Pattern's Chemo-Electric Trading Journal

p1 new:






environs organs/viscera upper((brain/)thalamus theorize/order/follow) lower(heart need/let-go,immune protect/v./(s__)mrg/prct,gut eat/simple(pancreas)) ;action muscles/extremities u(neck/mouth/ear/face/scalp) l(abd'l.plate/ribs/hand/foot/knees);leverage logic/opp-/viral;L:M rule-count;action(rpt,strcth,volat) of environs->turn of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) as lvg;ls2/(bow-atm)/bracket; perfect/polygons






----

ex. new approach:
symtri with a twist(~turn,rpt+strtch+volat,lvg) --






l.p.5;traded to the return to the split --






-- The second set of charts overlap the first set; maybe a logic (dot,seg't,or new one) or rule-count on the M side is in there...

Yes, found a rule-count.
L-M stack: the twisted symtri had a hz line segment at its base and middle, and not at its top -- Yet. So I trade for price going to its top. This is very much against the l.p.5 completing a lower cycle, so I must watch price to touch or break its middle line to exit the trade.

.





-- Okay, now my method works, at least on one trade: Some kind of rational SL, 100-pip profit and all of the overlapping (again) area explained on that last trade.
With the three trades, I was able to be flexible enough to reinterpret the same area, include how the last trade went, and get the number of pips each trade that the chart and not my wants reflect.










--




http://www.fxintel.com/ -- compares broke r spreads (alongside ff, of course); source





------



ellipse interesting how an ellipse forms:



-------

Think at the competency stated in post#1, or you lose. TL's, simple triangles w/o the rest, etc., are bound to lose over at least several trades, due to their inadequacy to explain the entire chart and its shifting paradigms each new chart section.

p1 adj:

environs/continuity organs/viscera upper((brain/)thalamus theorize/order/follow) lower(heart need/let-go,immune protect/v./(s__)mrg/prct,gut eat/simple(pancreas)) ;action/leverage muscles/extremities u(neck/mouth/ear/face/scalp) l(abd'l.plate/ribs/hand/foot/knees);exchange logic/opp-/viral;L:M rule-count;action(rpt,strcth,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchanging;ls2/(bow-atm)/bracket; perfect/polygons
-- Perform at the TA level specified; else, you lose.

p1 old:

environs organs/viscera upper((brain/)thalamus theorize/order/follow) lower(heart need/let-go,immune protect/v./(s__)mrg/prct,gut eat/simple(pancreas)) ;leverage muscles/extremities u(neck/mouth/ear/face/scalp) l(abd'l.plate/ribs/hand/foot/knees).environs logic/opp-/viral;L:M rule-count;action(rpt,strcth,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchanging;ls2/(bow-atm)/bracket; perfect/polygons leverage
-- Perform at the TA level specified; else, you lose.


p1 dump:
(AT)joints;cranial,neck,spine;scalp,ear,abd.wall;gums,finger/toenails
vertical lines(of muscles/cartilage/joints;





p1 new:



line(Anatomy Trains),torsion(Egoscue),use(Ecstatic Postures):ear/nail/vertebra/tooth/suture mov'ts/points
theorize/digest;L:M rule-count
order/follow;logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go;action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchanging
mrg/prct,v./protect;ls2(bow-atm)/bracket,L:M perfect/polygons



line(Anatomy Trains),torsion(Egoscue),use(Ecstatic Postures):ear/nail/vertebra/tooth/suture mov'ts/points
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons

--------



warmup Sketch body motion with qualitative of pattern types, in landscape photos.
body motion: line(Anatomy Trains),torsion(Egoscue),use(Ecstatic Postures):ear/nail/vertebra/tooth/suture mov'ts/points . pattern types:
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons




warmup Sketch body motion with qualitative of pattern types, in landscape photos.
body motion: line(Anatomy Trains),torsion(Egoscue),use(Ecstatic Postures):ear/nail/vertebra/tooth/suture mov'ts/points . pattern types:
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons



warmup Sketch body motion with qualitative of pattern types, in landscape photos.
body motion: line(Anatomy Trains),torsion(Egoscue),use(Ecstatic Postures):ear/nail/vertebra/tooth/suture mov'ts/points . pattern types:
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons




p1 completed:




warmup Sketch qualitative of pattern types, in landscape photos.
Add to sketch, color, after run body motion through sketched landscape with imagery from stretches, for where to emphasize: line(Anatomy Trains),torsion(Egoscue),use(Ecstat ic Postures):ear/nail/vertebra/tooth/suture mov'ts/points . pattern types:
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons
-- You have got to have this snapshot, to know who you are at this moment,
or you are causing yourself harm going forward with trades. React to who you are, rather than to the trades you can now contain, to make money.

Ran into a problem.

I've got, in my own ptm, what I call the necessary cycle. Now, with this new post #1 --


warmup Sketch qualitative of pattern types, in landscape photos.
Add to sketch, color, after run body motion through sketched landscape with imagery from stretches, for where to emphasize: line(Anatomy Trains),torsion(Egoscue),use(Ecstat ic Postures):ear/nail/vertebra/tooth/suture mov'ts/points . pattern types:
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons
-- You have got to have this snapshot, to know who you are at this moment,
or you are causing yourself harm going forward with trades. React to who you are, rather than to the trades you can now contain, to make money.

-- I've got need, with a functional thinking model to go with it (as do I with each station in the necessary cycle). There's an alternate both to necessity and need. Plus, a continuation for d would be e, into outer shell at e/e and pr shapes; a continuation for c (this being a linguistically balanced ptm) is b, or the area just above impression (see this journal's model of necessity cycle), connecting with a layer of flow.
Thus, a has no immediate connector, unless b does; in the culture of VSD, this is easy enough, for you take action on response. This could be on need as a balanced parallel, only often this is ignored for a monetary (read: balance plus cg-line breakdown positioning plus overall-hz-level value, with risk creating opportunity if separate from this non-bd paradigm) gain. Doing c in this primary selection of necessary cycle, vs. the need selection, culture b, and e -- balance of behavior (pr-shape e/e adj w/os(outer shell)) -- opposite a(ction).
Okay, that makes sense, to me, at least; in short, I run the proper thinking models according to what factors are affecting my actions -- strings, I guess, and so more os-station adj during exit toward outside of os and inside general environs -- and behavior(al development) (e/e of pr shapes w/os adj).
So a and e tie together. c and d tie together, and b and c tie together. I think I said b and d do, too -- it's easier to say that c is atop and/or an echo of d, and b is the inner core of d where c is, so that the top of n/d is subsumed with a natural division between b and c. This suggests a can only happen if the brain is subsumed with this natural division, while behavior is adjusted much more easily, that is, through e from d (the current post #1). This is both natural, behavior being a subset of action, and scary, behavior as the leverage turning point for b (culture).
Perhaps it is this paradox of behavior that I should concentrate on, as it relates to gut thinking and thus most trading, at e. Or, this is too easy to say, as the more difficult is to focus on the b and c before action. "Necessary (action) to get", perhaps, would be a functional phrase to follow for the lattter choice in choosing one's purpose for running a necessary cycle. b spikes are most dangerous, especially from sp to b, and so any b -- or, more functionally, bc -- topic would have to flow through naturally enough to avoid whole-body spikes from e / pr shapes to correct positioning within any necessary cycle involving the bc layer at flow. Temporary e/e holds upon a pr shape, whether positioning a bc topic flipped into the pr shapes position for inter - ma-# actions phreaticizing one's behavior for the individual's bc configuration, or using such an e/e to smoothen control of the necessary cycle from a higher control of the necessary cycle with os and thus the body, can change the course of one's trade with gut-trace ease.

--
http://www.commonlanguagepsychothera...ndex.php?id=76 -- yeah, none of this matches. It's a psychometric model of mine I'm following, not common practice. So...

Alright, trying to move this mostly nontrading stuff to a safer place,
or at least round it up so it's trading-relevant, understandable and repeatable.



Why the body can change the course of one trade,
I always thought was a personal space (which is a common-language term in psych'y) issue, how one's body twists or turns to avoid or go with a trading decision.
Personal space, in my own ptm, is os. So behavior adjusting on a pr shape, which I can interpret here as a gc-line position (yes, slipping into my own ptm's terms a bit much) -- that is, the qualitatives alongside each pattern type in post #1 (okay, a connection there, at least) -- creates a body move in personal space corresponding to what is breaking that personal space, whatever it is. Let's say, there is a polarization between that whatever-it-is and the body concerned. So, any personal space change, say, from , within p1's
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons
, a 'follow' the whatever-it-is instead of own good advice, or follow nothing instead of own bad advice, or lead with own bad advice, or lead with own good advice, or hide good or bad advice so that do -- lead or follow, irrespective and simply a jump to do -- the trade,
are the choices when have - order/follow centralizing the grouping side -- 1,2,part of 3 -- infect the specifics side -- part of 3, and then 4,5 -- as reinforcers to do the - grouping side. A bad advice from the body may take a stable shape and project from it without due consideration, and so throw off the entire grouping side, so that a train of logic might break the trade deal, or severe and obvious continuation of such an idea would lead to another path -- acceptable if it's something like a large in-trade drawdown that later profits significantly, and unacceptable if that in-trade drawdown messes up the trade.
Okay, so simple polarity centralized on one side and affecting the other side wholly and in a lesser affect way, is an approach to achieving personal space representation. This would avoid all that drawing/exercise stuff, which helps but is less direct, responsive and in-trade adjustable.
I ran everything through my own ptm to see where it'd go, first identifying the pattern+qualifier list as the gc line when used with n/d. This checking through my ptm, is how I often use my own ptm, so that I can create a simpler and/or more effective solution than the one before using my own ptm.
To review:
p1 self is cumbersome
it resembles n/d, in my own ptm
n/d says it must fit within the a-e echoes paradigm, to be complete
I found that a simple polarity and side-centrality use of the qualifer+pattern list now in p1, would suffice
testing shows this idea works, and I replace the current p1:self with this one (presumed step)



p1 new:



personal-space approach -- Centralize one side with a polarity, and then process with the other, now thrown-off, side:
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons

An infinite number of examples besides this use of polarity would exist, so the one given is a starter and one may imagine one's life situations to practice the idea and thus the method, before using it in the current trade.
------------

p1 new:



personal space Trade chart from own env't of diff't obj't/entity personal spaces and their influences (ex.) -- Center one,process other,side w/a polarity,sep. from chart's actions within its own personal space:
theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons


An infinite number of examples besides this use of polarity would exist, so the one given is a starter and one may imagine one's life situations to practice the idea and thus the method, before using it in the current trade.







