Pattern's Chemo-Electric Trading Journal

another p1, to reflect the new idea:









polygon holds,pivots|shp prj'ns cross/expand/touch to adjust trend angles (tend,balance,group)|L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec|series, cycle, scenario, shell or volatility for
1 "Rspnsbl w/o choice..torment..falsely accused..wrongly blamed. {v-v} greed...wasteful..harmful excess." Cycle exchange/availability/consumption1,mec
2 reaction to other, initial --> rank of thinking ability and force of interaction, each --> new
Choice is moot if powerful disarming realigns self-preservation. Rank (v,h) lines in mec,a person each.
lots of people "Aristotle{:} 'that which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it. Every one thinks chiefly of his own' " 2 Resource share -> social emotions overlay mec.










p1 adj:










shp prj'ns cross/expand/stay to adjust trend angles --
1 Polygon holds,pivots. "Rspnsbl w/o choice..torment..falsely accused..wrongly blamed. {v-v} greed...wasteful..harmful excess." Cycle exchange/availability/consumption1,mec
2 L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec.
reaction to other, initial --> rank of thinking ability and force of interaction, each --> new
Choice is moot if powerful disarming realigns self-preservation. Rank (v,h) lines in mec,a person each.
lots of people Series, cycle, scenario, shell or volatility. "Aristotle{:} 'that which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it. Every one thinks chiefly of his own' " 2 Resource share -> social emotions overlay mec.


p1 adj:









chart shp prj'ns cross/expand/stay to adjust trend angles --
1 Polygon holds,pivots. "Rspnsbl w/o choice..torment..falsely accused..wrongly blamed. {v-v} greed...wasteful..harmful excess." Cycle exchange/availability/consumption1,mec
2 L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec.
reaction to other, initial --> rank of thinking ability and force of interaction, each --> new
Choice is moot if powerful disarming realigns self-preservation. Rank (v,h) lines in mec,a person each.
lots of people Series, cycle, scenario, shell or volatility. "Aristotle{:}'common to the greatest(,)least care bestowed..Every one(,)his own' " 2 Resource (compete,) share -> social emotions overlay mec.








-----------




Here's a Gann Fan that's structurally sound
-- jump at the start,
feeds thru levels cleanly,
breaks a bit then continues sharply down
before leaving fan for good --
only it's all midlines, which foreshortens the initial jump, 90-degrees the beginning areas with the sharp down, and creates a return to the fan's origin AND finish.
















----------------


p1 adj:










chart (if w/CD: brain-speed dampen, physical attach,pre-/copy diversion) shp prj'ns cross/expand/stay to adjust trend angles --
1 Polygon holds,pivots. "Rspnsbl w/o choice..torment..falsely accused..wrongly blamed. {v-v} greed...wasteful..harmful excess." Cycle exchange/availability/consumption1,mec
2 L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec.
reaction to other, initial --> rank of thinking ability and force of interaction, each --> new
Choice is moot if powerful disarming realigns self-preservation. Rank (v,h) lines in mec,a person each.
lots of people Series, cycle, scenario, shell or volatility. Time 1ish 2 right, disturb lots' natural cycle(,) of actions -- "Aristotle{:}'common to the greatest(,)least care bestowed..Every one(,)his own' " 2 Resource (compete,) share -> social emotions overlay mec.












-----------









p1 adj:










chart
1 shp prj'ns (polygon holds,pivots) cross/expand/stay
2 intensity times count of trend angles -- L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec
lots Series, cycle, scenario, shell or volatility: Obtains, ranks own, social consumes --
reaction to other, initial --> rank of thinking ability and force of interaction, each --> new










another:








chart
1 polygon projects a line, or pivots; several-of cross/stay/expand
2 PA flow around 1: intensity times count of trend angles -- L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec
lots all: Series, cycle, scenario, shell or volatility: Obtains, ranks own, social consumes --
reaction to other, initial --> rank of thinking ability and force of interaction, each --> new





---------------




p1 new:





New trend angle: Polygon projects a line, or pivots; several of either cross/stay/expand to place angle.
Select w/severity times count or L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec.
Area: A bunch of same. Volatility(boundary,entrance,acceptance,continuance), series, cycle, scenario, shell




-------------------------------




using new approach --

okay, i'm getting comfortable with the new trading approach.









count was easy, since severity was fairly even across each count. Projections were also fairly easy to get, since the polygon was also a trendline. Expansion was the rule. I ignored area as anything except a natural extension of new and select.




A little more used to it --

This one, at first I didn't try and get into it.
Then, on this trade, I did, reaching into my creativity to explore what the chart really had, in terms of polygons projecting a line, or pivots.
I got a really good cross/stay/expand of some channel lines, from a stacked-triangles pivot and an ellipse.
The first, before this drawing, was the volatility in different spots. Too, a rectangle can be similar in purpose to an ellipse or, for that matter, two stacked triangles.
Anyhow, it worked really well to represent the area:

p1, new:

(reflecting info learned from another thread's post)









decision weight: self-others, mistake-improvement

(Know thyself: A person has their own set point
for how much -/+ in their life they're willing to live with, however always affected by same as A) says.
So they tend to stay in a range of the fight-or-flight sydrome
and also weighted in a certain place from passive to aggressive with other people. )
That's three set points that establish who one is, entering the market and expecting to make profit (always +) like anyone else.

They lead into establishing one's position with what or who is most influential in your trading decisions. 'Predation' is a useful term in then following the series(,) of events in which these and you interact: "The act of predation can be broken down into a maximum of four stages: Detection of prey, attack, capture and finally consumption." Symbiosis, parasitism and other subterms change the relation into a more mutual one. All terms must relate to how they stop or start obtainment of your objective, profit.

my technical edge, which can be used to chart said relations:
New trend angle: Polygon projects a line, or pivots; several of either cross/stay/expand to place angle.
Select w/severity times count or L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec.
Area: Volatility(boundary,entrance,acceptance,continuance), series, cycle, scenario, shell



1: "Set a time limit within which you will not modify your rules for
determining if a trade is Good. You must periodically evaluate your methodology but only at prescribed intervals. Proper risk management rules will prevent you from losing much money if your methodology has ceased working for you."









-----------------------------







p1 new:










decision weight:

. mistake-improvement 1: "Set a time limit within which you will not modify your rules for
determining if a trade is Good. You must periodically evaluate your methodology but only at prescribed intervals. Proper risk management rules will prevent you from losing much money if your methodology has ceased working for you."
my technical edge, which can be used to chart said relations:
New trend angle: Polygon projects a line, or pivots; several of either cross/stay/expand to place angle.
Select w/severity times count or L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec.
Area: Volatility(boundary,entrance,acceptance,continuance), series, cycle, scenario, shell
. self-others
(Know thyself: A person has their own set point
for how much -/+ in their life they're willing to live with, however always affected by same as A) says.
So they tend to stay in a range of the fight-or-flight sydrome
and also weighted in a certain place from passive to aggressive with other people. )
That's three set points that establish who one is, entering the market and expecting to make profit (always +) like anyone else.
They lead into establishing one's position with what or who is most influential in your trading decisions. 'Predation' is a useful term in then following the series(,) of events in which these and you interact: "The act of predation can be broken down into a maximum of four stages: Detection of prey, attack, capture and finally consumption."
Symbiosis, parasitism, behavior modification, and other subterms change the relation into a more mutual one. All terms must relate to how they stop or start obtainment of your objective, profit.


