Pattern's Chemo-Electric Trading Journal

------------------


Procrastination
"plan, organize, staff, lead, and control"
-- suggests mgt lvg's addictions, or at least flips (of anchor asymptotic flip cross opp)

Traders mng themselves.

.
.

--------




p1 add:










flow micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec or symbolic L or R), or macro-(hz grid thru midline) area adjusts, in time only,
anchor. polygon pivot stacks to nowhere --> (nothing)
asymptotic. lp3 skews one way --> regular(spec or symbolic L or R) area
flip. lp5 vert's both ways --> micro-(vert or hz) area
cross. logr (momentum: expansive/contractive +,-) expands one way; mid- (equal +,-) expands both ways --> macro-(valence (+,-: divideable amount up or down) plus volatility (randomness within a set time), when settled between valences, may produce momentum, and visa-versa) area
opp. super-big candle or area, or a peculiar run of small candle sets in relation to an old, super-big line --> all (relatively)

Emotion is post- all this, with bare affects from each.
Why: The above slowly establishes and then builds upon two axes.
Also, each emotion can be expressed in terms of the above.
The grid in mec assumes a set grid, upon which smaller variations using the above can happen as layers, say one or one side of the above is dominant in a relation (1,0;1,1;1,sev'l;1,inf.).
how I think of it: Cross is only horizontal and flip only vertical, asymptotic a shadow of both, position anchor, and path opp(osite) (each item along the way). Anchor and opp are then 'free' of any one chart and its two axes, and flip the most tied into there being an axis.







p1 rewrite:











flow micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec or symbolic L or R), or macro-(hz grid thru midline) area adjusts, in time only,
anchor. polygon pivot stacks to nowhere --> (nothing)
asymptotic. lp3 skews one way --> regular(spec or symbolic L or R) area
flip. lp5 vert's both ways --> micro-(vert or hz) area
cross. logr (momentum: expansive/contractive +,-) expands one way; mid- (equal +,-) expands both ways --> macro-(valence (+,-: divideable amount up or down) plus volatility (randomness within a set time), when settled between valences, may produce momentum, and visa-versa) area
opp. super-big candle or area, or a peculiar run of small candle sets in relation to an old, super-big line --> all (relatively)

Emotion -- each of which can be expressed in terms of the above --is post- all this, with bare affects from each.
Why: The above slowly establishes and then builds upon two axes:
Cross is only horizontal and flip only vertical, asymptotic a shadow of both, position anchor, and path opp(osite) (each item along the way). Anchor and opp are then 'free' of any one chart and its two axes, and flip the most tied into there being an axis.
The grid in mec assumes a set grid, and thus not only flip (vertical -- gravity, person, price; relatively, esp. w/mec, could temporarily be horizontal, which would then make cross vertical) but at least asymptotic or cross, which would often skew when anchor upon or opp to it as a layer (1,0(w/self);1,1(w/other);1,sev'l(w/group);1,inf.(w/all (considered))).







--------


moved post, was ignored and it has value:


I like the phrase 'run your profits and take losses quickly'.

Regardless, you said
Forex seems perfectly suited to do this, versus other markets. I've tried a few ways, without it holding for me.
What's your approach?
(Or where was it posted..)












--------------




p1 new:








them : flip, i.e. (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo
spike(vert'l trend angle; me) , Y bland (them); overload -- self : anchor-opp, i.e. stacked (triangles) (rectangle) - bar/angle
me : cross - asymptotic, i.e. L:M - (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed



---------

p1 dump:



how you work any environment with the source of unlimited P/L






p1 rewrite:









chemical-face-emotion, each
. them : flip, i.e. (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo
. spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland : anchor-opp, i.e. stacked (triangles) (rectangle) - bar/angle
. me : cross - asymptotic, i.e. L:M - (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed




post #1 rewrite:






chemical(+-ch'l, overlaying n/c)-face(position chart)-emotion(mec), each of them and me and, opt'l, exchange (else creates forever-existence-+ dependence (feed))
. them : flip, i.e. (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo
. balance : spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland : anchor-opp, i.e. stacked (triangles) (rectangle) - bar/angle
. me : cross - asymptotic, i.e. L:M - (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed\\\


-face[/b](position chart)-emotion(mec)[b], Procrastination
"plan, organize, staff, lead, and control"
-- suggests mgt lvg's addictions, or at least flips (of anchor asymptotic flip cross opp)\
(1-5 / 2-4 / 3)-structure build (1->5) order, anchor-asymptotic-flip-cross-opp

post #1 rewrite:






chemical(+-ch'l, overlaying n/c)-face(position chart)-emotion(mec), each of them and me and, opt'l, exchange (else creates forever-existence-+ dependence (feed))
. them : flip, i.e. (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo
. balance : spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland : anchor-opp, i.e. stacked (triangles) (rectangle) - bar/angle
. me : cross - asymptotic, i.e. L:M - (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed\


-face[/b](position chart)-emotion(mec)[b], Procrastination
"plan, organize, staff, lead, and control"
-- suggests mgt lvg's addictions, or at least flips (of anchor asymptotic flip cross opp)
order -- (1-5 / 2-4 / 3)-structure build (1->5) -- anchor-asymptotic-flip-cross-opp


st-0's ( t.m. : #)

(used in face (iAT), emotion, st-0's t.m.:#, +-ch'ls, gut trace (opt'l: on concept), cl positioning (from cb echo), spinning triangle and attention's cv, etc.

ex. reality pattern -- position A, B, C, D -> exchange -> turn in for risk of exchange -> profit (or not) -> do tasks in regular exchange






p1 dump:




anchor. stacked (triangles) (rectangle)
asymptotic. (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed
flip. bar/angle
cross. L:M trace
opp. (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo

use --
structure (1-5 / 2-4 / 3)
build (1->5)
adjust ( put one or two on one side and same on other side, w/balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland) measured in middle)





each w/severity of addiction:
anchor (shell). stacked (triangles) (rectangle)
asymptotic (scenario). (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed
flip (volatility). bar/angle
cross(cycle). L:M trace
opp(series). (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo

use --
structure (1-5 / 2-4 / 3)
build (1->5)
adjust ( put one or two on one side and same on other side, w/balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland) measured in middle)










p1 adj:







each w/optional (severity-of-addiction ~ 'exchange') structure for chart study:
anchor (non-;shell). stacked (triangles) (rectangle)
asymptotic (non-,forced;series). (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed
flip (mild;volatility). bar/angle
cross(mild,forced;1.-10. cycle). L:M trace
opp(severe;cycle). (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo

use --
structure (1-5 / 2-4 / 3)
build (1->5)
adjust ( put one or two on one side and same on other side, w/balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland) measured in middle)










-----------







p1 adj,dump:








dump:

anchor/shell/1,asymptotic/scenario/3,flip/volatility/bar-angle,cross/series/L:M,opp/cycle/5
,where 1 stacked (triangles) (rectangle). 3 (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed, 5 (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo









adj:










volatility/shell
asymptotic-3
opp-5
cross-L:M
flip-bar/angle,
,where 1 stacked (triangles) (rectangle). 3 (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed, 5 (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo
use --
structure (1-5 / 2-4 / 3) , build (1->5) , adjust (one - balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland, w/one - one)




volatility/shell, asymptotic-3, opp-5, cross-L:M, flip-bar/angle
-- 1(shell) stacked (triangles) (rectangle). 3 (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed, 5 (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo
use -- structure (1-5 / 2-4 / 3) , build (1->5) , adjust (one - balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland, w/one - one)

Hello Ha-Pattern,

Interesting post here on addiction.

Re: food being addictive. For sure. I also wonder if some of the fast food recipes have something in them to keep people coming back for more. Will read through some of your other comments on the levels of addiction.

FX4

Thanks for visiting.

The example is personally familiar

I've an interest in how scenarios form, as that controls how well I chart technicals,
and feel this is an easy way to range them for trading -- even if the description in the article is a bit raw.

p1 dump (effective):


volatility/shell, asymptotic-3, opp-5, cross-L:M, flip-bar/angle
-- 1(shell) is stacked (triangles) (rectangle).
3 is (triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed, also called l.p.3 or fibonacci fan
5 is (triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo, also called l.p.5
logr (momentum) ratio with mid- (line), where Gann Fan w/ momo, grid
use -- structure (1-5 / 2-4 / 3) , build (1->5) , adjust (one - balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland, w/one - one)



# sides
multi- -- l.p. 5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo), grid, bar/angle
several- -- polygon : triangle, rectangle
two- -- l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed),balance/plus / volatility(random) shape
one- -- pitchfork/channel, Gann/fibonacci; curve
non- -- stack, opp/mid-, series





p1 new:
































(size)

in form of inner representation of pattern -- example of proxy for scenario

somewhere along the line of studies,selection,impression,entry,and follow-through, I include negative feeling with the data to reason with, that is, I step aside from my barely-conscious mind that I decide where to draw possibilities with, to reinterpret whether or not to take a trade; that is, interrupts skew the intuition call.
Or, after the intuition call, entire groups of (non)trading instances follow in my mind and weigh against the initial one to interpret the second. That is, another scenario stacks on the first. It creates that final pattern gets stuck in my body as a positioning so that my mind projects outside of me a scenario how to use that trade to resolve thru compromise my own positioning with some worldly difficulty, etc.

i.e., this simple range defining CD


times


(intensity)

in form of addiction, example of inner-variables interpretation for scenario

adjust (one - balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland, w/one - one)

non-
life and death go thru one comprehensive cycle --
one place has no heart disease or, maybe, addictions
dangers : guess -- motor: awareness(inhibition/excitation) of environs and social conflict (mid- and frontal brain, respectively) or both (modern skill to, perhaps, or...)(pregnancy, other activities)

non-, forced
(tabula rasa, the typical); that is,
behavior training that addresses input and speed rather than the entire being (socratic) --
" “re-start”... attention during the “low” {timing to} attention cycles of the brain. One area of concern is assessment... learned and retained....
mental breaks during learning gives the brain time to relax and process... a way .... cross-lateral exercises....
variety of ways to present ....Making information relevant..."
" provoking emotions.... expressed by enthusiasm during cooperative" "music... stimulation..."1

mild
"Better yet, two or three calorie-controlled pink or brown diet shakes throughout the day followed by a "sensible dinner." The sauce on the turkey in that 230 calorie microwaveable meal has such a unique taste. Four or five days a week at the gym, walking or running or elliptical or aerobics. It's exhausting, but you tell yourself you feel good, and for a couple months, success. Pounds come off, closer-to-goal pants come on - right up until you crack and end up face first in a plate of warm brownies one time too many."1

forced-mild
"They had to institute a buddy system so that none of the men were allowed to leave the dormitory alone, as one man went off diet and had to be excused from the study. They had dizziness, cold intolerance (requesting heavy blankets even in the middle of summer), muscle soreness, hair loss, reduced coordination, edema, and ringing in the ears. Some had to withdraw from their university classes because they did not have the capability to concentrate. Their sex drive disappeared. They became obsessed with food, eating with elaborate rituals (which eating disorder patients also do) and adding water to their plates to make the food last longer. Many collected cookbooks and recipes. One man, tempted by the odor from a bakery, bought a dozen doughnuts and gave them to children in the street just to watch them eat. Originally, the participants were allowed to chew gum, but when many of the men went to chewing about 40 sticks a day, it was decided that gum would affect the experiment and it was disallowed.