This new approach allows deeper chart theory:

I was able to sustain a 90-pip in-trade drawdown from the logic of these few candles and a backward check of the backwards Gann fan's lines for their validity,
later justifying with additional charts AND using an off-pa point AND justifying a backwards Gann fan's beginning exactly. That's a lot of spatial logic, there, quantifying charts to a much greater degree than I ever have.




p1 dump:


personal space Trade chart from own env't of diff't obj't/entity personal spaces and their influences (ex.) -- Center one,process other,side w/a polarity,sep. from chart's actions within its own personal space:
group order -- theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
sequential order -- order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
measure, order -- need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
sequential measure -- mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
group measure -- v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons


An infinite number of examples besides this use of polarity would exist, so the one given is a starter and one may imagine one's life situations to practice the idea and thus the method, before using it in the current trade.





p1 adj:

Personal spaces, incl.chart's, each polarizing one side's center then processing the other, or another approach:
group order -- theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
sequential order -- order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
measure, order -- need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
sequential measure -- mrg/prct: ls2(bow-atm)/bracket
group measure -- v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons



p1 adj:



Personal spaces, incl.chart's, each polarizing (ex.) one side's center,processing the other:
group order -- theorize/digest: L:M rule-count
sequential order -- order/follow: logic/opp-/viral
measure, order -- need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
sequential measure -- mrg/prct: ls2(bow)/(bracket-atm)
group measure -- v./protect: L:M perfect/polygons



--------



p1 adj:




Personal spaces, incl.chart's, each polarizing (ex.) one side's center,processing the other:
group order -- theorize/digest: L:M rule(>parallel)-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count(>serial)
sequential order -- order/follow: logic(>parallel)/opp-/viral(>serial)
measure, order -- need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
sequential measure -- mrg/prct: ls2(delegate)(bow)/(bracket-atm(overwhelm)) -
group measure -- v./protect: L:M polygons(delegate) - perfects - combos(line seg't - curve;parallel lines - cycle;2 diff't polygons, one 1 or 2-dim shape)(overwhelm)




shorter p1:







Personal spaces, incl.chart's, each polarizing (ex.) one side's center,processing the other:
group order -- theorize/digest: L:M rule(>parallel)-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count(>serial)
sequential order -- order/follow: logic(>parallel)/opp-/viral(>serial)
measure, order -- need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
sequential measure -- mrg/prct: ls2(delegate)(bow)/(bracket-atm(overwhelm)) -
" -- v./prtct: L:M polygons(delegate)-perfects-combos(line seg't -curve;repeat each;2 diff't polygons, one 1,2-dim shape)






Personal spaces, incl.chart's, polarizing (ex.) one affects rest to process differently:
group order -- theorize/digest: L:M rule(>parallel)-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count(>serial)
sequential order -- order/follow: logic(>parallel)/opp-/viral(>serial)
measure, order -- need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles(pattern-grouped) exchange
sequential measure -- mrg/prct: ls2(delegate)(bow)/(bracket-atm(overwhelm)) -
" -- v./prtct: L:M perfects-polygons-combos(line seg't -curve;repeat each;2 diff't polygons, one 1,2-dim shape)(delegate)



psych -- wait, it's all psych, now; so, the first line, devoted only to psych -- adj:





Personal spaces (chart's,) polarizing (ex.) one affects rest to process diff.: passion/u(c) vs. center/typify
group order -- theorize/digest: L:M rule(>parallel)-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count(>serial)
sequential order -- order/follow: logic(>parallel)/opp-/viral(>serial)
measure, order -- need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles choice
sequential measure -- mrg/prct: ls2(delegate)(bow)/(bracket-atm(overwhelm)) -
" -- v./prtct: L:M perfects(delegate)-polygons-combos(line seg't -curve;repeat each;2 diff't polygons, one 1,2-dim shape)


--------



l.p.5 w/adverse line:

(increased range of use for the l.p.5 pattern)







---------








p1 adj:





Personal spaces (chart's,) polarizing (ex.) one affects rest to process diff.: passion/u(c) vs. center/typify
theorize/digest: L:M rule(>parallel)-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count
order/follow: logic(>parallel)/opp-/viral(>serial)
need/let-go: action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles choice
mrg/prct: ls2(delegate)(bow)/(bracket-atm(overwhelm)) -
v./prtct: L:M perfects(delegate)-polygons-combos(line seg't -curve;repeat each;2 diff't polygons, one 1,2-dim shape)



Personal spaces (chart's,) polarizing (ex.) one affects rest to process diff.: passion/u(c) vs. center/typify.
L:M rule(>parallel)-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count(>serial)
order/follow: logic(>parallel)/opp-/viral
action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles choice
mrg/prct: atm-bracket-bow-ls2(delegate)
L:M combos(line seg't -curve;repeat each;2 diff't polygons, one 1,2-dim shape)(overwhelm)-polygons-perfects(delegate)



-------

channel that returns later --
didn't logicize parallel thought, the extreme logr's within the perfectly midline channel,
so poor centering on one side weakened my passion u(c) on the other side,
that of having a good channel that I recognized as not being a twisted channel and thus a good candidate for telling price to continue downward.

Only, it was later that this did so, and my ignoring the insides, that is, the L:M, of the channel
-- which would have required a fast turn in my train of thought,
since a twisted has a lot of possible L's to define it in a way totally different
than the logr the channel (possibly and) does have.

That I did pick up on the closeness to a twisted channel, and thus an internal balance that would (eventually) be used, is something I would not have been able to rationally explain before now.




Next trade, still failed to centralize and then develop logic, even as I began to rationalize clearly from the passion of several shapes everywhere on the pattern types list. So, avoidable drawdown:









-- Alright, I was floating about the quantitative, in the chart's space with me intersecting it, and I was still tied down about the qualitative, the more of me within the intersection of me and the chart. Gotta watch that, as well as the former in-trade drawdown. I was resisting the other side of the pattern types list, its qualitative in particular.
It was happening at the same time as the trade reason I did include, the in-trade drawdown reason was, and so I was not doing parallel processing in my brain enough; instead, I fried. Must push this to get chart theory at all enough to trade it.

googled this: "computer “think differently from the rest of us. They develop hypertext minds. They leap around. It’s as though their cognitive structures were parallel, not sequential.”" and other references in this article 1
I was jumping around, into a new order; only, I had to emotionally surround each one to cooperate with the new meaning of all, the slice of context adjusted even the very direction I should go at the moment. It's not just 'get an up AND down reason', it's get contrasting and with-level and angled-TL overtaking pattern copies and etc., so look for the, in my pattern types list, the overall centrality, the trend angles, to pick which to use as an influence, as a copy, as insignificant a reason for this current, possible trade.
Of course, there is also serial processing, and so I was ignoring the study of that one side of the pattern types list, and instead washing through with what to overwhelm me as a good reason instead of further delegating in ls2/perfect-style -- one shape, then lots of cycles thereafter, which would need processing from the other side to trade each cycle properly instead of with possibly large in-trade drawdown -- the ACTIVE study to process this possibly trade-crashing information. I.e., once you have it, you need to count -- Or you're just trading off the shape itself, which ignores volatility after paying attention to what repetition and, in the case of each of these two trades, stretch, there was. So I got the trades, barely, because I got 2/3s of each trade right. Not all of each, as was readily available with, to begin, parallel processing of the chart-action choices.
-- So, how I wrote this, the middle of the pattern-types list -- how I describe use of trend angles -- tells simply how I may be making a mistake, since looking at parallel processing as a fault is more detail and thus not readily accessible from the overall qualitative view of the pattern-types list.



so, p1 adj psych-only line:



Personal spaces (chart's,) polarizing(ex.) one affects rest's process: qual. vs. passion/u(c) vs. center/typify.
L:M rule(>parallel)-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count(>serial)
order/follow: logic(>parallel)/opp-/viral
action(rpt,strtch,volat) of micro-trend angles choice
mrg/prct: atm-bracket-bow-ls2(delegate)
L:M combos(line seg't -curve;repeat each;2 diff't polygons, one 1,2-dim shape)(overwhelm)-polygons-perfects(delegate)




-- It's the psychology of the patterns themselves, that matters.

And, post#1 is a gestalt psychology model that may be applied to why traders choose a particular trading method, etc.

-----------

simplified so can at least make my trades, in p1:




Personal spaces (chart's,) polarize(ex.)one,processes rest: qual. vs.passion/u(c) vs.center/typify patterns --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count
SEPARATE: logic/opp-/viral
micro-trend angles/length,or other regular measure (in-cycle midline-and-fan,etc.)
MERGE: atm-bracket-bow-ls2
combos(line seg't -curve;repeat each;2 diff't polygons, one 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects





personal space centers side; passion/u(c) a type polarizes/processes; patterns, layers:
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count
SEPARATE includes: logic/opp-/viral
micro-trend angles/length,or other regular measure (in-cycle midline-and-fan,etc.)
MERGE projects: atm-bracket-bow-ls2
combos(line seg't -curve;repeat each;2 diff't polygons, one 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects




---------

note to self:
rewriting the 1.-10. cycle to blend the current post#1 into it.











-----
highest carb:fiber ratio -- berries(any), cruciferous (broc.,caul.),some beans (small: lentils),some oil-based(vegetable:avacado;grain:flax),extract(polysac. of seaweed(agar,),plant gums(xanthum,guar,)


HSP,INTP -- rare.

1.-10. cycle is example of AVABA-RPRPR; must use actual w/own ptm for further utility.


p1 r/w:




personal space -- center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects

------

moving schema -- object/time-,ego-
mixed,ambiguous,false
schema construct: prime to target.
possible constructs, ito mixed -- space to time, space to space,time to space,time to time

"The
widgets were designed to be frontless, vertically symmetrical, and mobilelooking"
"If the
participants imagined the widgets as moving out of the page (the object-moving
perspective), then the bottom or closest widget should be `ahead'. On the other hand,
if the participants imagined themselves moving into the page toward the widgets
(the ego-moving perspective), then the widget furthest along in the direction of
motion of the observer (the top or farthest widget) should be `ahead'."
false,except 1/3 of time, according to study -- "thinking about
time requires accessing not only the temporal components of a scenario, but also the
spatial schemas necessary to organize these temporal components."

FRAME OF REFERENCE,MOTION(thus,3Dspace/2Dtime),PRIME(source moved): ego- or object-,mixed;ambiguous cause,false;3D



"It appears that spatial schemas were not necessarily
accessed in solving the temporal prime questions, and that people did not use the primed temporal schemas to think about space.
These findings support the weak Metaphoric Structuring prediction that people can use spatial schemas to think about time, but not the strong prediction that spatial
schemas are necessary to think about time."
--
"people were influenced by spatial primes when thinking about time, but were not influenced by temporal
primes when thinking about space." (two objects,prime and target, with the order of prime moves to target); alternately said, "Apparently, space and time can share structured relational information
on-line, but this sharing is asymmetric; spatial schemas can be used to think
about time, but temporal schemas cannot be used to think about space."
manual entry and exit of trading position -- This is a good place to enter, because of prior-set spatial conditions; and, this is a good place to exit time-wise, because of prior-set conditions that post-entry spatial developments have confirmed the existence of.
SL,TP preset without watching position -- Because, within a probability of doubt, prior-set conditions will be confirmed, a time both to enter and to exit was set, with an exit, given non-confirmation of preferred spatial developments, also set.
With description of time with space and not of space with time,
one may say "the time of 8 to 9 am varies motion in the shape of a peak, for which one may consider as a triangle in partial form"
and not "there is a time from 8 to 9 am; thus, the shape of a peak appears",
because the former has two points, 8 and 9 am, to build upon a third or more spatial consideration, motion (the combination of space and time) adding that third consideration, and thus, in this instance a peak and thus a triangle is noticed.

hypothesis:
Four points,
say from one space and one time to another space and another time
of the same object or from one object in the former to another object in the latter -- either object considered as one, in a super-class representation of possible multiple objects (as in a time-measured group of ticks, or bar, on a trading chart),
is a straight line on a space-time chart where space, axis y, is relative to time as the adjunctive state;
thus, space-time is rectangular, since any one point on a chart has a specific time and modifying space, and any other point on a chart has same,
-- The thing is,
1) what if the two objects are considered different;
2) what if, according to the study, time is a subset of space, and not, as on a trading chart, space -- that is, price -- a modifier of time?
Spatial considerations divide times, in pattern trading.
Space changes often when it is on the y axis.
Time is sectioned between two points or directed between one point and an ever-changing second point. Space is between two points given a section of time, or similar. Space is relative to the section it is found between, and any change in its establishing points changes the space. Since time can be either sectioned or directed, any change in its establishing points changes only the spatial view of that time and not its time considerations.
Thus, if space is between directed time, then only the space changes, not the time -- More time is added to existing time, and space changes because of its referent time changing.
This is, of course, a relative condition set only when time is on the x axis and the chart moves along the x axis, with space on the y axis and moving relative to the x axis.
If the opposite were true, that space is static and more space is added to existing space,
then directed time could not exist, so that time changes because of its referring to the same, static space.

Only in practice, I found that direction does indeed refer to the same space, so that time is directed statically within a certain area of price (that is, space's added variable to make more relative one time to another). When price does move from one area to another, time becomes sectioned within the former area and begins again to be directed in the forming/new area.
Because it is directed, space/price changes its reference and thus its existence each tick time is directed, and only in proportion to how much time is directed vs. sectioned (into an area).
There are sub-sets of this, where price locks into a pattern as an initial shape or its copy or opposite or some such relation -- in this case, time is hyper-sectioned and more directionless -- and super-sets of this, where price has several different shapes happen in coordination with each other within a specific space and initial time -- in this case, time is hyper-directioned and more space-sectioned.
So, copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
several different shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless

Okay, so I reached a conclusion to my meandering, sometimes almost illogical thoughts, one that appears useful at the moment. The inspiration was this thread and the quotes, some paraphrases, and additional inspiration was this link.
Ego- vs. object-orientation was ignored in this free-associative study.

