heh
ok, talking of cycles but now... planetary.
in some previous posts i talked about my forecast for second week of March. Well, here a weekly report (seems consistent with i am suspecting of markets behavior) of Mr. Merriman (astro financial analist) with revision to the weeks to come;
------
"The major geocosmic signature present this finish week ...
Planetary Cycles Trading (EUR/USD)
- #761
- Mar 7, 2010 3:47pm Mar 7, 2010 3:47pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
- #762
- Mar 7, 2010 3:49pm Mar 7, 2010 3:49pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
. . .
I am using astro cycles to confirm entry of my trades and they are deeply analized before with my technycal aproach.
...
- #763
- Mar 7, 2010 3:52pm Mar 7, 2010 3:52pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
...
this is the case of 7 March, natals of dollar. Golden Aspect:
Venus 000 Chiron 07/03/2010 12:33
19.28 hours
a nice conjunction of Venus (tr) with Chiron (USD), my prefered aspect (chiron with jup too)
advice is stay pendent, dollar will have a good rally close to that date.
http://www.astro.com/swisseph/ae/1700/ae_1776.pdf
- #764
- Mar 7, 2010 4:00pm Mar 7, 2010 4:00pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
- #765
- Edited 4:11am Mar 8, 2010 4:07am | Edited 4:11am
I think this is the best way to use it!
If i see just tech my charts are reflecting good setups for longs in USD cross pairs (sell USD or buy his marriage pairs) but i am in doubt with the specific range of astro bad days to come.
Maybe i will wait a few days to see the planets weather (new definition heh) i dont know, recents retracements are weird, not as usual; it seems to me a strange market behavior, strongs moves with low volumes, not a often presence or entries of the big boys, they seems to be in coma, or maybe just waiting too.
Its seems like overall market is triying to convince us everything is "normal" and attracting us with clear and strongs signals of suddenly economic recovery in general (fast track? lol), "buy, buy buy", breaking res and psi levels to upside pretty easy i believe. I am a long term trader and i dont want to be caught in a long trade, because i dont monitor plataform often.
Well, leaving planets beside, checking just media, suspecting fundamentals (i hate it lol), tricky manipulation maybe?
if i need some pips i guess my option is to be scalping cause i dont believe in a clear strong move up or down yet. (i dont like to scalp too much)
- #766
- Edited 4:58am Mar 8, 2010 4:51am | Edited 4:58am
Have you been able to verify this conjunction, by using software other than Aspectarian? I’m not sure their 1776 placement for Chiron is correct. It’s quite a bit different than the Swiss Ephemeris.
http://www.astro.com/swisseph/ae/1700/ae_1776.pdf
I use the zet8 , the aspectarian and astro123 and until today it had no strong differences in degrees.
That aspect posted was 0 degrees difference between these two planets (not at 0 position, i mean its a conjunction aspect), but i was not checking the original degrees of natal chiron of USD, in fact its the first time i catch an aspect with natal chiron of usd.
Your question and post of ephemerides make me to review what degree positions they show, each one and guess what? all are close or the same... except chiron!
strange, all softs are astrodents based.
Here is a screen of several softs.
there we see...
strong discrepancy between the results of chiron and ephemerides, but the funny thing is that all these softs are based on these Ephemerides! they pull positions of that database.
mmhh this happens only with the dollar natal chiron asteroid.
or perhaps with other asteroids of dollar too as but I have not reviewed because I only use chiron aspects (I do not use ceres or sedna).
bugs from soft? missing files source of asteroid positions for dollar? what can be?
wow, nice catch, i will investigate whats wrong with natal position chiron of usd.
EDIT: and yes, all configured at same date of 1776. weird
All kind day and good luck.
I will dare to notice, as authentic data about the basis what or currencies are not present easier to adjust on the statistican - "in a manual mode". ZET8 the similar method allows. That about Kondratyev's cycles the movement basis was made by break of technical thought in the industry. For example steam engine in IXX century, the car and the petrol engine in the XX-th century. What will be in XXI? There can be "a hybrid engine" or "alternative kinds of energy"?
I will dare to notice, as authentic data about the basis what or currencies are not present easier to adjust on the statistican - "in a manual mode". ZET8 the similar method allows. That about Kondratyev's cycles the movement basis was made by break of technical thought in the industry. For example steam engine in IXX century, the car and the petrol engine in the XX-th century. What will be in XXI? There can be "a hybrid engine" or "alternative kinds of energy"?
???? ????!
- #769
- Mar 8, 2010 6:04am Mar 8, 2010 6:04am
[color=black]Here are some other possible natal dates for major currencies. I agree that the dates being used for EUR, AUD, and NZD are solid. But I haven’t found anything in the Declaration of Independence about the dollar or currencies. So I’m including this new USD date (below) in my research, along with the July 4, 1776 date that some of you are using. I also haven’t found anything about currencies in the British 1927 treaty date, so I’m including this new date (below) in my research. I also found a possible natal date for CHF (below) which...
How do you will test them?
I guess if a date is close to be truly we must find significant % of correlation between aspects (transit vs natals) and important or significant history price (movements) when they are plotted in chart. ie a big fall, a change trend, etc
because its cycle timing, tuning in past times is key to find next truly aspect (ahead of now) i guess
how you will do?
ah! btw fascinanting info! recently researching i was curious to plot manual moon phases in charts and i have seen there are important correlations between "new moon" phases (full moon not so much) and price fluctuations on general.