--------------------




p1 new:















decision weights:

1. New trend angle: Polygon projects a line, or pivots; several of either cross/stay/expand to place angle.
   Select w/severity times count or L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's as tri,rec.
   Area: Volatility(boundary,entrance,acceptance,continuance), series, cycle, scenario, shell
2. Your chances:
   1. <5:1 +/- breakpoint
   2. mistake-improvement, upset/mistime; distract/misdirect, resituate/change-stimuli; hold when need to let go or visa-versa
   3. set point --
      -- for how much -/+ in their life they're willing to live with
      -- one average spot, with varying intensities thru life, along the fight-or-flight sydrome
      -- weighted in a certain place from passive to aggressive with other people

3. 'Predation -- four stages: Detection of prey, attack, capture and finally consumption." Related -- Symbiosis, parasitism, behavior modification, 'overwhelm'. Choose position, follow series(,).

p1 another:

decision weights:

1. New trend angle at: Polygon projects a line, or pivots; several of either cross/stay/expand to place angle.
   Select w/severity times count or L:M or triangle:rectangle or a random copied opp's tri'ed or rec'ed together to a common point.
   Area: Volatility(boundary,entrance,acceptance,continuance), series, cycle, scenario, shell
2. Your chances:
   1. <5:1 +/- breakpoint
   2. negative possibilities: mistake-improvement, upset/mistime; distract/misdirect, resituate/change-stimuli; hold when need to let go or visa-versa
   3. set point --
      -- for how much -/+ in their life they're willing to live with
      -- one average spot, with varying intensities thru life, along the fight-or-flight sydrome
      -- weighted in a certain place from passive to aggressive with other people

3. 'Predation -- four stages: Detection of prey, attack, capture and finally consumption." Breakdown as subterms -- Symbiosis, parasitism, behavior modification, 'overwhelm'. Choose position, follow series(,).

p1, new:









(switchoff to mec: emotions on the cycle (vrt axis of viscera(ea.w/basic hormone,purpose)) area: <5:1 +-
(": rank, etc., on the grid (")) polygons line/pivot to cross/stay/expand for trend angle: L:M



p1, return to the last method:


(too much info -- will add language of my ptm, if necessary)






(switchoff to mec: emotions on the cycle ) area: <5:1 +-
(": rank on the grid ) polygons line/pivot to cross/stay/expand for trend angle: L:M








RULES! (Hey.)









area series, cycle, scenario, shell or volatility
shape at least one line/pivot from one polygon
map to cross(lp3)/stay(lp5)/expand(L:M)
trade to turn trend angle











another:








area series, cycle, scenario, shell or volatility, and properties therein
shape at least one line/pivot from one polygon
map to cross(lp3,)/stay(lp5,)/expand(L:M,)
confirmation chart:same(red-flag news),different(cross-correlation)
trade to follow turn new trend angle represents















-----------


There's a magazine called Pattern Recognition. It's expensive, so I won't link to it. I will list an excerpt that includes terms you can google for more information about:
"clustered random sampling [4],
which shows that distributed yet local patterns are most informative,
or by hierarchical clustering [5] to construct and take advantage of
spatial relationships. Rodriguez et al. [6] extend independent component analysis (ICA) to take into account the phase information of
fMRI data; ICA can be used as feature extraction based on the
training data or in a semi-supervised way. Cabral et al. [7] investigate
ensembles of classifiers for decoding of visual information, and
Olivetti et al. [8] study the statistical significance of classification
results evaluated within the Bayesian framework. The optimization
of the regularization parameter, which highly influences brain maps
that can be extracted from the decoder, should not consider
classification accuracy as a sole criterion, but also measures of
reproducibility [9]. When training data becomes very limited, such
as in real-time fMRI, a new paradigm that uses feedback to modulate
brain activity, performance can be boosted using naive labeling [10]" 1

-- Yeah, I got confused fast.

I did find one term, Lyapunov Exponent, a math equation and concept that measures chaos. The most expansion of the dynamics of use of this concept, I found here.
an initial, relatively uneducated view is: different, rate, localization, multipler-copy, of expansion

Then I found Gestalt terms that, as a qualitative set, explains how the brain measures chaos.
Gestalt terms (here):
similarity, continuation, closure, proximity, figure-and-ground



Okay, here's my technical chart study using this approach --

First, I subconsciously thought of cycles, and wished, as per my current post #1 method, to include trend angles' change over time.
Second, I just went over lots of google material, and felt expansive; too, the word 'expansive' stuck in my mind from my method, as it bothered me somehow.
Last, some people were acting with me as if I were a dummy who didn't have any personal information worth identifying with and took even some of my own and turned it against me happily and freely. So I turn around and find complex knowledge that can't easily be used similarly against me and apply a concept that I can use in figuring when such an attack may reoccur and alleviate the pain of the occurrence of their anger through finding a path I can call my own. Happens all the time in sociology, with different subcultures choosing a moneymaking field that also fits territorial demands for the field's physical activity and symbolic hierarchy.


The regularity expressed in the first chart was key in my understanding the trendline just before and above it would be the area's summarizing trend angle.

The second chart expresses how the same general trend angle continues,
here at a more regular rate.

The third chart goes one more area into the past, where price range expands and trend angle dissipates into verticality.
The first three charts show an upward bias.

The fourth chart, which is after the first chart, is chaos, where, while the same main trend angle is retained, both left and right trend angles are expressed strongly to challenge the main trend angle, as a lead into the first appearance of horizonality that at last happens on the right.

The fifth chart confirms the upward bias and continues the motions of the fourth chart with a logarithmic/momentum organization of the chaos found in the fourth chart. This organization is a mere continuation, since a strong release happens once price is above.

The last chart suggests nomenclature for finding a new trend angle's influence on price. Main trend angle for an area -- specific angle in runs, else a symbolic left or right 45-degree angle -- , most common trend angle over the set of micro-trend angles for the same area -- vertical or horizontal or a qualified mix of each -- , and, for the macro-area, or rather the combination of all areas studied, horizontal divider line (unlabeled: the long horizontal, solid line that continues beyond the right) for largest area and midline (or other count) between pivots and any angle-changeover confluence. The angle-changeover confluence is of the series of areas' change in angle between trend angle that is micro- average over an area and trend angle for an entire area.
The lowest, dashed, horizontal line goes on to be touched once as a final, high-momentum pivot before price trends upward for good in the fifth chart.
Vertical condensing is in the third chart leading into regularity of the second, setting in the first, and chaos in the fourth charts, before repetition in the fifth chart occurs. This last chart combines the first and second charts with part of the fourth chart, explaining how they have the most definition.
This labels variation in 'series' alternately to and natively vs. my former definition of it: display,condense,set,decide,repeat

Horizonality may be rationalized as a settled price between the two currencies.










-----------

p1 new reorg'n:








Gestalt (similarity, continuation, closure, proximity, figure-and-ground) reliable finding for each step --
1. area (proximity?)
series narrow/use, cycle confront/comply,scenario reject/alternate,shell aware,volatility bound
series (display,condense,set,decide,repeat; an alternate for choice,logic,average,set,use),
cycle (1. entity given name for positioning 2. doubt/threaten/reject 3. helplessness, objectification among other objects 4. stimulus: pattern preset, introduction with real pattern, copy real pattern 5. breakdown and reintroduction),
scenario (An addiction cycle: 1 pain (negative warmth); 2 pleasure dissociation/trance (cold); 3a response framing -- leverage (outside) ritual to act out, 3b response act out, 3c leverage (inside) conclusive realignment with dealing with pain ("consequences of acting out")(positive-warmth (akin to 'nostalgia' -> neutral.)
shell (1 gut reaction 2 volatility consciousness 3 body-parts feel of path among objects 4 senses awareness for detailed interaction with objects 5 adjust self to environs as inner balance occurs
volatility (boundary(~Gestalt: proximity?),entrance(figure-and-ground?),acceptance(closure?),continuance(continuation?)(,similarity?:comparison))
area: measure micro-(vertical or horizontal or a qualified mix of each),regular(specific angle in runs, else a symbolic left or right 45-degree angle),macro-(pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, with high,mid and low types, justifying a midline for macro-area)
2. shape (closure?) at least one line/pivot from one polygon
3. map (figure-and-ground?) to cross(lp3,)/stay(lp5,)/expand(L:M,)
4. confirmation (similarity?) chart:same(red-flag news),different(cross-correlation)
5. trade (continuation?) to follow turn new trend angle represents




simplified:











Gestalt (similarity, continuation, closure, proximity, figure-and-ground) reliable finding for each step --
1. proximity series narrow/use,cycle confront/comply,scenario reject/alternate,shell aware,volatility bound
series (display,condense,set,decide,repeat; an alternate for choice,logic,average,set,use),
cycle (1. entity given name for positioning 2. doubt/threaten/reject 3. helplessness, objectification among other objects 4. stimulus: pattern preset, introduction with real pattern, copy real pattern 5. breakdown and reintroduction),
scenario (An addiction cycle: 1 pain (negative warmth); 2 pleasure dissociation/trance (cold); 3a response framing -- leverage (outside) ritual to act out, 3b response act out, 3c leverage (inside) conclusive realignment with dealing with pain ("consequences of acting out")(positive-warmth (akin to 'nostalgia' -> neutral.)
shell (1 gut reaction 2 volatility consciousness 3 body-parts feel of path among objects 4 senses awareness for detailed interaction with objects 5 adjust self to environs as inner balance occurs
volatility (boundary(~Gestalt: proximity?),entrance(figure-and-ground?),acceptance(closure?),continuance(continuation?)(,similarity?:comparison))
area: measure micro-(vertical or horizontal or a qualified mix of each),regular(specific angle in runs, else a symbolic left or right 45-degree angle),macro-(pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, with high,mid and low types, justifying a midline for macro-area)
2. closure at least one line/pivot from one polygon
3. figure-and-ground to cross(lp3,)/stay(lp5,)/expand(L:M,)
4. similarity chart:same(red-flag news),different(cross-correlation)
5. continuation to follow turn new trend angle represents






another:









What act? 5mec -- where a nontrading pattern may, at least partially, repath one's trade; ex.'s :
what do you act upon?
Every trade is dependent on balanced u(c) (C) - i/o (D) fliplines of C-D for what's on one's mind to leverage for trade, as well as on recognizing all of what's there -- Gestalt (similarity, continuation, closure, proximity, figure-and-ground) reliable finding for each step:
1. proximity Absorb, use given information. scenario reject/alternate, reframe (area of objects to use (in a habitual, one-concept way (thus, same area and different frame (appended/subtitute, collective view) each entity));
shell aware, anchor; cycle confront/comply, rank; (anchor plus rank (line) is leverage) series narrow/use, leverage; (leverage provides action, which one guides (use of objects)) volatility guide
scenario (An addiction cycle: 1 pain (negative warmth); 2 pleasure dissociation/trance (cold); 3a response framing -- leverage (outside) ritual to act out, 3b response act out, 3c leverage (inside) conclusive realignment with dealing with pain ("consequences of acting out")(positive-warmth (akin to 'nostalgia' -> neutral.)
shell (1 gut reaction 2 volatility consciousness 3 body-parts feel of path among objects 4 senses awareness for detailed interaction with objects 5 adjust self to environs as inner balance occurs
cycle (1. entity given name for positioning 2. doubt/threaten/reject 3. helplessness, objectification among other objects 4. stimulus: pattern preset, introduction with real pattern, copy real pattern 5. breakdown and reintroduction)
series (display,condense,set,decide,repeat; an alternate for choice,logic,average,set,use)
volatility, as in, guide thru the volatility of the area (boundary(~Gestalt: proximity?),entrance(figure-and-ground?),acceptance(closure?),continuance(continuation?)(,similarity?:comparison))
area: measure, a method w/ 'proximity' -- micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),macro-(pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types, then midline for macro-area)
2. closure at least one line/pivot from one polygon
3. figure-and-ground to cross(lp3,)/stay(lp5,)/expand(L:M,)
4. similarity chart:same(red-flag news),different(cross-correlation)
5. continuation to follow turn new trend angle represents from the line(s) aligning, with specific R:R measure

p1 new:



(dropped gestalt, was decent scaffolding)








a few shapes from real life:
. Mental rotation of an idea in order to expose it to different stimuli and reorder responses saves it from being put into the unconsciousness. .
. where use trace of pattern: directed fliplines at (pre-)consciousness (thought with drawing) and in/external of body (interacting). Ex., body-trace of chart move, flipline with consciousness has one trade the opposite.
. Redirect of self around idea, in mec.
. Leverage of idea: scenario reject/alternate, reframe (area of objects to use (in a habitual, one-concept way (thus, same area and different frame (appended/subtitute, collective view) each entity));
shell aware, anchor; cycle confront/comply, rank; (anchor plus rank (line) is leverage) series narrow/test, leverage; (leverage provides action, which one guides (use of objects)) volatility guide
. Trade on idea:
1 at least one line/pivot from one polygon
2a to cross(lp3,)/stay(lp5,)/expand(L:M,)
2b follow turn new trend angle represents from the line(s) aligning
4 micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),macro-(pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types, then midline for macro-area)
0 (optional) similarity chart:same(red-flag news),different(cross-correlation)











------------------







Gann Fan -- from nice L:M turn, right into air. Worked fine, if a bit rough.


















------------



another thread:

-- erased a post, didn't contribute enough, and thus was pushy/superficial






If you mean "gradation", then it's a three-tier with a top and bottom point, or just a middle line if you want things simpler. A middle line makes it easy to compare different peoples' set of emotions, because it relates so well to one person being dominant or have the motive to do something and the other person not. Plus, your ego stuff fits.

And, as noted, I'm only sketching it from amateur (however heavy and almost a decade of) experience of making and using a personal thinking model and extra models such as a type of mec. I mean, one person's sensibility is another's off-the-wall behavior. I'm glad to share any of it, though.


-------------------------------










p1 another:









a few shapes from real life: Attachment
. (reframe) idea: scenario reject/alternate, reframe (area of objects to use (in a habitual, one-concept way (thus, same area and different frame (appended/subtitute, collective view) each entity));
shell aware, anchor; cycle confront/comply, rank; (anchor plus rank (line) is leverage) series narrow/test, leverage; (leverage provides action, which one guides (use of objects)) volatility guide
(anchor). Redirect of self around idea, in mec.
(leverage). Mental rotation of an idea in order to expose it to different stimuli and reorder responses saves it from being put into the unconsciousness. .
(rank). where use trace of pattern: directed fliplines at (pre-)consciousness (thought with drawing) and in/external of body (interacting). Ex., body-trace of chart move, flipline with consciousness has one trade the opposite.
. (guide) idea:
1 at least one line/pivot from one polygon
2a to cross(lp3,)/stay(lp5,)/expand(L:M,) pivot(s)/line(s)
2b and tell where new trend angle is
4 in an area that is micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types, then midline for macro-area)
0 (optional) chart:same(red-flag news),different(cross-correlation)






-----




p1 new:







aware, anchor;
(anchor). Redirect of self around idea, in mec.
+
(anchor plus rank (line) is leverage) narrow/test, leverage
(leverage). Mental rotation of an idea in order to expose it to different stimuli and reorder responses saves it from being put into the unconsciousness. .
=
confront/comply, rank;
(rank). where use trace of pattern: directed fliplines at (pre-)consciousness (thought with drawing) and in/external of body (interacting). Ex., body-trace of chart move, flipline with consciousness has one trade the opposite.