Upon moving results to the first post of this journal,
I figured another finding --
A chart space may also be called, 'reactive space', where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned.
This would quantify stimulus-response in terms of, say, a conceptualization defining, space-wise, time redirection's impact upon the moving target or prime.





A summary of conclusions, process and definition of this overall approach to stimulus-response, which is the basis of all chart action, is in the initial (not below main body of text, that is), main body of text of this new post#1:










personal space -- center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types);
chart space -- may also be called, 'reactive space', where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned; thus, this would quantify stimulus-response in terms of selection vs. proportion of what is being responded to, and thus intent of response. The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to, is dependent upon, and also versus identification of that time redirection's impact upon, the moving,changing-point-in-range-of-conceptualization target or prime or, conversely, time sectioning's pattern and its projection into space. Priming is defined as a prime carrying the conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, within the range of conceptualization that includes both targets.*
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
patterns, or sections (thus, spatial(price) modif'ns of s'ed time, variant to change from directed time) --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects



* Another, more detailed way to consider it is that a prime is an automatic stimulus-response based upon a spatial reaction to another space across the time from one space to another -- thus, time directionless except in reference to space's copy, or modification of the original concept of what is to be primed as a continuum (range example three, below). Thus, one is primed to have an automatic s-r when, first, space is ignored in favor of time and thus, hyper-directed, so that a balance must take place from the range ex. three, to reestablish, with the development of the conceptualization first established in the priming of it, balance so that several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other along the lines of the hyper-sectioned time and thus an instance of priming balance evokes a mere leverage and positioning of an instance in a range of the conceptualization in one party, and a break in the balanced section and direction for the party presented opportunity for off-setting the initial priming. It redefines, for the balance-broken party, a point in the conceptualization's range that identifies the rebalancing individual; for the individual, though, it is a mere counter-balance point that exists not for the individual, but only in relation to the initial priming's set of points established from the conceptualization's range, and moreover, may be built upon by space to create an average theoretical condition within which such a conceptualization may be used as a counter-balancing of its points at a later time -- Offering increased immunity against such an occurence both for the individual and for anyone the theory is shared with. -- Theory may be a type of pattern for a certain set of bars and their shape and juxtaposition, or a particular grouping and order of pieces within an established ptm, or other.











-----------




p1 adj:










personal space -- center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types);
reactive space, where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned; thus, this would quantify stimulus-response in terms of selection vs. proportion of what is being responded to, and thus intent of response. The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to, is dependent upon, and also versus identification of that time redirection's impact upon, the moving,changing-point-in-range-of-conceptualization target or prime or, conversely, time sectioning's pattern and its projection into space. Priming is defined as a prime carrying the conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, within the range of conceptualization that includes both targets.*
Chart space, as a subset of reactive space's significance for any one area and its main prime-motion-target, in order to reuse an area or rebalance upon a new area for consideration of included-variables conceptualization of intent (to move), is defined within the range of
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
patterns, or sections (thus, spatial(price) modif'ns of s'ed time, variant to change from directed time) --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects



* Another, more detailed way to consider it is that a prime is an automatic stimulus-response based upon a spatial reaction to another space across the time from one space to another -- thus, time directionless except in reference to space's copy, or modification of the original concept of what is to be primed as a continuum (range example three, below). Thus, one is primed to have an automatic s-r when, first, space is ignored in favor of time and thus, hyper-directed, so that a balance must take place from the range ex. three, to reestablish, with the development of the conceptualization first established in the priming of it, balance so that several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other along the lines of the hyper-sectioned time and thus an instance of priming balance evokes a mere leverage and positioning of an instance in a range of the conceptualization in one party, and a break in the balanced section and direction for the party presented opportunity for off-setting the initial priming. It redefines, for the balance-broken party, a point in the conceptualization's range that identifies the rebalancing individual; for the individual, though, it is a mere counter-balance point that exists not for the individual, but only in relation to the initial priming's set of points established from the conceptualization's range, and moreover, may be built upon by space to create an average theoretical condition within which such a conceptualization may be used as a counter-balancing of its points at a later time -- Offering increased immunity against such an occurence both for the individual and for anyone the theory is shared with. -- Theory may be a type of pattern for a certain set of bars and their shape and juxtaposition, or a particular grouping and order of pieces within an established ptm, or other.










-----------

p1 adj:













This model of trading is a chart-based reinterpretation of the psychological field of behavioralism, as an amateur not versed in the direct practice nor applied career of it would be, instead as a parallel, intuitive view starting from a cognitive model would create the reinterpretation.
The benefit of such an approach is, with naivety from practice/application, a more tensegral approach between now-established terms from a variety of non-behavioralism psychological fields' terms, and, with widespread projection for space/price from history of such within most any trading chart, a tying together of these disparate terms into an effective, new application that behavioralism can have with this ersatz gestalt (that is, pattern-centric) form of psychology.
To me, then, chart patterns can be leveraged as a key missing ingredient to viewing different forms of psychology under one roof.


reactive space, where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned; thus, this would quantify STIMULUS-RESPONSE (in which, I separately purport, cognitive biases within the states of conditioning (under the term 'behavioralism' and over the term 'stimulus-response';thus, 'areas' as noted in some posts here as, in my own term,
'scenario+' -- a train of events along the same conceptualization being a line segment; a series being unrelated shapes aligned with a future, single event and thus post-initiated around that undefined future event to be conceptualized; alternative train of events beside the current train, also with its own, same conceptualization; and, so on for the other types of 'scenario+';
a more complete set of these types of 'scenario+':to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle),addiction(scenario),serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series), interpersonal conflict (bound), e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes));
cognitive biases are what people have, apparently often ego- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection, when people use 'scenario+' 's for selection between different types of choices (usually distinguished with form of gathering information to determine each choice)

)) in terms of selection vs. proportion of what is being responded to, and thus intent of response. The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to, is dependent upon, and also versus identification of that time redirection's impact upon, the moving,changing-point-in-range-of-conceptualization target or prime or, conversely, time sectioning's pattern and its projection into space. Priming is defined as a prime carrying the conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, within the range of conceptualization that includes both targets.*

chart space, as a subset of reactive space's significance for any one area and its main prime-motion-target, in order to reuse an area or rebalance upon a new area for consideration of included-variables conceptualization of intent (to move), is defined within the range of
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
personal space / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types);
patterns, or sections (thus, spatial(price) modif'ns of s'ed time, variant to change from directed time) --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects



* Another, more detailed way to consider it is that a prime is an automatic stimulus-response based upon a spatial reaction to another space across the time from one space to another -- thus, time directionless except in reference to space's copy, or modification of the original concept of what is to be primed as a continuum (range example three, below). Thus, one is primed to have an automatic s-r when, first, space is ignored in favor of time and thus, hyper-directed, so that a balance must take place from the range ex. three, to reestablish, with the development of the conceptualization first established in the priming of it, balance so that several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other along the lines of the hyper-sectioned time and thus an instance of priming balance evokes a mere leverage and positioning of an instance in a range of the conceptualization in one party, and a break in the balanced section and direction for the party presented opportunity for off-setting the initial priming. It redefines, for the balance-broken party, a point in the conceptualization's range that identifies the rebalancing individual; for the individual, though, it is a mere counter-balance point that exists not for the individual, but only in relation to the initial priming's set of points established from the conceptualization's range, and moreover, may be built upon by space to create an average theoretical condition within which such a conceptualization may be used as a counter-balancing of its points at a later time -- Offering increased immunity against such an occurence both for the individual and for anyone the theory is shared with. -- Theory may be a type of pattern for a certain set of bars and their shape and juxtaposition, or a particular grouping and order of pieces within an established ptm, or other.














----------------------






another:




chart space, as a subset of reactive space's significance for any one area and its main prime-motion-target, in order to reuse an area or rebalance upon a new area for consideration of included-variables conceptualization of intent (to move), is defined within the range of
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
reactive space, where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned; thus, this would quantify STIMULUS-RESPONSE (in which, I separately purport, cognitive biases within the states of conditioning (under the term 'behavioralism' and over the term 'stimulus-response';thus, 'areas' as noted in some posts here as, in my own term, in terms of selection vs. proportion of what is being responded to, and thus intent of response. The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to, is dependent upon, and also versus identification of that time redirection's impact upon, the moving,changing-point-in-range-of-conceptualization target or prime or, conversely, time sectioning's pattern and its projection into space. Priming is defined as a prime carrying the conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, within the range of conceptualization that includes both targets.*

chart patterns, or sections (thus, spatial(price) modif'ns of s'ed time, variant to change from directed time) --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
'scenario+' -- a train of events along the same conceptualization being a line segment; a series being unrelated shapes aligned with a future, single event and thus post-initiated around that undefined future event to be conceptualized; alternative train of events beside the current train, also with its own, same conceptualization; and, so on for the other types of 'scenario+';
a more complete set of these types of 'scenario+':to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle),addiction(scenario),serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series), interpersonal conflict (bound), e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))

personal space within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types);
cognitive biases are what people have, apparently often ego- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection, when people use 'scenario+' 's for selection between different types of choices (usually distinguished with form of gathering information to determine each choice)











DATA (AVAILABILITY)
chart space, as a subset of reactive space's significance for any one area and its main prime-motion-target, in order to reuse an area or rebalance upon a new area for consideration of included-variables conceptualization of intent (to move), is defined within the range of
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
reactive space, where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned; thus, this would quantify STIMULUS-RESPONSE (in which, I separately purport, cognitive biases within the states of conditioning (under the term 'behavioralism' and over the term 'stimulus-response';thus, 'areas' as noted in some posts here as, in my own term, in terms of selection vs. proportion of what is being responded to, and thus intent of response. The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to, is dependent upon, and also versus identification of that time redirection's impact upon, the moving,changing-point-in-range-of-conceptualization target or prime or, conversely, time sectioning's pattern and its projection into space. Priming is defined as a prime carrying the conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, within the range of conceptualization that includes both targets.
PATTERN (STUDY)
chart patterns, or sections (thus, spatial(price) modif'ns of s'ed time, variant to change from directed time) --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
personal involvement with chart patterns: 'scenario+' -- a train of events along the same conceptualization being a line segment; a series being unrelated shapes aligned with a future, single event and thus post-initiated around that undefined future event to be conceptualized; alternative train of events beside the current train, also with its own, same conceptualization; and, so on for the other types of 'scenario+';
a more complete set of these types of 'scenario+':to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle),addiction(scenario),serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series), interpersonal conflict (bound), e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))
CHOICE (TRADE)
EGO cognitive biases are what people have, apparently often ego- / survival of self- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection, when people use 'scenario+' 's for selection between different types of choices (usually distinguished with form of gathering information to determine each choice) -- So it'd be the cognitive bias, vs. what the chart says.
COPY A perspective-dependent approach alternate or further delineation to using cognitive biases, is to rank uses of gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace and thus which can be moved at will along the given pattern, and so on; because, one may prefer a strong emotion that supports a dominant ally's perspective, in lieu of rational facts that support the chart's patterns as one understands it after long experience with doing so, because a multi-body emotion supercedes in rank a gut trace and its accompanying projection (being a gut decision trace to go with it).
DIFFERENTIATION To go, instead, into the pattern(s) it(them)self(ves), is to consider choice as a matter of personal space within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)






p1 adj -- moved 'ego' section to after 'diff.' section, and renamed it SELECTION, thus making ego necessary to the trading process, which is a key change to the overall trading method, with subsequent changes to subtitles etc.:







DATA (AVAILABILITY)
chart space, as a subset of reactive space's significance for any one area and its main prime-motion-target, in order to reuse an area or rebalance upon a new area for consideration of included-variables conceptualization of intent (to move), is defined within the range of
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
reactive space, where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned; thus, this would quantify STIMULUS-RESPONSE (in which, I separately purport, cognitive biases within the states of conditioning (under the term 'behavioralism' and over the term 'stimulus-response';thus, 'areas' as noted in some posts here as, in my own term, in terms of selection vs. proportion of what is being responded to, and thus intent of response. The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to, is dependent upon, and also versus identification of that time redirection's impact upon, the moving,changing-point-in-range-of-conceptualization target or prime or, conversely, time sectioning's pattern and its projection into space. Priming is defined as a prime carrying the conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, within the range of conceptualization that includes both targets.
PATTERN (STUDY)
chart patterns, or sections (thus, spatial(price) modif'ns of s'ed time, variant to change from directed time) --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
personal involvement with chart patterns: 'scenario+' -- a train of events along the same conceptualization being a line segment; a series being unrelated shapes aligned with a future, single event and thus post-initiated around that undefined future event to be conceptualized; alternative train of events beside the current train, also with its own, same conceptualization; and, so on for the other types of 'scenario+';
a more complete set of these types of 'scenario+':to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle),addiction(scenario),serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series), interpersonal conflict (bound), e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))
CHOICE (TRADE)
COPY and go by A perspective-dependent approach alternate or further delineation to using cognitive biases, is to rank uses of gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace and thus which can be moved at will along the given pattern, and so on; because, one may prefer a strong emotion that supports a dominant ally's perspective, in lieu of rational facts that support the chart's patterns as one understands it after long experience with doing so, because a multi-body emotion supercedes in rank a gut trace and its accompanying projection (being a gut decision trace to go with it).
DIFFERENTIATION and live (with (thus, the center of a range from COPY to SELECTION)) it To go, instead, into the pattern(s) it(them)self(ves), is to consider choice as a matter of personal space within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)
SELECTION and live by cognitive biases are what people have, apparently often ego- / survival of self- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection, when people use 'scenario+' 's for selection between different types of choices (usually distinguished with form of gathering information to determine each choice) -- So it'd be the cognitive bias, vs. what the chart says.







p1 adj SELECTION (trade):










DATA (AVAILABILITY)
chart space, as a subset of reactive space's significance for any one area and its main prime-motion-target, in order to reuse an area or rebalance upon a new area for consideration of included-variables conceptualization of intent (to move), is defined within the range of
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
reactive space, where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned; thus, this would quantify STIMULUS-RESPONSE (in which, I separately purport, cognitive biases within the states of conditioning (under the term 'behavioralism' and over the term 'stimulus-response';thus, 'areas' as noted in some posts here as, in my own term, in terms of selection vs. proportion of what is being responded to, and thus intent of response). The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to, is dependent upon, and also versus identification of that time redirection's impact upon, the moving,changing-point-in-range-of-conceptualization target or prime or, conversely, time sectioning's pattern and its projection into space. Priming is defined as a prime carrying the conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, within the range of conceptualization that includes both targets.
PATTERN (STUDY)
chart patterns, or sections (thus, spatial(price) modif'ns of s'ed time, variant to change from directed time) --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
personal involvement with chart patterns: 'scenario+' -- a train of events along the same conceptualization being a line segment; a series being unrelated shapes aligned with a future, single event and thus post-initiated around that undefined future event to be conceptualized; alternative train of events beside the current train, also with its own, same conceptualization; and, so on for the other types of 'scenario+';
a more complete set of these types of 'scenario+':to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle),addiction(scenario),serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series), interpersonal conflict (bound), e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))
CHOICE (TRADE)
COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth A perspective-dependent approach alternate or further delineation to using cognitive biases, is to rank uses of gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace and thus which can be moved at will along the given pattern, and so on; because, one may prefer a strong emotion that supports a dominant ally's perspective, in lieu of rational facts that support the chart's patterns as one understands it after long experience with doing so, because a multi-body emotion supercedes in rank a gut trace and its accompanying projection (being a gut decision trace to go with it). This is the alter to cognitive bias, an inner truth which only corruption from the surroundings creates a cognitive bias of, chosen to trade under a dominant-, related more to subsuming one's ego for the greater good, etc.
DIFFERENTIATE and live with, for adjusting to temporary circumstances (thus, the center of a range from COPY to SELECTION) proximity To go, instead, into the pattern(s) it(them)self(ves), is to consider choice as a matter of personal space within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)
Ito mec, two examples of use, differentiating OWN vs. COPY: 'own' stays at greed/ecstacy, flips other into depression and grabs the loot when it goes to where it is; contrastedly, 'copy' stays at anxiety/capitulation, enters whole self into trade just as close to depressive truth as can, and exits at greed/ecstacy when feels it's too much to possibly own. The former is a top-down approach, and so averages profits better; the latter is a left-right approach, and so tends toward extremes (margin calls, etc.) The trade-off is understanding for the left-right, profit for the up-down; so, for instance, into not-understanding is either a completion into full loss, or a full understanding of that which is not now rational, the further risk being that which is discovered in history is inspirational and thus a one-shot understanding that may ignore a more important pattern that limits the viability of that discovery.
OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency (who you are, how you think; thus, biases) cognitive biases are what people have, apparently often ego- / survival of self- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection, when people use 'scenario+' 's for selection between different types of choices (usually distinguished with form of gathering information to determine each choice) -- So it'd be the cognitive bias, vs. what the chart says. A way is to rank choices from the source of its possible copy, that is, echoes from self, i.e. gut trace, emotions, etc.






DATA (AVAILABILITY)
chart space, as a subset of reactive space's significance for any one area and its main prime-motion-target, in order to reuse an area or rebalance upon a new area for consideration of included-variables conceptualization of intent (to move), is defined within the range of
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination with each other -- section and direction are balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
reactive space, where time redirects according to its hyper/o-reactivity to space being sectioned; thus, this would quantify STIMULUS-RESPONSE (in which, I separately purport, cognitive biases within the states of conditioning (under the term 'behavioralism' and over the term 'stimulus-response';thus, 'areas' as noted in some posts here as, in my own term, in terms of selection vs. proportion of what is being responded to, and thus intent of response). The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to, is dependent upon, and also versus identification of that time redirection's impact upon, the moving,changing-point-in-range-of-conceptualization target or prime or, conversely, time sectioning's pattern and its projection into space. Priming is defined as a prime carrying the conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, within the range of conceptualization that includes both targets.
PATTERN (STUDY)
chart patterns, or sections (thus, spatial(price) modif'ns of s'ed time, variant to change from directed time) --
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
personal involvement with chart patterns: 'scenario+' -- a train of events along the same conceptualization being a line segment; a series being unrelated shapes aligned with a future, single event and thus post-initiated around that undefined future event to be conceptualized; alternative train of events beside the current train, also with its own, same conceptualization; and, so on for the other types of 'scenario+';
a more complete set of these types of 'scenario+':to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle),addiction(scenario),serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series), interpersonal conflict (bound), e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))
CHOICE (TRADE)
COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth A perspective-dependent approach alternate or further delineation to using cognitive biases, is to rank uses of gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace and thus which can be moved at will along the given pattern, and so on; because, one may prefer a strong emotion that supports a dominant ally's perspective, in lieu of rational facts that support the chart's patterns as one understands it after long experience with doing so, because a multi-body emotion supercedes in rank a gut trace and its accompanying projection (being a gut decision trace to go with it). This is the alter to cognitive bias, an inner truth which only corruption from the surroundings creates a cognitive bias of, chosen to trade under a dominant-, related more to subsuming one's ego for the greater good, etc.
DIFFERENTIATE and live with, for adjusting to temporary circumstances (thus, the center of a range from COPY to SELECTION) proximity To go, instead, into the pattern(s) it(them)self(ves), is to consider choice as a matter of personal space within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)
Ito mec, two examples of use, differentiating OWN vs. COPY: 'own' stays at greed/ecstacy, flips other into depression and grabs the loot when it goes to where it is; contrastedly, 'copy' stays at anxiety/capitulation, enters whole self into trade just as close to depressive truth as can, and exits at greed/ecstacy when feels it's too much to possibly own. The former is a top-down approach, and so averages profits better; the latter is a left-right approach, and so tends toward extremes (margin calls, etc.) The trade-off is understanding for the left-right, profit for the up-down; so, for instance, into not-understanding is either a completion into full loss, or a full understanding of that which is not now rational, the further risk being that which is discovered in history is inspirational and thus a one-shot understanding that may ignore a more important pattern that limits the viability of that discovery. That is, impulsive choice or other confusion makes time hyper-sectioned, in response to saving a trade from ruin rather than making a hyper-directed choice from an overview of all the chart, that is, in response corresponding to one's intent.
OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency (who you are, how you think; thus, biases) cognitive biases are what people have, apparently often ego- / survival of self- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection, when people use 'scenario+' 's for selection between different types of choices (usually distinguished with form of gathering information to determine each choice) -- So it'd be the cognitive bias, vs. what the chart says. A way is to rank choices from the source of its possible copy, that is, echoes from self, i.e. gut trace, emotions, etc.



----------

p1 condense around lists each subtitle:








DATA (AVAILABILITY)
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination w/each other -- section,direction balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
reactive space if responded to. intent of response The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to. Priming defined as a prime w/conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, w/in range of conceptualization w/both targets.
PATTERN (STUDY) sections
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
personal involvement with chart patterns:
to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle). addiction(scenario). serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series). interpersonal conflict (bound). e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes)).
CHOICE (TRADE)
COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth high-none or low-all gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace and thus which can be moved at will along the given pattern, and so on; surroundings chooses a cognitive bias of, often ego- / survival of self- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection..
DIFFERENTIATE personal space within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)
mec: ex. 1) 'own' stays at greed/ecstacy, flips other into depression and grabs the loot when it goes to where it is; contrastedly, 'copy' stays at anxiety/capitulation, enters whole self into trade just as close to depressive truth as can, and exits at greed/ecstacy when feels it's too much to possibly own. The former is a top-down approach, and so averages profits better; the latter is a left-right approach, and so tends toward extremes (margin calls, etc.) The trade-off is understanding vs. impulsivity for the left-right, profit/loss for the up-down. Struggle bet two -- prefer a strong emotion w/dom't ally's persp., in lieu of rational facts exp. supports chart's patterns; a multi-body emotion supercedes in rank a gut trace;, related more to subsuming one's ego for the greater good, etc.
OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency. High-all, low-none for the gut-emot'n range.









p1 -- trade like trend, pattern sections all, area poss. pattern-relevant thus in a sense either;
no, erased this confusion with area's definition of same terms:










DATA (AVAILABILITY)
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination w/each other -- section,direction balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
reactive space if responded to. intent of response The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to. Priming defined as a prime w/conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, w/in range of conceptualization w/both targets.
PATTERN (STUDY)
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
personal involvement with chart patterns: interactive
to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle). addiction(scenario). serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series). interpersonal conflict (bound). e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes)).
personal within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)
CHOICE (TRADE)
gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace and thus which can be moved at will along the given pattern, and so on; surroundings chooses a cognitive bias of, often ego- / survival of self- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection.
COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth high-none or low-all. DIFFERENTIATE Get into. Each adj'able, thus all same. OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency. High-all, low-none for the gut-emot'n range.
mec: ex. 'own' stays at greed/ecstacy, flips other into depression and grabs the loot when it goes to where it is; contrastedly, 'copy' stays at anxiety/capitulation, enters whole self into trade just as close to depressive truth as can, and exits at greed/ecstacy when feels it's too much to possibly own. The former is a top-down approach, and so averages profits better; the latter is a left-right approach, and so tends toward extremes (margin calls, etc.) The trade-off is understanding vs. impulsivity for the left-right, profit/loss for the up-down. Struggle bet two -- prefer a strong emotion w/dom't ally's persp., in lieu of rational facts exp. supports chart's patterns; a multi-body emotion supercedes in rank a gut trace;, related more to subsuming one's ego for the greater good, etc.





