Fractals, ZZ & the Pissing Dog
Apologies if I have missed this answer somewhere, but if all our patterns are 4 or greater, how would we handle a zz leg with a fractal sequence of 1? I've search back and forth for the answer, I know I've missed it.
{quote} That's why I made my suggestions earlier, because I was also wondering what had happened here (http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?p=7109197#post7109197) for example: Bar "sequence": 0 Fractal "sequence": Appearances in SET3: erm... Seems like I gotta dig up some extra creativity again
{quote} That's why I made my suggestions earlier, because I was also wondering what had happened here (http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?p=7109197#post7109197) for example: Bar "sequence": 0 Fractal "sequence": Appearances in SET3: erm... Seems like I gotta dig up some extra creativity again
{quote} That one bar swing is equal to 4 bars previous to it... Search "0" fractal. 4 bar length. Next bar... Carl PS. We questioned G about how he could get a signal on the very next bar... his answer about using ATR5 to modify search length shed some light on how that was possible.
you should not manipulate the bar patterns to something it is not, ie. a '0' to '000'
{quote} The fractal and length bits are clear. But the next bar - I mean, you wrote this earlier: {quote} There's either a contradiction on your side (we start counting after the previous signal, that gives us the big bar, and if we leave the pattern of the big bar as 0 instead of 0000, how do we do next bar?), or part of my brain is refusing to comprehend something patently obvious. I'll be happy to acknowledge the latter, it wouldn't be the first time, but...
As far as your next item... I think you may be adding something in that is not there yet. If you have in real-time "01", what is the probability that there will be "011" or "010"? If "011" has a higher probability, then from your description, you will be adding a "0" to where the probabilities don't agree. I hope you understand my point. In my view, the only reason to add the "0" or "1" is to check to see if here is a higher probability for a longer fractal pattern, not that it is a "0" or "1". Carl
The picture is from post 306, appearing earlier at post 292.{quote} killerno, In your (mine) posted example the down signal at the start of the big move was an "error". In those cases the algo start calculating again from the actual ZZ top after it is confirmed.
For me, "confirmed" ZZ end-point is when we got a fractal in opposite direction.
{quote} killerno, Going back to that example: ZZ position is confirmed only 5 bars later. Following that confirmation point I can't find in my DB a valid pattern for swing signal that contains only 5 down bars. G.
What I meant was that I don't have a swing pattern with "01" and that length and a "next bar" with high probability against longer pattern at that point. G.
At the end of each ZZ leg there is a fractal. We start counting the first fractal AFTER that one (not including the fractal at the end of previous leg). Our historical database INCLUDES the last fractal in its next ZZ fractal pattern. So, our search for "next bar in opposite direction" should include one more fractal that didn't reveal itself in real-time. Does that makes sense? Ahhha factor? ;-} G. EDIT: To elaborate - if probabilities shows pattern of 4 fractals and you already got 4 fractals - you are too late by at least 3 bars...
{quote} Why does he mention "01" if we are only at Bar #6 open, "following the confirmation point"? {quote}
{quote} SET1 = Bar sequences with counts SET2 = FRACTAL PATTERNS SET3 = Bar sequences with counts (SET1) that are in SET2 (filtered by SET2). In essence, we are reducing SET1, by only including bar patterns that are also FRACTAL patterns. We preserve how many times the bar patterns occured in our database. Carl
You saved me from ripping out my hair, in the quote below I easily thought it was fractal sub-sequences, which wouldn't make sense.Creating SET3: From the list of FRACTAL sequences obtained and stored as SET2, we now create a list of sub-sequences from each ZZ leg. Sub-sequences of fractal patterns are made the same way as described in SET1. We create sub-sequences of length 4-13. For fractals sequence that are longer than 13 we create only the right-most 13 fractals.
{quote} SET1 = Bar sequences with counts SET2 = FRACTAL PATTERNS SET3 = Bar sequences with counts (SET1) that are in SET2 (filtered by SET2). In essence, we are reducing SET1, by only including bar patterns that are also FRACTAL patterns. We preserve how many times the bar patterns occured in our database. Carl
A venti (cigarette paper) in time allows a new turn, desperate for a connection, a whiff of enlightenment, a gasp for air for more understanding and discernment, grasping at the endeavors in pledge between my Lord and the greatness he has bestowed in the glean of “I AM”.
A joyance in contentment that as He provided the flood, the energy it re
resents in the life that portends “I AM”,
the heart of which that lets Spirit; wind wings, test and faith envisioned and spoken true from heaven. The mysticism and awe countless tones in the life that calls. Yet when called the glory of knowledge and knowledge of who, Glory of identity , we want to know you. The openings of construct rains as he lets Spirit, heaven energy, proclamation of faith, us and nation envision and in vision of souls and hearts no longer closed left asking for more.
Discontent with LOVE; a heart beat of freedom directed to shame; a present darkish afterglow of life overcome by his presence. Given knowledge of time wisdoms of books kept in libraries long lost to wars. The glory of his goodness, the atmosphere around a wall of water present dwelling of where the glory of his presence brings rest to my soul where wealth and peace – take me home; to the Holy Spirit enabling me to love his Presence. The necessitating realm of his continuance to the ages; the resonance with which minds long for his presence, to his voice and void a resonance with the LOVE for Jesus.
