Elliott Wave Trading | Page 328 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Elliott Wave Trading by Ayax 2,105 replies

Elliott wave trading 94 replies

elliott wave trading channel 22 replies

Group Trading based on Elliott wave and Harmonics 0 replies

Elliotters..Elliott Wave Trading 9 replies

Attachments: Elliott Wave Trading
Exit Attachments

Elliott Wave Trading

  • #6,541
  • Jan 9, 2014 6:43pm Jan 9, 2014 6:43pm
Quoting infinitus
{quote} ???

im checking 1.6038 downward...and 1.5141 downward to 1.18.
the wave always move by 5-3-5...if the second 5 hit 100 of the first 5 then it create b wave up. as long as the 5 wave move follow 3 EW rules.
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,542
  • Jan 9, 2014 9:03pm Jan 9, 2014 9:03pm
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} im checking 1.6038 downward...and 1.5141 downward to 1.18. the wave always move by 5-3-5...if the second 5 hit 100 of the first 5 then it create b wave up. as long as the 5 wave move follow 3 EW rules.
Well , I think that a 5-5-3 followed by a 3-3-3 and then sees a triple by pass radio XYZ and recycles in a 5-5-3-3-5 would see an outcome that would confirm that 3-7-9 may be the solution that would fit in with a 4-5-2 double triple 3-wave impulsive correction...
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
  • #6,543
  • Jan 10, 2014 12:30am Jan 10, 2014 12:30am
Quoting Ian Copsey
{quote} Well , I think that a 5-5-3 followed by a 3-3-3 and then sees a triple by pass radio XYZ and recycles in a 5-5-3-3-5 would see an outcome that would confirm that 3-7-9 may be the solution that would fit in with a 4-5-2 double triple 3-wave impulsive correction...

  • #6,544
  • Jan 10, 2014 12:36am Jan 10, 2014 12:36am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} im checking 1.6038 downward...and 1.5141 downward to 1.18. the wave always move by 5-3-5...if the second 5 hit 100 of the first 5 then it create b wave up. as long as the 5 wave move follow 3 EW rules.
Man, seriously, everybody here likes to help and has understanding for EW newbees. But when you continue in this way, no one will take you seriously.

When you say something like

looks like the first 5-3-5 (lets call it A) -Primary zero point of trend- that break beyond 100 extention of the first 5 will create a 3 wave B segment that the b wave of the A will decide will the C (5 wave) should break extreme A end point or not. this did not happen in flat i think...3-3-5 will be created by small 5-3-5...

if only i can do programing, i want to simulate this rules into automatic charting.


nobody knows what you are talking about. Nobody.

If you want discuss with us a new wave thesis, or whatever, put it down and visualize it with a chart.


All else is simply pain.........


Just to say......
  • #6,545
  • Jan 10, 2014 5:41am Jan 10, 2014 5:41am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} Man, seriously, everybody here likes to help and has understanding for EW newbees. But when you continue in this way, no one will take you seriously. When you say something like looks like the first 5-3-5 (lets call it A) -Primary zero point of trend- that break beyond 100 extention of the first 5 will create a 3 wave B segment that the b wave of the A will decide will the C (5 wave) should break extreme A end point or not. this did not happen in flat i think...3-3-5 will be created by small 5-3-5... if only i can do programing, i want to...

http://charts.mql5.com/3/537/eurusd-...orporation.png
this one is example
http://charts.mql5.com/3/537/eurusd-...poration-2.png
or this one ?
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,546
  • Jan 10, 2014 5:42am Jan 10, 2014 5:42am
Quoting Ian Copsey
{quote} Well , I think that a 5-5-3 followed by a 3-3-3 and then sees a triple by pass radio XYZ and recycles in a 5-5-3-3-5 would see an outcome that would confirm that 3-7-9 may be the solution that would fit in with a 4-5-2 double triple 3-wave impulsive correction...

did not work so well on lower timeframe..
it almost often goes past 100 and become
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,547
  • Jan 10, 2014 6:19am Jan 10, 2014 6:19am
Quoting Ian Copsey
{quote} Well , I think that a 5-5-3 followed by a 3-3-3 and then sees a triple by pass radio XYZ and recycles in a 5-5-3-3-5 would see an outcome that would confirm that 3-7-9 may be the solution that would fit in with a 4-5-2 double triple 3-wave impulsive correction...
LMAO. It's hard not to laugh. I think he's from Indonesia but I love the Elliott Wave jokes. Ah, nerd out.
  • #6,548
  • Jan 10, 2014 7:25am Jan 10, 2014 7:25am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} {image} this one is example {image} or this one ?

second chart:

how can you label the C wave on this place - makes entirely no sense

have you started to read a book? would help, really..................


Maybe after reading the "Elliott Wave Principle" you get fresh and meaningful ideas for your attempt to invent a new ud1nh0-wave
  • #6,549
  • Jan 10, 2014 7:30am Jan 10, 2014 7:30am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} did not work so well on lower timeframe.. it almost often goes past 100 and become
I have to apologise... I do know that it's not easy when learning EW/ HEW. However, as Infinitus suggested, you really need to put a visual with your descriptions so that we can get an idea of what you're trying to convey. I was lost... I had no idea what you were trying to describe so can't even begin to make an intelligible response that would help.

