Your post is one of the primary reasons why I left the online Forex Trading Community years ago. It is arrogant, foolish and all at once, worthless.
Thus, contrary to your pointless and useless attempt to describe to the developer of an idea, what his idea means to him, it is the dynamic extension of ATR that leads to the ability to derive Capacity - whether you like it or not. My mathematical extensions of ATR, turn it into something that you've never seen before, and probably never will on this particular forum. A ton of research went into producing and optimizing those extensions.
So, your reply tells me several things about you:
a) You don't know how to read in context.
b) You don't possess much intellectual honesty.
c) You are foolish enough to argue the design intent of someone you don't know, on a mathematical basis that you can't possibly understand, because it was never given to you, to know it or understand it.
d) You are vary arrogant and highly assumptive, which probably places your trade performance in the lower 95th.
My mathematical extensions remove ATR from the purely lagging class of commonly used indicator. Why on earth would I favor Leading Indicators and then turn right around and use Lagging Indicators. After reading the title of the thread, common sense should have told you that much.
In that same post, I specifically stated that the way I use ATR would be discussed later. Of course, you never read that, because common sense would have told you to wait for the explanation and/or that the explanation about the extensions used on ATR, had not been discussed up to that point in the thread. It was your foolish ego, that lead you into this hornet's nest of silly supposition and wrong headed assumption.
Now, do yourself a favor and re-read the entirety of the original post, followed by Lesson One. Or, do us all a favor and don't. Either way, the decision is all yours.
I'm not going to sit here and argue a red herring false point of yours that has no merit, or even a reason for its existence. You don't argue with the designer - you design something better, if you can. Otherwise, take notes and learn something, if that is even possible, given your mentality put on display thus far inside this thread.
DislikedKnow the ATR in all time-frames for every currency pair you trade. If you are good with Excel, or with your trading platform's indicator language, then constructing a dynamic extension of the ATR, will allow you to know the very first principle in all of trading: Capacity.Ignored
So, your reply tells me several things about you:
a) You don't know how to read in context.
b) You don't possess much intellectual honesty.
c) You are foolish enough to argue the design intent of someone you don't know, on a mathematical basis that you can't possibly understand, because it was never given to you, to know it or understand it.
d) You are vary arrogant and highly assumptive, which probably places your trade performance in the lower 95th.
My mathematical extensions remove ATR from the purely lagging class of commonly used indicator. Why on earth would I favor Leading Indicators and then turn right around and use Lagging Indicators. After reading the title of the thread, common sense should have told you that much.
In that same post, I specifically stated that the way I use ATR would be discussed later. Of course, you never read that, because common sense would have told you to wait for the explanation and/or that the explanation about the extensions used on ATR, had not been discussed up to that point in the thread. It was your foolish ego, that lead you into this hornet's nest of silly supposition and wrong headed assumption.
Now, do yourself a favor and re-read the entirety of the original post, followed by Lesson One. Or, do us all a favor and don't. Either way, the decision is all yours.
I'm not going to sit here and argue a red herring false point of yours that has no merit, or even a reason for its existence. You don't argue with the designer - you design something better, if you can. Otherwise, take notes and learn something, if that is even possible, given your mentality put on display thus far inside this thread.
