Rich
I've been following this thread with interest. While I agree that using a Triangular MA (TMA) helps solve the chop problem - but it introduces too much of a DELAY for my liking.
I prefer the EMA (either 34/33 or 55/56) ... which cross faster. I avoid the chop problem by using a 150EMA to indicate the TREND either UP or DOWN and don't trade against it. This helps get rid of the chop problem and still retains the speed of entry of the EMA's.
Comments?
BAKROB
I've been following this thread with interest. While I agree that using a Triangular MA (TMA) helps solve the chop problem - but it introduces too much of a DELAY for my liking.
I prefer the EMA (either 34/33 or 55/56) ... which cross faster. I avoid the chop problem by using a 150EMA to indicate the TREND either UP or DOWN and don't trade against it. This helps get rid of the chop problem and still retains the speed of entry of the EMA's.
Comments?
BAKROB