. (reframe) idea: reject/alternate reframe ;
area of objects to use (in a habitual, one-concept way
1 at least one line/pivot from one polygon
2a to cross(lp3,)/stay(lp5,)/expand(L:M,) pivot(s)/line(s)
2b and tell where new trend angle is
4 in an area that is micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types, then midline for macro-area)
0 (optional) chart:same(red-flag news),different(cross-correlation)



--------------


p1 new:





a psychological risk formula

aware, anchor;
(anchor). Redirect of self around idea, in mec.
+
(anchor plus rank (line) is leverage) narrow/test, leverage
(leverage). Mental rotation of an idea in order to expose it to different stimuli and reorder responses is often NOT in synch with how much is close to the subconscious.
=
confront/comply, rank;
(rank). where use trace of pattern: directed fliplines at (pre-)consciousness (thought with drawing) and in/external of body (interacting). Ex., body-trace of chart move, flipline with consciousness has one trade the opposite.

chart study

Reject/alternate reframe
at least one line/pivot from one polygon
to cross (lp3,) / stay (lp5,) / expand (L:M,)
and tell where new trend angle is
in an area that is micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types, then midline for macro-area).









---------------







p1 short:








a psychological risk formula

mec 5:1 +-
flip line u(c)
distractives i/o

at least one line/pivot from one polygon
to cross (lp3,) / stay (lp5,) / expand (L:M,)
and tell where new trend angle is

in an area that is micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types, then midline for macro-area).







shorter:





. mec 5+:1-
. flip line u(c)
. distractives i/o
. at least one line/pivot from one polygon
to cross (lp3,) / stay (lp5,) / expand (L:M,)
and tell where new trend angle is
. in an area that is micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),
regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),
or macro-(midline; pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types).







new:







. flip line u(c), mec 5+:1-, % distractives i/o
. at least one line/pivot from one polygon, that crosses (lp3,) / stays (lp5,)
/ expands (L:M,),
and tells how well where new trend angle is
. in flow w/micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),
regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),
or macro-(midline; pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types) area









another post dump, so I don't sound like a snot:





My guess is that poker has clear-cut technicals and difficult-to-achieve favorable money management, and trading visa-versa. So your post reads like calculator magic.






------------








okay, new method with a little to offer:

(absorbed oddsmaking into approach)





t1 odds -- .25,.5,.35,.75,.5 avg = 47% chance of success
t2 odds -- .75, .5, .65, .15, .3 = .47
t3 odds: .25+.75+.35+.45= 0.36

t4 odds: (.75+.75+.25+.35+.4)/5= .5

t4 odds: .4+.5+.05+.65+.8)/5=0.48
t5 odds: .65+.75+.2+.4+.6)/5=0.52










------------------------------


p1 adj:

(w/links)








. flip line u(c), mec 5+:1-, % distractives i/o
. at least one line/pivot from one polygon/(volatility-cycle/random-copied),
that crosses (lp3,) / stays (lp5,) / expands (L:M,), and tells how well where new trend angle is
. in flow w/micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),
regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),
or macro-(midline; pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types) area
















-------------------








Here's another acct:



odds: .25+.4+..45+.2+.75)/5=0.41 MENTAL ERROR
ATF odds: .65 total REVENGE (highly emotional, is what I mean) TRADING (ATF: (calculated) "after the fact")
odds: .15+.4+.35+.3+.5)/5=0.34
.35+.65+.3+.7+.9)/5=0.58 NOT SHOWN










p1 new:

















. flip line u(c), mec 5+:1-, % distractives i/o
. at least one line/pivot from one polygon/(volatility-cycle/random-copied),
that crosses (lp3,) / stays (lp5,) / expands (L:M,),
and tells how well (opt'l/sim L:M) where new trend angle is
. in flow w(opt'l/sim Lyapunov Exponent)/micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),
regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),
or macro-(midline; pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types) area

on / since beginning 'odds':
it's not that i've lost any accounts,
it's that the trades I HAVE lost were so uncontrollable at that time
that it makes me uncomfortable to have that much chaos/risk
running in my way.

I find 'cycles' works, only inadequate
for pretending I'm doing anything except making really bad guesses
as to how well I'll trade next. Much less correct my approach during trading with exercises.








-------------





added more order to my odds method:








A set record of how I did before the trade, to prepare it, allows me to compare notes of a) did I represent that preparation correctly and b) will this key list of variables keep me from losing money.
Thus, "odds: (.xx+.yy+.zz+.aa+.bb)/5=.cc" , in .05's" each (_'ed) rating of the pre-trade study, multiplies mm from .5 avg.

direction:
flip line u(c),
cycle area:
mec 5+:1-,
source of pattern:
% distractives (real-life patterns, etc.) i/o ..
representation of right shape:
at least one line/pivot from one polygon/volatility(/random - copied shape),
measure crosses w/lp3(,), stays w/lp5(,), expands w/L:M(,) for new trend angle(s)
right flow of area:
micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),
regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),
or macro-(midline; pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types) area



---------------


Another ATF, this one aligned with the chart at least.
I was upset that the tiny drawdown I had to allow because of the low-% multiple,
knocked out a perfectly good trade from going through.

Anyway, this is a good example of a fibonacci fan as an ersatz Gann Fan.








I'm getting tired of feeling I have to watch the trade all the way through.
Of course, the trade won't do exactly what I want, so I decrease my risk -- barring my own negative psychology, which is a tough one -- watching the trade.

Anyway, here's another clear example of two shape/polygons' trendlines matching to turn the central trend angle.
I should be finding this good a signal more often, according to my method.
I thought price may go down a little and then go up strong
the turn, which I didn't really guess;
gratified the two crosses did capture volatility and the turn's immediate history as well as the turn itself

I shoulda coulda woulda but didn't predict a major turn where the arrow is,
from a line I'd already made in the last post in conjunction with the band in the first picture:










the critical projected turn (frames around the lines' crossover, starting approximately at the arrow):

normal trade afterward, which I watched like a hawk; it was so hesitant, probably still didn't(/don't) grasp the turn's significance:

-- Now that I look at it afresh, there's a triple there -- the critical turn a divergent downslope, then a compressed horizontal, and finally, in the last trade, a slight upslope of a line segment.
I usually play this to the middle, only that turn and the compression make me rethink such a choice.
(I DON"T have to be so consciously hyper-analytic in my trades for my method to work; in tune emotionally with the trend angles' flow at a close-to-unconscious read of the chart makes money, too.)

hey ha whhat is all the concepts/perception of all that based on?

interesting stuff

Thanks for visiting and showing positive interest.

While there's a link for each portion of the method,
it's fairly obvious I haven't rounded up everything concretely.

So maybe I have something, this time. Cool.

btw u got a 45 viewer spike atm. is that normal?
-----------

im guessing what you do explains the harmony of price movement in your own way?

pretty hardcore btw hehe
im just intrigued. mybe a little explanation would spark a nice discussion

I read ff (Trading Discussion the most) avidly for ideas to rework post 1. Recently, I exchanged several posts in a psychology thread in Trading Discussion, and developed my own ideas heavily from this input.

From this, I arrived at several psychometric variables with limited choices I make percentiles of. They blend nicely with charts, so they merit deciding my money management per trade.

If it weren't for this, I'd be margin-calling every third or eighth trade again.

pretty innovative, i think ure nailing this down lol and ure making sense of chaos which is awesome

nice HA
ill see what ure up to from tiem to time hehe

buma

This one, I read thru my initial odds for the first trade, and found that, in my personal life, I had some heavy issues in emotional and distractive patterns that usurped about anything I could think of. So, any call to work my unconscious right may fail in the immediate sense.
Instead, I thought I could tie in my emotional with flow, while still being analytical. Lazily, I ignored my little flow method again; it's fine, if representative. What I did was enlarge the shape-and-line to the entire area available to me in LFH simulator 1'.

As the first trade shows, this achieved precision with one heck of a lot of in-trade drawdown. A decent odds recording multiplied this reasonably honestly on the big loss and again on the bigger profit in the next trade.
It was about the same time trading, just fewer trades.
And yes, I could let it tear me up inside that I missed hauling in 144 pips on a really big leverage, but hey, at least I made it through, and I feel comfortable about that..... Well no, the large loss bothers me too. Breakin' all the rules, hmm... I did use a well-measured SL on that first trade, so....I guess I'm simply an irregular person. Lots of people are, in different ways.




