 3.
Donde hay Patron no manda Marinero
As simple as possible: RENKO M5 trading 75 replies
Trading is this Simple? Finally Explained simple and clearly! 46 replies
Simple Level Trading 1 reply
Trading: As simple as possible, but no simpler - by a real Cityboy 92 replies
Disliked{quote} i understand the rules perfectly well and i am by no means trying to derail your thread. I only wanted to show him something i.e to pay a little more attention. That's all and nothing more. u wont see any chart posted by me again with trend lines attached. That said, your method is awesome and it fits my personality, so a big thanks to you for the method and mastermind for helping me understand it better and not getting angry when i ask him some silly questions.Ignored
DislikedSince there is rule 6: No long @ .900 level Should we short at 136.9 of EJ for improvement?Ignored
Disliked{quote} would a EJ short @ .900 would be according to the rules ?? UdineIgnored
Disliked{quote} i understand the rules perfectly well and i am by no means trying to derail your thread. I only wanted to show him something i.e to pay a little more attention. That's all and nothing more. u wont see any chart posted by me again with trend lines attached. That said, your method is awesome and it fits my personality, so a big thanks to you for the method and mastermind for helping me understand it better and not getting angry when i ask him some silly questions.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Should not you specify that you posted trades do not meet the rules, to not confuse newbies? Both trades violate rule 3. {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I am aware of rule3 but the entries were before FO and GJ closed in FO. CheersIgnored
Disliked{quote} If you mean 4.4 before any commission, it could be because with a hidden TP, the EA enters a market order when conditions are met and the next available Buyer could have been 6 points below.Ignored