Only 32 of the original 36 completed the semistarvation period. One man who broke diet admitted to stealing scrapings from the garbage cans, stealing and eating raw rutabagas, and stopping at shops to eat sundaes. Two of the men suffered severe psychological stress - one became suicidal, and another cut off three of his fingers in an act of self-mutilation. Both men were taken to a psychiatric hospital.

The 3 month refeeding period involved trying several different combinations of protein, vitamins, and levels of calories. Dizziness, apathy and lethargy improved first, but persistent hunger, weakness, and loss of sex drive persisted for several months. The men described "a year long cavity" that needed to be filled. The day after they were finally released from the study, one of the men was hospitalized to have his stomach pumped after binging. In the aftermath of the study, "many, like Roscoe Hinkle, put on substantial weight: Boy did I add weight. Well, that was flab. You don't have muscle yet. And get[ting] the muscle back again, boy that's no fun." None who were interviewed in their 80s felt there was any lasting medical harm, once they'd recovered.

What strikes me the most about this study is how close it is to the standard recommendations for weight loss today (500-1000 calorie deficit daily for goal of 1-2 pounds lost a week, plus moderate exercise). The difference is by degree (1700 calorie deficit daily for goal of 2.5 pounds lost a week), and the fact that the men were normal weight when they began the study. But this strict diet sent 6% of the participants to the psychiatric hospital - and these were highly motivated, healthy young men! There is also a marked contrast between the psychological states in this long-term semi-starvation and reports of shorter-term water fasts. " ibid
I've done shorter-term water fasts, and one of mine slowed down my entire body and I moved as if I were in slow motion in extreme environmental conditions. I felt I had accomplished a pivotal event, since it was in a row with other self-training activities in one practice of mine.

severe
This is the traditional view of an addiction cycle.
1 (paraphrased and quoted) 1 "frustration-craving coping with a major life event
{2} fantacizing will weigh out the pros and cons of such use and oftentimes will not speak openly about these thoughts.
{3} obsession... fantasies will grow in the addicts mind to the point where the thought is nearly constant. The obsessions of drug use may be accompanied by a sense of impending doom and the addict might simply come to terms with the idea of using again.
{4} the actual addictive activity. This varies depending on what addiction the addict is recovering from
{5} This drug use tends to spiral out of the addicts control. When control is lost and the addictive activity is running the addict's life, the fifth step commences which is characterized by powerlessness over the activity. The addict will use drugs during inappropriate times and even when he or she doesn't truly want to. An addict in this phase may feel completely incapable of abstaining for even a relatively small period of time.
{6} After loss of control has been established, the addict is using drugs in a completely chaotic fashion. This leads to feelings of shame, guilt, or remorse which are the traits of the sixth step. The addict may feel very regretful about his or her decision to use drugs again and may also be too embarrassed to let anybody know about these insecurities. Self-image is negatively affected in this phase and a sense of dissatisfaction for life is also noted in most cases.
{7} Once guilt has consumed the addict to the point of submission, the addict will begin to make resolutions to end the behavior. This may include promises to others or self that use will soon end. It may also consist of a vow to end drug use forever and possible disposal of drug paraphernalia. The drug use may abruptly end for a period of time and when a proper
recovery plan isn't put into action the eighth step may occur, which starts the cycle all over again.
{8}... discomfort or mental anguish. This is almost identical to the first step and the addict will often forget the chain of events that occurred during the last relapse which may cause drug use fantasies to return. Mental pain is the main characteristic of this phase and unless the addict finds help one way or another, this cycle can repeat for the rest of their lives."


of


(shape)

, each projectible

any(flip) volatility/random
one pivot(stack), line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
opposite balance/plus, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)
skew(asymptotic) l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed),fib fan,viral grid
tensegrity(cross) Gann fan, hachured grid, series (bar/angle)

pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew







------------









p1 adj titles:



















(potential energy)

gut trace

somewhere along the line of studies,selection,impression,entry,and follow-through, I include negative feeling with the data to reason with, that is, I step aside from my barely-conscious mind that I decide where to draw possibilities with, to reinterpret whether or not to take a trade; that is, interrupts skew the intuition call.
Or, after the intuition call, entire groups of (non)trading instances follow in my mind and weigh against the initial one to interpret the second. That is, another scenario stacks on the first. It creates that final pattern gets stuck in my body as a positioning so that my mind projects outside of me a scenario how to use that trade to resolve thru compromise my own positioning with some worldly difficulty, etc.

i.e., this simple range defining CD


(active energy)

addiction

adjust (one - balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland, w/one - one)

non-
life and death go thru one comprehensive cycle --
one place has no heart disease or, maybe, addictions
dangers : guess -- motor: awareness(inhibition/excitation) of environs and social conflict (mid- and frontal brain, respectively) or both (modern skill to, perhaps, or...)(pregnancy, other activities)

non-, forced
(tabula rasa, the typical); that is,
behavior training that addresses input and speed rather than the entire being (socratic) --
" “re-start”... attention during the “low” {timing to} attention cycles of the brain. One area of concern is assessment... learned and retained....
mental breaks during learning gives the brain time to relax and process... a way .... cross-lateral exercises....
variety of ways to present ....Making information relevant..."
" provoking emotions.... expressed by enthusiasm during cooperative" "music... stimulation..."1

mild
"Better yet, two or three calorie-controlled pink or brown diet shakes throughout the day followed by a "sensible dinner." The sauce on the turkey in that 230 calorie microwaveable meal has such a unique taste. Four or five days a week at the gym, walking or running or elliptical or aerobics. It's exhausting, but you tell yourself you feel good, and for a couple months, success. Pounds come off, closer-to-goal pants come on - right up until you crack and end up face first in a plate of warm brownies one time too many."1

forced-mild
"They had to institute a buddy system so that none of the men were allowed to leave the dormitory alone, as one man went off diet and had to be excused from the study. They had dizziness, cold intolerance (requesting heavy blankets even in the middle of summer), muscle soreness, hair loss, reduced coordination, edema, and ringing in the ears. Some had to withdraw from their university classes because they did not have the capability to concentrate. Their sex drive disappeared. They became obsessed with food, eating with elaborate rituals (which eating disorder patients also do) and adding water to their plates to make the food last longer. Many collected cookbooks and recipes. One man, tempted by the odor from a bakery, bought a dozen doughnuts and gave them to children in the street just to watch them eat. Originally, the participants were allowed to chew gum, but when many of the men went to chewing about 40 sticks a day, it was decided that gum would affect the experiment and it was disallowed.

Only 32 of the original 36 completed the semistarvation period. One man who broke diet admitted to stealing scrapings from the garbage cans, stealing and eating raw rutabagas, and stopping at shops to eat sundaes. Two of the men suffered severe psychological stress - one became suicidal, and another cut off three of his fingers in an act of self-mutilation. Both men were taken to a psychiatric hospital.

The 3 month refeeding period involved trying several different combinations of protein, vitamins, and levels of calories. Dizziness, apathy and lethargy improved first, but persistent hunger, weakness, and loss of sex drive persisted for several months. The men described "a year long cavity" that needed to be filled. The day after they were finally released from the study, one of the men was hospitalized to have his stomach pumped after binging. In the aftermath of the study, "many, like Roscoe Hinkle, put on substantial weight: Boy did I add weight. Well, that was flab. You don't have muscle yet. And get[ting] the muscle back again, boy that's no fun." None who were interviewed in their 80s felt there was any lasting medical harm, once they'd recovered.

What strikes me the most about this study is how close it is to the standard recommendations for weight loss today (500-1000 calorie deficit daily for goal of 1-2 pounds lost a week, plus moderate exercise). The difference is by degree (1700 calorie deficit daily for goal of 2.5 pounds lost a week), and the fact that the men were normal weight when they began the study. But this strict diet sent 6% of the participants to the psychiatric hospital - and these were highly motivated, healthy young men! There is also a marked contrast between the psychological states in this long-term semi-starvation and reports of shorter-term water fasts. " ibid
I've done shorter-term water fasts, and one of mine slowed down my entire body and I moved as if I were in slow motion in extreme environmental conditions. I felt I had accomplished a pivotal event, since it was in a row with other self-training activities in one practice of mine.

severe
This is the traditional view of an addiction cycle.
1 (paraphrased and quoted) 1 "frustration-craving coping with a major life event
{2} fantacizing will weigh out the pros and cons of such use and oftentimes will not speak openly about these thoughts.
{3} obsession... fantasies will grow in the addicts mind to the point where the thought is nearly constant. The obsessions of drug use may be accompanied by a sense of impending doom and the addict might simply come to terms with the idea of using again.
{4} the actual addictive activity. This varies depending on what addiction the addict is recovering from
{5} This drug use tends to spiral out of the addicts control. When control is lost and the addictive activity is running the addict's life, the fifth step commences which is characterized by powerlessness over the activity. The addict will use drugs during inappropriate times and even when he or she doesn't truly want to. An addict in this phase may feel completely incapable of abstaining for even a relatively small period of time.
{6} After loss of control has been established, the addict is using drugs in a completely chaotic fashion. This leads to feelings of shame, guilt, or remorse which are the traits of the sixth step. The addict may feel very regretful about his or her decision to use drugs again and may also be too embarrassed to let anybody know about these insecurities. Self-image is negatively affected in this phase and a sense of dissatisfaction for life is also noted in most cases.
{7} Once guilt has consumed the addict to the point of submission, the addict will begin to make resolutions to end the behavior. This may include promises to others or self that use will soon end. It may also consist of a vow to end drug use forever and possible disposal of drug paraphernalia. The drug use may abruptly end for a period of time and when a proper
recovery plan isn't put into action the eighth step may occur, which starts the cycle all over again.
{8}... discomfort or mental anguish. This is almost identical to the first step and the addict will often forget the chain of events that occurred during the last relapse which may cause drug use fantasies to return. Mental pain is the main characteristic of this phase and unless the addict finds help one way or another, this cycle can repeat for the rest of their lives."


(boundaries)

, each projectible
-- prove-and-first touch of projectible
any(flip) volatility/random
one pivot(stack), line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
opposite balance/plus, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)
skew(asymptotic) l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed),fib fan,viral grid
tensegrity(cross) Gann fan, hachured grid, series (bar/angle)
-- random touch of projectible
pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew












p1 adj:




(more subtitle rewriting and section moving)




























(list to make edge from)

-- random touch of projectible, how lists a method in and of itself and thus accurate in a random-touch sense
pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew

-- prove-and-first-touch of projectible : latest list of approaches, categories of them not necessarily accurate
one pivot(stack), line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
any(flip) volatility/random,
opposite balance/plus, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)
tensegrity(cross) Gann fan, hachured grid, series (bar/angle)
skew(asymptotic) l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed),fib fan,viral grid


(other inclusions)

gut trace : this simple range defining CD : interrupt, weigh, portion

. somewhere along the line of studies,selection,impression,entry,and follow-through, I include negative feeling with the data to reason with, that is, I step aside from my barely-conscious mind that I decide where to draw possibilities with, to reinterpret whether or not to take a trade; that is, interrupts skew the intuition call.