--------
an interesting article linked to here:

 

1. "When researchers slashed the price on certain foods, the monkeys sought out the best deal.
2. They also typically spent all their cash at once and didn't bother to save.
3. about spending $2.20 on a cup of coffee. But when she looks up at the chalk board listing drink prices, the Nutella Latte goes for $3.85 and the Ginger Snap is $4.15. "My $2 cup doesn't seem as expensive anymore," she said.
4. In one experiment, a researcher showed a monkey two pieces of apple but handed over one in exchange for a token. A second researcher showed one piece of apple and gave the slice to the monkey for the token. The monkeys strongly preferred to trade with the second researcher. They did not like being offered two apple pieces and then only getting one.
5. whether monkeys, like humans, desire an expensive item more. For the same number of tokens, the monkeys could choose whether they got a tiny square of blue Jell-O or a big chunk of red Jell-O. Later, the monkeys were allowed to choose which kind they wanted. If the monkeys were like humans, they would have gone for the blue Jell-O, the more "expensive" choice. But the monkeys gorged happily on both....Some might argue that human economic behavior is more advanced since it includes "culture and meta-awareness" in decision-making, said Dr. Santos. There's another, less flattering possibility too. "The monkeys," she said, "are more rational.""

free-association, starting with 5.:
5. is, perhaps, leverage vs. level for humans, and average vs. potential for monkeys. The former involves a vertical, class-like attribution, and the latter involves a sidelereal, Socratic-like attribution. Perhaps the former is interactive, as in exchange of multiple items for sustaining what one wants, and the latter a non-emotional, direct need. Chronic and acute, as in medicine.
One can argue that one 'leapfrogs' a set of knowledge or other foodstuff from the giver to the taker, in tabula rasa, or the vertical, class-like attribution. Contrarily, knowledge is discussed all on a level Socratically and spoon-fed from high-level giver to low-level taker via tabula rasa, so that the former may take much longer than the latter. Both are either contextual or not, only the former is guaranteed to be so, and in fact jump between perspectives more agilely than the latter. Tabula rasa is to learn, socratic is to work with, also.
So if one were to need and apply correctly some knowledge, the correct path would be socratically. Since tabula rasa takes averages of various perspectives to make up some for not having the socratic method's strength, it could position when to apply the socratic method. That would make the Socratic method the edge (in trading).
So you discuss the edge and feed the mm, to control what when. The latter would be a kind of bumpy, malshapened tube that the effort of applying edge goes through to get so much P/L; and, the edge would exchange and derive and conclude the difficult, never-ending problem of what the chart says.
On 1.) to 4.):
I'd think you'd need mm to account for these to trade, as well as one's edge. Edge would be a mere range for the 1.) to 4.) to exist within.




---------



very thinking day -- another, from here (which is, in turn, from its quote):

mm makes time a dependent variable, just as space/price is upon time, so that it stacks price, time, profit,
instead of what one would expect -- profit as a part of a difference in price which shapes into readable patterns with stable time.
Or maybe you have to think backwards with trade vs. study.








---------------








p1 messy rewrite, so a dump in part at least:







DATA (AVAILABILITY)
a single trend creates almost no significant space -- time is hyper-directed, and thus sectionless
several diff't shapes happen in coordination w/each other -- section,direction balanced in time
copy/opp/other-relation to an initial shape -- time is hyper-sectioned, and thus directionless
reactive space if responded to. intent of response The measure -- selection vs. proportion -- of what is responded to. Priming defined as a prime w/conditions of one prime-target motion to another target, w/in range of conceptualization w/both targets.
Also --
opportunity storage vs. time value of item vs.
time value of item stored vs. time value of need for item vs. action-worth level
place item found vs. availability of item vs. cost of item
action-worth level

item use up value of : action-worth level
time value of item: opportunity storage, item cost
item availability: item cost, action-worth level







WHAT response, in a token economy, given certain conditions? 1:

1. "When researchers slashed the price on certain foods, the monkeys sought out the best deal.
2. They also typically spent all their cash at once and didn't bother to save.
3. about spending $2.20 on a cup of coffee. But when she looks up at the chalk board listing drink prices, the Nutella Latte goes for $3.85 and the Ginger Snap is $4.15. "My $2 cup doesn't seem as expensive anymore," she said.
4. In one experiment, a researcher showed a monkey two pieces of apple but handed over one in exchange for a token. A second researcher showed one piece of apple and gave the slice to the monkey for the token. The monkeys strongly preferred to trade with the second researcher. They did not like being offered two apple pieces and then only getting one.
5. whether monkeys, like humans, desire an expensive item more. For the same number of tokens, the monkeys could choose whether they got a tiny square of blue Jell-O or a big chunk of red Jell-O. Later, the monkeys were allowed to choose which kind they wanted. If the monkeys were like humans, they would have gone for the blue Jell-O, the more "expensive" choice. But the monkeys gorged happily on both....Some might argue that human economic behavior is more advanced since it includes "culture and meta-awareness" in decision-making, said Dr. Santos. There's another, less flattering possibility too. "The monkeys," she said, "are more rational.""
   free-association, starting with 5.:
   5. is, perhaps, leverage vs. level for humans, and average vs. potential for monkeys. The former involves a vertical, class-like attribution (mng or other higher-leverage task), and the latter involves a sidelereal, Socratic-like attribution (any task, seen from its action point of view rather than how its existence affects other tasks'.

PATTERN (STUDY)
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
personal involvement with chart patterns: interactive
to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle). addiction(scenario). serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series). interpersonal conflict (bound). e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes)).
personal within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)
CHOICE (TRADE)
gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace and thus which can be moved at will along the given pattern, and so on; surroundings chooses a cognitive bias of, often ego- / survival of self- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection.
COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth high-none or low-all. DIFFERENTIATE Get into. Each adj'able, thus all same. OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency. High-all, low-none for the gut-emot'n range.
mec: ex. 'own' stays at greed/ecstacy, flips other into depression and grabs the loot when it goes to where it is; contrastedly, 'copy' stays at anxiety/capitulation, enters whole self into trade just as close to depressive truth as can, and exits at greed/ecstacy when feels it's too much to possibly own. The former is a top-down approach, and so averages profits better; the latter is a left-right approach, and so tends toward extremes (margin calls, etc.) The trade-off is understanding vs. impulsivity for the left-right, profit/loss for the up-down. Struggle bet two -- prefer a strong emotion w/dom't ally's persp., in lieu of rational facts exp. supports chart's patterns; a multi-body emotion supercedes in rank a gut trace;, related more to subsuming one's ego for the greater good, etc.




mm makes time a dependent variable, just as space/price is upon time, so that it stacks price, time, profit,
instead of what one would expect -- profit as a part of a difference in price which shapes into readable patterns with stable time.
Or maybe you have to think backwards with trade vs. study.
So you discuss the edge and feed the mm, to control what when. The latter would be a kind of bumpy, malshapened tube that the effort of applying edge goes through to get so much P/L; and, the edge would exchange and derive and conclude the difficult, never-ending problem of what the chart says.







p1 adj:






/\ *trade........................value...........trend.....position
| .*type.........................intent..........shape.....level
\/ *i/o cdo(cdo: copy,differentiate,own)..consistency..relation..(s)p(l)ace
--- internal variables of same range ---
use..........wear rate
maintain....[training,tools,parts]
...............[cost,availability]
store.........atmospheric effects

shape
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects
COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth high-none or low-all. DIFFERENTIATE Get into. Each adj'able, thus all same. OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency. High-all, low-none for the gut-emot'n range.
o
interactive to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle). addiction(scenario). serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series). interpersonal conflict (bound). e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes)).
personal within and among chart patterns / single-time-initiated area -- The sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)
i
range of... gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace and thus which can be moved at will along the given pattern, and so on; surroundings chooses a cognitive bias of, often ego- / survival of self- vs. a more objective (thus) object-based selection. mec a thinking model for emotions








-----------

post#1 adj:








/\ *trade..............................value...........trend.....position
| .*coordination...................intent..........shape.....level
\/ *i/o cdo(cdo: copy,differentiate,own)..consistency..relation..(s)p(l)ace
--- internal variables of same range ---
use..........wear rate
maintain....[training,tools,parts]
...............[cost,availability]
store.........atmospheric effects

shape (pattern list)
rule-object(grid,fan,arcs) - count -- separate -- logic/opp-/viral
regular micro-trend angle/length, cycle regular-measure,etc.
atm-bracket-bow-ls2 -- merge -- combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)-polygons-perfects

COPY gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace w/motion, (angles-extensive) pre-conscious chart interpretation, intuitive carrying to non-self source for interactive rendering to extract interpreted pattern,etc.

COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth high-none or low-all. DIFFERENTIATE Get into. Each adj'able, thus all same. OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency. High-all, low-none for the gut-emot'n range.

OWN.... whole-body interaction in and around chart patterns (to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle). addiction(scenario). serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series). interpersonal conflict (bound). e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))) / somebody/thing else projects pattern into self to deal with / pattern-list line selection (the sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)) / (social) mec / single-standard adjustment (ego- / interreactionary circumstance adjustment for survival of self- / objective (object-based) / own-ptm (thus,tensegral) combo) / rank-and-order arrang't










p1 partial adj:


(new range description)



selection......pattern
proportion.....area..........level
intent...........trade.........position........trend


again:





COPY
selection......pattern
proportion.....area..........level
intent...........trade.........position........trend

OWN
use..........wear rate
maintain....[training,tools,parts]
...............[cost,availability]
store.........atmospheric effects




again:




COPY (bias: ~selection)
selection......pattern
proportion.....area..........level
intent...........trade.........position........trend
OWN (bias: ~proportion)
use..........wear rate
maintain....[training,tools,parts]
...............[cost,availability]
store.........atmospheric effects



again, partial:

(not '~selection')


~maintain



----------



new pattern: weak








Thus, p1 partial adj:


(only weak has a projection; the other two are in and of themselves, tho likely have typical projections -- which may be progressively static / in one place only)


(atm-bow-weak)-bracket-ls2




p1 first part again:




COPY (bias: ~maintain); or, section
selection......pattern
proportion.....area..........level
intent...........trade.........position........trend
OWN (bias: ~proportion); or, direction
use..........wear rate
maintain....[training,tools,parts]
...............[cost,availability]
store.........atmospheric effects


p1 partial NEW PATTERN LIST!!!!!! :

(yes, coordinates w/rest of p1)




shape (pattern list)
whole/: perfect,polygons
merge: bracket,logic,combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape)
area/structure:ls2 / cycle regular-measure; rule,count,define(grid/fan/arcs)
stay/return/turn/diverge: (atm-bow-weak),opp-;s/r,A&E,dt tb;angle,viral



another of same:




shape (pattern list)
whole: perfect,polygons
merge: partial,whole,whole-overlap: bracket,combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape),logic
area/structure:ls2 / cycle regular-measure; rule,count,define(grid/fan/arcs)
stay/return/turn/diverge: (atm-bow-weak),opp-;s/r,A&E,dt tb;angle,viral


again:



shape (pattern list)
whole/copy: perfect,polygons
partial,whole,whole-overlap: bracket,combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape),logic
area/structure:ls2 / cycle regular-measure; rule,count,define(grid/fan/arcs)
stay/return/turn/diverge: (atm-bow-weak),opp-;s/r,A&E,dt tb;angle,viral




now here's a paradigm -- 'project' is in ONE category, the future of others inclusive in other ways; p1 adj partial:



shape (pattern list)
project/opp/copy: perfect,polygons
partial,whole,whole-overlap: bracket,combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape),logic
area/structure:ls2 / cycle regular-measure; rule,count,define(grid/fan/arcs)
stay/return/turn/diverge: (atm-bow-weak),opp-;s/r,A&E,dt tb;angle,viral




p1 retitle/org w/ mvt of patterns to top:





CHART shape (pattern list)
project/opp/copy: perfect,polygons
partial,whole,whole-overlap: bracket,combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape),logic
area/structure:ls2 / cycle regular-measure; rule,count,define(grid/fan/arcs)
stay/return/turn/diverge: (atm-bow-weak),opp-;s/r,A&E,dt tb;angle,viral

TRADE
COPY (bias: ~maintain); or, section
selection......pattern
proportion.....area..........level
intent...........trade.........position........trend
OWN (bias: ~proportion); or, direction
use..........wear rate
maintain....[training,tools,parts]
...............[cost,availability]
store.........atmospheric effects

COPY gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace w/motion, (angles-extensive) pre-conscious chart interpretation, intuitive carrying to non-self source for interactive rendering to extract interpreted pattern,etc.

COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth high-none or low-all. DIFFERENTIATE Get into. Each adj'able, thus all same. OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency. High-all, low-none for the gut-emot'n range.

