Of course you're not, that's why you're on here asking the kinds of questions you're asking, making the kinds of statements you're making, and posting pointless screenshots supposedly of your equity curve!
- #105
- Aug 6, 2010 6:32am Aug 6, 2010 6:32am
- Joined Apr 2008 | Status: Parsimony Rulez! | 3,216 Posts
I apologize, I forgot that anything I do or say is pointless. Thank you for reminding me.
You obviously can't understand why a screenshot of an equity curve is pointless but that's ok.
- #106
- Aug 6, 2010 6:35am Aug 6, 2010 6:35am
- Joined Apr 2008 | Status: Parsimony Rulez! | 3,216 Posts
Obviously you do, because otherwise you would not waste your time hanging around...
Anyway, your amusement value just expired and I'm bored with you now so unless there anything new....cheerio!
- #108
- Aug 6, 2010 7:16am Aug 6, 2010 7:16am
- Joined Jun 2009 | Status: Trader | 2,000 Posts
On the contrary, some parts of the discussion have been quite interesting....but of course you wouldn't realise that because you're not interested and you don't appear to want to learn, or perhaps you're not capable of learning, who knows, who cares!
Most honest statement in the thread! Have a well deserved V (for that and being able to talk seriously to this guy for more than 1 consecutive post
)
- #111
- Aug 6, 2010 9:15am Aug 6, 2010 9:15am
- Joined Apr 2008 | Status: Parsimony Rulez! | 3,216 Posts
Most honest statement in the thread! Have a well deserved V (for that and being able to talk seriously to this guy for more than 1 consecutive post
......... oh forget about it. - #114
- Aug 6, 2010 2:16pm Aug 6, 2010 2:16pm
- Joined Mar 2006 | Status: Trade the reaction not the news! | 10,359 Posts
Thanks - you validated my point!
- #115
- Edited 5:12pm Aug 6, 2010 4:59pm | Edited 5:12pm
This is getting off topic but...
My point is the majority loses not because of entering in the right direction, but due to other factors such as exiting too soon and trade management issues, etc. So, since you don't agree I assume you're implying it's entering in the wrong direction correct? If no, what?
My point is the majority loses not because of entering in the right direction, but due to other factors such as exiting too soon and trade management issues, etc. So, since you don't agree I assume you're implying it's entering in the wrong direction correct? If no, what?
I don't think so.
- #116
- Aug 6, 2010 5:13pm Aug 6, 2010 5:13pm
- Joined Mar 2006 | Status: Trade the reaction not the news! | 10,359 Posts
- #117
- Aug 6, 2010 5:37pm Aug 6, 2010 5:37pm
- Joined Nov 2008 | Status: living deliberately | 11,122 Posts
- #118
- Aug 6, 2010 8:52pm Aug 6, 2010 8:52pm
- | Joined Aug 2009 | Status: Trader | 1,074 Posts
thanks god, Mr. Knowitall has gone...
I was just trying to think out of the box
.
- #119
- Aug 6, 2010 9:09pm Aug 6, 2010 9:09pm
- Joined Feb 2008 | Status: Trader | 6,736 Posts
My advice to you is to stop taking this personally, and look at why people are criticising you. It doesn't matter whether you thought this probably wasn't feasible, the fact is you thought there was even a possibility that it was feasible.
Ideas are often worse when most people try to think outside the box. This is the equivalent of an inexperienced lion getting the bright idea to catch a buffalo by stepping in front of it. "It's never been done, it might just work", we hear the lion say. And that's the last we heard from him
Time hides Nothing
- #120
- Aug 6, 2010 9:10pm Aug 6, 2010 9:10pm
- Joined Apr 2008 | Status: Parsimony Rulez! | 3,216 Posts
This is the equivalent of an inexperienced lion getting the bright idea to catch a buffalo by stepping in front of it. "It's never been done, it might just work", we hear the lion say. And that's the last we heard from him