. Or, after the intuition call, entire groups of (non)trading instances follow in my mind and weigh against the initial one to interpret the second. That is, a typical, recent scenario stacks on the first. It creates that final pattern gets stuck in my body as a positioning so that my mind projects outside of me a scenario how to use that trade to resolve thru compromise my own positioning with some worldly difficulty, etc.


. macro-topic relational portioning of other activities to exist and include with trading activity: An addiction covers a little of every activity you do, sustaining interrupt/weigh activity over potentially much longer a time and thus much deeper influence than mere lack of skill in leveraging that typical scenario for its benefits. 'How much' is another way to put a "topic" as a variable in body traces:
It'll make a typical scenario important, due to the addiction activity that creates negativity for oneself, and thus carry thinking patterns and even, subconsciously, the material directly connected to those thinking patterns, to decide on or repeatedly use from that typical scenario.

-- ADDICTION note typical scenarios: boss-employee(s) relations -- tasks-manipulation , social-positioning or - (inner) criticism (high, painful variability); sports achievement imagery, routine chores, driving in a car near business ads and other stimuli. Each person has their own general scenarios. Also look for thematic reaction that covers a portion of each typical scenario for the person; this enters the realm of addiction.

adjust (one - balance (spike(vert'l trend angle) from X focus to over/underload from Y bland, w/one - one)

non-
life and death go thru one comprehensive cycle --
one place has no heart disease or, maybe, addictions
dangers : guess -- motor: awareness(inhibition/excitation) of environs and social conflict (mid- and frontal brain, respectively) or both (modern skill to, perhaps, or...)(pregnancy, other activities.)

non-, forced
(tabula rasa, the typical); that is,
behavior training that addresses input and speed rather than the entire being (socratic) --
" “re-start”... attention during the “low” {timing to} attention cycles of the brain. One area of concern is assessment... learned and retained....
mental breaks during learning gives the brain time to relax and process... a way .... cross-lateral exercises....
variety of ways to present ....Making information relevant..."
" provoking emotions.... expressed by enthusiasm during cooperative" "music... stimulation..."1

mild
"Better yet, two or three calorie-controlled pink or brown diet shakes throughout the day followed by a "sensible dinner." The sauce on the turkey in that 230 calorie microwaveable meal has such a unique taste. Four or five days a week at the gym, walking or running or elliptical or aerobics. It's exhausting, but you tell yourself you feel good, and for a couple months, success. Pounds come off, closer-to-goal pants come on - right up until you crack and end up face first in a plate of warm brownies one time too many."1

forced-mild
"They had to institute a buddy system so that none of the men were allowed to leave the dormitory alone, as one man went off diet and had to be excused from the study. They had dizziness, cold intolerance (requesting heavy blankets even in the middle of summer), muscle soreness, hair loss, reduced coordination, edema, and ringing in the ears. Some had to withdraw from their university classes because they did not have the capability to concentrate. Their sex drive disappeared. They became obsessed with food, eating with elaborate rituals (which eating disorder patients also do) and adding water to their plates to make the food last longer. Many collected cookbooks and recipes. One man, tempted by the odor from a bakery, bought a dozen doughnuts and gave them to children in the street just to watch them eat. Originally, the participants were allowed to chew gum, but when many of the men went to chewing about 40 sticks a day, it was decided that gum would affect the experiment and it was disallowed.

Only 32 of the original 36 completed the semistarvation period. One man who broke diet admitted to stealing scrapings from the garbage cans, stealing and eating raw rutabagas, and stopping at shops to eat sundaes. Two of the men suffered severe psychological stress - one became suicidal, and another cut off three of his fingers in an act of self-mutilation. Both men were taken to a psychiatric hospital.

The 3 month refeeding period involved trying several different combinations of protein, vitamins, and levels of calories. Dizziness, apathy and lethargy improved first, but persistent hunger, weakness, and loss of sex drive persisted for several months. The men described "a year long cavity" that needed to be filled. The day after they were finally released from the study, one of the men was hospitalized to have his stomach pumped after binging. In the aftermath of the study, "many, like Roscoe Hinkle, put on substantial weight: Boy did I add weight. Well, that was flab. You don't have muscle yet. And get[ting] the muscle back again, boy that's no fun." None who were interviewed in their 80s felt there was any lasting medical harm, once they'd recovered.

What strikes me the most about this study is how close it is to the standard recommendations for weight loss today (500-1000 calorie deficit daily for goal of 1-2 pounds lost a week, plus moderate exercise). The difference is by degree (1700 calorie deficit daily for goal of 2.5 pounds lost a week), and the fact that the men were normal weight when they began the study. But this strict diet sent 6% of the participants to the psychiatric hospital - and these were highly motivated, healthy young men! There is also a marked contrast between the psychological states in this long-term semi-starvation and reports of shorter-term water fasts. " ibid
I've done shorter-term water fasts, and one of mine slowed down my entire body and I moved as if I were in slow motion in extreme environmental conditions. I felt I had accomplished a pivotal event, since it was in a row with other self-training activities in one practice of mine.

severe
This is the traditional view of an addiction cycle.
1 (paraphrased and quoted) 1 "frustration-craving coping with a major life event
{2} fantacizing will weigh out the pros and cons of such use and oftentimes will not speak openly about these thoughts.
{3} obsession... fantasies will grow in the addicts mind to the point where the thought is nearly constant. The obsessions of drug use may be accompanied by a sense of impending doom and the addict might simply come to terms with the idea of using again.
{4} the actual addictive activity. This varies depending on what addiction the addict is recovering from
{5} This drug use tends to spiral out of the addicts control. When control is lost and the addictive activity is running the addict's life, the fifth step commences which is characterized by powerlessness over the activity. The addict will use drugs during inappropriate times and even when he or she doesn't truly want to. An addict in this phase may feel completely incapable of abstaining for even a relatively small period of time.
{6} After loss of control has been established, the addict is using drugs in a completely chaotic fashion. This leads to feelings of shame, guilt, or remorse which are the traits of the sixth step. The addict may feel very regretful about his or her decision to use drugs again and may also be too embarrassed to let anybody know about these insecurities. Self-image is negatively affected in this phase and a sense of dissatisfaction for life is also noted in most cases.
{7} Once guilt has consumed the addict to the point of submission, the addict will begin to make resolutions to end the behavior. This may include promises to others or self that use will soon end. It may also consist of a vow to end drug use forever and possible disposal of drug paraphernalia. The drug use may abruptly end for a period of time and when a proper
recovery plan isn't put into action the eighth step may occur, which starts the cycle all over again.
{8}... discomfort or mental anguish. This is almost identical to the first step and the addict will often forget the chain of events that occurred during the last relapse which may cause drug use fantasies to return. Mental pain is the main characteristic of this phase and unless the addict finds help one way or another, this cycle can repeat for the rest of their lives."

















--------------









p1 new:
















At the bounds of and inside each trade,

-- Draw general shapes: random touch of projectible as a regularity of shape
pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew

-- prove-and-first-touch and an independence axes bring
anchor pivot(stack), line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
skew(asymptotic) l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed),fib fan,viral grid
any(flip) volatility/random,
tensegrity(cross) Gann fan, hachured grid, series (bar/angle), L:M
opposite balance/plus, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)

-- Get sensitive to the smallest portions of the chart, so that one is primed to react appropriately to PA activity around general and specific lines.
Do entire chart study for a trade in one of the patterns below as an exercise in trade training,
and then blend in several with justified proportion each when trading at a higher level:
shell(opposite of volatility, where start from within and leave close awareness of self for acceptance and its continuance; tends to stay within self),
scenario(within an ordinary scene, imagine and overlay an extraordinary one, reinterpreting all in the ordinary to enact different results/satisfaction),
series (move along PA of chart, noting and connecting things see along the way, until reach 'destination'),
volatility (detail each of boundary, entrance, acceptance, continuance with each area; tends to bounce around different boundaries),
cycle (bounce between different levels of activity regularly).

Here's a Gann Fan forward and a fibonacci fan backward:
Gann Fan is overly midline-ish and its trend angles at first push upward and then go vertical and tighten up for a corner drop from all those midlines.
Fibonacci fan neatly portrays a skewed/momo higher area and solid midline-inclusive lower area.


(The second trade shown was off an l.p.5, what with the triangle-rectangle match and an imagined hz line between them.)
















-------------------------------










p1 new:

(includes gut intuition (what I've called 'CD')

















-- Each mindbody trace forms a separate/distinct, equally- and handle-ably - sized pattern,
so that one pattern may interrupt, weight vs., or surround another,
when found while doing a regular way to interpret information found while use one of the following venues to interact with environment, which one later defines specific projections from the environment with for later interactions trades are
shell(opposite of volatility, where start from within and leave close awareness of self for acceptance and its continuance; tends to stay within self),
scenario(within an ordinary scene, imagine and overlay an extraordinary one, reinterpreting all in the ordinary to enact different results/satisfaction),
series (move along PA of chart, noting and connecting things see along the way, until reach 'destination'),
boundary (detail each of boundary, entrance, acceptance, continuance with each area; tends to bounce around different boundaries),
cycle (bounce between different levels of activity regularly).

-- Get sensitive to the smallest portions of the chart, so that one is primed to react appropriately to PA activity around general and specific lines
once enter and begin to interact with environment.
One of, or an interrupt-weightvs.-surround mix therein, begin mindbody's projected shapes
Gut cog's on axis around stomach plate as how to digest information.
Body does same in form of reexperience a current leverageable part of or, in sequence, all of, as how to act:
the left-right (>x axis) -- w/recent activity, as well as vertebral lengths and twists set in, that create extra energy between levels from left to right -- push-pulls left from muscle movement
and the forward-backward (>y axis) fluid levels or locked-in level left from fight-or-flight response.
Mind demonstrates similar within an imagined environment so that reaction to any series of actions or digestion of information from environment is done in a certain pattern with respect to the axal balance in that environment.
more esoteric versions:
transfer from drawing on a piece of paper;
acceptance of another person's decision (gut) and instruction (body) within each person's position (mind) in given environment;
a wide-spanning, often-changing environment with one thread that is modeled into a series of events in a sort of pattern,
or conversely, multiple object/entities' changes in an environment over a set amount of time;
another neural plexus' activity.
Emotion, as a way to direct the entire mindbody forcefully and hurriedly, may tinge a mindbody trace enough to replace the last three steps, that of generalize, build upon, and trade within the type of interact with environment, such as a (market) emotion cycle would do.

-- Transfer of each type of interact with environment in small as well as a starter overall type,
generates raw, general (tend to keep extending along time) shapes: random touch of projectible as a regularity of shape
pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew

-- More into it, build independence axes bring (ex.'s of) shapes more discrete of time
and allow prove-and-first-touch capability to trade with.
anchor pivot(stack), line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
asymptotic(skew) l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed),fib fan,viral grid
any(flip) volatility/random,
tensegrity(cross) Gann fan, hachured grid, series (bar/angle), L:M
opposite balance/plus, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)

-- Once find mindbody trace that works, leverage it at the bounds of and inside each trade, which one defines the SL(s) and TP(s) from.

This is my final method, I now believe,
since it deals with non-trading in terms of trading, for trading,
all on the same level as every trading step.









So I didn't use the first step of the method, and margin-called.
Then I did, and adjusted how I thought about it with step 2,
and, haltingly, I profited.
Not saying I'm in any crisis enough to really test the system,
and it may've even been a postive-negative energy cycle that let me trade well. Anyway....


this is the environment that had me worried

this adjusted the environment to reduce my worry enough to go on haltingly

this is my first trade, a loss

win

win








Margin-called again.