OWN.... whole-body interaction in and around chart patterns (to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle). addiction(scenario). serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series). interpersonal conflict (bound). e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))) / somebody/thing else projects pattern into self to deal with / pattern-list line selection (the sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)) / (social) mec / single-standard adjustment (ego- / interreactionary circumstance adjustment for survival of self- / objective (object-based) / own-ptm (thus,tensegral) combo) / rank-and-order arrang't







again, reorg for 'copy-differentiate-own' to have four ways to include in trading(/life):





description:
COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth high-none or low-all. DIFFERENTIATE Get into. Each adj'able, thus all same. OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency. High-all, low-none for the gut-emot'n range.
pattern:
COPY -- project/opp/copy: perfect,polygons
DIFFERENTIATE -- partial,whole,whole-overlap: bracket,combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape),logic
stay/return/turn/diverge: (atm-bow-weak),opp-;s/r,A&E,dt tb;angle,viral
OWN -- area/structure:ls2 / cycle regular-measure; rule,count,define(grid/fan/arcs)
thinking model:
COPY (bias: ~maintain); or, section
selection......pattern
proportion.....area..........level
intent...........trade.........position........trend
OWN (bias: ~proportion); or, direction
use..........wear rate
maintain....[training,tools,parts]
...............[cost,availability]
store.........atmospheric effects
example:
COPY gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace w/motion, (angles-extensive) pre-conscious chart interpretation, intuitive carrying to non-self source for interactive rendering to extract interpreted pattern,etc.
OWN.... whole-body interaction in and around chart patterns (to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle). addiction(scenario). serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series). interpersonal conflict (bound). e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))) / somebody/thing else projects pattern into self to deal with / pattern-list line selection (the sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)) / (social) mec / single-standard adjustment (ego- / interreactionary circumstance adjustment for survival of self- / objective (object-based) / own-ptm (thus,tensegral) combo) / rank-and-order arrang't



again, partial:

(not 'chart', 'example')


chart patterns


experience











p1 adj (pattern list, meaning all):






description:
COPY and go by, regardless, for plain-faced truth high-none or low-all. DIFFERENTIATE Get into. Each adj'able, thus all same. OWN and live by selection, for longterm consistency. High-all, low-none for the gut-emot'n range.
chart patterns:
COPY -- project/opp/copy: perfect,polygons
DIFFERENTIATE -- >COPY partial,whole,whole-overlap: bracket,combos(line seg't -curve;rpt ;2 diff't polygons, 1,2-dim shape),logic
>OWN stay/return/turn/diverge: (atm-bow-weak),opp-;s/r,A&E,dt tb;angle,viral
OWN -- area/structure:ls2 / cycle regular-measure; rule,count,define(grid/fan/arcs)
thinking model:
COPY (bias: ~maintain); or, section
selection......pattern
proportion.....area..........level
intent...........trade.........position........trend
OWN (bias: ~proportion); or, direction
use..........wear rate
maintain....[training,tools,parts]
...............[cost,availability]
store.........atmospheric effects
experience:
COPY gut trace, gut decision trace, emotion grouping of information for direction, a whole-body trace w/motion, (angles-extensive) pre-conscious chart interpretation, intuitive carrying to non-self source for interactive rendering to extract interpreted pattern,etc.
OWN.... whole-body interaction in and around chart patterns (to relate to boss ((1.-10.)cycle). addiction(scenario). serial interpretation -> parallel contextualizing (series). interpersonal conflict (bound). e/immersion with a role and/or an individual's in-area set of characteristics ((surround (point and its echoes))) / somebody/thing else projects pattern into self to deal with / pattern-list line selection (the sequence of motions center one, detail other side; isolate if passion/u(c); affects if type polarizes; patterned sequence, such as AVABA-RPRPR for regular(angle)-viral(etc. types)-bow(etc. types) - rule(etc. types)-polygons(etc. types)) / (social) mec / single-standard adjustment (ego- / interreactionary circumstance adjustment for survival of self- / objective (object-based) / own-ptm (thus,tensegral) combo) / rank-and-order arrang't





p1 add partial:


(super-title)

BALANCE
(copy other,
differentiate another with,
own maximal-adjusting within self)

p1 new:






TRACE -- I(mec) - ACT (gut) - O (env't)

projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line direction) | weak/bow/atm,bracket,micro-trend angle,2&3 combo
multi-line direction (cycle) | (3&3 combo), ls2
solid-centered grid | logic,opp-,viral
grid (whole, or partial-initiated) | count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)











--------

I keep losing every trade.
Maybe if I worry and fuss about each trade,
I'll trade better. I seem to worry well.
-- It's like hunt-and-peck trying to find the right psychology.

p1 adj:



I(leveraged exchange cycle mec) - ACT(right/wrong pattern gut) - O(right/wrong interp/pstn of ptrn env't):
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line direction) | weak/bow/atm,bracket,micro-trend angle,2&3 combo
multi-line direction (cycle) | (3&3 combo), ls2
solid-centered grid | logic,opp-,viral
grid (whole, or partial-initiated) | count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)



FINALLY!
My psych stops producing losers: Ten margin calls in a row!!!!!!!!!!

Then dropped the ball a little and took five hours (in simulator, as usual (now)) for the next trade, totally unrealistic. Started again (euphemistically -- same account) with two trades, each an hour long, of meat-and-potatoes size (5%) plus a little gravy (+15% then 20% of initial (21 (micro-, in real, so $5 an hour (yeah, prefer $1000 in account for $50 an hour))lots for $500 an hour) compounded onto lots -- Same risk as very first trade, is what I usually do, plus NO SL, at least not yet, until I begin making REAL consistency -- 20-50 trades in a row this way. Gotta PROVE myself.
-- That's my standard mm and 50:1-leverage profit-rate requirements, take it or leave it. I feel comfortable with an SL, to protect my profits and cut any stupid mistakes as with the 5-hour trade (env'tal, or rather pattern wrong for trade cycle AND wrong fit for patterns area: reason too lazy to go up and down, no try in-between; oft, too slight a reason to angle) or the umpteen margin calls (wrong way, pattern interpretation), in a real penny or full account, which I hope to do if this psych pans through.
2-3 trades a day, five (full) days a week; I guess, f___ up 20% of trades, so get 6 of 10 trades in the clear, so 2.5*.6*5=7.5 compounded for 8.846 trades or 44% a week. 6 1/2 weeks of this for 1000% of account, or one level up: 10->100->1000->10000->100000. That's all I would risk, unless it were someone else's money and I got a significant cut of the profits. Either way, withdraw monthly after initial/any 6 1/2 - week buildup.

Well anyway, one can dream....

I understand there's mm out there that can front-load the maximum of one's profits safely.....

Oh, and practice 4-5 hours a day on same method, I guess, to get this high and consistent a return. That's a full-time job.

-- Yep, that's how I think. Dumb, eh?



on one page:

I'm going to slow down my posting here.
I have enough of a method to do so, and will continue to practice trading simulator off-line.
I will post charts occasionally, and note any progress in getting my method to work (the 25-50 trades per session right, in post#1).

p1 adj:




in own ptm, mec-gut/projection-(scenario+) rep of patterns ,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line direction) | weak/bow/atm,micro-trend angle,2&3 combo
multi-line direction (cycle) | 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
grid (whole, or partial-initiated) | count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
solid-centered grid | logic,opp-,viral




mm








in own ptm, mec-gut/projection-(scenario+) rep of patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line / half-cycle direction) | weak/bow/atm,micro-trend angle,2&3 combo
cycle proj'n,dependent | 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
cycle outline | count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
cycle definition| logic,opp-,viral




mm





-------------------------------



okay, another p1 adj, one I got a pattern interplay from (w/o psych help (1st line)):


in own ptm, mec-gut/projection-(scenario+) rep of patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line / half-cycle direction) | weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo,micro-trend angle
cycle proj'n,dependent | 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
cycle outline with lines| count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
cycle definition| logic,opp-,viral




mm






and here's the non-psych interplay:

The way I did it, was recognize price did not continue with pattern type 5, after doing some counts (type 4) that only cycled after an angle exchange (type 2) happened. I had expected price to continue dropping (that is, do a full 1/2 - 1/2 instead of repeating a 1/2 - 1/4 (type 4, as noted) for the count -- unusual for anything to do so, as that's a rule to pivot after even one 1/2 - 1/4), and price eventually did after pivoting off the angle changeover (type 2, as noted -- a pivot) with the 1/2-1/4 - series build-up, a temporary and even semi-fake existence of the 1/2-1/4 rule.

So it's basically a helper came along and got a rule to succeed, so that when its help ended on another like it, the rule got continued through its count and made money.





-- So I got a story, only it's bumbling now and more examples will tell if the method works.






in own ptm, mec-gut/projection-(scenario+) rep of patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line / half-cycle direction) | weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo,micro-trend angle
cycle proj'n,dependent | 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
cycle outline with lines| count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
cycle definition| logic,opp-,viral




mm








incl volatility in p1:








(into) volatility's stabilizer | regularized patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line / half-cycle direction) | weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo,micro-trend angle
cycle proj'n,dependent | 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
cycle outline with lines| count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
cycle definition| logic,opp-,viral




mm









------------

Here's a pattern subtype under bracket, which is a continuation in this example:

(hi-lo -- rectangle, or wide line; fib -- opposing 20-80 proportions each side of the bracket;
so, really like a 1-3-5 pattern type, since the type 5 opp- is a bunch of the shape called 'opposing-shape on either side of line segment', and a hi-lo as a rectangle or wide line is a type 1, and of course bracket is a type 3;
this suggests the pattern list can be weighted with the direction of price action, this being a continuation pattern)










convoluted, far more accurate version of last post's for p1:









inner-rhythm disturbances of the gut, and thus decision and thus (sub)dominance within gut decision trace
(/emotion:given, push for; /env't:given,build within) (into) volatility's stabilizer | regularized patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line / half-cycle direction) | weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo,micro-trend angle
cycle proj'n,dependent | 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
cycle outline with lines| count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
cycle definition| logic,opp-,viral




mm






-----------







p1 new:









inner-rhythm disturbances of the gut (V(v/),S(w/),D(i/o)), and thus decision and thus (sub)dominance within gut decision trace
(/emotion:given, push for; /env't:given,build within) (into) volatility's stabilizer | regularized patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line / half-cycle direction) | weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo,micro-trend angle
cycle proj'n,dependent | 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
cycle outline with lines| count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
cycle definition| logic,opp-,viral




mm

FINALLY!
My psych stops producing losers: Ten margin calls in a row!!!!!!!!!!

Then dropped the ball a little and took five hours (in simulator, as usual (now)) for the next trade, totally unrealistic. Started again (euphemistically -- same account) with two trades, each an hour long, of meat-and-potatoes size (5%) plus a little gravy (+15% then 20% of initial (21 (micro-, in real, so $5 an hour (yeah, prefer $1000 in account for $50 an hour))lots for $500 an hour) compounded onto lots -- Same risk as very first trade, is what I usually do, plus NO SL, at least not yet, until I begin making REAL consistency -- 20-50 trades in a row this way. Gotta PROVE myself.
-- That's my standard mm and 50:1-leverage profit-rate requirements, take it or leave it. I feel comfortable with an SL, to protect my profits and cut any stupid mistakes as with the 5-hour trade (env'tal, or rather pattern wrong for trade cycle AND wrong fit for patterns area: reason too lazy to go up and down, no try in-between; oft, too slight a reason to angle) or the umpteen margin calls (wrong way, pattern interpretation), in a real penny or full account, which I hope to do if this psych pans through.
2-3 trades a day, five (full) days a week; I guess, f___ up 20% of trades, so get 6 of 10 trades in the clear, so 2.5*.6*5=7.5 compounded for 8.846 trades or 44% a week. 6 1/2 weeks of this for 1000% of account, or one level up: 10->100->1000->10000->100000. That's all I would risk, unless it were someone else's money and I got a significant cut of the profits. Either way, withdraw monthly after initial/any 6 1/2 - week buildup.

Well anyway, one can dream....

I understand there's mm out there that can front-load the maximum of one's profits safely.....

Oh, and practice 4-5 hours a day on same method, I guess, to get this high and consistent a return. That's a full-time job.

