why EURUSD defending to Down Move
Dislikedok
here why it is defending the down move
it is testing each level of old weekly HighIgnored
VSA-divergence trading 187 replies
How to Blow $200 account using VSA--- 594 replies
VSA Journal 57 replies
VSA broker history change datas 11 replies
Dislikedok
here why it is defending the down move
it is testing each level of old weekly HighIgnored
DislikedYea didn't think about that. I just saw it as accumulation because it started ranging after a long down move. An accumulation has to be supported by high volume around support with RUT SO and Test. Am I right to say that?
I'll post updates on this counter so it can be a good learning tool for everyone.Ignored
DislikedYes, if you only traded these two setups you would do well.
Buying Climax, up thrust and no demand at resistance.
Selling Climax, reverse up thrust and no supply at support.Ignored
DislikedHey all,
I took this trade today. Longed EU at 2710 and closed at 2730.
There was a down move at bar 1. This was after EU made a higher high. It was a wide spread bar but on failrly low volume compared to other wide spread bars. I expected volume to be more if it were to try and break 2711 which was the start of the previous wide bar.
Price did break 2711 on high volume at bar 2. It was the 2nd highest volume bar of the day thus far, but the spread of the bar was smaller than 1. It also did not close at the low. I...Ignored
DislikedI agree, VSAers tend to over complicate things in an effort to become more profitable. It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that every tick is a result of the Men in Black (SM) manipulating price to trick retail traders. When you're thinking like this you will look at each bar and try to figure out their mysterious trickery.
Of course there are shenanigans involved but it's nothing more than two groups of people (attackers/defenders) of levels that are usually options barriers. The stops of the defenders and of other traders (primarily...Ignored
DislikedHey buddy,
Here's a more simplified version (remember simple logic is behind the price movements)
Enter at 6 exit at 7 while the bar is forming; you don't know if it's buying or selling while it's forming but who cares that's great RIgnored
DislikedI can understand the temptation but, there is just not enough of these that work out to justify the entry.
You can greatly increase your win rate by entering on the break of the high of the ND without affecting your profit too much. You can further improve your win rate by only entering on the break of the high of the ND if and ONLY IF, the SO is confirmed with an up bar BEFORE entry.Ignored
DislikedHi guys,
It's great to see some new posters in the thread. Just wanted to mention something about entering long after bar 6.
This thread is littered with charts showing this type of setup and experience has shown us that entering on the ND close is a losing trade in the long term. I can understand the temptation but, there is just not enough of these that work out to justify the entry.
You can greatly increase your win rate by entering on the break of the high of the ND without affecting your profit too much. You can further improve your...Ignored
DislikedFor those familiar with Todd Krueger's lessons, this one is pretty good in explaining what really moves the price, who's in control and how you can potentially take advantage of it.Ignored
DislikedI agree, VSAers tend to over complicate things in an effort to become more profitable. It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that every tick is a result of the Men in Black (SM) manipulating price to trick retail traders. When you're thinking like this you will look at each bar and try to figure out their mysterious trickery.Ignored
DislikedThis is going to be a weird question... Is there anyone here who is an expert on VSA and speaks Russian? If so, I have some resources in that language that contradict important parts of the book so many VSA traders find very valuable: "Mastering the Markets by Tom Williams".
(P.S. I speak Russian well, but am not well versed in the topic of VSA).
Now, I am not saying that the whole VSA method is invalid, in fact it seems the best thing to reading into the what SM is doing. What I am saying though is that certain aspects of the text regarding...Ignored
DislikedHi guys,
It's great to see some new posters in the thread. Just wanted to mention something about entering long after bar 6.
This thread is littered with charts showing this type of setup and experience has shown us that entering on the ND close is a losing trade in the long term. I can understand the temptation but, there is just not enough of these that work out to justify the entry.
You can greatly increase your win rate by entering on the break of the high of the ND without affecting your profit too much. You can further improve...Ignored
DislikedThis is going to be a weird question... Is there anyone here who is an expert on VSA and speaks Russian? If so, I have some resources in that language that contradict important parts of the book so many VSA traders find very valuable: "Mastering the Markets by Tom Williams".
(P.S. I speak Russian well, but am not well versed in the topic of VSA).
Now, I am not saying that the whole VSA method is invalid, in fact it seems the best thing to reading into the what SM is doing. What I am saying though is that certain aspects of the text regarding...Ignored
DislikedThanks for the tip Intel. Based on what you said the entry should have been at the bar AFTER 6 since it broke the high of it? Or do you mean it has to close above bar 6 (3 bars later) for a trade to happen?
Going back to the chart, would you have taken the trade? There was a shake out at bar 5. No Supply came after it. Do you need an up bar BEFORE a No Supply to confirm the shake out? or can the up bar 3 bars after 6 be the confirmation? Which will lead to the same outcome as the above?Ignored