I thought the posted trades were enough to put me over the edge. They weren't.

The reason this method is so long, is that life is tough and you have to deal with it to trade,
because when you're sitting there alone and have to depend on only you,
you must have your brain in order to get what you need and accept what you find.

I used to say or think that I'd have to do exercises to make it in trading.
If this post #1 suggests me to and how to do so, then I will. I'm not seeing it, right now.


Another margin call.

I corrected my emotions using mec intelligently,
but I didn't apply step 1 to it, which would've completed the self-study.

I think I can bond the mindbody pattern with interpretation of specific, step 4. (YAY!)
Of course, it'll be more general terms -- trend-angle flow, momentum, volatility, and the like.


Margin-called again. This time, entire account exploded.
No boundaries for my trade. The trade reason was right, only the follow-through was wrong.
What I think it was, was hope: Mec ran it up the flag pole, and I lost.
What I mean is, I put in a TP that was way too big, that I couldn't support with chart interpretation.

Margin-called again, or at least enough to try my patience.
I exchanged hope for details, and so understood what was going on,
only I kept missing the exit and that got so bad I missed an entire trade and lost the account.

It's like I spun out of control seven times in a row.
Now that's a pattern.


Things weigh on me heavily,..............................gut
I react sharply,....................................................mec
and I don't accept my skills as real....................environment: boundary

So it was step 1 and 2, as early on noted,
only I wasn't getting to the broad and deep base of my issue.

Can't ever have the possibility of this happening again:
The margin calls, any margin calls.
The rest, well that's life, something I HAVE to deal with, and post #1 can do it.



-------------

changing the specific patterns to more closely match general words, as noted above:


from

-- More into it, build independence axes bring (ex.'s of) shapes more discrete of time
and allow prove-and-first-touch capability to trade with.
anchor pivot(stack), line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
asymptotic(skew) l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed),fib fan,viral grid
any(flip) volatility/random,
tensegrity(cross) Gann fan, hachured grid, series (bar/angle), L:M
opposite balance/plus, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)


to


anchor -- line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
asymptotic(skew)
to
tensegrity(cross)
-- L:M (either skewed or crosses more) --
l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed)(more skewed),fib fan(more skewed),viral grid(more skewed), viral dot (overlapping segmented rhythms, each segment symmetric within itself -- the entirety momentum -- that match at a point that becomes only s or r)(more skewed) -- all use L:M more subtly, since more specific and more examples
to
Gann fan(crosses more), hachured grid(crosses more) -- both use L:M more obviously, since more general and fewer examples
any(flip, between skew and cross, and yet neither) volatility/random; bar/angle series
opposite,i.e., single crosses balance/plus,pivot(triangle stack as a rectangle); wide s/r,l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)


Well, it didn't end up as I wished.
It makes more sense now, only I use common terms within definitions and of a light nature.
This way establishes my separations more, which is essential to the method's clarity.
Hmmm....




I printed this chart, so changed mindbody trace's coordinates in new p1:







-- Each mindbody trace forms a separate/distinct, equally- and handle-ably - sized pattern,
so that one pattern may interrupt, weight vs., or surround another,
when found while doing a regular way to interpret information found while use one of the following venues to interact with environment, which one later defines specific projections from the environment with for later interactions trades are
shell(opposite of volatility, where start from within and leave close awareness of self for acceptance and its continuance; tends to stay within self),
scenario(within an ordinary scene, imagine and overlay an extraordinary one, reinterpreting all in the ordinary to enact different results/satisfaction),
series (move along PA of chart, noting and connecting things see along the way, until reach 'destination'),
boundary (detail each of boundary, entrance, acceptance, continuance with each area; tends to bounce around different boundaries),
cycle (bounce between different levels of activity regularly).

-- Get sensitive to the smallest portions of the chart, so that one is primed to react appropriately to PA activity around general and specific lines
once enter and begin to interact with environment.
One of, or an interrupt-weightvs.-surround mix therein, begin mindbody's projected shapes
Gut cog's on axis around stomach plate as how to digest information.
Body does same in form of reexperience a current leverageable part of or, in sequence, all of, as how to act:
the left-right (>x axis) -- w/recent activity, as well as vertebral lengths and twists set in, that create extra energy between levels from left to right -- push-pulls left from muscle movement
and the forward-backward (>y axis) fluid levels or locked-in level left from fight-or-flight response.
energy/volume(object/entity puts into xy axis) variable per division on xy axis.
consonance/dissonance ~ divergence or skew or asymptotic, positions a shape as excluded from others, or similar purpose.
Mind demonstrates similar within an imagined environment so that reaction to any series of actions or digestion of information from environment is done in a certain pattern with respect to the axal balance in that environment.
more esoteric versions:
transfer from drawing on a piece of paper;
acceptance of another person's decision (gut) and instruction (body) within each person's position (mind) in given environment;
a wide-spanning, often-changing environment with one thread that is modeled into a series of events in a sort of pattern,
or conversely, multiple object/entities' changes in an environment over a set amount of time;
another neural plexus' activity.
Emotion, as a way to direct the entire mindbody forcefully and hurriedly, may tinge a mindbody trace enough to replace the last three steps, that of generalize, build upon, and trade within the type of interact with environment, such as a (market) emotion cycle would do.

-- Transfer of each type of interact with environment in small as well as a starter overall type,
generates raw sketch, general (tend to keep extending along time) shapes: random touch of projectible as a regularity of shape
pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew

-- specific patterns. rough to perfect, small to super-size, each variable (dependent on other patterns adjusting it) thus weak or strong:
anchor -- line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
asymptotic(skew)
to
tensegrity(cross)
-- L:M (either skewed or crosses more) --
l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed)(more skewed),fib fan(more skewed),viral grid(more skewed), viral dot (overlapping segmented rhythms, each segment symmetric within itself -- the entirety momentum -- that match at a point that becomes only s or r)(more skewed) -- all use L:M more subtly, since more specific and more examples
to
Gann fan(crosses more), hachured grid(crosses more) -- both use L:M more obviously, since more general and fewer examples
any(flip, between skew and cross, and yet neither) volatility/random/twisted; bar/angle series
opposite,i.e., single crosses balance/plus,pivot(triangle stack as a rectangle); wide s/r, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)

-- Find mindbody trace w/specific shapes' sizes, or similar confidence, leverage each trade therein with how it defines the SL(s) and TP(s).







--------


volatility -- volume
skew -- dissonance
opposite --








p1 new:


(added shape-type separation to mindbody step (2))
























-- Each mindbody trace forms a separate/distinct, equally- and handle-ably - sized pattern, so that one pattern may interrupt, weight vs., or surround another -- A series of immediate energy increases that are faster than the object played off, done in a flip (valence) direction, and timed L:M-wise, that one opposite does, can turn a calm entity into a raging lunatic in under an hour -- so that one pattern may interrupt, weight vs., or surround another,
when found while doing a regular way to interpret information found while use one of the following venues to interact with environment, which one later defines specific projections from the environment with for later interactions trades are
ANCHOR shell(opposite of volatility, where start from within and leave close awareness of self for acceptance and its continuance; tends to stay within self),
ASYMPTOTIC scenario(within an ordinary scene, imagine and overlay an extraordinary one, reinterpreting all in the ordinary to enact different results/satisfaction),
FLIP series (move along PA of chart, noting and connecting things see along the way, until reach 'destination')
CROSS cycle (bounce between different levels of activity regularly)
OPPOSITE boundary (detail each of boundary, entrance, acceptance, continuance with each area; tends to bounce around different boundaries)

-- A sense of otherness is developed, acting independently.
Get sensitive to the smallest portions of the chart, so that one is primed to react appropriately to PA activity w/gen'l,spec lines
once enter and begin to interact with environment.
One of, or an interrupt-weightvs.-surround mix therein,begin
ANCHOR mindbody's projected shape
Gut cog's on axis around stomach plate as how to digest information.
Body does same in form of reexperience a current leverageable part of or, in sequence, all of, as how to act.
Mind demonstrates similar within an imagined environment so that reaction to any series of actions or digestion of information from environment is done in a certain pattern with respect to the axal balance in that environment.
more esoteric versions: transfer from drawing on a piece of paper; acceptance of another person's decision (gut) and instruction (body) within each person's position (mind) in given environment; a wide-spanning, often-changing environment with one thread that is modeled into a series of events in a sort of pattern, or conversely, multiple object/entities' changes in an environment over a set amount of time; another neural plexus' activity.
ASYMPTOTIC consonance/dissonance ~ divergence or skew or asymptotic, positions a shape as excluded from others, or similar purpose. Plays off any (un)formed shape, so any direction is the trend angle divergence.
FLIP energy/volume(object/entity puts into xy axis) variable per division on xy axis.
CROSS Emotion, as a way to direct the entire mindbody forcefully and hurriedly, may tinge a mindbody trace enough to replace the last three steps, that of generalize, build upon, and trade within the type of interact with environment, such as a (market) emotion cycle would do.
OPPOSITE A sense of otherness is developed, acting independently.
the left-right (>x axis) -- w/recent activity, as well as vertebral lengths and twists set in, that create extra energy between levels from left to right -- push-pulls left from muscle movement
and the forward-backward (>y axis) fluid levels or locked-in level left from fight-or-flight response.

-- Transfer of each type of interact with environment in small as well as a starter overall type,
generates raw sketch, general (tend to keep extending along time) shapes: random touch of projectible as a regularity of shape
pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew

-- specific patterns. rough to perfect, small to super-size, each variable (dependent on other patterns adjusting it) thus weak or strong:
anchor -- line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)
asymptotic(skew)
to
tensegrity(cross)
-- L:M (either skewed or crosses more) --
l.p.3((triangle) (or (rectangle)) thru | to go angled and skewed)(more skewed),fib fan(more skewed),viral grid(more skewed), viral dot (overlapping segmented rhythms, each segment symmetric within itself -- the entirety momentum -- that match at a point that becomes only s or r)(more skewed), fighter jet (for which a plain ellipse, which'd have a center line for r/s, is a cross) -- all use L:M more subtly, since more specific and more examples
to
Gann fan(crosses more), hachured grid(crosses more) -- both use L:M more obviously, since more general and fewer examples
any(flip, between skew and cross, and yet neither) volatility/random/twisted; bar/angle series
opposite,i.e., single crosses balance/plus,pivot(triangle stack as a rectangle); wide s/r, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)

-- Find mindbody trace w/specific shapes' sizes, or similar confidence, leverage each trade therein with how it defines the SL(s) and TP(s).

l.p. 5 so big its middle is more important;
that is, an example of L:M affecting l.p. 5.
(Sorry about all the extra lines: It's just about the big triangle, the large rectangle after it, and the line exactly halfway between them, as per definition of l.p.5 .)







Price stays in this area for a very, very long time,
so that one could say the oversized l.p.5 tra...


No, wait! Once an l.p. 5, always an l.p. 5.
Lookit!!!!
It took all this time to digest, showing signs of going up (w/c&h)...
and then took off














,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,






A fool and his money are lucky enough to get together in the first place." v

Tax man, always gets his cut of the profits, over here doesn't refund you anything for his losses.
;'How to create your own tax
Yup, not to mention the broker's always get their cut. The brokers pay people to work for them. You could go on and on through the whole chain of events and all those involved. Trading is not a zero sum game as in a coin toss.' 1\\\



'I laugh at all those systems with a lot of cheap psychology but not clear rules for entries and exits, how can somebody follow them?