-- Yep, that's how I think. Dumb, eh?













p1 partial adj -- psych only:



inner-rhythm disturbances of the gut (V(v/;x, effect y),S(w/;y, effect x),D(i/o;pt.s along x,y)), and thus decision and thus (sub)dominance within gut decision trace
(/emotion:given, push for; /env't:given,build within) (into) volatility's stabilizer | regularized patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:





of first secton:





inner-rhythm disturbances of the gut (V(v/;x, effect y),S(w/;y, effect x),D(i/o;pt.s along x,y)),
and thus decision and thus (sub)dominance within gut decision trace
(/emotion:given, push for; /env't:given,build within) (into) volatility's stabilizer | regularized patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
projected line segment | polygon,perfect
pivot(line / half-cycle direction) | weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo,micro-trend angle
cycle proj'n,dependent | 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
cycle outline with lines| count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
cycle definition| logic,opp-,viral


raison d'etre for gut in pattern list, and change of 'volatility':


inner-rhythm cycle disturbances of the gut (V(v/;x, effect y),S(w/;y, effect x),D(i/o;pt.s along x,y)),
and thus decision and thus (sub)dominance within gut decision trace
(/emotion:given, push for; /env't:given,build within)
cycle: (from-)volatility/empty-space | regularized patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
anchor| polygon,perfect
pivot| weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo,micro-trend angle
depend| 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
outline| count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
define| logic,opp-,viral



So now, they reflect each other:
Nothing artificial about pivot being a multiple of anchor, or pivot being the opposite -- in one sense -- to outline.






cycle: (from-)volatility/empty-space | regularized patterns,
which has 1,5 similar and 2,4 similar, and then 3 similar both to 1,2 and to 4,5:
type 1.......................................................anchor| polygon,perfect
type 2.........angle V_|S|_Ddiv.-whole.........pivot| weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo,micro-trend angle
type 3.......................................................depend| 3&3 combo, ls2,bracket
type 4.........emot pushes / env't details.....outline| count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
type 5.......................................................define| logic,opp-,viral














---------------------

p1 adj:


(included in own ptm on a regular basis,thus interacting the patterns with each other off-chart;
Only difference is that you're in 3D and deal with different entities to source a (pairs(,)) chart with.)


1.....micro-trend angle,weak/bow/atm,2&3 combo OPP count,rule,device(grid/fan/arcs)
1+..i: (extruded(note L:M/volat))polygon;i/o: perfect;sep-o:ls2
2:3&3 combo,logic,opp-,viral/volatility,empty-fill /bracket



new partial:

(extruded)


-- New category for patterns:

polygons are filled with stuff. They balance in some way. Usually, it is only polygons, with various fillings. Sometimes only the filling shows -- see 'balance patterns' in various journal posts:
plus in rectangle, right-sided balance (hz seg't attached to middle of short vertical line seg't), dot with surrounding area either X'ing (rectangle) or perhaps volatility-misshapened (ellipse, perhaps) --
and the outer edge of the polygon missing:
Thus, extruded polygon. 3+3 combo, example L:M stack.
In general, volatility (t2) plus (t1: OPP) count equals this 1+ type of pattern.










----------



---------------------

P1 adj:

ALL ||||||| L:M crd |||||||
CONT'S ef <-----hi-lo,bracket----->micro
BREAK logic-viral.....poly-3*3...ls2-perfect



--------------



Math -- physics,math PhD's, with computer skill in C++ and/or Java
Chart patterns -- maybe something there I could realistically do, with a lot of work.....
Then or here,the latter of which I'm more familiar with

I'd need mostly whole and some partial differential equations, according to the latter article.
At least I could stop reorganizing according to my current psych and put my chart patterns on paper/Internet for all to enjoy.
Gotta dream, at least.

new method -- really, replacing old names of patterns with a bunch of very traditional stuff anybody can easily figure; my patterns are really obscure in their description, so doing this will help eliminate this problem in time and keep charts understandable from using this set of terms right away.

. chart reason, from --
*chart drawing device*
OVERLAY line-ray,triangle-fan,channel-zone,rectangle-grid,ellipse-arcs
MEASURE half,fractal,fib,perfect,square
MODIFY dot/opp-/copy/combo/volatility


p1, new:

(haven't done it yet, just trying once-tested ideas together)



. chart reason, from --
*chart drawing device*
OVERLAY line-ray,triangle-fan,channel-zone,rectangle-grid,ellipse-arcs
MEASURE half,fractal,fib,perfect,square
MODIFY dot/opp-/copy/combo/volatility

*pre- to entire trading day* extended pre-consciousness trades, and other warm-ups in the gut trace range of ideas
*pre- to each trading session* make an ordered list of five or so patterns that work both in space and time, with which one makes or reflects how one made one's decisions in an influential area pressing on one's mind at the time
*at- each session*
. sketches of relevant portion of own ptm: before each trade
. draw chart reasons using a portion of devices that fit in with the day's ordered list of patterns
. trade, if available, at current skill level, using mm noted in link below

mm









----------------










mm (copy)

FINALLY!
My psych stops producing losers: Ten margin calls in a row!!!!!!!!!!

Then dropped the ball a little and took five hours (in simulator, as usual (now)) for the next trade, totally unrealistic. Started again (euphemistically -- same account) with two trades, each an hour long, of meat-and-potatoes size (5%) plus a little gravy (+15% then 20% of initial (21 (micro-, in real, so $5 an hour (yeah, prefer $1000 in account for $50 an hour))lots for $500 an hour) compounded onto lots -- Same risk as very first trade, is what I usually do, plus NO SL, at least not yet, until I begin making REAL consistency -- 20-50 trades in a row this way. Gotta PROVE myself.
-- That's my standard mm and 50:1-leverage profit-rate requirements, take it or leave it. I feel comfortable with an SL, to protect my profits and cut any stupid mistakes as with the 5-hour trade (env'tal, or rather pattern wrong for trade cycle AND wrong fit for patterns area: reason too lazy to go up and down, no try in-between; oft, too slight a reason to angle) or the umpteen margin calls (wrong way, pattern interpretation), in a real penny or full account, which I hope to do if this psych pans through.
2-3 trades a day, five (full) days a week; I guess, f___ up 20% of trades, so get 6 of 10 trades in the clear, so 2.5*.6*5=7.5 compounded for 8.846 trades or 44% a week. 6 1/2 weeks of this for 1000% of account, or one level up: 10->100->1000->10000->100000. That's all I would risk, unless it were someone else's money and I got a significant cut of the profits. Either way, withdraw monthly after initial/any 6 1/2 - week buildup.

Well anyway, one can dream....

I understand there's mm out there that can front-load the maximum of one's profits safely.....

Oh, and practice 4-5 hours a day on same method, I guess, to get this high and consistent a return. That's a full-time job.

-- Yep, that's how I think. Dumb, eh?




-----------

trophology.





---------

p1 r/w:


(to show the examples)




. chart reason, from --
*chart drawing device*
OVERLAY
position (any-.) : half,fractal,fib,perfect,square
origin (from-.) : ellipse-arcs
trend (_) : line-ray,channel-zone
axis (|_) : rectangle-grid
side (|_) : triangle-fan

*pre- to entire trading day* extended pre-consciousness trades, other warm-ups in gut trace range of ideas, including in that range env't of patterns (pre- to each trading session -- make an ordered list of five or so patterns that work both in space and time, with which one makes or reflects how one made one's decisions in an influential area pressing on mind then)
*at- each session*
. sketches of relevant portion of own ptm: before each trade
. draw chart reasons
. trade, if available, at current skill level, using mm




p1 new, technicals only:


position (any-.) (ex.'s:half,fractal,fib,perfect,square),origin (from-.),trend (_),axis (|_),side (|_)
TIMES
[in the range of simple/bound - hyperbole(that is, the opposite copy thereof, both copies there) - series]






p1 adj, to account for weak in-trade drawdowns and the occasional (!) big loss:



drawing on chart with --
position (any-.) (ex.'s:half,fractal,fib,perfect,square),origin (from-.),trend (_),axis (|_),side (|_\)
TIMES
[in the range of simple/bound - hyperbole(that is, the opposite copy thereof, both copies there) - series]

*pre- to entire trading day* extended pre-consciousness trades, other warm-up MINDBODY EXERCISES -- think here, w/o so much loss -- ONLY in gut trace range of ideas, including in that range env't of patterns (pre- to each trading session -- make an ordered list of five or so patterns, or an env't ordered with a pattern to facilitate congruence of several reasons, that work(s) both in space and time, with which one makes or reflects how one made one's decisions in an influential area pressing on mind then);
and, still in the range of gut trace, pre-motion of entire body, or rather emotion, that is, mec
*at- each session*
. sketches of relevant portion of own ptm: before each trade
. draw chart reasons
. trade, if available, at current skill level, using mm






----------




hous nrg









-----------------

p1 adj "draw on chart with " (the chart technical analysis) section:

(a succinct way to put how each polygon only applies to certain types of ratios)

Attachment







I've also worked on defining -- and thus dealing more effectively with -- my inner critic's presence, which also helps me define the qualitative portion of trading, this Voice being so dependent on the chart substance of its in-the-gut-trace-tradition approach to interacting with me.


I guess I've stuck with listing polygons and their ratios, after listing specific patterns (ratios-included),
due to first making my own ptm ("personal thinking model") and a tensegrity, however localized to me, of polygons in a specific fit with and ratio to each other.

Another thing is I tried volume again, and it worked pretty well -- using a VSA tick indicator from ff's major thread on it, I did hi's pivot-deviation-trend and lo's pivot-trend.

I'll have to dump post#1 though, because I went over the different mindbody techniques in my mind and found I wasn't experienced enough with a few of the ones I created, the ones with some promise of increasing the value of gut traces for example:


drawing on chart with --
position (any-.) (ex.'s:half,fractal,fib,perfect,square),origin (from-.),trend (_),axis (|_),side (|_\)
TIMES
[in the range of simple/bound - hyperbole(that is, the opposite copy thereof, both copies there) - series]

*pre- to entire trading day* warm-up MINDBODY EXERCISES -- think here, w/o so much loss -- ONLY in gut trace range of ideas :

1. either
   body (pre)motion,
   brainwave-altered observation,
   logic equation of symbols used,
   own-ptm group interaction,
   or
   scenario-with-objects orientation
   
   

*at- each session*
. sketches of relevant portion of own ptm: before each trade
. draw chart reasons
. trade, if available, at current skill level, using mm









upon writing in p1, I was able to advance my understanding of gut feel and emotion; thus, p1 adj:




Attachment
-- There's nothing to this, really, it's just my cribbed way of putting it that's a bit cryptic.
There are five polygons -- grid (thus, rectangle), fan (thus, triangle), line, in the middle; curve (thus, circle (or, in charting, ellipse)), on top; and, point/pivot/dot on the bottom --
and five ratios -- half/even, with grid; fractal, which has contribution from grid, then fib, more directly related to fan, and next perfect (numbers), a functional inclusion which has contribution from line, each of the three with fan; and, square, with line.

Plus, I watch my inner critic for how it uses the above,
as well as monitor my day's and current immediate surroundings for inner influences on my behavior and how that feeds into my decision structure.
-- I read in science that they closely relate emotions and gut trace and say they detach from reality easily; only, I've yet to pinpoint functionally how this works, despite the obvious help from the cycle of market emotions and my simplified version of it and my use and expansion of the idea of gut trace, so I'm leaving it out for now. Maybe the charting of Voice with mec and gut trace will lead somewhere.
I guess it's all gut decision trace mec can tap directly in, and I should skip direct body tracing of the chart for alternate exercises to keep my usual mindbody source for reading a chart and its angles ectetera fresh with energy.
So there you have it: The order is gut trace, gut decision trace, mec; and, the energy tap is gut trace, and the emotion energy tap is, of course, mec, which simply runs with what's there and spends all its time positioning its perspective.

Finally, I understand tape reading has volume in it. Maybe my recent (undoc) foray into it can add a necessary dimension to progress of my endeavor.




again:



Attachment
-- There's nothing to this, really, it's just my cribbed way of putting it that's a bit cryptic.
There are five polygons -- grid (thus, rectangle), fan (thus, triangle), line, in the middle; curve (thus, circle (or, in charting, ellipse)), on top; and, point/pivot/dot on the bottom --

and five ratios -- half/even, with grid; fractal, which has contribution from grid, then fib, more directly related to fan, and next perfect (numbers), a functional inclusion which has contribution from line, each of the three with fan; and, square, with line. A curve internalizes any of the ratios into angles, and a dot externalizes any of the (three middle) polygons with their set (beginning definitions of angles of) shapes.

