- #13,090
- Jan 11, 2014 12:15pm Jan 11, 2014 12:15pm
- Joined Jun 2010 | Status: zero | 20,603 Posts
{quote} Don't forget this scenario! I think he added a Xchen and 400 Pips! {image}
Imagine, there had not been the (manipulative) stop hunt on 12.27.2013 (in low liquidity or better said, participation time :
his count would have been right, although the wave 2 would have retraced much more......
Simple question:
how is it, that any analyst has the right to be wrong, but when it comes to EW they all have to be right all of the time?
Next question:
when other methods produce such "all the time" reliable analysis (which you can trust 100% of the time), why was there a need to look at EW, or even pay for a subscription?
Attention: once again I am in bad mood, because I have to do some serious work over the weekend.
Add to that, that all my friends are already deep in the mountains and make jokes about the "homy" 
In plain German: "Mit mir ist nicht gut Kirschen essen"
- #13,094
- Jan 11, 2014 1:51pm Jan 11, 2014 1:51pm
- Joined Mar 2012 | Status: Trader | 10,087 Posts
{quote} http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...33520&page=654 den chart gibt es immer noch, weil immer noch valide the 4th wave in this chart is an ABC-flat all perfectly legal
next week in-valid
- #13,095
- Jan 11, 2014 1:56pm Jan 11, 2014 1:56pm
- Joined Mar 2012 | Status: Trader | 10,087 Posts
{quote} Imagine, there had not been the (manipulative) stop hunt on 12.27.2013 (in low liquidity or better said, participation time : his count would have been right, although the wave 2 would have retraced much more...... Simple question: how is it, that any analyst has the right to be wrong, but when it comes to EW they all have to be right all of the time? Next question: when other methods produce such "all the time" reliable analysis (which you can trust 100% of the time), why was there a need to look at EW, or even pay for a subscription?
- #13,096
- Jan 11, 2014 2:36pm Jan 11, 2014 2:36pm
- Joined Mar 2012 | Status: Trader | 10,087 Posts
{quote} Imagine, there had not been the (manipulative) stop hunt on 12.27.2013 (in low liquidity or better said, participation time : his count would have been right, although the wave 2 would have retraced much more...... Simple question: how is it, that any analyst has the right to be wrong, but when it comes to EW they all have to be right all of the time? Next question: when other methods produce such "all the time" reliable analysis (which you can trust 100% of the time), why was there a need to look at EW, or even pay for a subscription?
1. Ich bin sehr ehrlich und bei uns sagt man sich seine Meinung gerade aus, damit können einige EW-Analysten nicht leben (ich meine damit nicht DICH)
2. Wenn einer 200$ im Monat für einen Shit verlangt, dann sollte er wenigstens brennen wenn man ihn anzündet.
3. Bei einem EW Anbieter der 200$ im Monat verlangt - hat letzte Woche keine einzige Analyse funktionert, da ist es berechtigt mal nachzufragen warum nicht? Übrigens die nehmen 200$ minimum + extra baksis für andere scheiß Analysen
4. Wenn ich mich dabei abgezockt fühle, dann ist es auch berechtigt andere davon zu warnen, diesen Service nicht in Anspurch zu nehmen.
5. Ich habe aber nur 9.99$ bezahlt und da hätte ich lieber mein Auto dafür gewaschen - da hätte ich mehr davon!
6. Wenn man bei denen mal kritisch nachfragt, da fliegt man in der Regel raus! Warum ?? Bin übrigens rausgeflogen
.Schickeria!
- #13,097
- Jan 11, 2014 3:02pm Jan 11, 2014 3:02pm
- Joined Jun 2010 | Status: zero | 20,603 Posts
{quote} Mein Hauptproblem ist: 1. Ich bin sehr ehrlich und bei uns sagt man sich seine Meinung gerade aus, damit können einige EW-Analysten nicht leben (ich meine damit nicht DICH) 2. Wenn einer 200$ im Monat für einen Shit verlangt, dann sollte er wenigstens brennen wenn man ihn anzündet. 3. Bei einem EW Anbieter der 200$ im Monat verlangt - hat letzte Woche keine einzige Analyse funktionert, da ist es berechtigt mal nachzufragen warum nicht? Übrigens die nehmen 200$ minimum + extra baksis für andere scheiß Analysen 4. Wenn ich mich dabei abgezockt...
Schickel hat Hausverbot
- #13,098
- Jan 11, 2014 4:20pm Jan 11, 2014 4:20pm
- Joined Nov 2012 | Status: Trader | 12,211 Posts
Yeeeeeeks, Goldman concludes, that SP500 is 30% overvalued Did Goldman Just Kill The Music? - "The S&P500 Is Now Overvalued By Almost Any Measure" Who would have thunk?
Anything that is anyhow related being nominated in dollars is overvalued..from oil to stock indexes to house prices. We just need to keep eye on Petrodollar, once it starts to weaken more we can expect dollar colapse trough hyperinflation. Time to short sell then...and turn all profits in gold couse euro is just as much crap, has less value than goat crap...becouse it burns less aparently.