If it's classic EW I should really step back from commenting as the labelling is totally arbitrary to me and doesn't make sense to me any more.
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
  • #6,550
  • Jan 10, 2014 7:48am Jan 10, 2014 7:48am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} second chart: how can you label the C wave on this place - makes entirely no sense have you started to read a book? would help, really.................. Maybe after reading the "Elliott Wave Principle" you get fresh and meaningful ideas for your attempt to invent a new ud1nh0-wave

that 5 wave non overlap between 4 and 1. wave 3 the longest. wave 1 simple. wave 3 and 5 extended.
that becoz algo trade sir...too hard to spot on thick chart
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,551
  • Jan 10, 2014 7:59am Jan 10, 2014 7:59am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} that 5 wave non overlap between 4 and 1. wave 3 the longest. wave 1 simple. wave 3 and 5 extended. that becoz algo trade sir...too hard to spot on thick chart

I see, that this wave is an impulse, but where is the context to the wave A and B?
  • #6,552
  • Jan 10, 2014 8:12am Jan 10, 2014 8:12am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} I see, that this wave is an impulse, but where is the context to the wave A and B?

on the far left....there's a b white label, before that it was 5 move down then 3 move up ( 3 move up is b white)

5-3....what else? it should be 5 next.. but it goes far as elongated zigzag....
neely guideline as elongated zz is may retrace more than 61. but not break the start of the c wave (a.k.a b wave of elongated zz)
elongated zz as A, upward 5-3-5 as B
so its 3-3
3 is zz A (5-3-5), 3 is zz B
rest is simple 5

this only works on correction sir.....on first strong impulse....it usually shoot up till 400 in lower tf
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,553
  • Jan 10, 2014 8:25am Jan 10, 2014 8:25am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} on the far left....there's a b white label, before that it was 5 move down then 3 move up ( 3 move up is b white) 5-3....what else? it should be 5 next.. but it goes far as elongated zigzag.... neely guideline as elongated zz is may retrace more than 61. but not break the start of the c wave (a.k.a b wave of elongated zz) elongated zz as A, upward 5-3-5 as B so its 3-3 3 is zz A (5-3-5), 3 is zz B rest is simple 5 this only works on correction sir.....on first strong impulse....it usually shoot up till 400 in lower tf
Is so difficult to understand, if not chart, nothing is.
  • #6,554
  • Jan 10, 2014 8:31am Jan 10, 2014 8:31am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} on the far left....there's a b white label, before that it was 5 move down then 3 move up ( 3 move up is b white) 5-3....what else? it should be 5 next.. but it goes far as elongated zigzag.... neely guideline as elongated zz is may retrace more than 61. but not break the start of the c wave (a.k.a b wave of elongated zz) elongated zz as A, upward 5-3-5 as B so its 3-3 3 is zz A (5-3-5), 3 is zz B rest is simple 5 this only works on correction sir.....on first strong impulse....it usually shoot up till 400 in lower tf

OK, do me a favor:


take your a- wave and your b-wave

and then do the subwave counting on them until you reach the start of wave C
  • #6,555
  • Jan 10, 2014 8:35am Jan 10, 2014 8:35am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} on the far left....there's a b white label, before that it was 5 move down then 3 move up ( 3 move up is b white) 5-3....what else? it should be 5 next.. but it goes far as elongated zigzag.... neely guideline as elongated zz is may retrace more than 61. but not break the start of the c wave (a.k.a b wave of elongated zz) elongated zz as A, upward 5-3-5 as B so its 3-3 3 is zz A (5-3-5), 3 is zz B rest is simple 5 this only works on correction sir.....on first strong impulse....it usually shoot up till 400 in lower tf


Please, please, please:


now you coming up with Neely, too

but out of my sight you do not even understand the basics of traditional EW



when I see a chart, like the one we are discussing about, and there is an A-wave up, and a B-wave down, but the C-wave ends on a down move, then I know, that you have not understand the basics and the logic of EW
  • #6,556
  • Jan 10, 2014 8:38am Jan 10, 2014 8:38am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} Is so difficult to understand, if not chart, nothing is.

this chart sir
http://charts.mql5.com/3/540/eurusd-...orporation.png
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,557
  • Jan 10, 2014 8:49am Jan 10, 2014 8:49am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} this chart sir {image}

come on man, this chart was clearly not the chart we were talking about, and was also not one of the charts you showed above.


If you like to drive us nuts, especially me, I will simply put you on ignore
  • #6,558
  • Jan 10, 2014 9:05am Jan 10, 2014 9:05am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} come on man, this chart was clearly not the chart we were talking about, and was also not one of the charts you showed above. If you like to drive us nuts, especially me, I will simply put you on ignore

it is the second chart.
look at the price and candle but its on smaller timeframe since ovidiu asking about elongated zz in left
i mean, if i wanted to see 5 wave complete with abc every corrective wave..i have to look at 1 m chart or maybe more..in monthly, it seems doesn't works on EU.
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,559
  • Jan 10, 2014 9:15am Jan 10, 2014 9:15am
Quoting x-x
hi, i m new to elliott wave i hope i have done it right. this is gold 1h chart {image}

here a update on my previous post
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: xauusdch1.png Size: 48 KB
  • #6,560
  • Jan 10, 2014 9:21am Jan 10, 2014 9:21am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} it is the second chart. look at the price and candle but its on smaller timeframe since ovidiu asking about elongated zz in left i mean, if i wanted to see 5 wave complete with abc every corrective wave..i have to look at 1 m chart or maybe more..in monthly, it seems doesn't works on EU.
OK, I see

but you should not change the TF when we are discussing wave counts. It is hard enough to follow you, anyway.

So care to comment about the ABC on the second chart and explain, how a C wave can end on a down-wave, when the A wave is an up-wave?
8 traders viewing now