• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • User/Email: Password:
  • 6:56am
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 6:56am
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Poll for your Profit Factor 46 replies

New Expert Advisor PROFIT FACTOR 19.39 47 replies

Profit Factor OR Expected Payoff...Which is more important?? 5 replies

Profit Factor Target 27 replies

Profit factor : 11.64 2 replies

  • Trading Discussion
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
  • 6
Attachments: Profit Factor Phase Space
Exit Attachments

Profit Factor Phase Space

  • Post #1
  • Quote
  • First Post: Edited at 5:51am May 2, 2010 4:07am | Edited at 5:51am
  •  ForexQuant
  • Joined Jan 2010 | Status: Member | 519 Posts
Before I go into the topic, I would like to highlight that this thread is not going to discuss any trading systems but the scientific method to exploit the optimal profit potential of a quantitative trading strategy.

Like many of you here, I suspected that there could be an optimal profit factor for a systematic trading system. I have done a lot research and I came out this one, the profit factor phase space.

Here are the sample profit factor phase space for my quantitative model. Both charts are the same but at different angle of view. Btw spread is not taking into consideration in these charts so that i can minimize the external interference that distort the true statistical behaviour of my model.

I just wonder any of you did a similar study on your trading strategy? Let's talk.
Attached Images (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: PF_rotation20deg.PNG
Size: 56 KB Click to Enlarge

Name: PF_rotation200deg.PNG
Size: 56 KB
  • Post #2
  • Quote
  • May 2, 2010 5:46am May 2, 2010 5:46am
  •  dongsky
  • Joined Sep 2009 | Status: Member | 5,977 Posts
i haven't come accross this kind of study in forex trading but i'm all ears
Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiam
 
 
  • Post #3
  • Quote
  • Edited at 7:07am May 6, 2010 6:49am | Edited at 7:07am
  •  kk007
  • Joined Feb 2009 | Status: Commercial Member <- Don't trust me | 2,976 Posts
Hi ForexQuant,

I may have tried to do something similar, but I am not sure. I've tried to understand your chart, but I don't know what the "scale parameter" on your chart refers to (it isn't RRR, when I check the shape), and so failed to understand it.

cheers,


Quoting ForexQuant
Disliked
Before I go into the topic, I would like to highlight that this thread is not going to discuss any trading systems but the scientific method to exploit the optimal profit potential of a quantitative trading strategy.

Like many of you here, I suspected that there could be an optimal profit factor for a systematic trading system. I have done a lot research and I came out this one, the profit factor phase space.

Here are the sample profit factor phase space for my quantitative model. Both charts are the same but at different angle of view. Btw...
Ignored
 
 
  • Post #4
  • Quote
  • May 6, 2010 10:36am May 6, 2010 10:36am
  •  spekkiefx
  • | Joined May 2009 | Status: Member | 164 Posts
Very interesting.

Could you tell us on how many trades your graph is based. I am finding that profit factor decreases the more trades there are. This does not mean it isn't profitable. Have you come to that conclusion?
 
 
  • Post #5
  • Quote
  • May 6, 2010 11:50am May 6, 2010 11:50am
  •  Darth Vader
  • | Joined Nov 2008 | Status: Trading with the force | 115 Posts
ForexQuant,

Looking forward for more background...
 
 
  • Post #6
  • Quote
  • May 6, 2010 12:14pm May 6, 2010 12:14pm
  •  kk007
  • Joined Feb 2009 | Status: Commercial Member <- Don't trust me | 2,976 Posts
No Brainer Trades OP (a thread on forexfactory) may have done a similar analysis for his trading method as ForexQuant, although he did not make a 3-dimensional surface chart.

http://www.nobrainertrades.com/2010/...placement.html
 
 
  • Post #7
  • Quote
  • May 6, 2010 3:25pm May 6, 2010 3:25pm
  •  ForexQuant
  • Joined Jan 2010 | Status: Member | 519 Posts
Quoting kk007
Disliked
Hi ForexQuant,

I may have tried to do something similar, but I am not sure. I've tried to understand your chart, but I don't know what the "scale parameter" on your chart refers to (it isn't RRR, when I check the shape), and so failed to understand it.

cheers,
Ignored
Usually probability distribution has 2 parameter. One is scale parameter and another one is location parameter.
 
 
  • Post #8
  • Quote
  • May 6, 2010 3:33pm May 6, 2010 3:33pm
  •  ForexQuant
  • Joined Jan 2010 | Status: Member | 519 Posts
Quoting spekkiefx
Disliked
Very interesting.

Could you tell us on how many trades your graph is based. I am finding that profit factor decreases the more trades there are. This does not mean it isn't profitable. Have you come to that conclusion?
Ignored
I plotted this graph based on probability distribution of my model. It is not based on the trade results. However the model was built to fit the trade results.

IMO the profit factor does not "decrease", it is just approaching its true profit factor.
 