Halfway thru this third chart, before the trade there, I did figure a longterm down channel was on hand.
However, I also noticed an upbreak was imminent, and in my mood at the time, as described minutely above, I went for the big haul.

'nuther trade:
went back for something to substantiate the froth,
and ran into an extra, solid line for the climb.
It gathered percentile for a trade, on a flip around it (still shook, watching every move. eek.)


At first, I wanted absolutely higher -- who wouldn't (if lower wasn't there)?

When I saw price was just surrounding the lower line, I gave that up and scrounged around the base of the fans for a trendline or something.
I got one:

Then what the intro said. I figured the ascending triangle, which I saw before going for the upmost move to upper fan lines, would have a say here. It has a little balance within its upper bound, instilling weakness price may return to or at least use some.


NOTE:
I guess I'd better print my demo simulator trades.
No, if anyone can count on the chart showing the tiny red or blue line segments for SL/TP -- if not visible, then unlimited for SL or manually exited for either.
The trade prints are annoying to me, if they're not real or at least with substantial time spent on them, as with demo (not simulator).











------------


unposted:







What, you mean 'Trading Journals'?



-- well, mine at least to recent, anyway..
(I don't study Trading Systems area much.)










---------





same account....
More nail-biting; it's funny I had to wait over a day for a.48 (would've been better with the .58) and 2-5 minutes for a .27, but whatever, that's where my understanding of the technicals stood at the time.






---------



Deleted from that psych thread noted:



Hey F,

I found a curious thing. When I established definite criteria to judge my psychological profile at the time of each trade,
and practiced thus for a while,
I found that I was the system, rather than veering from some rules discretionarily.





-- Why deleted:

What I know now feels more and more irrelevant to what others say.
Others have the words I built upon, so I should get over the feeling.
Several make money trading on ff, so it's easy to acknowledge I'm full of ice cream.

It's just right now. I also feel like an employee of myself, or rather of my mm multiplier (which includes the technical study), which is what most of my life is like anyhow, managers and other employees judging how well I do my job and subtracting or adding hours or trained-for tasks to work.
Only, a little more potential for this job.

Whatever, as long as it feels like a job I must have and is also a job I do well at. Or something like this.



----------------


Can't twiddle my thumbs all day....
Gotta be passionate about something....
(Life? Well....)


Angst, so used to those margin calls, now am kicking the habit.
The margin-call blues? Wow.;asdkad

No, like really, I USED those margin calls etc. to get an adrenaline kick
that fed me to get new, inspired ideas.
Aasdkjfa;sifj



uasdjf;alksdfja;lkdfiej'[qepjqeorpfd


(its a good thing
its a good thing
its a good thing
..................................................



hm
as;fd;qoweijr ['qprj4ORJ
\

bETTER NOW.


Can of worms.


Well, I'll practice then for a few hours a day, and that's that.
Maybe I'll do chores or take a hike.


a;sdlfa;fjiqewporj

arhghhh.

ANOTHER STICK-IN-THE-MUD JOB?!?!?!?!?!
Is that what I want?
I guess it is.

So I'll work the levels, paper -> simulator -> demo -> pennies -> real,
and see how well I perform.
Maybe I can expand the conditions under which I work;
that was always fun.
I used to trade at a public computer in a visitor's center,
on a payphone outside a near-east restaurant in a city I made only that stop at,
and via snail mail to close an old trade.
Once each, about, as I recall (the last may be imaginary.)

There is a whole world within profitable trading, right? Yes. Where no more worries
about how you do are there, only how well and even that in a restrictive range.
-- Okay, now it's getting mind-expansive again. Feeling better.




What I mean is,
maintaining any level of competence is tough,
because you must remain competitive else others will get your spot
one way or another.

So it's okay.
I'll read or something.Argh.

"Ha-pattern, the trader".
Got a ring to it.







I do remember that I'm supposed to exercise physical-psychological actively
during trading, to make it. Real will be much, much tougher psychologically,
so I'll need that extra edge.

That's something I can do, and it'll keep me active too.

account 9, platform skipped two weeks of data, so deleted the account.
No, I didn't margin call also.

account 10:
Account 9 was wild, though, and I regained confidence in the chart
after a loss.
Here, too, I lost and needed the confidence to run without much tending to.
I had a good bit of confidence in the last trade, from some multi-aligned l.p.3 lines.
(One thing I gotta say to anybody, don't try this at home unless you use such trading-activity-leveragable, comprehensive and strict psych variables and also have the charting experience to take care of most all chart possibilities (10K? Hmm).
It's more pragmatic and self-cornering, than a good thing. Better you use one system after another when it's appropriate, and am well-balanced psychologically, than this way. Anyhow, hope anyone profits from what I write/draw.)



















-----------------






l.p.3 reminds me of a fibonacci fan -- Often divergence to a Gann fan or a grid area.
What's more, because it' more like a triangle than the Gann Fan or the fib fan are,
it can trap a certain area whether or not it acts as a divergence.

I just tried an account WITHOUT the controls -- the stats, that is.
I felt lucky breaking even after ten trades. And believe you me, I sweated it even more than with the stats.
So I return to the stats. The downside is absurd without them.
You can also tell I'm really worked up emotionally. Not good for later trades.

In other words,
there's a continuum, for which no (psychological) controls, controls, exercise and controls, system (not in my league), and program (also not in my league) are the range.


I apparently got into a vicious (emotional) cycle that I clawed my way out of by sheer will.
I won't always have that willpower, so I need an edge, a control such as the psych stats.
But I must use them proactively and with exercise, to push myself into the next skill level of trading.


I lost the battle at -20%, after +10,-30,-5,-10,-20 from the initial balance.



--------
So that's my problem, I always need a fresh proxy. ANY competent proxy.
If I can use old proxies, that'd at least stem the flow.

. 1.-10. cycle: Combats cycling negative emotions that overtook the technical side of the chart,as noted above. I repeat the same area until I have to choose between two or more in the same area, and rank them while I choose a direction to trade from one to the next.
And there is a positive, gut-trace-informed version of emotion cycle that whips up some nice profit.
. any CD combo using the first psych-stat number, flip-line u(c). That freeform drawing called direction + or something.
. diversion i/o? That gut trace thing, especially a book sketch transfer. AND, 'volatility', the boundary etc. thing. That'd anchor an appropriate pattern all over me and my environs, instead of a nontrading pattern overtaking my attention.
. Then, next, I can purify my use of the two technicals, feel more at ease with them.
. Especially, I must start using the incredibly simple and reasonably effective, or at least contributive, trend-angles flow approach.

Exercises, there you go. If I get too off-the-wall on a score in the psych stats, I take action to raise that score.







----







p1, adj:








psych stats
"odds: (.xx+.yy+.zz+.aa+.bb)/5=.cc" , in .05's" each (_'ed) rating of the pre-trade study, multiplies mm from .5 avg. Emotion and the smaller technicals are centers of attention, the former in reality and the latter in chart study. So if the surrounding of either takes precedence, do an exercise to balance its central opposer.
direction: flip line u(c),
cycle area: mec 5+:1-,
source of pattern: % distractives (real-life patterns, etc.) i/o ..
representation of right shape: at least one line/pivot from one polygon/volatility(/random - copied shape),
measure stays w/lp5(,grid,), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), expands w/L:M(,Gann fan,) for new trend angle(s)
right flow of area: micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),
regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),
or macro-(midline; pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types) area

score exercises (sample)
. flip-line u(c). That freeform drawing called direction + or something.
. 1.-10. cycle: repeat the same area until I have to choose between two or more in the same area, and rank them while I choose a direction to trade from one to the next.
And a positive, gut-trace-informed version of emotion cycle.
. diversion i/o? That gut trace thing, especially a book sketch transfer. AND, 'volatility', the boundary etc. thing.
. Especially, I must keep ordered the smaller technical's use
. and near-automate the larger's use.











