A Systematic Approach to Markets

Who is remodeling and expanding?
Card counters or the casinos.

I wonder who is pulling people's legs.

Oh yeah. Card counters are just too good.
In the end, casinos end up expanding....

That should tell you something...

And I can say for a fact that you are not a gambler.
You cannot count cards in POKER!
You are mixing BlackJack card counting with Poker.

In poker, they reshuffle the deck every round!
And that's probably what they are doing now a days with BlackJack.
For what purpose? To deceive people that card counting have merit!

Ha! Get smarter.

For the suckers, let me tell you why card counting does not work.
Card counting is like mathematical probability guesswork.
It does not guarantee or tell you what the next card is, or the next, or the next....
All it does is give you probability. In the end, the house still have edge!

charlyher, relax man.
Card counting in Blackjack works if the casino doesn't reshuffle the deck after every round and they let you play after they find that you're doing it.

Casinos expand and don't go bankrupt simply because most of their games incline the odds drastically in their favour. Even if they let you counting cards as long as you want you wouldn't be able to do any considerable damage to their profit.

If you still feel the need to disagree just open a topic about casinos and explain your new approach to applied statistics.

I ain't disagreeing with anybody.
My point is not about disagreement but about opening all perspectives.

Be realistic, that's all.
Don't expect me to just agree.

Of course, unless you have actual proof like a bank statement or several years of income tax filings to prove your success or system.

Success does happen BUT not at the incredible pace people are proclaiming out there.
I know I can succeed in Forex. Again, I ain't disagreeing but simply provoking perspectives.

only now i had the opportunity to read this and the other link.

he emphasize the word "simple" many times. Id like to understand how simple it is.

id like to know from thoose that studied his ideas what was his goals. So i have a few questions.


it is necessary that both systems have positive expectance or he will try to create with a fusion of too systems?

it is necessary a special MM wich will stabilze both systems or what he was saying is simple traing too systems and when putting a trade for a system forget the other?

he gave real examples of what he was doing?


thanks in advance.

Anyone saw the film Pi, very good, a guy finds a number that gives him the holy grail. Don't go trying to replicate it though. The answer is 49.32.

Without a doubt the very best black and white, jewish, math formula movie i saw that year.

You forgot trading related.

I'd like to ask for help from anyone who cares to share a little bit of their altruism..

What am i doing wrong?! https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/bwana-1/23136

It's rare to find a refreshing thread and poster on any forum.
In one respect, I get annoyed that they are lifting the bar for others who have spent years making similar discoveries, in another-- I appreciate hearing ideas that resonate soundly with analytical truth.

On the downside, it's the most engaging thread I've read since codebreaker
As much as he was lambasted, I still gained a lot from his ideas and discussions/work that ensued from participating thread posters.