Its very notorius when we plot new moon phases on our charts. try it and u will be very curious.
we can get similar results in daily! just minimal differences (factors: broker, spreads, time zone etc)
mmhh at least some same standards for all
so grateful to see you making research, curiosity is the begining. we can learn a lot of your objetive view point and ideas.
Have a nice begining week.
sorry about my english
- #770
- Mar 8, 2010 6:11am Mar 8, 2010 6:11am
All kind day and good luck.
I will dare to notice, as authentic data about the basis what or currencies are not present easier to adjust on the statistican - "in a manual mode".
i choose event data, it doesnt matter if its a currency birth for me. its works.
- #771
- Mar 8, 2010 2:11pm Mar 8, 2010 2:11pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
- #772
- Mar 8, 2010 2:20pm Mar 8, 2010 2:20pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
Interesting views, i didnt have date of CHF, i will check yours.
How do you will test them?
I guess if a date is close to be truly we must find significant % of correlation between aspects (transit vs natals) and important or significant history price (movements) when they are plotted in chart. ie a big fall, a change trend, etc
because its cycle timing, tuning in past times is key to find next truly aspect (ahead of now) i guess
how you will do?
ah! btw fascinanting info! recently researching i was curious to plot manual moon phases in charts and i have seen there are important correlations between "new moon" phases (full moon not so much) and price fluctuations on general.
Its very notorius when we plot new moon phases on our charts. try it and u will be very curious.
we can get similar results in daily! just minimal differences (factors: broker, spreads, time zone etc)
mmhh at least some same standards for all
I'll check it out!
- #773
- Mar 8, 2010 2:24pm Mar 8, 2010 2:24pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
i like too! but he is not talking something about his programm, i mean... we can standardize and try to use something with similar results to check these calls or learn about it.
...
I like soft aspectarian because is simple and it list the aspects easy and fast (transits vs natals)
...
- #774
- Edited 10:45pm Mar 8, 2010 10:26pm | Edited 10:45pm
Have you been able to verify this conjunction, by using software other than Aspectarian? I’m not sure their 1776 placement for Chiron is correct. It’s quite a bit different than the Swiss Ephemeris.
http://www.astro.com/swisseph/ae/1700/ae_1776.pdf
sherlock holmes uhm heh
I found the cause of the discrepancies of chiron and is not the free software. In fact none of them is failing.
it is malfunctioning the database server of swiss ephemeris from which each one of softwares are puling data to calculate positions of asteroids. (main planets are not failing)
I've been tested even with the "demo" executables files from same site swiss ephemeris (download in ftp://ftp.astro.com/pub/swisseph/programs/) to calculate positions: runing his exe shows that file is missing, ( a kind of file number 12) of the asteroids. (see errors screen posted below)
i guess that fail is recent, weeks ago positions of asteroids were right and aspects of natal chiron (or other asteroids) were calculated with good performance.
Now every astro software using swiss ephemeris database online to calculate those asteroids positions (puling datas) will be wrong on degrees of asteroids because main source its not working or files are missing.
So, my solution is...
1.- astro swiss ephemeris site must fix his database linking routines (i dont know if they have interest to fix it because freeware is using his database) or...
2.- try another soft with the ephemeris files actualy integrated into his executable programm or subfolders. (not linking to ephemeris files online)
My fast option is 2
i guess because i have kepler soft on PC and it doesnt pull data online from swiss site, i mean kepler have all these swiss ephemeris files into his system folders and full access to data even offline!in next post i will add info about it
nature of error of database swiss ephemeris online posted below...
- #775
- Edited 11:17pm Mar 8, 2010 11:01pm | Edited 11:17pm
I will use kepler then, i mean to calculate aspects of transit vs natals.
i prefered aspectarian before cause is most simple and fast BUT until database swiss ephemeris connections could be fixed it will useless to use it (and other softs in same case).
Kepler has an interfase with lot of features and i dont like so much, i want to know just importants aspects (sq, conj, ops, trines) vs natals fast and easy and the rest is just too much.
well, but for now is the soft working and accurate bringing aspects for dates and currencies i am using.
here is comparation vs ephemeris. (little degrees differences on ven,merc or moon are because they are fast planets, time zone hours from calculations affect them a bit)
EDIT: Add correct list of aspects, golden linkage ven conj natal chiron usd it no was 7 march, its next 23 March.
thanks pips_cruiser for point out the error
i prefered aspectarian before cause is most simple and fast BUT until database swiss ephemeris connections could be fixed it will useless to use it (and other softs in same case).
Kepler has an interfase with lot of features and i dont like so much, i want to know just importants aspects (sq, conj, ops, trines) vs natals fast and easy and the rest is just too much.
well, but for now is the soft working and accurate bringing aspects for dates and currencies i am using.
here is comparation vs ephemeris. (little degrees differences on ven,merc or moon are because they are fast planets, time zone hours from calculations affect them a bit)
EDIT: Add correct list of aspects, golden linkage ven conj natal chiron usd it no was 7 march, its next 23 March.
thanks pips_cruiser for point out the error
- #776
- Mar 8, 2010 11:11pm Mar 8, 2010 11:11pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
- #779
- Mar 8, 2010 11:29pm Mar 8, 2010 11:29pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts
EDIT: Add correct list of aspects, golden linkage ven conj natal chiron usd it no was 7 march, its next 23 March.
thanks pips_cruiser for point out the error
- #780
- Mar 8, 2010 11:31pm Mar 8, 2010 11:31pm
- Joined Jul 2007 | Status: Following The Trade Winds | 8,442 Posts