Technical Analysis Fallacy | Page 834 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

The Ultimate Fallacy in Technical Analysis 99 replies

"Technical Analysis Fallacy" thread people, I need your help 54 replies

Technical Analysis Fallacy Redux 23 replies

Statistical analysis fallacy 33 replies

Attachments: Technical Analysis Fallacy
Exit Attachments

Technical Analysis Fallacy

  • #16,661
  • Jun 19, 2010 3:01pm Jun 19, 2010 3:01pm
I discovered this interesting thread in my search for knowledge, I just want you to know that I´m gonna be reading the thread first before I post. I hope my presence here doesn´t bother you.

Have a nice weekend you all.

Kind regards.

Red.
  • #16,662
  • Edited 3:21pm Jun 19, 2010 3:04pm | Edited 3:21pm
Quoting Zoran
Fana, this comes from the bible:

[color=red]"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is...
吃 碗 面,反 碗 底
人 心 不 足,蛇 吞 象
  • #16,663
  • Jun 19, 2010 3:17pm Jun 19, 2010 3:17pm
Quoting fti
wish was mine.
it belongs to the AVG of Claire Lee Chennault designed by disney.

regards
  • #16,664
  • Jun 19, 2010 3:33pm Jun 19, 2010 3:33pm
Quoting fti
吃 碗 面,反 碗 底
人 心 不 足,蛇 吞 象
Yes!!!, we continue to Spheres, and angles! ...
Attached Image
  • #16,665
  • Jun 19, 2010 3:36pm Jun 19, 2010 3:36pm
Quoting Gro
Yes!!!, we continue to Spheres, and angles! ...
4D tesseract
  • #16,666
  • Jun 19, 2010 3:39pm Jun 19, 2010 3:39pm
Quoting Rednose
I discovered this interesting thread in my search for knowledge, I just want you to know that I´m gonna be reading the thread first before I post. I hope my presence here doesn´t bother you.

Have a nice weekend you all.

Kind regards.

Red.
Welcome, Rednose
  • #16,667
  • Jun 19, 2010 3:43pm Jun 19, 2010 3:43pm
Quoting Fana
4D tesseract
how many angles and in what ratio?
  • #16,668
  • Jun 19, 2010 3:51pm Jun 19, 2010 3:51pm
Quoting fti
吃 碗 面,反 碗 底
人 心 不 足,蛇 吞 象
哦，不，在中国语言文字
fti的，你能分享的一些笑丸？我需要一些。
  • #16,669
  • Edited 4:08pm Jun 19, 2010 3:53pm | Edited 4:08pm
Quoting Gro
how many angles and in what ratio?
It has 32 edges...and 90degrees... , but dont know more yet...
so... is it s 90degrees? 8x3+8x4= 56 angles?
  • #16,670
  • Jun 19, 2010 4:12pm Jun 19, 2010 4:12pm
Quoting Fana
It has 32 edges...and 90degrees... , but dont know more yet...
so... is it s 90degrees? 8x3+8x4= 56 angles?
and 50% do you see?
  • #16,671
  • Jun 19, 2010 4:14pm Jun 19, 2010 4:14pm
Quoting Gro
and 50% do you see?
sorry, but i dont understand... ? Tell it straight please...
80angles ?
  • #16,672
  • Jun 19, 2010 4:24pm Jun 19, 2010 4:24pm
Quoting Fana
sorry, but i dont understand... ? Tell it straight please...
80angles ?
I said it straight ... or stop encyclopedic mind (without "insight").
  • #16,673
  • Edited 4:45pm Jun 19, 2010 4:31pm | Edited 4:45pm
Quoting Gro
I said it straight ... or stop encyclopedic mind (without "insight").
I saw that tesseract 2minutes before you have post it. I was searching for something and this was there. You mean 50% that i dont understand it? Sorry for bad calculations. My problem:
Btw how many angles does it have?
...hmm ... The insight on market can be multidimensional. How many dimension does this ideal market has?
  • #16,674
  • Jun 19, 2010 4:44pm Jun 19, 2010 4:44pm
Quoting Fana
I saw that tesseract 2minutes before you have post it. I was searching for something and this was there. You mean 50% that i dont understand it? Sorry for bad calculations. My problem:
Btw how many angles does it have?
e.g. Gann angles if you "there" not see "50%" = Forget it.
You prefer to remember that the retracement more than 50% "can" mutate into the opposite trend.
  • #16,675
  • Jun 19, 2010 5:00pm Jun 19, 2010 5:00pm
Fana and Gro, do you realise this is not part of the teachings in this thread?
  • #16,676
  • Jun 19, 2010 5:02pm Jun 19, 2010 5:02pm
Quoting Zoran
Fana and Gro, do you realise this is not part of the teachings in this thread?
Zoran, me think that sure it is!
But many ppl dont understand fully the purpose of the thread. The real how it is. Me also still not.
  • #16,677
  • Jun 19, 2010 5:05pm Jun 19, 2010 5:05pm
Quoting fti
180 degrees.READ the thread, CAREFULLY.
Fana, fti just told you it isn't. Read above. Click the > icon to read your original question.
  • #16,678
  • Edited 5:51pm Jun 19, 2010 5:10pm | Edited 5:51pm
Quoting Zoran
Fana, fti just told you it isn't. Read above.
What i am looking for is knowledge. Real amusement for me. It is difficult to eat, that so many new thinks are here to find out... And everywhere we are surrounded by that ancient technique. We are at some starting point of technique. And the best what i can do is thinking. Life is some 90yrs, our next generations also.... real knowledge cant be ...hard work at the same place. But targeted progress.
-and do you think, that it is possible to adopt some problematics in one year? I am trying all insides from all angles. It scrapes, yes, hardly.... But i dont look only fo confirmations type: Yes, it is like this. I have to have also confirmation type : Yes i know this is not it... THAT IS WHY I SOMETIMES HAVE SILLY QUESTIONS, I AM SORRY FOR THAT. But in this focusing, process of understanding is faster than when read books......Book dont answer your questions, you can only do test, but there arent your questions...
And about Gann- he did really interesting thinks. His work is unclear for most ppl. I still dont know what to think about it. I dont dive to some unknown ocean, i just push into it and wait for confirmations or something what tells me: stop. I havent recognize "stop". So i have to continue. And i have to say, that i have some small benefit from it already. Nothing abstract. It is practically function.
And finally on the top of it i am defeated today by some 4D tesseract. Oh, how far am i from the true :-) regards

Imho and i see some analogy with mobius strip. Tesseract has as angles as normal cube. The only more is + one dimension.
  • #16,679
  • Jun 19, 2010 5:36pm Jun 19, 2010 5:36pm
我们为什么看回到看见我们何处去？ 这些译者是一件整洁的事
  • #16,680
  • Jun 19, 2010 5:40pm Jun 19, 2010 5:40pm
Quoting Gro
e.g. Gann angles if you "there" not see "50%" = Forget it.
You prefer to remember that the retracement more than 50% "can" mutate into the opposite trend.
Hi Zoran

This says FTI (and Gann)
91 traders viewing now