Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE | Page 354 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Harmonic trading-harmonic patterns 527 replies

Elliot Wave and Fibo for the Newbies 41 replies

Elliot waves & Harmonic Patterns for MT4 4 replies

GBPCHF Buying Wave (V) Elliot Wave 0 replies

Yen Crosses & Elliot Wave Charts 15m and Up 8 replies

Attachments: Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE
Exit Attachments

Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE

  • #7,061
  • Mar 12, 2012 9:07am Mar 12, 2012 9:07am
Quoting egkid
Hi my dear friend
Your PM is OFF and always off on skype how can i contact you?
How do you do my good men Egkid,

i thing you know my Email Id: [email protected]
DRAGON-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS!
  • #7,062
  • Mar 12, 2012 1:29pm Mar 12, 2012 1:29pm
Quoting vincy balboa
I DID!!
Thank you so much Vincy!!!
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #7,063
  • Mar 12, 2012 10:17pm Mar 12, 2012 10:17pm
C:UserssamiDocumentsforcasting2012-03-12_2215.png
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2012-03-12_2215.png Size: 53 KB
  • #7,064
  • Mar 14, 2012 4:42am Mar 14, 2012 4:42am
Congrat Bro...

And thank's a lot

Quoting vincy balboa
Cable Chart 4 Hours


A= 68.1%

Attachment
Quoting vincy balboa
Hello Every Body!!

I specially go trade on Big Time Frame Now Swing Trades.


Eur/Jpy Update $35K from this Pair.
Always looking the GREAT, never left GOOD Point...
  • #7,065
  • Mar 14, 2012 8:00am Mar 14, 2012 8:00am
BEFORE &AFTER
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: usdx h1 03-09-12.gif Size: 20 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: usdx h103-14-12.gif Size: 18 KB
The finest tool in the world still needs a MAN who KNOWS how to use it.
  • #7,066
  • Mar 14, 2012 1:02pm Mar 14, 2012 1:02pm
Could you please check if the following waves are correct?

https://www.tradingview.com/i/Wzj49dUf
  • #7,067
  • Mar 14, 2012 3:41pm Mar 14, 2012 3:41pm
Quoting kstyxxx
Could you please check if the following waves are correct?

https://www.tradingview.com/i/Wzj49dUf
start with the basics, this is completely wrong
Don't have an ego. Always question yourself and your ability.
  • #7,068
  • Mar 14, 2012 4:01pm Mar 14, 2012 4:01pm
Quoting RamsesII
start with the basics, this is completely wrong
Could you please be more specific? It is based on the indicator presented here https://www.tradingview.com/e/ and i'm trying to understand if it can be used for valid Elliott Waves analysis. Please explain.
  • #7,069
  • Mar 14, 2012 4:42pm Mar 14, 2012 4:42pm
Telling you what's wrong with your count would actually involve me teaching you Elliott wave. There are many resources on the web for that.
Don't have an ego. Always question yourself and your ability.
  • #7,070
  • Mar 14, 2012 5:14pm Mar 14, 2012 5:14pm
Quoting RamsesII
Telling you what's wrong with your count would actually involve me teaching you Elliott wave. There are many resources on the web for that.
Are you saying that this study is completely wrong? I'm not asking you for teaching, i'm need to know why you think that the Intermediate wave is wrong?
  • #7,071
  • Mar 14, 2012 5:49pm Mar 14, 2012 5:49pm
Hi, I am counting it merely for fun, but anyway, here is a wave view.

T
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: d1.gif Size: 18 KB
"I know one thing, that I know nothing." Sokrates
  • #7,072
  • Mar 14, 2012 7:49pm Mar 14, 2012 7:49pm
Quoting kstyxxx
Are you saying that this study is completely wrong? I'm not asking you for teaching, i'm need to know why you think that the Intermediate wave is wrong?
Trust Ramses, he knows what he is talking about.

I can hardly find one wave labeled right.

Why are you using software for labeling EW, when you are not able to proof the labeling, at least the basics.

I think this is not the right thread for traders without knowledge of EW........
  • #7,073
  • Mar 14, 2012 7:50pm Mar 14, 2012 7:50pm
Quoting Tom_D_Trader
Hi, I am counting it merely for fun, but anyway, here is a wave view.