I laugh too at all those systems with rules that when you backtest them you realize that they don't work, how can somebody follow them?

These both are 99% of systems posted here in FF...

People are sheeple.' 1

-- this one turned me, rewrote around technicals and posted 'insert psych as needed'

"Know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em." 1
-- saw this threadstarter's results

AND it kept going, a bunch of times higher than the usual l.p.5 I'm used to trading (note extra trade, to leverage 'inside-of-chart' focus):
.

Super-size is super-pips, even on the 1'TF.


Okay, so this was a revenge trade, and I didn't get relatively much for it. I knew there was an upside, only I didn't know which direction and I fumbled along until the chart showed positive signs of a direction.
I made up a cumulative 30% drop in my account with one trade.



Three things I learned:

1. Obey the direction signal from PA on your lines.
2. Use bigger shapes for bigger time frame effect.
3. Work regular trades off regular shapes within the bigger shapes.

At least, this seems like a good, standard beginner's approach.
It also restates 'general shapes' as sketch shapes to initial a full range of size*roughness(*interaction) of shapes.

Also, that fumbling is due to poor TP/SL, so I can focus on this, since I got a full range of specific-shape sizes.








-------






Included divergence in the method post #1 is,
so that any skew away from the trend may be pivotal to a major turn later on:

Margin call, once more.























-----------






more p1 crap:











|C PR(bounds-env't,series-physical) -- tilde, balance, everything resists change. Single crosses.
opposite,i.e., single crosses balance/plus,pivot(triangle stack as a rectangle); wide s/r, l.p.5((triangle)_(rectangle) to go hi and lo)
C:S BL(scenario-sketch,cycle-size) slip n' slides, grid everywhere
>skew: fib fan, lp3,fighter jet,viral grid,
>grid: grid,Gann fan,viral dot,lp5
both: L:M as shapes
(P) AN(shell-trade) -- (anchor ) from there, goes anywhere : line segment, triangle, rectangle, curve(circle)











p1 try again, this time list only, fill in as psych if wish:








dot: plus - tilde - on-object balance, pivot - compromise
line trend angles, wide s/r - stack, l.p.5
skew: fib fan, l.p.3, fighter jet, viral grid
grid: grid/Gann fan - L:M, viral dot - volatility/twisted
flow: pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew; shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds; pivot, line segt, triangle,rect,curve








again:








dot: plus - tilde, on-polygon balance, compromise
line trend angles, wide s/r - stack, l.p.5
skew: fib fan, l.p.3, fighter jet, viral grid
grid/skew: grid/Gann fan - L:M, viral dot - volatility/twisted - count
flow: pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew; shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds; pivot, line segt, triangle,rect,curve

learning more about momo-range, or whatever you want to call it:
Compared skew/divergence with midline/flow/etc.,
and got a good overview of everything for an excellent staged run --

.










---





















------------







p1 adj:











dot: plus - tilde, on-polygon balance, compromise
line wide s/r w/stack, l.p.5
skew: fib fan, l.p.3, fighter jet, viral grid
grid/skew: grid/Gann fan - L:M, viral dot / volatility/twisted, trend angles w/count
flow: pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew; shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds; pivot, line segt, triangle,rect,curve


-- under 'reason for editing (optional)':

insert psych as needed








p1 new:








shape: on-polygon balance, compromise; plus - wide s/r w/stack - l.p.5
/ skew: fib fan, l.p.3, fighter jet - tilde, viral grid
grid/skew: grid/Gann fan - L:M, viral dot / volatility/twisted, trend angles w/count
flow: pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew; shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds; pivot, line segt, triangle,rect,curve


-- under 'reason for editing (optional)':

insert psych as needed









another:




closed/open shape: on-polygon balance, compromise; plus - wide s/r w/stack - l.p.5; fighter jet / cup and handle - tilde
grid/skew: grid/Gann fan - L:M, viral dot / volatility/twisted, trend angles w/count, fib fan / l.p.3 - Gann fan, viral - hachured grid
flow: pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew; shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds; pivot, line segt, triangle,rect,curve



-- under 'reason for editing (optional)':

insert psych as needed







-----





An interesting triangle, I ran across, looking at others' charts.
It's a logr, I usually call it;
only this time, I called it a triangle and looked at what happened:
TOTAL REVERSAL!
The energy was going down and across, not dividing the triangle neatly in half which would've made it a triangle -- subtle, indeed.






--------






another p1:



(after next couple of posts)




environs -- general pattern; ,physical(action,trace,emote) -- specific pattern, general size; chart -- specific size

closed/open shape: on-polygon balance, compromise; plus - wide s/r w/stack - l.p.5; fighter jet / cup and handle - tilde
grid/skew: grid/Gann fan - L:M, viral dot / volatility/twisted, trend angles w/count, fib fan / l.p.3 - Gann fan, viral - hachured grid
flow: pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew; shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds; pivot, line segt, triangle,rect,curve










p1 another:




(logr inserted at an s/r to ignore lower tl's, above a symmetric triangle ;
that is, ignoring that it's also a cup and handle)


mc'ed:


environs -- general pattern; ,physical(action,trace,emote) -- specific pattern, general size; chart -- specific size

closed/open shape (which, depending on where symmetry is in shape, is logr/mid): on-polygon balance, compromise; plus - wide s/r w/stack - l.p.5; fighter jet / cup and handle - tilde
grid/skew insert: grid/Gann fan - L:M, viral dot / volatility/twisted/harmonics, trend angles w/count, fib fan / l.p.3 - Gann fan, viral - hachured grid
flow next: pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew; shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds; pivot, line segt, triangle,rect,curve

uu use 1m charts for what 100+ pip trades?

cool

Thanks for visiting and the compliment.

I'm usually too busy trying to get consistent trades,
but yeah, sometimes I see the bigger picture.
100+'s safer in the long run, anyhow, so gotta.

More junk psychology,
and another tiresome organization of my etchings:

(momo,skew,grid) of O., (triangle), (rectangle) _ (examples)
(ellipse/dot) flow groups, size*series, bar/angle
(triangle) 3, fan, compro
(rectangle) +,5,grid, wide r/s

review of chart study's +-'s
pit/sx care/lust,thym/adren defend/anger-strong,thal/pancr in-charge/simple,liv/pin clean/night&day




p1 dump:













Physical count, angle, weight of low-ball type of decision -- "Following successive compliance with escalating demands, internal commitment is developed, until eventually an “attitude” results. And, the low-balling technique depends on the target individual developing an internal justification for the initial decision, which then strengthens commitment and leads to behavior following the “low ball.”
Consequently, the key lesson is that people attempt to keep their internal dimensions (like attitude) and external actions (behavior) consistent. Thus, whether attitude or behavior is influenced first, if the person does not feel coerced, the other will likely follow." 1


closed/open shape (which, depending on where symmetry is in shape, is logr/mid): on-polygon balance, compromise; plus - wide s/r w/stack - l.p.5; fighter jet / cup and handle - tilde
grid/skew insert: grid/Gann fan - L:M, viral dot / volatility/twisted/harmonics, trend angles w/count, fib fan / l.p.3 - Gann fan, viral - hachured grid
flow next: pivot,flow,corner,grid,skew; shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds; pivot, line segt, triangle,rect,curve

.

new p1:









W/range of (momo,skew,grid),
(ellipse/dot) flow groups, size*series, bar/angle
(triangle) 3, fan, compro
(rectangle / line segment) +,5,grid, wide r/s

review of chart study's +-'s
pit/sx care/lust,thym/adren defend/anger-strong,thal/pancr in-charge/simple,liv/pin clean/night&day








p1:







W/range of (momo,skew,grid),
(ellipse/dot) flow groups, size*series, bar/angle, volatility -- angle
(triangle) 3, fan, compro -- energy
(rectangle / line segment) +,5,grid, wide r/s, twisted -- price

review of chart study's +-'s
pit/sx care/lust,thym/adren defend/anger,thal/pancr in-charge/simple,liv/pin clean / subconscious-unknown-fast or conscious beta-slow













-----------------









give/take,anchor/reframe,group
review of chart study's +-'s
pit/sx care/lust,
give/take
thym/adren defend/anger
anchor
,thal/pancr in-charge/simple,
reframe
liv/pin clean / subconscious-unknown-fast or conscious beta-slow
in/exclude








p1 dump:




W/range of (momo,skew,grid),
(ellipse/dot) flow groups, size*series, bar/angle, volatility -- angle
(triangle) 3, fan, compro -- energy
(rectangle / line segment) +,5,grid, wide r/s, twisted -- price










p1 workup:









W/range of (momo,skew,grid),
(ellipse/dot) flow groups, size*series, bar/angle, volatility -- angle
(triangle) 3, fan, compro -- energy
(rectangle / line segment) +,5,grid, wide r/s, twisted -- price
W/range of (momo,skew,grid)
give/take,

anchor/reframe,

group
dot shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds pair (size*series,bar/angle,volatility
features:

area shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds
shape momo,skew,grid,polygon,multi-line
flow size*series,bar/angle,volatility











--------------



p1 new:







Area and flow range and guide shape:
area shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds
shape momo,skew,grid,polygon,multi-line
flow size*series,bar/angle,volatility








---------





Manually drew it in, too lazy, helps accept detail:
Gann Fan weak start, midline top shape up-run conversely.







So that time it was counterweighting or whatever, area * flow.
This time it's definitely flow, 'cause angle needs a twin and it looks like it's going up:










l.p. 5, multi-tier --

(inside that cup in the upper middle of the chart is triangles, and then the short line segments thereafter have rectangles; ignore ALL of the lines)










p1 adj:







Area and flow range and guide shape:
area shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds
shape momo,skew,grid;polygon,multi-line
flow size*series;bar/angle;volatility




again:










reframe shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds
continue size*series;bar/angle;volatility
anchor momo,skew,grid: polygon,multi-line










---------






l.p. 5 -- another, this one w/a symmetric triangle below and first at the line, which extends the line past the rectangle-triangle pair and increases the number of up-down's:




The account before this, I margin-called refusing to read the (trend-)angle continuous/ity, because I get fed up internally and over-anchored on an older level being the reframe.
So this time, I got to avoid angle continuity.
Next trade, I don't think I'll be so lucky, given all the different types of volatility inside the l.p. 5.

Glancing at the chart above really fast, I can see a corner breaking up the older hz, so I can shorten and make definite trend-angle use with multi-line off this corner.


-------

I just read market emotion cycle works well with the 'monkey poop' trading approach:
I'm honored for the recognition. Yay! ; )

Seriously, I'm sick of losing. It's absurd.

And maybe I've run with the psychologicals about as far as I know to go. Except for my personal thinking model. I'll keep even that low-key, maybe just here in this thread.

Well, it's been fun. There's lots of stuff I should do.

I'll still post in the journal. I know I get on some peoples' nerves, elsewhere (and even here.)

One person did like the 100+ - poop -- no, pip -- trades. Guess I can only post those.

But I LIKE expounding on fans and such, it's like a reference booklet. One day I'll compile it.
So all this is useful, it's just that some things I type about are annoyingly undeveloped.

