Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE | Page 330 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Harmonic trading-harmonic patterns 527 replies

Elliot Wave and Fibo for the Newbies 41 replies

Elliot waves & Harmonic Patterns for MT4 4 replies

GBPCHF Buying Wave (V) Elliot Wave 0 replies

Yen Crosses & Elliot Wave Charts 15m and Up 8 replies

Attachments: Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE
Exit Attachments

Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE

  • #6,581
  • Jan 31, 2012 6:01am Jan 31, 2012 6:01am
Actually

the Diametric Formation by Neo wave or "Neowave Diametric Formation"

is just like a 2 combination of Cont. TG and Expadd TG OR more easy
just resemble as

A BOW TIE


plz look at these 2 segments
From my experience... E and F is usually failure but RARE

look USDCAD now...
Attached Image
  • #6,582
  • Jan 31, 2012 6:03am Jan 31, 2012 6:03am
Quoting knightpips
Hello , I am new to forex factory , I have to agree with you ,I think this is one of the diametric formation that been discovered by Glenn Nelly ( Neowave ).
nowadays the diametrics tend to turn into symmetrical formations especially when there's enough room in higher order pattern and the aim of a diametric is not achieved.
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,583
  • Jan 31, 2012 6:13am Jan 31, 2012 6:13am
update of USDCAD

the REALTIME of NEOWAVE DIAMETRIC FORMATION





If u are expert u can see from this small structure is build to the next impulse larger wave...

i am not expert.. hehe
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: ucad.png Size: 16 KB
  • #6,584
  • Jan 31, 2012 6:15am Jan 31, 2012 6:15am
Quoting Sixer
knightpips,

i doubt that Glenn Neely discovered the "Diamond Formation" - from where did you get such nonsens ??

Sixer
Hi Sixer,

knightpips was talking about diametric formation, which is not the same as diamond formation. The diametrics take shape of a bowtie (thank you, smilemiz!) when first 4 legs are contracting triangle and the last four are expanding triangle. The diamond-shaped diametric is formed when first 4 legs are expanding and the last 4 are contracting
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,585
  • Jan 31, 2012 6:19am Jan 31, 2012 6:19am
Quoting Blythe
Hi Sixer,

knightpips was talking about diametric formation, which is not the same as diamond formation. The diametrics take shape of a bowtie (thank you, smilemiz!) when first 4 legs are contracting triangle and the last four are expanding triangle. The diamond-shaped diametric is formed when first 4 legs are expanding and the last 4 are contracting

ok... call me miza


Sixer is my good friend!.. he is a very expert in Delta analysis..

Blythe, keep posting!


-byebye c u next time...
  • #6,586
  • Jan 31, 2012 8:14am Jan 31, 2012 8:14am
Thanks for pointing me to the difference between „Diametric“ and „Diamond“ formation.

Sixer
  • #6,587
  • Jan 31, 2012 11:19am Jan 31, 2012 11:19am
Quoting Raza
Do you agree with Diametric... or do you have any other alternative?

I know its a very good possibility....but on the flip side I keep getting this Fib level at 1.3070!I believe when it breaks 1.3141 by a pip...that is 1.3140 happens to be a daily pivot level as well (Camarilla and Classic) then we shall see 1.3070 upto 1.3010 -09.

Only above 1.3221 will make me Bullish.

What do you think?
Good call raza lol...although it was very tempting to go long.
Markets are not Random, they are designed!
  • #6,588
  • Feb 1, 2012 4:31am Feb 1, 2012 4:31am
Quoting Raza
Good call raza lol...although it was very tempting to go long.
yeah, very good call! Diametric turned into symmetrical formation
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eu_m15.png Size: 28 KB
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,589
  • Feb 1, 2012 6:20am Feb 1, 2012 6:20am
A more simple wave count and scenario:
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eurusd_h1_01-02-12.gif Size: 53 KB
  • #6,590
  • Feb 1, 2012 6:27am Feb 1, 2012 6:27am
Quoting Blythe
yeah, very good call! Diametric turned into symmetrical formation
No No.. Formation Now is Wrong or Tell me Which Formation is this!
DRAGON-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS!
  • #6,591
  • Feb 1, 2012 6:29am Feb 1, 2012 6:29am
this is my forcasting ?

C:UserssamiDocumentsforcasting2012-02-01_0620.png
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2012-02-01_0620.png Size: 42 KB
  • #6,592
  • Feb 1, 2012 6:39am Feb 1, 2012 6:39am
Quoting vincy balboa
No No.. Formation Now is Wrong or Tell me Which Formation is this!
hi Vincy,
it's a symmetrical formation. wave (f) is a truncated zz, so the new high is imminent. what do you think is wrong with the count? thanx
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,593
  • Feb 1, 2012 6:49am Feb 1, 2012 6:49am
Quoting Blythe
hi Vincy,
it's a symmetrical formation. wave (f) is a truncated zz, so the new high is imminent. what do you think is wrong with the count? thanx
dear But Which you are following See this Article http://kiprushov.wordpress.com/2008/...cal-formation/
DRAGON-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS!
  • #6,594
  • Feb 1, 2012 6:50am Feb 1, 2012 6:50am
Quoting knightpips
this is my forcasting ?

C:UserssamiDocumentsforcasting2012-02-01_0620.png
cool! I like it! i'd start the impuls @ 1.2732/Jan 18th to avoid the 4th wave being shorter than the 3rd. And, most importantly, the price action is responding to your count!
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,595
  • Feb 1, 2012 7:12am Feb 1, 2012 7:12am
Quoting vincy balboa
dear But Which you are following See this Article http://kiprushov.wordpress.com/2008/...cal-formation/
could be either one. the symmetricals may drift either way, they may expand and/or contract. the bottomline is that all the legs should have the minimal difference in price and time
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,596
  • Feb 1, 2012 7:22am Feb 1, 2012 7:22am
Quoting Blythe
could be either one. the symmetricals may drift either way, they may expand and/or contract. the bottomline is that all the legs should have the minimal difference in price and time
I dont Think it could be Flat Symmetrical Triangle s right you can see that all were Sharp moves!
DRAGON-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS!
  • #6,597
  • Edited 7:41am Feb 1, 2012 7:40am | Edited 7:41am
Quoting vincy balboa
I dont Think it could be Flat Symmetrical Triangle s right you can see that all were Sharp moves!
you're right, the symmetricals cannot be completely flat. but it's not finished. i expect it to to bend upward at the end. if the complex correction is finishing with a symmetrical, one would expect violent sharp moves up and down.
Lehman Sisters Wouldn't Have Failed
  • #6,598
  • Feb 2, 2012 3:36am Feb 2, 2012 3:36am
Quoting Sixer
Thanks for pointing me to the difference between „Diametric“ and „Diamond“ formation.

Sixer
welcome

Quoting Raza
Good call raza lol...although it was very tempting to go long.
well done..impressive..

but why ask me again..no need to ask.. you are VERY expert
  • #6,599
  • Feb 2, 2012 3:41am Feb 2, 2012 3:41am
Aussie/$
against from others major

Watch point:
1.0622 level = invalid count
SL : engulfed at the Territory of w1
Attached Image
  • #6,600
  • Feb 2, 2012 4:27am Feb 2, 2012 4:27am
How about this scenario:
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 12-02-02_12-24-47_EURUSD_H2.gif Size: 41 KB
20 traders viewing now