I am thinking to make an optimisation for my trade sizes, leverage optimisation.
There are the Trade Explorers and lets select a period of time. Hopefully it will be losing trades to not only winning, because there are all wining trades, than the max allowed leverage by broker is the optimum and is done.
Let be a winning ration of 70% and lets select a period, where are 7 consecutive wins and 3 consecutive lose trades and R:R ratio 1:1.
If we take the same return from the trade of the 1% than around 7-3 = 4% will be, not exactly, but around that: +4.025863%
If we take 10 % return ( loss ) than the winning will generate 194.78% and a drawdown to 72,9% => +41.99% and there is an answer for When to broke the 2% rule.
If 20%, than+83.45%
if 40% , than +129.85%
if 80%, than -51.022%! Negative return ( drawdown)!
If we take a 100% return ( loss ) than no matter how much we made with 7 consecutive win, because we are losing all in the first loser trade.
So the optimum is less than 100% and it seems it is bigger than 1%, but how much is it? How is the formula containing the consecutive lose trade numbers?!
I believe it is a math for school, and I forgot the optimum search for a "geometrical progression"? Anybody can help?
There are the Trade Explorers and lets select a period of time. Hopefully it will be losing trades to not only winning, because there are all wining trades, than the max allowed leverage by broker is the optimum and is done.
Let be a winning ration of 70% and lets select a period, where are 7 consecutive wins and 3 consecutive lose trades and R:R ratio 1:1.
If we take the same return from the trade of the 1% than around 7-3 = 4% will be, not exactly, but around that: +4.025863%
If we take 10 % return ( loss ) than the winning will generate 194.78% and a drawdown to 72,9% => +41.99% and there is an answer for When to broke the 2% rule.
If 20%, than+83.45%
if 40% , than +129.85%
if 80%, than -51.022%! Negative return ( drawdown)!
If we take a 100% return ( loss ) than no matter how much we made with 7 consecutive win, because we are losing all in the first loser trade.
So the optimum is less than 100% and it seems it is bigger than 1%, but how much is it? How is the formula containing the consecutive lose trade numbers?!
I believe it is a math for school, and I forgot the optimum search for a "geometrical progression"? Anybody can help?
I want to buy PATIENCE