"Improve your edge, improve your edge" I've heard.
You know how I improve my edge?
I bounce off ANY ideas to spark an interest in such. So the rest of that nonsense is maybe useful. I guess I can inspire myself with things inherently useful done in unusual ways

.






p1 dump:






reframe shell,scenario,cycle,series,bounds
continue size*series;bar/angle;volatility
anchor momo,skew,grid: polygon,multi-line








--------

p1 new:



EXIST............................EXPAND.........................ADJUST
1-2 of |,_,\,.,O ........ rectangle(grid)/triangle(fan) ....... 3,5: its |'s AND r. or t.


-- The idea is that a horizontal line simply exists and can last forever or a second,
that a rectangle can expand into a grid and so can have a great effect,
and that an l.p. 3 is usually about the same proportion and so has the same effect per its proportion (not its size) always.
There's lots of variation doing 2 of a simple shape shown. One is a O and a \, in a fighter jet (a pattern of my own, which is like a two-handled cup with the divergence line lain atop it like a lid ('scuse the mixed metaphors, the first time I recognized it the cup was more pointy with a jet's foldable wings)) or cup and handle. Another is a +.
Notice I didn't list L:M. I figure it'll go thru 'expand'. Maybe.

Okay, clearer:



proportion variation for likely response time to lines
all 1-2 of |,_,\,.,O ....... .
most rectangle(grid)/triangle(fan)
average 3,5: its |'s AND r. or t


The extra variable helps justify. Now I know reliability.
Shapes, tho, are a different story.... Hmm....
Okay, it's just that...Well...No excuse.

Try again.

1-2 of |,\,_,.,O
rectangle(grid),triangle(fan)
l.p.3,5 (mix lines and polygons)

-- No hooplah or fake connections. Better.


bit o' hooplah ---



Trick gut, entrain repeatedly, or do whatever to trust chart technicals enough to trade it:
1-2 of |,\,_,.,O
rectangle(grid),triangle(fan)
l.p.3,5 (mix lines and polygons)



'nuther:


boundary,shell;series,scenario,cycle --
1-2 of |,\,_,.,O
rectangle(grid),triangle(fan)
l.p.3,5 (mix lines and polygons)
simple (|\_.O),rectangle(gid),triangle(fan),l.p.3




thot one that makes sense --


TP/SL according to, using this chart device:
boundary,shell -- one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O;
series,scenario,cycle -- triangle/fan/l.p.3; rectangle/grid/l.p.5







--------


Adam and Eve pattern

One thing I've never understood is why the A&E double bottom (or top) is off-weighted.
Most all traditional patterns depend on symmetry to work, even if they're one-sided like an ascending triangle.
Being a double bottom is too little a reason to compete with the asymmetry of the Adam vs. the Eve. So how can I look at the A&E and understand where the overall symmetry in counterbalance with the thick-and-thin nature of the two bottoms/tops?

On the site http://www.thepatternsite.com/aedb.html ,
it says to wait for price to rise above the high between the two bottoms.
Such a thing doesn't align with anything I've seen, so I may have to adjust all of my categories.

My current categories and why they're organized as such:

TP/SL according to, using this chart device:
boundary,shell -- one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O;
series,scenario,cycle -- triangle/fan/l.p.3; rectangle/grid/l.p.5

On to why the A&E forms as it does --
first impression, using arbitrary descriptive words Split, widen and mid- the extreme before cup-and-handle'ing the split in a rush. (Note I draw/write on a copyrighted chart of Mr. Bulkowski's.)

How the Eve midlines the Adam is important to how much the rebound is.
How symmetric is the triangle between the Adam, the peak between the Adam and the Eve, and the Eve, matters too.
A&E is a symmetric pennant pointing the wrong way -- up instead of away -- , in one hypothesis. The further from the flagpole, the less likely price'll complete the A&E, because of price needing to midline all that way. Price may even reverse the flagpole, from all that weight, after a briefly successful A&E.
Similar width of the bottoms is same as wide bottom heavily midlining narrow bottom.
Flow is key: If the general trend angle is the same as the A&E's 'symmetric triangle' 's angle, then price'll likely continue.
Look for the flagpole to be on the opposite side, if not in the regular or removed position:


Okay,try this:
side of pattern flagpole is on
angle A&E's middle triangle is completing or beginning
angle may have no explicit top -- still, draw a triangle
if A&E fails, the symmetry may attract s/r later
consider the entire base of each pivot for A- or E-ness
There may be a horizontal - vertical thing going on with the pivots,
even to the notion of how far the A&E works
If there is a + -- hz-vert'l -- thing going on,
that instead of the center may be an s/r


conclusions about the Adam and Eve pattern --
Tri's angle w/pole, incl. symmetry with left or right of pole; hz/vert symmetry w/tri's pivots or middle, vs. how far its logr pushes itself Symmetry within, (counter)match triangle's angle with the pole, distinctiveness of main pivots compared to larger area. It's the distinctness relative to the area before it, not the width, of the two main pivots that matter; the width merely adds momentum, which a similar angle with a larger area the pole is in has more to do with.

or...
Symmetry within, (counter)match triangle's angle with the pole, distinctiveness of main pivots compared to larger area.





--------------------








p1 tacked on some more patterns:





TP/SL according to, using this chart device:
boundary,shell -- one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet); three or more (A&E,s&h,harmonics)
series,scenario,cycle -- triangle/fan/l.p.3; rectangle/grid/l.p.5

logr whole fib, midline split, fib logr split



-------

Something interesting about the A&E picture above
is that it curves for the Eve portion.
Maybe I can segue into how curves are made. Hmmm..

Still, how the energy from trend angles and such leading up to the A&E and balance the two main pivots is crucial.






-----


Deleted a post, since it didn't seem I made enough of a point with it.
I thought I was, because of the vast difference between highly regulated/uniform indicators and freeform, go-anywhere drawing devices.
--

That's indicators.

Drawing devices adapt to any type of market.
However, they're tough to pin down rules for.

EDIT: Some people have done it, tho. This makes it IMHO.


---------






p1 new:







TP/SL according to, using this chart device:
boundary,shell -- one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet); three or more (A&E,s&h,harmonics): How does it gel together to make a boundary/shell?

energy
0 energy affect count
1 logr whole fib
2 midline split
3 fib logr line
5 size count particulate

geometry
0 boundary -- another's rejection or acceptance or my same of theirs
1 shell -- acceptance as enter environs and warm up for interaction therein
2 series -- cue aligning during ordinary task to prepare for high-leverage situation w/scripted responses
3 scenario -- imagined and separate environs w/diff't responses overlain for same stimuli in real environs
5 cycle -- acceptance outside of myself and about myself; the complexity is in the possible interpretations found at each level one touches upon during the acceptance process


buddhism -- "The FIve Hindrances" desire,aversion,sleepiness,restlessness,doubt
need,face,u(c),nerves,confusion
-- Okay, I've done the middle three and hinted at the first and last.
Anyway, I do a good job at chart study if I let myself. I may have to keep at it occasionally,
which is where the cycle etc. comes in.

series,scenario,cycle -- triangle/fan/l.p.3; rectangle/grid/l.p.5





p1 fuggitaboutit:









energy
0 energy affect count
1 logr whole fib
2 midline split
3 fib logr line
5 size count particulate

geometry
0 boundary -- another's rejection or acceptance or my same of theirs
1 shell -- acceptance as enter environs and warm up for interaction therein
2 series -- cue aligning during ordinary task to prepare for high-leverage situation w/scripted responses
3 scenario -- imagined and separate environs w/diff't responses overlain for same stimuli in real environs
5 cycle -- acceptance outside of myself and about myself; the complexity is in the possible interpretations found at each level one touches upon during the acceptance process







-------






p1 new:


(this weird thing seems to be playing thru okay; I needed something to challenge me)





body-pattern reading

energy
0 energy affect count
1 logr whole fib
2 midline split
3 fib logr line
5 size count particulate
geometry
0 boundary -- another's rejection or acceptance or my same of theirs
1 shell -- acceptance as enter environs and warm up for interaction therein
2 series -- cue aligning during ordinary task to prepare for high-leverage situation w/scripted responses
3 scenario -- imagined and separate environs w/diff't responses overlain for same stimuli in real environs
5 cycle -- acceptance outside of myself and about myself; the complexity is in the possible interpretations found at each level one touches upon during the acceptance process

At level five -- and don't jump there until work to it -- look for dependable shapes (one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet); three or more (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3; rectangle/grid/l.p.5).


-------------








p1






one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet); three or more (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s
0 vector boundary -- another's rejection or acceptance or my same of theirs
1 whole shell -- acceptance as enter environs and warm up for interaction therein
2 corner-from or split-to series -- cue aligning during ordinary task to prepare for high-leverage situation w/scripted responses
3 line scenario -- imagined and separate environs w/diff't responses overlain for same stimuli in real environs
5 particulate cycle -- acceptance outside of myself and about myself; the complexity is in the possible interpretations found at each level one touches upon during the acceptance process
----








Not sure why you ignore the rest of price action, especially given the time you devote. And, the classic signals are worth paying attention to, if you first know why they work and how its pattern can be slightly adjusted to get another decent signal. Finally, you can slowly build your price-action knowledge to make larger trades.
It's great that you think that much of learning price action from scratch. Good luck.



















------------------













p1 dump



















one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet); three or more (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo.
0 vector boundary -- another's rejection or acceptance or my same of theirs
1 whole shell -- acceptance as enter environs and warm up for interaction therein
2 corner-from or split-to series -- cue aligning during ordinary task to prepare for high-leverage situation w/scripted responses
3 line scenario -- imagined and separate environs w/diff't responses overlain for same stimuli in real environs
5 particulate cycle -- acceptance outside of myself and about myself; the complexity is in the possible interpretations found at each level one touches upon during the acceptance process
-----------













that faild.





i';ll just use my failsfe, tm+. pllllz ignor ir: Penty o' charts I'll explakn fully.
z(I mustr be idjit, not get psych.)









p1






tm+ every response
logr shape / 3, corner / 5, multi-trend-angle shapes





p1












tm+ every aberrant stimulus and obedient response to it
chart: logr shape / 3, corner / 5, multi-trend-angle shapes



















































p1


































screen via tm+ every aberrant stimulus and obedient response to it -- tm+-draw recognize normal stimuli to respond similarly


and :think that;s gonna work -- no it isn't" is not one word.
chart: logr shape / 3, corner / 5, multi-trend-angle shapes



p1






1) yell at anyone who tries to stop me from trading
2) draw all 3,5,fj on available chat
3) trade w/TP/SL therein












p1






1) yell at anyone who tries to stop me from trading
2) draw all 3,5,fj on available chat
3) trade w/TP/SL within 2)'s lines




p1






Trade w/ one line each for TP,SL:
one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet); three or more (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo
0 vector boundary -- exchange of rejection or acceptance
1 whole shell -- rejection or acceptance as enter
2 corner-from or split-to series -- self-rejection/acceptance through cue aligning for scripted responses
3 line scenario -- imagined and separate environs w/diff't responses
5 particulate cycle -- acceptance as possible interpretations found at each level one touches










p1



tm+ each stimulus-response as work through entire trade session:
Trade w/ one line each for TP,SL:
one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet); three or more (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo

p1
(plays off the buddhist list of hindrances)


Record own gut trace and iopposing insane remarks (at level, pace, octave and volume) EVERY TIME and interpret the exchange with its affect -- one of desire,aversion,sleepiness,restless ness,doubt -- on you. That's how you'll trade one |_, .O; two +,~,O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill .



examples:






plus the charts of drawing devices and the trades I did with them.

