Extracted Posts | Page 3 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Extracted Posts 9 replies

Extracted Post (per poster's request) 0 replies

Attachments: Extracted Posts
Exit Attachments

Extracted Posts

  • #41
  • Oct 11, 2012 3:20pm Oct 11, 2012 3:20pm
If you have read all the posts that he wrote,then just using simple logic you will understand that he is right.
  • #42
  • Oct 11, 2012 3:51pm Oct 11, 2012 3:51pm
Quoting timos
If you have read all the posts that he wrote,then just using simple logic you will understand that he is right.
I do not give a damn about his logic. I follow same logic as him by letting trades run as long as they make money.
What i say is that he has not shown his trades but only was talking and everybody was listening.
  • #43
  • Oct 11, 2012 4:47pm Oct 11, 2012 4:47pm
this is a time that I read this question and advice discution I learned beaoup thank you all.
{Promotion Removed}
  • #44
  • Oct 11, 2012 5:33pm Oct 11, 2012 5:33pm
Quoting fxterrapin
Gettin' that wako-jacko house-of-pain-and-gain-bullshit-vibe again...
Except jacko scammed people into investing. All Sun Woo did was share his trading methods.

Yon
  • #45
  • Oct 11, 2012 5:39pm Oct 11, 2012 5:39pm
Quoting VEEFX
Let's us all stop the banter and prioritize our focus back to trading and learning/improving our skills from each other.

In my opinion, it is too early to form a strong bias or be judgmental one way or the other towards Graeme and his intensions.

Exactly Vee. No one can assume another persons motives and expect to be right 100% of the time. The replies coming from this thread truely reflects who really cares about their own trading and who doesn't.

I am only sharing what I learned and what I was told. It could be possible that some of the stuff Sun Woo had told me may not of been 100% true either. Hence going back to the math problem illustration. If you hear two different stories then at least one is BS or both are BS. People are free to think what they want and if people think I am BS then the burden of proof is really on them.

Yon
  • #46
  • Oct 13, 2012 3:17am Oct 13, 2012 3:17am
Quoting Mjolnir17
What I dont understand is how can he have so many legs on all pairs, when the market is moving, lot of pairs have strong moves at the same time. So he just manages it well stacking in e.g. 3 pairs at the same time?
If you are good at starcraft where managing many units at a time is involved, then stacking many pairs simultaneously is not too difficult especially when you have enough experience to place trades almost effortlessly.

According to Sun Woo, you have to be BOLD and SWIFT. This can be developed from around 10000 hours of screen time for most people.

Yon
  • #47
  • Oct 13, 2012 3:45am Oct 13, 2012 3:45am
Quoting yonseo
If you are good at starcraft where managing many units at a time is involved, then stacking many pairs simultaneously is not too difficult especially when you have enough experience to place trades almost effortlessly.

According to Sun Woo, you have to be BOLD and SWIFT. This can be developed from around 10000 hours of screen time for most people.

Yon
It is quite possible for us average folks also if stacking is based on H1/H4 TF. Most important thing in stacking for me is to not take another position until the last position is moved to BE for that pair. I am VERY guilty of this and have landed in trouble few times (Greed!).

I don't think Graeme stacks in multiple pairs at the same time. That would be over exposure due to correlation. Spaced out entries is another excellent way to lower your risk exposure that he has mentioned.
Staying in my lane...
  • #48
  • Oct 13, 2012 6:34am Oct 13, 2012 6:34am
Quoting VEEFX
It is quite possible for us average folks also if stacking is based on H1/H4 TF. Most important thing in stacking for me is to not take another position until the last position is moved to BE for that pair. I am VERY guilty of this and have landed in trouble few times (Greed!).

I don't think Graeme stacks in multiple pairs at the same time. That would be over exposure due to correlation. Spaced out entries is another excellent way to lower your risk exposure that he has mentioned.
Well stacking when your previous position is at a loss is a form of averaging down. I'm sure everyone has done it at least once in their trading career to get out at breakeven or small profit.

As for overexposure, I think the concept is subjective by nature. One could have stacked 50 positions to breakeven while another person enter only 1 position without a stoploss. I would say the latter is more guilty of overexposure if he/she used max available leverage and lotsize.

Yon
  • #49
  • Oct 13, 2012 10:39am Oct 13, 2012 10:39am
Yon

I like your posts, they're a welcome addition to a cold thread. An what an excellent thread it's been

But I must say for someone who admits to being so inexperienced and new to trading you're awfully knowledgeable. The advances you've made in the last few months would take an average person a few years at least.
Road To Wisdom? To err and err and err again, but less and less and less...
  • #50
  • Last Post: Nov 29, 2018 5:47am Nov 29, 2018 5:47am
Quoting yonseo
>>>
so sad that you deleted this post. :/
0 traders viewing now