Time Cell Trading

USDCHF, M5, 2010 August 19

M5 shows a divergence. H1 is in an "extreme Overshoot" [-2/8] level. If the hammer (H1) will stay along so enter long again with several positions at H1, too.

Enter Long at 1.02850/1.02950 with several positions.

USDCHF, H1, see #264

Daily/Weekly: Further downside movements possible since 1.0098 or lowest 2009.11.22 at 0.99137 and should be hedged at M15/M30.

1.02850/1.02950 seems for me a good price.

On UCAD (5min) what was your thinking behind not taking profits/going short (SAR) at the two red boxes??:

1 First box - at BB and CCI OB 1.0272. Why not go short there (without hindsight)?

The only reason I can think of is that it was just before U.S news due = caution. Othewise, we would have been killed on this trade. Or maybe you were looking at the BB on the M30 and hourly too, which was higher.

2 Second box - at BB, and CCI OB, and at > DR1 by the time the 5min bar that hit DR1 closed (closed at 1.0363 way above DR1). 100 pips higher than first red box.

Now we are at DR2 with CCI divergence at 1.0373, ie. currently we are 40 pips ABOVE where that last red box ended.... about here where this text line ends....




http://i38.tinypic.com/lv1ur.jpg

Also, London close, so maybe day's move is exhausted, I would think factored in too (into your thinking too as to why it would be a good time to take a trade)?

**Makes sense to take a counter move at price exhaustion at London close (ie. a long UCHF trade after a big trend down), just as it makes sense to avoid taking trades just before US news (re the UCAD above). Context matters for every sys. Good trade

Kindest regards.

http://i35.tinypic.com/2crucd4.jpg

USDCHF, H1, 2010 August 19

see #261, please.

see #262, please.

Yes, the M30/M15 one. For going down I don't have had enough arguments at M15.

At the same time I have trade the M15 with several positions and here the upward movement was at the beginning whereas M5 has reached its highs. So I decided to go out with M5 not so early, more at these P3/P4 levels. mS1 1.0280 wasn't a real option for me due to the fact that M15 (see chart below, please) was running up in a good way till DR2, mR3 as we could seen later. M15 candle has forming a hammer at DS1 1.0259.

Also possible to go out at mS1 1.0280 when trading the M5, pips should be enough (for a M5 trade) and a winning trade is been made. That's every traders freedom, to go out earlier or take the risk over and let the trade further run.


Taking profit at M5 at DR1 1.0363 is absolutely okay, and then when looking at the upwards drift at M15 (see chart below, please) there are no arguments for an enter short further more. Not so at DR2 1.037 (due to the fact that the next higher pivotal point was reached and a CCI peak) or mR3 1.0385 (here is M15 diverence). At both levels you can go with enter short in the market (if H1/H4 shouldn't told other things).

Hope it helps!

Keept it up!

USDCAD, M15, 2010 August 19:

USDCHF, H1, 2010 August 19

USDCHF has forming a hammer.

See #261, please

TCT is also when making the market analysis to take a global look at the higher timeframes before an enter of trade (positions) at lower timeframes.

Profit: +633 pips http://cdn.forexfactory.com/images/s...m/thumbsup.gif

http://twitter.com/triggFX

CADJPY, H4, 2010 August 19

Enter Long at 82.10 with 5 positions and hedge the positions if H4 support don't hold.

Weekly could go further down till "overshoot" [-1/8 ] at 79.68 or "extreme overshoot" [-2/8 ] 78.125. Lowest was 2009.01.18 at 68.38.

CADJPY delivers excellent visual aspects for trading the H1 and the H4, ...at H4 with its peaks and valleys whereas at H1 let your wins run if EMA10 and EMA20 would go well parallel.

Terrific tip!!

Thank You!

How strong could be the arguments if you trade to the exclusion of CCI peaks & its valleys?

Example:
EURUSD, H1, 2010 August 20

How strong could be the arguments if you trade exclusively under CCI peaks & the CCI valleys?

Example:
EURUSD, H4, 2010 August 20

How strong could be the arguments if you trade strictly net CCI peaks & the CCI valleys?

Example:
GBPJPY, H1, 2010 August 20

How strong could be the arguments if you trade excessive the CCI peaks and its valleys?

Example:
GBPJPY, H1, Version 2, 2010 August 20

That's Add-Up Position

Look at all the open positions, the pending orders and the History File


http://www.myfxbook.com/members/triggFX

(How can I get the open positions, the pending orders & the history file? See #48, please.)

Hope it helps!

Kindest regards!
FXcube

...and now it's time to mow the lawn!

Wish you all a happy week-end!

See p.4, #50

Profit at all target points!

Hello, ForexCube,

Questions in Chart.

Ducke

Hi Ducke

Closely monitored!

Absolutely correct!.

That was my intention to give you this aspect of Non-Stop-Loss Trading with TCT.

You might see in the future that 80-90 % of all opened positions will run in the wins. The first days since this account is opened was to earn money and now I can make investments at H4 and H1 more. When you see the examples above with CCI tops and bottoms then it's clear that you need more cash for the next winning trades, because it could run one or two waves in the counterpart direction (e.g. forming a divergence) and then you have to invest once more at the next CCI top or bottom level. See charts above, please. So 100-200 pips could go easily in the counterpart direction (at H4 level), but then market could often turn in your favor. Ergo: This kind of unorthodox trading needs 30-50% of your account capital for making a constant profit over time! My purpose is to trade predominantly with the profit money and not with the deposit money (5'000.-$). All opened positions are in an excellent position for making good profits. Sure! You'll see this in the future. And that's an unorthodox strategy which I intend to post here at this board, now! So it's extremely important to view this account result just now!...and how it will change in the future for understanding this unorthodox kind of strategy. You don't need copy this you can trade in your style and make money with TCT. I trade in this way and I want it post here for all interesting traders. The relation opened trades to history trades are near 1:10. When it'll get lesser then often the lotsizes will increases.

The - 1'996.23$ is money which will run in the win! It's the breath of the market!

Risk is a function of a trader not one of the market. Risk is controlled by position size and by the used strategy and so it's controlled exclusively by the trader!

Hope it helps at first!

Kindest regards
FXcube

see p. 4, #52, please.

Profit at all target points!