-------------


acct 11:
saw an lp5, went for its literal meaning, which worked: lost 5%, 150 up lost in-trade potential (used 12/20 of acct, so was okay), 150 down for the manual exit. +10% total. That's about as contrary a trade as I can get, and I've been doing them increasingly the entire series of accounts.
And no, I didn't margin call account 10, so much as lose 20% in that ONE account, which could average over the previous nine accounts as an overall profit and a learning experience.

I haven't done any exercises yet. I did rewrite the short technicals a bit, ordering mid- mid-/logr logr for the line juxtapositions.




stress test of the psych stats approach: posts 665 to 676, about fifty trades.
Next, also do the exercises and improve my results to settle at normal and better, instead of shove the approach into the ground until it stops giving way and instead rebounds stronger.






p1 adj:









psych stats "odds: (.xx+.yy+.zz+.aa+.bb)/5=.cc" , in .05's" each (_'ed) rating of the pre-trade study, multiplies mm from .5 avg. Emotion and the smaller technicals are centers of attention, the former in reality and the latter in chart study. So if the surrounding of either takes precedence, do an exercise to balance its central opposer.
direction: flip line u(c),
cycle area: mec 5+:1-,
source of pattern: % distractives (real-life patterns, etc.) i/o ..
representation of right shape: at least one line/pivot from one polygon/volatility(/random - copied shape),
measure stays w/lp5(,grid,), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), expands w/L:M(,Gann fan,) for new trend angle(s)
right flow of area: micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),
regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),
or macro-(midline; pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types) area
stress test of the psych stats approach: posts 665 to 676, about fifty trades; shoves the approach into the ground until it stops giving way and instead rebounds stronger. Also do the exercises and improve my results to settle at normal and better.
score exercises (sample)
. flip-line u(c). That freeform drawing called direction + or something.
. 1.-10. cycle: repeat the same area until I have to choose between two or more in the same area, and rank them while I choose a direction to trade from one to the next.
And a positive, gut-trace-informed version of emotion cycle.
. diversion i/o? That gut trace thing, especially a book sketch transfer. AND, 'volatility', the boundary etc. thing.
. Especially, I must keep ordered the smaller technical's use
. and near-automate the larger's use.











-----------


Okay, I got an approach to include almost all instances of use,
thru adding two or three more variables:
physical position -- consider a sphere at the 0,0 axis of the grid in mec's center, think it's you (a person), and move and warp its shape so that it imitates an overwhelmable anger, etc. With this addition to mec, physical position becomes charged from interrelations at or near the trade, and goes to how mec cycles stay and play thru so that negative ones are removed and positive ones maximized the use of
technical use of mec's center grid -- involvement in nontrading naturally excludes said in trading, unless unconscious/felt


p1 rev:









psych stats "odds: (.xx+.yy+.zz+.aa+.bb)/5=.cc" , in .05's" each (_'ed) rating of the pre-trade study, multiplies mm from .5 avg. Emotion and the smaller technicals are centers of attention, the former in reality and the latter in chart study. So if the surrounding of either takes precedence, do an exercise to balance its central opposer.
direction: flip line u(c),
cycle area: mec 5+:1-,
physical position -- consider a sphere at the 0,0 axis of the grid in mec's center, think it's you (a person), and move and warp its shape so that it imitates an overwhelmable anger, etc. With this addition to mec, physical position becomes charged from interrelations at or near the trade, and goes to how mec cycles stay and play thru so that negative ones are removed and positive ones maximized the use of,
source of pattern: % distractives (real-life patterns, etc.) i/o ..
representation of right shape: at least one line/pivot from one polygon/volatility(/random - copied shape),
measure stays w/lp5(,grid,), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), expands w/L:M(,Gann fan,) for new trend angle(s)
right flow of area: micro-(vert or hz or a qualified mix),
regular(spec angle in runs, or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle),
or macro-(midline; pivot/trend-angle-changeover lines, w/hi,mid,lo types) area
technical use of mec's center grid -- involvement in nontrading naturally excludes said in trading, unless unconscious/felt, and so warps understanding of chart flow.
stress test of the psych stats approach: posts 665 to 676, about fifty trades; shoves the approach into the ground until it stops giving way and instead rebounds stronger. Also do the exercises and improve my results to settle at normal and better.
score exercises (sample)
. flip-line u(c). That freeform drawing called direction + or something.
. 1.-10. cycle: repeat the same area until I have to choose between two or more in the same area, and rank them while I choose a direction to trade from one to the next.
And a positive, gut-trace-informed version of emotion cycle.
. a physical exercise making bland, that is, spread the effect until negativity removed from, negative position over manipulation of lots of objects and interactive re-ranking with lots of people; or, intensifying a positive physical position thru repeated action w/few objts/ppl.
. diversion i/o? That gut trace thing, especially a book sketch transfer. AND, 'volatility', the boundary etc. thing.
. Especially, I must keep ordered the smaller technical's use
. and near-automate the larger's use.
. Make, blend in beside trading, and dissolve to replace with trading's, nontrading patterns, maybe with a proxy such as drawing from a book, or free drawing a model of an important life event's causality. Distinguishing this helps resolve its impact and establish distance from trading activity and its patterns, thus increasing effective objectivity to retain/change with the chart's flow.






-----------


including the two new psych stat variables:


the obvious:
I felt a greater awareness of the physical position
and of nontrading chart work happening at the time,
which helped create an overall that's changeable with exercise.
A stereotypical Gann Fan shape -- high initial run, if without much midline/grid influence and lots of logr/momentum content or visa-versa, allows extra time in the grid and thus some kind of break upward, if only temporarily held. Which I've posted before, nothing new.
I didn't really exploit the polygon-line combination, in the sense that there was no tradeable distance between price and it.

Trading is still rough going.

Dropped extra.



p1:




flip line u(c)

cycle area: mec 5+:1-

physical position -- consider a sphere at the 0,0 axis of the grid in mec's center, adjusts body to match usual emotions in mec

% distractives (real-life patterns, etc.) i/o

polygon/volatility(/random - copied shape) w/line/pivot stays w/lp5(,grid,), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), expands w/L:M(,Gann fan,) where new trend angle(s) begins

micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec angleor symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(midline, w/pivot/trend-angle anchored lines defining it) area

technical study of self, instead of chart, at one's involvement







p1:





price L:M(,)'s, flows and L:M(,)'s, or flows, w/artifacts (polygons/rndm-shapes) along the way --

flow
micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec angle or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(midline, w/pivot/trend-angle anchored lines defining it) area

cycle area: mec 5+:1-

(anti-)
technical study of self, instead of chart, at one's involvement

L:M(,)
flip line u(c):environs enters soon after breach conscious-subconscious; and, how gut trace flips,is ignored in u(c),etc.

artifacts:
polygon/(volatility/random - copied shape) w/line/pivot stays w/lp5(,grid,), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), expands w/L:M(,Gann fan,) where new trend angle(s) begins

physical position -- consider a sphere at the 0,0 axis of the grid in mec's center, adjusts body to match usual emotions in mec

(anti-)
% distractives (real-life patterns, etc.) i/o

To re-answer,
yeah, I just got your 'harmony-chaos' notion of PA,
expressed in my own way.
(That is, revised my approach to technicals (besides psych, which accompanies or supplants, but never is technically different from).)
Didn't realize I would, either.


I guess I'd better explain.


I was having a terrible time, still, even though I quit before losing too big. It just kept happening, losing; I was fighting and getting no technicals right.
Apparently, inside of me was the revision of my technicals, that it's always flow, L:M(,) and flow, or L:M(,), with artifacts along the way. Of course, there are other bodies of this source projecting their own chart, which may conflict with my own and/or disturb how I think/feel about the trading chart in front of me.