T
Try again, try harder..........; that is not funny
  • #7,074
  • Mar 15, 2012 12:13am Mar 15, 2012 12:13am
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: aud usd elliott wave.gif Size: 8 KB

my Elliott wave calculation

--------
macd
  • #7,075
  • Mar 15, 2012 3:22am Mar 15, 2012 3:22am
Quoting infinitus
Try again, try harder..........; that is not funny
It is not supposed to be funny, but simple. I dont care about elliot rules and if I left my S/R lines there, you wouldnt see those letters. . But ok, I will provide you with some more precise analysis next time.

T
"I know one thing, that I know nothing." Sokrates
  • #7,076
  • Mar 15, 2012 4:02am Mar 15, 2012 4:02am
Quoting Tom_D_Trader
It is not supposed to be funny, but simple. I dont care about elliot rules and if I left my S/R lines there, you wouldnt see those letters. . But ok, I will provide you with some more precise analysis next time.

T


Do not mind.....


Lately it is rare in this thread that people really care about EW or Nerowave rules......

Cage of fools.....
  • #7,077
  • Mar 15, 2012 4:49am Mar 15, 2012 4:49am
Quoting infinitus
Do not mind.....


Lately it is rare in this thread that people really care about EW or Nerowave rules......

Cage of fools.....
We already had this discussion once. I still believe people have to evolve this method and not blindly use it. Elliot made his work in 30s equities market nad this is 2012 FX.

I did my best as I wanted you guys here to appreciate my effort . And btw, that correction I draw already started. I hope it wont happen, as I have short at BE there, but I think we may be ranging rest of the week. Two major levels I watch for correction are ,3076 - ,3086 and ,3177 - ,3182. Chart below.

T
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: h4.gif Size: 120 KB
"I know one thing, that I know nothing." Sokrates
  • #7,078
  • Mar 15, 2012 6:05am Mar 15, 2012 6:05am
Quoting Tom_D_Trader
We already had this discussion once. I still believe people have to evolve this method and not blindly use it. Elliot made his work in 30s equities market nad this is 2012 FX.

I did my best as I wanted you guys here to appreciate my effort . And btw, that correction I draw already started. I hope it wont happen, as I have short at BE there, but I think we may be ranging rest of the week. Two major levels I watch for correction are ,3076 - ,3086 and ,3177 - ,3182. Chart below.

T
Former discussion or not: this is not about fantasy waves. it is about elliott wave, Harmonic and Ichimoky.

When everyone comes here and pollutes the thread with some kind of fantasy waves, it will get completely useless to post here anymore for all the followers of the rules and guidelines of Elliott or Neowave, which stood the test of time........

maybe you can try to put your waves in an own thread. Wouldn't that be better?
  • #7,079
  • Mar 15, 2012 6:31am Mar 15, 2012 6:31am
Quoting infinitus
...
maybe you can try to put your waves in an own thread. Wouldn't that be better?
Well I dont think that would be better. Btw, I dont see any such thing as Neowave in thread name. Anyway Elliot wasnt even trading FX and therefore you can not use his method directly here. When I come through the thread I see lots of marks like X,W,?, etc. I dont remember Elliot was using them either.

Gartley, butterfly, that is evolution of EW and I like that.

My point is, I combine EW principle with S/R and in fact I think I follow Elliots legacy much more, than some people in this thread. I never said this is the only way, but imo combining EW principle with S/R is the same like combining it with Fibo or whatever else and therefore, my charts could be usefull for someone.

T
"I know one thing, that I know nothing." Sokrates
  • #7,080
  • Mar 15, 2012 6:44am Mar 15, 2012 6:44am
Quoting Tom_D_Trader
Well I dont think that would be better. Btw, I dont see any such thing as Neowave in thread name. Anyway Elliot wasnt even trading FX and therefore you can not use his method directly here. When I come through the thread I see lots of marks like X,W,?, etc. I dont remember Elliot was using them either.

Gartley, butterfly, that is evolution of EW and I like that.

My point is, I combine EW principle with S/R and in fact I think I follow Elliots legacy much more, than some people in this thread. I never said this is the only way, but imo combining...
The rules and guidelines of EW are written down in the EWP, as you surely should know. And there are a lot of rules and guidelines of W, X, Y moves.

The fact that you do not know that, or pretend to not know that, shows your ignorance. Gartley and butterfly is an evolution of EW? Since when?

How can you combine EWP with something, when you disrespect (or not know) nearly any of EWP rules?
28 traders viewing now