 
  • Post #9
  • Quote
  • May 6, 2010 5:12pm May 6, 2010 5:12pm
  •  spekkiefx
  • | Joined May 2009 | Status: Member | 164 Posts
Quoting ForexQuant
Disliked

IMO the profit factor does not "decrease", it is just approaching its true profit factor.
Ignored
Nicely formulated (-:
 
 
  • Post #10
  • Quote
  • May 7, 2010 1:23am May 7, 2010 1:23am
  •  ForexQuant
  • Joined Jan 2010 | Status: Member | 519 Posts
We all know that the external factors like spread & slippage, etc play an important roles in our profitability. But how they screw us? Let's see.

Here are the charts for ideal case and non-ideal case for my model. For non-ideal case, I have included only 1pips for spread & slippage. Now you see the shape of the surface is completely different on the left side of the chart!
Attached Images (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Ideal PF.PNG
Size: 53 KB Click to Enlarge

Name: Nonideal PF.PNG
Size: 53 KB
 
 
  • Post #11
  • Quote
  • Edited at 2:27pm May 7, 2010 2:24pm | Edited at 2:27pm
  •  Tenetch
  • | Joined Nov 2009 | Status: Member | 38 Posts
ForexQuant,
Can you please give a definition for the profit factor ?
the profit factor is made from the %win and the risk/r ,but the %win is also use as a parameter ,so i am a bit confused.(from : http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=222748)
(I don't want to troll or anything it's look intressting,so i want to be sure of what i understand )
“Aim for the highest.” Andrew Carnegie
 
 
  • Post #12
  • Quote
  • May 7, 2010 2:47pm May 7, 2010 2:47pm
  •  ForexQuant
  • Joined Jan 2010 | Status: Member | 519 Posts
Quoting Tenetch
Disliked
ForexQuant,
Can you please give a definition for the profit factor ?
the profit factor is made from the %win and the risk/r ,but the %win is also use as a parameter ,so i am a bit confused.(from : http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=222748)
(I don't want to troll or anything it's look intressting,so i want to be sure of what i understand )
Ignored
profit factor = %win / % loss * Reward/Risk;

No i didnt use %win as a parameter. You can convert %win to Reward/Risk by using the standard profit factor formula.

I prefer to use %win because %win always fall within 0 - 100% therefore it is easier to make a comparison for multiple pairs.
 
 
  • Post #13
  • Quote
  • May 7, 2010 2:56pm May 7, 2010 2:56pm
  •  Tenetch
  • | Joined Nov 2009 | Status: Member | 38 Posts
okay thanks
“Aim for the highest.” Andrew Carnegie
 
 
  • Post #14
  • Quote
  • May 7, 2010 11:40pm May 7, 2010 11:40pm
  •  ForexQuant
  • Joined Jan 2010 | Status: Member | 519 Posts
My model has a significant positive skew distribution therefore a fat tail in nature. Before I created the phase space diagram for analysis, I thought that the profit factor should be approaching infinity if I use extreme reward/risk (Low win%). However this diagram has prove me wrong!

My model has a relatively stable scale parameter, which is about 1.8 +- 1 (I dont know why) for multiple pairs, multiple setting. Now we look at the attached phase space diagram again. Look at the red line, what you see? Yes it has a downward slope, which means the profit factor does not increase as i original thought! Instead It has an optimal profit factor around 15-20% zone!

Interesting right?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: optimal pf.PNG
Size: 53 KB
 
 
  • Post #15
  • Quote
  • May 8, 2010 6:35am May 8, 2010 6:35am
  •  spekkiefx
  • | Joined May 2009 | Status: Member | 164 Posts
I have some figures but haven't had the opportunity to put them in the charts.
I do have a feeling the results may be similar. I was quite surprised by the massive effect of 1 pip slippage chart on the high percentage winning systems. I am not sure if that is accurate. What type of data are you using? Or maybe it is specific to the system you are testing.
 
 
  • Post #16
  • Quote
  • Last Post: May 9, 2010 1:15am May 9, 2010 1:15am
  •  ForexQuant
  • Joined Jan 2010 | Status: Member | 519 Posts
Quoting spekkiefx
Disliked
I have some figures but haven't had the opportunity to put them in the charts.
I do have a feeling the results may be similar. I was quite surprised by the massive effect of 1 pip slippage chart on the high percentage winning systems. I am not sure if that is accurate. What type of data are you using? Or maybe it is specific to the system you are testing.
Ignored
I believe that the massive effect on the left is the behaviour of my setup because the scale parameter is about 1.8. If i can find a way or a setup which can reduce the scale parameter to 1.5 or something lower, the 1 pip effect on the left will be insignificant as per attached chart.

However, when the pip size increases gradually, the surface begins to deform and eventually back to the shape that i posted at post#10. The left side of the surface has a big deformation while the right side of the surface will remain similar to the ideal case.

I am not sure about other type of systems but I can conclude that the high probability setup of my model is vulnerable to external shock in regardless of scale parameter. The unforeseen event like widening spread, huge slippage, negative blackswan event or change in market dynamic will cause a great impact and maybe completely unpredictable if i do high probability trade.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Suface with 1pip Spread.PNG
Size: 58 KB
 
 
  • Trading Discussion
  • /
  • Profit Factor Phase Space
  • Reply to Thread
0 traders viewing now
Top of Page
Forex Factory Blog Updated: Alerting All Members
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2022