In a way, all I did was fit a 1'TF-only version and its extra motions, with the traditional range-and-trend, higher highs and lower lows, etc., type of interpretation. Doesn't make it more effective, necessarily, just more precise (what lots call "noise").

So that's another step along the path, at least, after defined psych variables and a comprehensive, disorganized view of what shapes the chart may produce.

.

A holistic interpretation of "lower highs and higher lows":


(note the contrast between the solid and dashed lines,
as well as how trend angle changes in small, heavy-L:M polygons/(volatility/random-shapes) early on)

It felt like decent lines were being ignored one after another,
because the larger structures were Gann fans one after another failing (long-wise).





I expected some kind of response to the greater area vs. the last big drop.
The latter was a tilde, that is, two opposing logr's (momentum/Gann fan) with a common middle.


Note on earlier mm multiplier:
I was going thru the not knowing the entirety scheme, having high-risk trades and low profit,
before I 'got it' and went for a longer hold, basing my excuse for going ATF upon this inside-the-chart understanding I had at the time. That, and the significant confidence in my trade was a lurch, over doubling, and using ATF also helped that way.

I find I'm trusting my psych stats a little more, where to use different versions and portions of it.








---------------



1 "plan, organize, staff, lead, and control"



1 "The way averages work, the larger the sample, the narrower the range of variation....
won’t play by the standard rules. They negotiate....(when the house is) desperate"












-----------


Margin-called.

First time in over a dozen posts here.

I could see in my mind what was wrong, I just felt helpless to change it, as if it were too much to deal with.

I MUST do exercises to go along with the psych stats, or else I'll begin serial margin calls again.

One thing is for sure, I take it too much into my own life to do me any good trading.





--------




p1 adj:






price L:M(,)'s, flows and L:M(,)'s, or flows, w/artifacts (polygons/rndm-shapes) along the way ;
each line is a psych stat from -1 to 1 in .05's, so that one adds them up and divides by 7 to multiply the usual trade's mm with,
any trade <=0 to skip
and especially good trades that have average scores okay to, for example, increase profit if with a stricter stop loss
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

flow
micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec angle or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(midline, w/pivot/trend-angle anchored lines defining it) area

cycle area: mec 5+:1-

(anti-)
technical study of self, instead of chart, at one's involvement

L:M(,)
flip line u(c):environs enters soon after breach conscious-subconscious; and, how gut trace flips,is ignored in u(c),etc.

artifacts:
polygon/(volatility/random - copied shape) stays w/lp5(,grid,opposing shape(s),), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), pivots (balance (plus,line segment,dot),), or expands w/logr-shape(,Gann fan,), deciding new trend angle(s)

physical position -- consider a sphere at the 0,0 axis of the grid in mec's center, adjusts body to match usual emotions in mec

(anti-)
% distractives (real-life patterns, etc.) i/o







http://www.tripit.com/destinations/1...-both-new-old/



Okay, now I'm loosening up on myself,
and allowing a full-strength mm to go thru while I keep track in my mind of my stats.
Then, when things for me seem to get tough,
I'll bring in the stats.
Only, I may drop a decimal and use more of the +-1 range, to increase clarity. Ex., ((-1) + 0 + .4 + .5 + .5 + .25 + 1) / 7 = 0.2357 .

.
I'm studying myself in the moment, so objectivity is tough: If I do the technicals first, at least on the opening trade,
and then do each of the five psychological statistics as if it were deciding the trade
and finally get an overall statistics,
and then repeat this series five times and get the average,
at least I'll know much more about myself and either keep that average or get inspired, do it once more, and be accurate.




----------

Read a post, working on its bibliog:

The post is on the trader's cycle.



" thalamus...translator of various input information into information readable by the cortex.
selective distribution from one thalamic point to one or several part of the cortex....
"a 'relay' that simply forwards signals to the cerebral cortex. ...
also modulates sensory signals to and from cortex."

"regulating states of sleep and wakefulness....
with the cerebral cortex, forming cortico-thalamo-cortical recurrent loops..,. consciousness....
regulating arousal, the level of awareness and activity.

Many different functions are linked to the system to which thalamic parts belong. This is at first the case for sensory systems....
'motor' systems.... VIm, the relay of cerebellar afferences... tremor.
The role of the thalamus in the more anterior pallidal and nigral territories {and} vestibular or to tectal functions is almost ignored. "


ibid " sensory systems(which excepts the olfactory function) :auditory, somatic, visceral, gustatory and visual systems"
-- I've never read of the gustatory system as a sensory system.

"The cerebellum is involved in the coordination of voluntary motor movement, balance and equilibrium and muscle tone." 1
"The cerebellum is involved in balance, equilibrium, muscle tone, and the coordination of voluntary motor movement.

"The cerebellum is the part of the brain that coordinates the actions of muscles (motor control) and helps to maintain balance. It is also involved in some cognitive functions such as attention and language, and probably in some emotional functions such as regulating fear and pleasure responses." 2

"The basal ganglia moderates the intensity of motor activity.
It does this by inhibiting the thalamus to a lesser or greater extent." 1
ibid

Read a post, working on its bibliog:

The post is on the trader's cycle.

I'd start the post with "Great post.

I often think I'm the only one going thru this.

Something that prevalent must have a psychological term (or two) attached to it."

Then I'd break down the continuing answer with a relevant summary of the material below and in the last of the last post above --



addiction, a cycle:


on addiction
" "Highly palatable" food can be addictive to certain susceptible individuals. Usually things are highly palatable because they are somehow good for us. I have the feeling that in an environment without the neolithic agents of disease, the food reward system would work as planned, just like the sex reward and the exercise reward. Jack up the system with weird chemicals in excess of anything we ever experienced in evolution - like heroin, tobacco, or ho-hos, and some people will develop a problem." -- if a variety catches on or is extensively avoided, then it changes how others respond (more or less ameliorate to (being of) that variety)

time, motor, pre-motor(emote), post-motor(repair),space -- paraphrased from 1

lots of versions
ex:
pre-: control/dependency 1 preoccupation 2 ritualization 3 acting-out
one that's reviewed others and picked one

range of severity of addiction

non-
life and death go thru one comprehensive cycle --
one place has no heart disease or, maybe, addictions
dangers : guess -- motor: awareness(inhibition/excitation) of environs and social conflict (mid- and frontal brain, respectively) or both (modern skill to, perhaps, or...)(pregnancy, other activities)

non-, forced
(tabula rasa, the typical); that is,
behavior training that addresses input and speed rather than the entire being (socratic) --
" “re-start”... attention during the “low” {timing to} attention cycles of the brain. One area of concern is assessment... learned and retained....
mental breaks during learning gives the brain time to relax and process... a way .... cross-lateral exercises....
variety of ways to present ....Making information relevant..."
" provoking emotions.... expressed by enthusiasm during cooperative" "music... stimulation..."1

mild
"Better yet, two or three calorie-controlled pink or brown diet shakes throughout the day followed by a "sensible dinner." The sauce on the turkey in that 230 calorie microwaveable meal has such a unique taste. Four or five days a week at the gym, walking or running or elliptical or aerobics. It's exhausting, but you tell yourself you feel good, and for a couple months, success. Pounds come off, closer-to-goal pants come on - right up until you crack and end up face first in a plate of warm brownies one time too many."1

forced-mild
"They had to institute a buddy system so that none of the men were allowed to leave the dormitory alone, as one man went off diet and had to be excused from the study. They had dizziness, cold intolerance (requesting heavy blankets even in the middle of summer), muscle soreness, hair loss, reduced coordination, edema, and ringing in the ears. Some had to withdraw from their university classes because they did not have the capability to concentrate. Their sex drive disappeared. They became obsessed with food, eating with elaborate rituals (which eating disorder patients also do) and adding water to their plates to make the food last longer. Many collected cookbooks and recipes. One man, tempted by the odor from a bakery, bought a dozen doughnuts and gave them to children in the street just to watch them eat. Originally, the participants were allowed to chew gum, but when many of the men went to chewing about 40 sticks a day, it was decided that gum would affect the experiment and it was disallowed.

