What do you think guys, possible start to week?
- #8,084
- Edited 3:57pm Nov 4, 2012 12:08pm | Edited 3:57pm
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Sep 2010 | 4,200 Posts
Eurusd-5m Trading Only 110 replies
LIVE Trades Only : EURUSD & GBPUSD 123 replies
Strategy behind 1 EA (buy only) and 1 EA (sell only) 2 replies
Script to change EA to long only/ short only at a price level? 1 reply
Trading EURUSD Only EA - Back Test & Improvements 30 replies
Disliked& if you are wrong you double the loss.
buy eurusd
buy euro
sell usd
buy usdjpy
buy usd
sell jpy
buy euro x 1
buy/sell usd neutral
sell jpy x 1
when you use same lt size in reality your action is
buy eurjpy with paying double cost
not logicIgnored
Dislikedexactly if im wrong... but If you Know JPY is the weak currencie in that day you are protected. Sometimes you know sometimes you think you know and sometimes you think you know and you loose....Ignored
PS: It is very important to note that what we are saying here is that the unit has not reached any unitary resistance at this time (trend is not stalled) – rather the lower scales or dimensions of the pair have exceeded upper limits within the associated reversion limits in the different fractal frames and need to correct to levels that will allow further buying to drive the unit up (this occurs sequentially on a LIFO (or FILO) basis). In other words, no point speculating about so-called “fundamentals” in making basic trade decisions (which frankly speaking is akin to reading the entrails of dead animals given the complex of intentions motivating buyers and sellers at any one time). Price moves in phases up and down whether going up or going down. But when the unit (as a whole i.e. MN) is moving up (or down) that is the trend until and unless it comes to some unitary resistance (support) and is reversed which in this case is still way up – all other time frames or fractions will obey its primary dictates or dynamic subject to reversion plays defined for their specific fractal dimensions which is non-integral on any scale. However, it is clear that were unitary trend to fail at this point - there would be sufficient indications from H4 patterns to signal such failure and hence the 1/20 chance of error in this assessment.
DislikedI do not believe in filters. Come, having said someone has a filter means someone knows what a market will do when in truth no one knows what market will do. Someone can filter out trade that will be great but due to filter doe snot look like a good one and can miss great opportunity. signals should be simple.Ignored
DislikedI was about to ask the same Q.
did not set them up yet.
what you guys think?
do they try to revese it from here or our "jurney to center of the earth" already started?Ignored
DislikedHello Steve! good day. this is what I expect, but of course it all depends on the price action and the sage time. what do you guys think?Ignored
DislikedMy friend,
I am resting, doing some back testing, Can't wait to see what the week holds for us......
What do you think......?Ignored
DislikedI do not know what "you" mean by filters but a filter could be......trading above or below the 200ma.......going with the trend.....double checking with the S&P and so on(non of these are mine,I am just using them as an example).
But all systems have filters in a certain way.....
I am sorry I will totally no agree with this......you can also get killed non stop when you take trades with no filter because you want to catch that odd trade....that is gambling.....
Filters is putting the odds in your favor......
I have not seen 1 profitable trader...Ignored
Dislikedwill learn by asking. he he
Hi Infinitus
why not those points named as #3 & #4 ??Ignored
DislikedYeah, I'm anxious, I think that with the London market price reaches 1.2896 maybe, here we will fight to the price and then the New York market will go down., but I will be careful if you pass something else entirely.Ignored
DislikedHello Steve! good day. this is what I expect, but of course it all depends on the price action and the sage time. what do you guys think?Ignored
DislikedYes, good question
Your proposed 3 would have, at least, the most momentum. That would fit :-)
But then again you would have a wave 1 wave 4 overlap by around 285 pips.
OK, that could be a leading diagonal down. In a leading diagonal we have impulsive moves with an wave 1 wave 4 overlap.
But then the following wave 2 up would only have retraced 38.2%. But as a rule of thumb: after a leading diagonal we like to see retracements to at least 62.8, much better 74.6-82.3%
So to simply go with probabilities the counts...Ignored
DislikedYes, good question
Your proposed 3 would have, at least, the most momentum. That would fit :-)
But then again you would have a wave 1 wave 4 overlap by around 285 pips.
OK, that could be a leading diagonal down. In a leading diagonal we have impulsive moves with an wave 1 wave 4 overlap.
But then the following wave 2 up would only have retraced 38.2%. But as a rule of thumb: after a leading diagonal we like to see retracements to at least 62.8, much better 74.6-82.3%
So to simply go with probabilities the counts...Ignored
Disliked"Normally" It should re trace to the 2882 area.....but that does not mean that it will......so we trade what it will give us....we have to wait and see....
I would love to see it @2896.....Ignored