Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE | Page 333 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Harmonic trading-harmonic patterns 527 replies

Elliot Wave and Fibo for the Newbies 41 replies

Elliot waves & Harmonic Patterns for MT4 4 replies

GBPCHF Buying Wave (V) Elliot Wave 0 replies

Yen Crosses & Elliot Wave Charts 15m and Up 8 replies

Attachments: Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE
Exit Attachments

Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE

  • #6,641
  • Feb 5, 2012 12:52pm Feb 5, 2012 12:52pm
Quoting Raza
I would like to thank everyone participated in this healthy discussion. This is how it should be. Before we begin new week I would like to remind myself That one needs to be patient, patience always pays off! Let them show their intentions.
Me too :-) Thank you all

It is nice to have so much Elliotticans (or Neelyens) around knowing their stuff.

And yes, patience is required. Trading is a snipers job. No need to be exposed all of the time. Wait for a high probability "shot".....
  • #6,642
  • Feb 5, 2012 3:06pm Feb 5, 2012 3:06pm
Hi Blythe

Thank you for answering my question.I would love to see what you have in your longer TF !
This is the data i collected for a year or so ,,, please be kind and let me know what you think? ...
Thank you...

C:UserssamiDocumentsforcasting2012-02-05_1609.png
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2012-02-05_1518.png Size: 39 KB
  • #6,643
  • Feb 5, 2012 5:02pm Feb 5, 2012 5:02pm
Quoting knightpips
Hi Blythe

Thank you for answering my question.I would love to see what you have in your longer TF !
This is the data i collected for a year or so ,,, please be kind and let me know what you think? ...
Thank you...

C:UserssamiDocumentsforcasting2012-02-05_1609.png
you're very welcome!
ok, what I see in your chart. Whatever I say should not mean that your way of labeling is wrong. Each waver has its own way of labeling. the very first wave X wasn't retraced 100% by the a-wave of the symmetrical. In my own opinion, wave X has to be retraced 100% by the a-wave AND in timely manner. Why? Since wave X is merely separating the segments of a complex correction and it's order is the same as the order of a-wave. Next, in your chart is symmetrical formation. It looks good.
If I get it right, the symmetric concludes the higher order wave G. so the breakout must be very powerful. The Price has to cover long distance in short time, BUT internal structure of the breakout must be a pattern with high energy rating such as impulse, zigzag with running b, expanding triangle. In a worst scenario you may see neutral triangle or flat. And you have a contracting triangle instead. Contracting triangles only form at the end of a complex combo, they also may be found as a standalone formation. The rule is that contracting triangle is not continuation pattern. imho, running diamond-shaped diametric in wave (A) looks better. In wave (B) you have again another contracting triangle but with reverse alternation. it looks ok, but the thrust out of the triangle is slower than the triangle's a-wave. The running triangle in wave (C) is not valid because there's no b/d overlap. In my opinion it's not important what label you put on one particular wave. the more important is the Price that follows your projection. My labeling of this TF is kind of similar to yours.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eurusd-daily.png Size: 41 KB
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,644
  • Feb 5, 2012 5:22pm Feb 5, 2012 5:22pm
Quoting Blythe
you're very welcome!
ok, what I see in your chart. Whatever I say should not mean that your way of labeling is wrong. Each waver has its own way of labeling.
Hey, Blythe.... are you Pacos in another space ?
  • #6,645
  • Feb 5, 2012 5:26pm Feb 5, 2012 5:26pm
Quoting Ss7225
Hey, Blythe.... are you Pacos in another space ?
hi, Ss7225,
who's Pacos? you have a link?
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,646
  • Feb 5, 2012 5:30pm Feb 5, 2012 5:30pm
Quoting Blythe
hi, Ss7225,
who's Pacos? you have a link?
http://forexforums.dailyfx.com/ellio...ml#post1031888

Post#44460, nearly the same labelling
  • #6,647
  • Feb 5, 2012 5:38pm Feb 5, 2012 5:38pm
Hello Blythe

Thank you so mush, I really appreciate you opinion ,, I am learning every day , (I don’t know how that wave X got there……sorry ).!
,,you are right both of our chart looks different but both say the same thing very much .
  • #6,648
  • Feb 5, 2012 5:45pm Feb 5, 2012 5:45pm
Quoting Ss7225
http://forexforums.dailyfx.com/ellio...ml#post1031888