No example yet for sleepiness, which is being tired, perhaps from emotional overwhelm/exhaustion. source




-------
numbers are popular for rating a trade. High number of pips is, too. I should get both in, once I have a base psychology approach and technicals skill.
It's either leverage or number of pips, to keep consistent instead of 'let go of losses and let your winners run.' Confidence in a trade is for leverage. Taking a smaller or larger reason is, for number of pips.
Confidence is psychology, number of pips is technicals skill. So I do the hindrances approach and then measure my confidence level and apply it to leverage. Then I study the chart to capture its flow for a 100+ - pip trade if I can and at least get the general idea and then trade an ordinary number of pips.
Sometimes my opposed-body-charts hindrance result is workable, other times my technicals are positive. It'd be best for the trade proposed from the technicals were to have an opposed-body-charts hindrance result, to extract the technicals' value for trade. L the trade.

On this -- warning: I discuss my ptm without giving background justification -- :
What if emotion feeds energy into the thinking model? Filter it thru homeostatics for an affect that produces tensegrity into cash.
That would make spinning triangle of my ptm data-rich and process-poor, a time-oriented energy model.
The best opposition/hindrances there is, to screen it, and opposition/hindrances the best nonself energy maker there is for an entity, thru stimulus-response generation -- no, well maybe, only go to cycling stimulus-response over time that adjusts homeostatics, especially money/value/worth, energy and ability to conduct or trap energy while still retaining it the most readily lucrative.
Emotion connects, loosely, at motive,spinning triangle, and d/s, and parallels with memory as well as reason etc. (then I could put 'doubt' with ex/impression). It's integral to the body, thus a cycle or other thinking model to understand it, or maybe even a Pert-inspired per-viscera model.
I don't think I'd mess with mec-n/c connections directly, and instead switch into mec only if emotion, a c-, and a time chart were involved. Keep the elements discrete and simple, switching to an element's own model iff necessary to extract a key piece's information from it -- It's all relative, at this level, even if all through-put is tensegral.

 

1. energy through hindrances/social mec for the body
2. Thus, I can input data at spinning triangle, and see how the various connections emotion has in the brain portion of the thinking model alight.
3. The opposing body patterns approach to name one's hindrance and then be mindful of it , deals especially with the body's non-brain neural plexuses.
4. cycle-series-boundary-scenario-shell deals with outer-shell and other nonself intersections with data.

That seems complex.

Try again, and I'd love to justify use of environmental controls that the last step proposes:
3rd step -- any patterns, not necessary to identify
4th step -- environment which contains objects to create patterns between
tm-p intersections or close ones thereof, to identify how 3rd-step patterns connect with 4th-step objects (I'm motivated to extract gold from this object,
and find tearing down the housing with tools is difficult so I feel subdominant in the act, with emotion at im/expression;
if I am used to feeling subdominant, I may create boundaries in which I accept less worth
than I would be capable of if I were to increase spinning triangle use
through freeing the spinning triangle's aligning from any hindrance emotion-laced memories block.

So process the freeing and then know what that freeing does for me, looking for a high-value approach to a next trade.
Otherwise, I could get stuck in a bad trade by trying to make the best of it
with an opposition that brought me into the bad trade and reaction
and identification of the hindrance that the exchange created.

With the series etc. structuring my environment that includes more of a nonself perspective, I could even process an entire trading session before the first trade.







p1 dump:








Record own gut trace and opposing insane remarks (at level(note), dissonance,pace, octave and volume) EVERY TIME; interpret exchange w/its affect
-- one of desire,aversion,sleepiness,restless ness,doubt -- on you. That's how you'll trade
one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill .

then:
numbers are popular for rating a trade. High number of pips is, too. I should get both in, once I have a base psychology approach and technicals skill.
It's either leverage or number of pips, to keep consistent instead of 'let go of losses and let your winners run.' Confidence in a trade is for leverage. Taking a smaller or larger reason is, for number of pips.
Confidence is psychology, number of pips is technicals skill. So I do the hindrances approach and then measure my confidence level and apply it to leverage. Then I study the chart to capture its flow for a 100+ - pip trade if I can and at least get the general idea and then trade an ordinary number of pips.
Sometimes my opposed-body-charts hindrance result is workable, other times my technicals are positive. It'd be best for the trade proposed from the technicals were to have an opposed-body-charts hindrance result, to extract the technicals' value for trade. L the trade.










-------------







p1 new:




(removed ptm references, thus treating my ptm as a scaffolding here)





. I can input chart study data -- one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill --
. with motive
. , (sub)dominance.
. The opposing body patterns draw and name one's hindrance-- one of desire,aversion,sleepiness,restless ness,doubt (optional, a simplified-mec emotion) -- from exchange and then be mindful of it during trade, deals especially with the body's non-brain neural plexuses.
. one (mix) of cycle-series-boundary-scenario-shell deals with outer-shell and other nonself intersections with data.



p1:





. I can input chart study data -- one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill -- for the brain's y axis (attention, flow)
. with motive - (sub)dominance on the x axis, how competent I am at the processing of that data.
. one (mix) of cycle-series-boundary-scenario-shell deals with outer-shell and other nonself intersections with data. Fits w/im/expression, centering the x,y axes and allowing intersection with the outside of self, opp-|||| next.
. The opposing body patterns draw and name one's hindrance-- one of desire,aversion,sleepiness,restless ness,doubt (optional, a simplified-mec emotion) -- from exchange and then be mindful of it during trade, deals especially with the body's non-brain neural plexuses.





p1 dump:







. I can input chart study data -- one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill -- for the brain's y axis (attention, flow) with motive - (sub)dominance on the x axis, how competent I am at the processing of that data.
. One (mix) of cycle-series-boundary-scenario-shell deals with outer-shell and other nonself intersections with data. Fits w/im/expression, centering the x,y axes and allowing intersection with the outside of self, opp-|||| next,
which one conditions or identifies (reasons) the acceptance of levels of im/expression with.
. The opposing body patterns draw and name one's hindrance-- one of desire,aversion,sleepiness,restless ness,doubt (optional, a simplified-mec emotion) -- from exchange and then be mindful of it during trade, deals especially with the body's non-brain neural plexuses. Get hindrance as xy axis of mec and as one's body signals.
. The motive-d(s) and data entry axes




p1 new:

 

1. with a certain flow hindrance adjusts, attend to data
   (one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill)
2. Im/expression
3. reason - condition balance of x-axis level -- applicable chart context
   (boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level,multi-point),scenario(one level,extra level),cycle(multi-level))
4. mec adaptation of chosen level
5. trade time A to time B

p1 adj:








1. with a certain flow adjustable with hindrance
(desire,aversion,sleepiness,restless ness,doubt),
attend to data
(one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill)
2. Im/expression
3. reason - condition balance of x-axis level -- applicable chart context
(boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level,multi-point),scenario(one level,extra level),cycle(multi-level))
4. mec adaptation of chosen level
5. trade time A to time B[/list]


.

again:







1. with a certain flow adjustable with hindrance (desire,aversion,sleepiness,restless ness,doubt),
attend to data (one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill)
2. Im/expression
3. reason - condition balance of x-axis level
-- applicable chart context (boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level,multi-point),scenario(one level,extra level),cycle(multi-level))
4. mec adaptation of chosen level
5. trade time A to time B







again:










1. with a certain flow adjustable with opposition's exchange for hindrance (desire, aversion, sleepiness, restlessness, doubt),
attend to data (one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill)
2. Im/expression, to center body pattern readings
3. reason - condition balance of x-axis level
-- applicable chart context (boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level with multiple points,multi-point),scenario(one level,extra level, each with multiple points),cycle(multi-level, each with multiple points))
4. mec adaptation of chosen level, to tinge body pattern readings if necessary
5. trade time A to time B






wonder why I saw this?!

(opposing-sides area produces l.p.3-like results, Gann fan thrown in for good measure)

-------









I just paper-simulator 'ed a desire-aversion - anchored restlessness trade, and it ruined my account!
Ito
context (boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level with multiple points,multi-point),scenario(one level,extra level, each with multiple points),cycle(multi-level, each with multiple points)) ,
I had multi-points, each having a distinct level to it; only, I got turned around when price moved to another level and its multiple points. That is, I was distraught trusting (~opposition; social part of mec) everything as relative to my anchor and observing other levels were pointing lots of conflicting ways.




p1 adj:










1. with a certain flow adjustable with opposition's exchange for hindrance (desire, aversion, sleepiness, restlessness, doubt), attend
to data (one |\_, .O; two +,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);3+ (A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill)
2. Im/expression, to center body pattern readings
3. reason - condition balance of x-axis level
-- applicable chart context (boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level with multiple points,multi-point),scenario(one level,extra level, each with multiple points),cycle(multi-level, each with multiple points))
4. mec adaptation of chosen level, to tinge body pattern readings if necessary
5. trade time A to time B with appropriate TP/SL




p1 adj:









1. with a certain flow adjustable with opposition's exchange for hindrance (desire, aversion, sleepiness, restlessness, doubt), attend
data (|\_, .O;+,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);(A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area)
2. Im/expression, to center body pattern readings
3. reason - condition balance of x-axis level
-- applicable chart context (boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level with multiple points,multi-point),scenario(one level,extra level, each with multiple points),cycle(multi-level, each with multiple points))
4. mec adaptation of chosen level, to tinge body pattern readings if necessary
5. trade time A to time B with appropriate TP/SL







-------------








I discovered my sleepiness:









The second one was a build-up of the opposition, so that I felt overwhelmed and at the same time, in other places sleepiness takes hold in my life, in an appropriate level.

In my last trade, I tried to digest all four of the pictures shown above. What I did was drop a competence level from that cycle and instead skew a scenario off them (lowering myself to prior/others' conditioning, instead of matching the test) and apply the attitude to create a novel use of ordinary technicals for my trade reason, and then avert myself when I had to face how poorly they did, not treating them exactly as they were, skewness often being both exact and of small reward. I then margin-called without an SL in place: I followed the forceful behavior of the last picture's left side, allowing my sleepiness to get slap-happy and so fit into the role the opposition requested strongly of me. In other words, I did a mixed-up up-and-down levels, whereas I did a mixed-up side-to-side levels in the last trade description ("I got turned around") above. The capability is y, the follow-through with the current trade x, per definition in my ptm and common sense it would seem. I should introduce multiple x-y axis study in this way.









p1 new:










1. with a certain flow adjustable with opposition's exchange for hindrance (desire, aversion, sleepiness, restlessness, doubt), attend
data (|\_, .O;+,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot);(A&E,s&h,harmonics); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rectangle/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area)
2. Im/expression, to center body pattern readings
3. reason - condition balance of x-axis level
-- competence: boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level with multiple points,multi-point),scenario(one,extra levels, each w/multiple points),cycle(multi-level, each with multiple points)
4. mec adaptation of chosen level, to tinge body pattern readings if necessary
5. The capability is y, the follow-through with the current trade x: multiple x-y axis study. trade time A to time B with appropriate TP/SL

. corner, prevalent in an earlier p1 version, is useful for avoiding in-trade drawdown, as shown below:










A simple opposition can be had, even:
Take one body pattern traded, that traced along the mec as sleepiness, aversion to capitulate with extra in-trade drawdown, only after a strong showing in the reason department early on.
Then the opposition gets behavioral and emphasizes the peak of reason to the latter fall, as if to increase anxiety.
didn't, misrepresents... okay.











