Elliott Wave Trading | Page 318 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Elliott Wave Trading by Ayax 2,105 replies

Elliott wave trading 94 replies

elliott wave trading channel 22 replies

Group Trading based on Elliott wave and Harmonics 0 replies

Elliotters..Elliott Wave Trading 9 replies

Attachments: Elliott Wave Trading
Exit Attachments

Elliott Wave Trading

  • #6,341
  • Dec 4, 2013 3:34pm Dec 4, 2013 3:34pm
I wonder if that's all for USDJPY or if we just experienced the b-wave of an expanded flat.
  • #6,342
  • Dec 4, 2013 7:18pm Dec 4, 2013 7:18pm
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} Well , we have a common flat . Possibility to exceed 1.3647 is very small .
Actually, it was a deep Wave b of Wave v... The 1.3661 - 84 targets remain intact...

(I really can't see that drop from 1.3613 being a 5-wave move...!)
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
  • #6,343
  • Dec 4, 2013 7:22pm Dec 4, 2013 7:22pm
Quoting iwavetrade
I wonder if that's all for USDJPY or if we just experienced the b-wave of an expanded flat.
http://harmonicelliottwave.blogspot....or-usdjpy.html
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
  • #6,344
  • Dec 5, 2013 1:31am Dec 5, 2013 1:31am
Hi everyone. Like this thread. My strategy is also based on Waves (my way). I might have cracked almost perfection. Good job Ian
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: AUD_CAD1.jpg Size: 94 KB
POSTMASTER
  • #6,345
  • Dec 5, 2013 1:47am Dec 5, 2013 1:47am
Quoting Ian Copsey
{quote} Actually, it was a deep Wave b of Wave v... The 1.3661 - 84 targets remain intact... (I really can't see that drop from 1.3613 being a 5-wave move...!)
Correct Ian . The drop from 1.3613 , is a flat with weak b wave (Wave-(B) in a common flat who begun at 1.3523 ).
  • #6,346
  • Dec 5, 2013 2:36am Dec 5, 2013 2:36am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} Correct Ian . The drop from 1.3613 , is a flat with weak b wave (Wave-(B) in a common flat who begun at 1.3523 ).
I'm sorry but that doesn't seem to make sense... From 1.3523? The rally from there to 1.3613 was in 5-waves... and not 3. Plus, it hasn't corrected a prior directional move but moved to new highs - so can't be a corrective pattern.
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
  • #6,347
  • Dec 5, 2013 2:45am Dec 5, 2013 2:45am
Quoting Ian Copsey
{quote} I'm sorry but that doesn't seem to make sense... From 1.3523? The rally from there to 1.3613 was in 5-waves... and not 3. Plus, it hasn't corrected a prior directional move but moved to new highs - so can't be a corrective pattern.
So did I until yesterday, but it was a double combination .
  • #6,348
  • Dec 5, 2013 2:49am Dec 5, 2013 2:49am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} So did I until yesterday, but it was a double combination .
More attention , the down movement began . When I get confirmation, I post the chart .
  • #6,349
  • Edited 3:33am Dec 5, 2013 3:22am | Edited 3:33am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} More attention , the down movement began . When I get confirmation, I post the chart .
My opinion . The down movement can be between 1.3398 and 1,3296 .
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Eur-Usd - H1 - 05.12.2013.jpg Size: 290 KB
  • #6,350
  • Dec 5, 2013 4:13am Dec 5, 2013 4:13am
ldt or edt?
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,351
  • Edited 11:51am Dec 5, 2013 5:47am | Edited 11:51am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} So did I until yesterday, but it was a double combination .
Twenty one years ago when I visited EWI's offices in Gainesville these double combinations never existed. I seem to recall that Prechter now "permits" complex corrections to start with these things. At that time I was told very categorically that Wave A of a complex MUST ALWAYS be in 3 waves. Later I heard that in the mid 1990's EWI discussed the fact that they noted "glob" Wave 1's which were in three waves... but then ignored it. It was after this we seem to have been provided with the opportunity to use these adjustments and it seems because it helps to justify a wave count.

Funnily enough, HEW is based on 3-wave structures and all these permitted additions are related to 3-wave moves... Any pennies dropping?
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
  • #6,352
  • Dec 5, 2013 6:24am Dec 5, 2013 6:24am
Quoting Ian Copsey
{quote} Twenty one years ago when I visited EWI's offices in Gainesville these double combinations never existed. I seem to recall that Prechter now "permits" complex corrections to start with these things. At that time I was told very categorically that Wave A of a complex MUST ALWAYS be in 3 waves. Later I heard that in the mid 1990's EWI discussed the fact that they noted "glob" Wave 1's which were in three waves... but then ignored it. It was after this we seem to have been provided with the opportunity to use these adjustments and it seems...
Sorry , but Glenn Neely says something and in my opinion he's right . And Robert Balan , says that . Strictly speaking, none of the theories is not perfect . However probability of reaching 1.3661 at this time is almost zero , but each trading as thinks fit .
  • #6,353
  • Dec 5, 2013 6:37am Dec 5, 2013 6:37am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} Sorry , but Glenn Neely says something and in my opinion he's right . And Robert Balan , says that . Strictly speaking, none of the theories is not perfect . However probability of reaching 1.3661 at this time is almost zero , but each trading as thinks fit .
sorry to interrupt, glenn neely and robert balan said what sih?
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,354
  • Dec 5, 2013 6:43am Dec 5, 2013 6:43am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} sorry to interrupt, glenn neely and robert balan said what sih?
SIH is?
  • #6,355
  • Dec 5, 2013 6:47am Dec 5, 2013 6:47am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} SIH is?
sih is additional word in indonesia without meaning
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,356
  • Dec 5, 2013 6:58am Dec 5, 2013 6:58am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} sih is additional word in indonesia without meaning
In my opinion, Robert Balan beginning and Glen Neely has written a book that covers most of the problems in EW .
  • #6,357
  • Dec 5, 2013 8:03am Dec 5, 2013 8:03am
I've always made it a case to read every book on wave principles and look over the difference. I've even purchased super timing for 80 bucks. HEW is no different. It's worth a read to further educate yourself in trading principles. I've been trading for almost a decade and I still read and re-read books.
  • #6,358
  • Dec 5, 2013 8:51am Dec 5, 2013 8:51am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} Sorry , but Glenn Neely says something and in my opinion he's right . And Robert Balan , says that . Strictly speaking, none of the theories is not perfect . However probability of reaching 1.3661 at this time is almost zero , but each trading as thinks fit .
The movement is strange , leads me to terminal impulse ( triangle ) . And now 1,3661 is possible .
  • #6,359
  • Dec 5, 2013 9:22am Dec 5, 2013 9:22am
Quoting ovidiu_gnt
{quote} The movement is strange , leads me to terminal impulse ( triangle ) . And now 1,3661 is possible .
its not it seems
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #6,360
  • Dec 5, 2013 10:38am Dec 5, 2013 10:38am
Ian, you've got to be very wealthy...
17 traders viewing now