Post#44460, nearly the same labelling
Lol! The Bernanke guy? I think I know him from the other thread. He's using lots of Neely's charts. The labeling is quite similar except that on weekly TF he's into Neely's terminal
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,649
  • Feb 5, 2012 5:55pm Feb 5, 2012 5:55pm
Quoting knightpips
Hello Blythe

Thank you so mush, I really appreciate you opinion ,, I am learning every day , (I don’t know how that wave X got there……sorry ).!
,,you are right both of our chart looks different but both say the same thing very much .
You're very welcome! We all learn. Mother Market is changing and to make a buck we have to follow.
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,650
  • Feb 5, 2012 7:58pm Feb 5, 2012 7:58pm
eur nok 4h

just IMHO

big yellow C?

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eur_nok_4h.jpg Size: 80 KB


could go a bit lower to make a 3 dives pattern though.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eur_nok_4h_2.jpg Size: 78 KB
  • #6,651
  • Edited 1:01am Feb 6, 2012 12:18am | Edited 1:01am
Quoting vincy balboa
LONG TERM

1970? to 2010


Attachment
I was just going thru your charts.

The time I met you I did not know nothing about Elliott Waves.

Now I do understand some of it and you dont post anymore.

I would request you to be here more often if possible.( just like old times)

Thanks.
Markets are not Random, they are designed!
  • #6,652
  • Feb 6, 2012 2:10am Feb 6, 2012 2:10am
Quoting infinitus
Hi Raza,

but I can remember, that you very early warned about a move much higher than most the Elliotticans thought about

Very near came Ramki with his call to cover at around 1.26 and wait for better shorting entries around 1.31 to 1.314

http://www.wavetimes.com/wp-content/...-9jan2012c.jpg

Well , now we can debate, if his count is invalidated with the red 4 moving into red 1 territory by a few pips (18pips) :-)

Catch you later my friend,

Markus
Yes I did... in your thread Shangri-La.... I would say Fibonacci is more important than the waves.
Markets are not Random, they are designed!
  • #6,653
  • Feb 6, 2012 5:23am Feb 6, 2012 5:23am
Why cant we just accept Correction is over?

1.3138 is Resistence NOW.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: CORRECTION DONE.jpg Size: 113 KB
Markets are not Random, they are designed!
  • #6,654
  • Feb 6, 2012 6:48am Feb 6, 2012 6:48am
Quoting Raza
Yes I did... in your thread Shangri-La.... I would say Fibonacci is more important than the waves.
How can you be so cruel?
  • #6,655
  • Feb 6, 2012 9:04am Feb 6, 2012 9:04am
Quoting egkid
In my smaller TF show 3135 as magneto point= will b touch over and over
any way i will wait my Sunday candle close and see what will do next
Hope u can edit your profile to b able send u pm or mail
Hellooooo 3135
  • #6,656
  • Feb 6, 2012 9:32am Feb 6, 2012 9:32am
Quoting egkid
Hellooooo 3135
yeap
catching wave (i) it's a pain in a neck. but finally all the pieces fall into their places. the unusually looking neutral triangle in wave (h) ended. And it was confirmed by a thrust (75% of a a largest wave).
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eurusd_06022012_h1.png Size: 33 KB
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,657
  • Feb 6, 2012 10:44am Feb 6, 2012 10:44am
Quoting longshot_nl
eur nok 4h

just IMHO

big yellow C?

Attachment

could go a bit lower to make a 3 dives pattern though.

Attachment
rejected
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eur_nok_4h.jpg Size: 73 KB
  • #6,658
  • Feb 6, 2012 12:21pm Feb 6, 2012 12:21pm
Quoting infinitus
How can you be so cruel?
ha ha ...
Markets are not Random, they are designed!
  • #6,659
  • Feb 6, 2012 12:29pm Feb 6, 2012 12:29pm
Quoting Raza
ha ha ...
  • #6,660
  • Feb 6, 2012 5:21pm Feb 6, 2012 5:21pm
Little more pain for the US/CAD, then a huge UP move. Based on a signal that is proprietary. Perhaps at some time soon. AND, where is a Vincy Chart? Havent seen that in some time.
0 traders viewing now