-----------------









p1, new:

mindbody pattern, working with

self desire, aversion, sleepiness, restlessness, doubt
environment boundary(one any,extra level),shell(one any,multi-level),series(level with multiple points,multi-point),scenario(one,extra levels, each w/multiple points),cycle(multi-level, each with multiple points)
object |\_, .O;+,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot),|_(corner);(A&E,s&h,harmonics);triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro;rect./grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area

optional

p1 adj:


-- removed picture








-----------



using (the verbal description form of) self and opposite mindbody pattern for trade management
.Now I'm down and the opposite tied me there.
Sometimes I'm up and I profit big.
The following is a great practice, because I'm down in the account
and yet I failed to margin call.

the latter trades ("7,8,9" are 1,2,3) are verbally described for their self-opposite mindbody-pattern content:

.(took a break, and felt positive from the positive, if low-scoring, trading session to now)








-------

method more key than omnipresent

I'd have to include how I feel about the big drawdown and acting as if it were okay, in my next trades after these charts.














I felt proud for taking that loss, because it was middle-sized, a little over small;
and, I feel ashamed for letting that 50+ - pip in-trade drawdown happen, even though I felt that confident in the trade.
That back-and-forth is about all I get from this high W:L and -profit account. It feels riskier than the last account, which had all small in-trade drawdowns.











---------


I just margin-called.
I was slipping in the account above, as I said, and let it go all the way.


------------

p1, significant number of small adjustments in:

mindbody pattern, working with

self desire, aversion, sleepiness, restlessness, doubt
environment boundary(one any,extra level or two),shell(. center O's(multi-level) of any),series(any w/points),scenario(one,w/extra level or two, each w/points),cycle(O's along _;multi-level, each w/points)
object |\ _.O; _.(midline),O.(logr),+,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot),|_(corner); \'s(harmonics,A&E,s&h), \.'s(stack/zone); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rect./grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area







p1 new:

mindbody pattern, working with

self desire, aversion, sleepiness, restlessness, doubt
object |\ _.O; _.(midline),O.(logr),+,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot),|_(corner); \'s(harmonics,A&E,s&h), \.'s(stack/zone); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro; rect./grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area
environment
reaction to object: (trend-) x,y -- volatility (any w/extra level(s): bound,enter,accept,continue)
pivot size, stability of x (or y) -- shell (. centers O's(multi-level) of any)
% distractives: artifacts how is ignored vs. consider a shape at the 0,0 axis -- series (any w/points)
MTF reaction: scenario (one,w/extra level or two, each w/points)
trend: angle change of y (or x) -- cycle (O's along _;multi-level, each w/points)




p1 adj:

mindbody pattern, working with

object |\ _.O; _.(midline),O.(logr),+,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot); |_w/ \(corner); \'s(harmonics,A&E,s&h), \.'s(stack/zone); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro, rect./grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area
environment projection stats each(/traded) area
reaction to object: (trend-) x,y -- volatility (any w/extra level(s): bound,enter,accept,continue)
pivot size, stability of x (or y) -- shell (. centers O's(multi-level) of any)
distractives: artifacts how is ignored vs. consider a shape at the 0,0 axis -- series (any w/points)
MTF reaction: scenario (one,w/extra level or two, each w/points)
trend: angle change of y (or x) -- cycle (O's along _;multi-level, each w/points)
self desire(x-), aversion(x+), sleepiness(y-), restlessness(y+), doubt(0,0 of xy) -- xy axis of cycle of market emotions



------------







p1 adj:




(got it so rate effectiveness of each trade, including the ability to get more (even 100+) pips)

mindbody pattern, working with
object-env't parallel each other, self acts as the xy axis

object |\ _.O; _.(midline),O.(logr),+,~,\O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot); |_w/ \(corner); \'s(harmonics,A&E,s&h), \.'s(stack/zone); triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro, rect./grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area
environment projection stats each(/traded) area
reaction to object: (trend-) x,y -- volatility (any w/extra level(s): bound,enter,accept,continue)
pivot size, stability of x (or y) -- shell (. centers O's(multi-level) of any)
distractives: artifacts how is ignored vs. consider a shape at the 0,0 axis -- series (any w/points)
MTF reaction: scenario (one,w/extra level or two, each w/points)
trend: angle change of y (or x) -- cycle (O's along _;multi-level, each w/points)
self desire(x-), aversion(x+), sleepiness(y-), restlessness(y+), doubt(0,0 xy) -- xy axis: cycle of market emotions

p1 new:







the more, the direction, the less, the anywhere, the 2-3, a few directions;
volatility of simple reframes direction of complex;
any shape as a perfect anchors a series:

simple . , O , | , (triangle) , (rectangle) complex
one . , O , | , triangle/fan/l.p.3/compro, rect./grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area
2-3 of one +,~, |_w/ (corner)
2-3 of mixed _.(midline),O.(logr), O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot)
lots of one 's(harmonics,A&E,s&h)
lots of mixed .'s(stack/zone)

-- directly plugs into my ptm (which corrects)
or opposing mindbody patterns (which lets go to be mindful of)





-----------







triangles, more:


(upper-trace -- one asctri, one symmetric (w/a wide base))






p1 adj:









the more, the direction, the less, the anywhere, the 2-3, a few directions;
volatility of simple reframes direction of complex;
any shape as a perfect anchors a series:

simple . , O , | , (triangle) , (rectangle) complex
one . (series,balance(center,pivot) or |(as a simple object,alone or as a balance)
. | (trend angle (severity,series),support/resistance(horizontal,trend line; divide,anchor,parallel),paired opposites)
. weight(candle body (anchor,settle,fade), volume, news)
. ellipse(trace,fade,split)
. triangle(trace,fade,split)/fan/l.p.3/compro, rect.(trace,fade,split)/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area
2-3 of one +,~, |_w/ \(corner)
2-3 of mixed _.(midline),O.(logr), \O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot)
lots of one \'s(harmonics,A&E,s&h)
lots of mixed \.'s(stack/zone)

-- directly plugs into my ptm (which corrects)
or opposing mindbody patterns (which lets go to be mindful of)








p1 adj:






ones directions -- must anchor w/a selection; rest frame -- must reframe along the way:
simple . , O , | , (triangle) , (rectangle) complex
one . (series,balance(center,pivot) or |(as a simple object,alone or as a balance)
. | (trend angle (severity,series),support/resistance(horizontal,trend line; divide,anchor,parallel),paired opposites(with-angle,opp-angle,skewed)
. weight(candle body (anchor,settle,fade), volume, news)
. ellipse(trace,fade,split)
. triangle(trace,fade,split)/fan/l.p.3/compro, rect.(trace,fade,split)/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area
2-3 of one +,~, |_w/ \(corner)
2-3 of mixed _.(midline),O.(logr), \O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot)
lots of one \'s(harmonics,A&E,s&h)
lots of mixed \.'s(stack/zone)

-- directly plugs into my ptm (which corrects)
or opposing mindbody patterns (which lets go to be mindful of)


------------









p1 dump:







ones directions -- must anchor w/a selection; Biased(emotion,): Two in same type of memory. opposing/mindful to (sub)dominance. Also serial processing (reason,).
rest frame -- must reframe along the way: - Neutral(reason,): short-term -- adaptive seven chunks; longterm -- infinite, resource for chunks. Parallel processing.




p1 new header:







To 7 chunks, resource longterm -- Parallel;complex/lots. Divide in two then choose, longterm direction -- Serial;simple/one.
simple . , O , | , (triangle) , (rectangle) complex
one . (series,balance(center,pivot) or |(as a simple object,alone or as a balance)
. | (trend angle (severity,series),support/resistance(horizontal,trend line; divide,anchor,parallel),paired opposites(with-angle,opp-angle,skewed)
. weight(candle body (anchor,settle,fade), volume, news)
. ellipse(trace,fade,split)
. triangle(trace,fade,split)/fan/l.p.3/compro, rect.(trace,fade,split)/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area
2-3 of one +,~, |_w/ \(corner)
2-3 of mixed _.(midline),O.(logr), \O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot)
lots of one \'s(harmonics,A&E,s&h)
lots of mixed \.'s(stack/zone)









the derivative, with #D 2,7, of

1. u(c) boundary on chart (complex action)
2. transferred likeness to chart (simple action)
3. say/face pattern (most active to make, non-action in and of itself)
4. gut trace (simple action)
5. series of actions leaving a pattern (complex action)

#D
simple . , O , | , (triangle) , (rectangle) complex
one . (series,balance(center,pivot) or |(as a simple object,alone or as a balance)
. | (trend angle (severity,series),support/resistance(horizontal,trend line; divide,anchor,parallel),paired opposites(with-angle,opp-angle,skewed)
. weight(candle body (anchor,settle,fade), volume, news)
. ellipse(trace,fade,split)
. triangle(trace,fade,split)/fan/l.p.3/compro, rect.(trace,fade,split)/grid/l.p.5/wide-r/s/hi-lo/empty-fill/opp-angles area
2-3 of one +,~, |_w/ \(corner)
2-3 of mixed _.(midline),O.(logr), \O(c&h,f.jet,Mt.Pilot)
lots of one \'s(harmonics,A&E,s&h)
lots of mixed \.'s(stack/zone)



think that? You are!

We know.

Why?????? (I beg for mercy.)

Reason for editing (optional): Praise be to the Voice!



-----




fun brain facts:

2 conflicts (interest/spontaneous (un)pleasant), 7 limits, 4 speeds chemicalize









------------










p1:







2 conflicts (interest/spontaneous level,(un)pleasant include in level / for consideration),
4 chemical speeds (serotonin play,GABA group,acetycholine effort,dopamine run),
7 limits number of chunks available in short-term memory

conflict,info,level of #D,
where # is 1,2-3,lots, and D is 1,2,3,4,(inf.); see posts for ones I know about






____________


2 conflicts (interest/spontaneous level,(un)pleasant include in level / for consideration),
4 chemical speeds (serotonin play,GABA group,acetycholine effort,dopamine run),
7 limits number of chunks available in short-term memory

conflict,info,level of #D,
where # is 1,2-3,lots, and D is 1,2,3,4,(inf.); see posts for ones I know about















2 conflicts (interest/spontaneous (un)pleasant),
4 chemical speeds (serotonin 'play',GABA 'group',acetycholine 'effort',dopamine 'run'),
7 limits number of chunks available in short-term memory
conflict,info,level of #D,
where # is 1,2-3,lots, and D is 1,2,3,4,(inf.); see posts for ones I know about








2 conflicts (interest/spontaneous (un)pleasant),
4 chemical speeds (serotonin 'play',GABA 'group',acetycholine 'effort',dopamine 'run'),
7 limits number of chunks available in short-term memory
#D, where # is 1,2-3,lots, and D is 1,2,3,4,(inf.); see posts for ones I know about
how: voice/paper/(sub)conscious/gut/action, or whatever works to trace pattern