Only 32 of the original 36 completed the semistarvation period. One man who broke diet admitted to stealing scrapings from the garbage cans, stealing and eating raw rutabagas, and stopping at shops to eat sundaes. Two of the men suffered severe psychological stress - one became suicidal, and another cut off three of his fingers in an act of self-mutilation. Both men were taken to a psychiatric hospital.

The 3 month refeeding period involved trying several different combinations of protein, vitamins, and levels of calories. Dizziness, apathy and lethargy improved first, but persistent hunger, weakness, and loss of sex drive persisted for several months. The men described "a year long cavity" that needed to be filled. The day after they were finally released from the study, one of the men was hospitalized to have his stomach pumped after binging. In the aftermath of the study, "many, like Roscoe Hinkle, put on substantial weight: Boy did I add weight. Well, that was flab. You don't have muscle yet. And get[ting] the muscle back again, boy that's no fun." None who were interviewed in their 80s felt there was any lasting medical harm, once they'd recovered.

What strikes me the most about this study is how close it is to the standard recommendations for weight loss today (500-1000 calorie deficit daily for goal of 1-2 pounds lost a week, plus moderate exercise). The difference is by degree (1700 calorie deficit daily for goal of 2.5 pounds lost a week), and the fact that the men were normal weight when they began the study. But this strict diet sent 6% of the participants to the psychiatric hospital - and these were highly motivated, healthy young men! There is also a marked contrast between the psychological states in this long-term semi-starvation and reports of shorter-term water fasts. " ibid
I've done shorter-term water fasts, and one of mine slowed down my entire body and I moved as if I were in slow motion in extreme environmental conditions. I felt I had accomplished a pivotal event, since it was in a row with other self-training activities in one practice of mine.

severe
This is the traditional view of an addiction cycle.
1 (paraphrased and quoted) 1 "frustration-craving coping with a major life event
{2} fantacizing will weigh out the pros and cons of such use and oftentimes will not speak openly about these thoughts.
{3} obsession... fantasies will grow in the addicts mind to the point where the thought is nearly constant. The obsessions of drug use may be accompanied by a sense of impending doom and the addict might simply come to terms with the idea of using again.
{4} the actual addictive activity. This varies depending on what addiction the addict is recovering from
{5} This drug use tends to spiral out of the addicts control. When control is lost and the addictive activity is running the addict's life, the fifth step commences which is characterized by powerlessness over the activity. The addict will use drugs during inappropriate times and even when he or she doesn't truly want to. An addict in this phase may feel completely incapable of abstaining for even a relatively small period of time.
{6} After loss of control has been established, the addict is using drugs in a completely chaotic fashion. This leads to feelings of shame, guilt, or remorse which are the traits of the sixth step. The addict may feel very regretful about his or her decision to use drugs again and may also be too embarrassed to let anybody know about these insecurities. Self-image is negatively affected in this phase and a sense of dissatisfaction for life is also noted in most cases.
{7} Once guilt has consumed the addict to the point of submission, the addict will begin to make resolutions to end the behavior. This may include promises to others or self that use will soon end. It may also consist of a vow to end drug use forever and possible disposal of drug paraphernalia. The drug use may abruptly end for a period of time and when a proper
recovery plan isn't put into action the eighth step may occur, which starts the cycle all over again.
{8}... discomfort or mental anguish. This is almost identical to the first step and the addict will often forget the chain of events that occurred during the last relapse which may cause drug use fantasies to return. Mental pain is the main characteristic of this phase and unless the addict finds help one way or another, this cycle can repeat for the rest of their lives."





---------

one takes over.......combines as math
non-...........................anchor
non- forced................asymptotic
mild..............................flip
mild forced..................cross
severe........................opp



dump p1:









Choose one, mm all (each +-1,/7):
chart -- projected angle,area flow
chart in environs -- flip,pattern,cycle
environs -- position,self


detailed description

price L:M(,)'s, flows and L:M(,)'s, or flows, w/artifacts (polygons/rndm-shapes) along the way ;
each line is a psych stat from -1 to 1 in .05's, so that one adds them up and divides by 7 to multiply the usual trade's mm with,
any trade <=0 to skip
and especially good trades that have average scores okay to, for example, increase profit if with a stricter stop loss

Or, I can simply do awareness, since it gets old when I make a good call and get paid almost nothing for it.
I think I have to practice them enough to react to them appropriately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

flow
micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec angle or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(midline, w/pivot/trend-angle anchored lines defining it) area

cycle area: mec 5+:1-

(anti-)
technical study of self, instead of chart, at one's involvement

L:M(,)
flip line u(c):environs enters soon after breach conscious-subconscious; and, how gut trace flips,is ignored in u(c),etc.

artifacts:
polygon/(volatility/random - copied shape) stays w/lp5(,grid,opposing shape(s),), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), pivots (balance (plus,line segment,dot),), or expands w/logr-shape(,Gann fan,), deciding new trend angle(s)

physical position -- consider a sphere at the 0,0 axis of the grid in mec's center, adjusts body to match usual emotions in mec

(anti-)
% distractives (real-life patterns, etc.) i/o












---------------------








p1 new:









chart technicals -- price L:M(,)'s, flows and L:M(,)'s, or flows, w/artifacts (polygons/rndm-shapes) along the way
flow
micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec angle or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(midline, w/pivot/trend-angle anchored lines defining it) area
artifacts:
polygon/(volatility/random - copied shape) stays w/lp5(,grid,opposing shape(s),), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), pivots (balance (plus,line segment,dot),), or expands w/logr-shape(,Gann fan,), deciding new trend angle(s)

mm -- rate each +-1 by .05's, divide total by 7, multiply by maximum allowable trade for current TP/SL:
one takes over.......combines as math
non-...........................anchor
non- forced................asymptotic
mild..............................flip
mild forced..................cross
severe........................opp











------------









p1 new:










price L:M(,)'s, flows and L:M(,)'s, or flows, w/artifacts (polygons/rndm-shapes) along the way
flow micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec angle or symbolic L or R 45-degree angle), or macro-(midline, w/pivot/trend-angle anchored lines defining it) area
artifacts: Choose thru anchor asymptotic flip cross opp:
polygon/(volatility/random - copied shape) stays w/lp5(,grid,opposing shape(s),), crosses w/lp3(,fib fan,), pivots (balance (plus,line segment,dot),), or expands w/logr-shape(,Gann fan,), deciding new trend angle(s)













p1 new:










artifact anchor asymptotic flip cross opp: polygons or random/volatile shapes lp5/mid-,lp3/balance,logr
flow micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec or symbolic L or R), or macro-(hz grid thru midline) area


p1 new:



artifact anchor asymptotic flip cross opp: lp5/mid-,lp3/balance,logr
flow micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec or symbolic L or R), or macro-(hz grid thru midline) area









p1 new:







flow micro-(vert or hz), regular(spec or symbolic L or R), or macro-(hz grid thru midline) area adjusts, in time only,
anchor. polygon pivot stacks to nowhere --> (nothing)
asymptotic. lp3 skews one way --> regular(spec or symbolic L or R) area
flip. lp5 vert's both ways --> micro-(vert or hz) area
cross. logr expands one way; mid- expands both ways --> macro-(hz grid thru midline) area
opp. super-big candle or area, or a peculiar run of small candle sets in relation to an old, super-big line --> all (relatively)



















----------



unposted:

or maybe

valence (+,-: divideable amount up or down) plus volatility (randomness within a set time) = "violency"
which, when settled between valences,
may produce momentum



----
using this:
valence (+,-: divideable amount up or down) plus volatility (randomness within a set time), when settled between valences, may produce momentum




------------------