I only implied combos from certain polygons and specialized projections -- that is, named patterns -- from certain ratios with polygons.
These apply in fewer cases and often skewed inside the range of the pattern I originally defined/found. Most of the time, I must remain agile enough to interpret about anything into a temporary pattern, and so have the above list (or graph or whatever it is called) to fill this role.

Plus, I watch my inner critic for how it uses the above,
as well as monitor my day's and current immediate surroundings for inner influences on my behavior and how that feeds into my decision structure.
-- I read in science that they closely relate emotions and gut trace and say they detach from reality easily; only, I've yet to pinpoint functionally how this works, despite the obvious help from the cycle of market emotions and my simplified version of it and my use and expansion of the idea of gut trace, so I'm leaving it out for now. Maybe the charting of Voice with mec and gut trace will lead somewhere.
I guess it's all gut decision trace mec can tap directly in, and I should skip direct body tracing of the chart for alternate exercises to keep my usual mindbody source for reading a chart and its angles ectetera fresh with energy.
So there you have it: The order is gut trace, gut decision trace, mec; and, the energy tap is gut trace, and the emotion energy tap is, of course, mec, which simply runs with what's there and spends all its time positioning its perspective.

Finally, I understand tape reading has volume in it. Maybe my recent (undoc) foray into it can add a necessary dimension to progress of my endeavor.



--------


I noticed 'dynamic balance' -- one obvious balancing area, and then another balancing area after it that has some extra thing to it that makes it dynamic -- in this cut-up set of chart from here and here:

I guess that's what my method's called, 'dynamic balance'. Or maybe not: 'Line patterns', for using projecting lines from patterns, is fairly unusual to do, at least explicitly.







p1, adj -- "in short" add:




Attachment
-- There's nothing to this, really, it's just my cribbed way of putting it that's a bit cryptic.
There are five polygons -- grid (thus, rectangle), fan (thus, triangle), line, in the middle; curve (thus, circle (or, in charting, ellipse)), on top; and, point/pivot/dot on the bottom --

and five ratios -- half/even, with grid; fractal, which has contribution from grid, then fib, more directly related to fan, and next perfect (numbers), a functional inclusion which has contribution from line, each of the three with fan; and, square, with line. A curve internalizes any of the ratios into angles, and a dot externalizes any of the (three middle) polygons with their set (beginning definitions of angles of) shapes.

I only implied combos from certain polygons and specialized projections -- that is, named patterns -- from certain ratios with polygons.
These apply in fewer cases and often skewed inside the range of the pattern I originally defined/found. Most of the time, I must remain agile enough to interpret about anything into a temporary pattern, and so have the above list (or graph or whatever it is called) to fill this role.
In short:
most of the time, be agile with a list -- polygons-ratios limits list (any ratio in angles with circles; any line group with dots; half/even ratio with grid, fractal (like half/even) or fib or perfect (numbers; like square) with fan, square ratio with line)
sometimes, specific patterns work well enough -- various patterns with set polygon-ratio specifications

Plus, I watch my inner critic for how it uses the above,
as well as monitor my day's and current immediate surroundings for inner influences on my behavior and how that feeds into my decision structure.
-- I read in science that they closely relate emotions and gut trace and say they detach from reality easily; only, I've yet to pinpoint functionally how this works, despite the obvious help from the cycle of market emotions and my simplified version of it and my use and expansion of the idea of gut trace, so I'm leaving it out for now. Maybe the charting of Voice with mec and gut trace will lead somewhere.
I guess it's all gut decision trace mec can tap directly in, and I should skip direct body tracing of the chart for alternate exercises to keep my usual mindbody source for reading a chart and its angles ectetera fresh with energy.
So there you have it: The order is gut trace, gut decision trace, mec; and, the energy tap is gut trace, and the emotion energy tap is, of course, mec, which simply runs with what's there and spends all its time positioning its perspective.

Finally, I understand tape reading has volume in it. Maybe my recent (undoc) foray into it can add a necessary dimension to progress of my endeavor.




p1 condensed in adj'ing:





Attachment
-- most of the time, be agile with a list -- polygons-ratios limits list (any ratio in angles with circles; any line group with dots; half/even ratio with grid, fractal (like half/even) or fib or perfect (numbers; like square) with fan, square ratio with line)
sometimes, specific patterns work well enough, due to various patterns with set polygon-ratio specifications, including combos and specialized projections.
-- Plus, I watch my inner critic for how it uses the above, as well as monitor my day's and current immediate surroundings for inner influences on my behavior and how that feeds into my decision structure. The order is gut trace, gut decision trace, mec; and, the energy tap is gut trace, and the emotion energy tap is, of course, mec, which simply runs with what's there and spends all its time positioning its perspective.
-- Finally, I understand tape reading has volume in it. Maybe my recent (undoc) foray into it can add a necessary dimension to progress of my endeavor.



---------



I ignored ratios here, except for noting whether or not they'd interfere with the great specific pattern I found: An l.p.3. It had what I considered an angle directive for the into-space portion of it, especially since the upper later three lines had the ratio in it:






p1 adj, one line added -- ' This is chart internalization, one could call it. ' -- after the gut trace paragraph, which had no title.


continuation of this section:


-- Plus, I watch my inner critic for how it uses the above, as well as monitor my day's and current immediate surroundings for inner influences on my behavior and how that feeds into my decision structure. The order is gut trace, gut decision trace, mec; and, the energy tap is gut trace, and the emotion energy tap is, of course, mec, which simply runs with what's there and spends all its time positioning its perspective. More specifically, mec has the same energy input and different interaction times polarity, while gut trace changes this as the base of emotion's position on mec. This is chart internalization, one could call it.
sum: gut trace is interaction, decision is direction, mec is interact*direction=polarity; as in, any pattern*certain angle = yes or no.








p1 adj, all of it too, since added 'dot' description about the 'rd #'s' in picture:






Attachment
-- most of the time, be agile with a list -- polygons-ratios limits list (any ratio in angles with circles; any line group with dots, round numbers from dots of a price each; half/even ratio with grid, fractal (like half/even) or fib or perfect (numbers; like square) with fan, square ratio with line)
sometimes, specific patterns work well enough, due to various patterns with set polygon-ratio specifications, including combos and specialized projections.
-- Plus, I watch my inner critic for how it uses the above, as well as monitor my day's and current immediate surroundings for inner influences on my behavior and how that feeds into my decision structure. The order is gut trace, gut decision trace, mec; and, the energy tap is gut trace, and the emotion energy tap is, of course, mec, which simply runs with what's there and spends all its time positioning its perspective. More specifically, mec has the same energy input and different interaction times polarity, while gut trace changes this as the base of emotion's position on mec. This is chart internalization, one could call it.
sum: gut trace is interaction, decision is direction, mec is interact*direction=polarity; as in, any pattern*certain angle = yes or no.
-- Finally, I understand tape reading has volume in it. Maybe my recent (undoc) foray into it can add a necessary dimension to progress of my endeavor.








p1, new picture -- adds 'micro-trend angle series', probably the most-important and -intuitive method of charting (the right-hand side of two pointing lines and its rightmost description):




thus, add to list : " ; micro-trend angles with trend lines , the rightmost connection"

"It's all a scam, is called natural selection!

Forex is a filter, the university is a filter, getting food is a filter .. which only suitable will pass." -- jonander50


p1, new:




-- The carats represent pressures, the small ones in the direction of the point and the big ones as an expansion from its point. The ellipses are empty space.
The catch-phrases of "(micro-)lines" and "(combo) poly's" captures fairly much any innovated pattern I have or will come up with, although lots stretch the boundaries of pivot,curve and line with their repetitions, off-the-price-action-line use, and compounding of other patterns.
-- The main thing about this is that micro-trend angles can be grouped in an area so that any small deviation, or %, of the whole retains the status quo of xy axes on the horizontal and vertical, and any large deviation, or 'axes', from the whole changes the status quo of xy axes to a diagonal-based one. Then, multi-lines may be built off these s/r's or TL's to suit. Alternatively, a larger pivot may be had by using (combo) poly's -- polygons and combinations of several ones -- and price then obeys lines extending from them.
Finally, in B), ratios permeate the chart, under 'curve', since only curves internalize the full range of ratios and also take 1D one ratio and another 1D another ratio to map a curve; so, perhaps an alternate is axis(two lines at 90-degree angle) with same ratios as lines or pivots and different ratios, in the middle, as curves.

Haven't gotten anywhere with trading, so doing a 90-10 split between involvement of self and actual charting.



Post dump, for lack of fitting in with rest of thread --


I think the intuition of experience creates a right of knowing far more often than the near-random behavior consciousness allows:

low -- The "busy mind" (from meditation) takes over against unknown dangers to sustain balance with one's greater status quo, redoing a consciously ordinary trade into a manifesto of the moment in one's life. This exchange may warp, misplace, or be right but high (low), uncontainably emotional (unreadably wise):

1. the proximity of a random, often-interactive other creates measure of a barrier; a presumptive high-flying (emotional) intuition makes an intuitive study a given; or, the protection of one's energies creates gradations around oneself for slow inclusion of information
2. preemptive (sketchy) or long-contained low-flying (flowing) intuition
3. protected post-emptive (ah-ha moment), or a consecutive series of interactions align simply to fill in the details of a complex, fast encounter
4. repositioning alternate (self or others hide or show the limits of one's abilities to the area and thus any compensation)
5. allows an alternate addiction to steadfastly allow comparison to a stressful scenario,
   or the cycling between levels for the balance along consecutive actions of where the final level is

high -- Chart containment of patterns through their progressive interaction to begin and end an area. Divisions simplified to absolute -- dot,line,curve;multi-/combo-;ratio -- any patterns.



rewrite of above --

prox rnd other -> block
presumptive-intuition emotion -> jump
protective gradations around self -> immerse
peemptive intuition -> sketch
contained off-radar intuition -> hold
protected post-emptive -> surprise
consective,small,aligned filling-in interactions -> encounter
self or other hide or show level contents -> position
addiction comparison or heavy-level encounter -> level
graphic measure of contents (dot,line,curve;multi-/combo-;ratio) -> pattern


TRADE SKILLS
prox rnd other -> block
presumptive-intuition emotion -> jump
protective gradations around self -> immerse
preemptive intuition -> sketch
contained off-radar intuition -> hold
protected post-emptive -> surprise
consective,small,aligned filling-in interactions -> encounter
self or other hide or show level contents -> position
addiction comparison or heavy-level encounter -> level
graphic measure of contents (dot,line,curve;multi-/combo-;ratio) -> pattern

post #1, new:








three levels to chart --
this

TRADE SKILLS
prox rnd other -> block
presumptive-intuition emotion -> jump
protective gradations around self -> immerse
preemptive intuition -> sketch
contained off-radar intuition -> hold
protected post-emptive -> surprise
consective,small,aligned filling-in interactions -> encounter
self or other hide or show level contents -> position
addiction comparison or heavy-level encounter -> level
graphic measure of contents (dot,line,curve;multi-/combo-;ratio) -> pattern[/quote]

this --- gut,entire-body,talk,env't (object(ive,idea)),emotion

and this
the 'dot' etc. in the following example of combining all three:

Chart is gut level copied, chart shapes drawn in detail, and axal sources triangulated.
-- Example is between two gut levels, one using voice for entire-body impact and environs idea to anchor vector for such an impact, the receiver of said impact, and the object(ive/idea) involved.

(key+volume) change projected with voice |,THAT IS,| voice and thus projectable body-position 'attitude'
+ third object(ive/idea) to reference with -ee and either from -er or -ee
= change in cartilage in other, that is, voice and/or cartilage response to this stimulus

With a chart connecting -er,-ee and object(ive/idea), these shapes:
dot -- balance with attention to
line segment -- angle of interaction, including opposition and levels
corner -- logr
curve -- fractal
box (which is opposing corners) -- midline

example of use of formula charted: "!@#$% (a type of person)" -- example of dot - and - line use, positioning the -ee at a lower level while directing said insult so -ee will, depending on the projection's accepted angle of interaction, balance upon it all of the -ee's energy