My Profitable Expert Advisor For U! Let's Optimize it Together | Page 2 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Profitable Expert Advisor EA found at forexfactory 2 replies

How to build a very profitable EXPERT ADVISOR 3 replies

Let's build together a system which makes 1000%/month 427 replies

Let's Learn Candlesticks Together 35 replies

Pattern trading indicators - let's make it together! 6 replies

Attachments: My Profitable Expert Advisor For U! Let's Optimize it Together
Exit Attachments

My Profitable Expert Advisor For U! Let's Optimize it Together

  • #21
  • Feb 16, 2010 12:46am Feb 16, 2010 12:46am
hi alousios

i check it the testing why is only buy, the old testing there is buy and sell...

is there something in the code that can't allowed to sell or different parameter setup?

i check it both at the new one with stochastic filter both rsi is <40 when opening signal... it look like diffeerent with the standar one rsi is <40 and the other one is >60

i really want to try back testing to change stochastic filter to 15m, one hour and 4 h and change rsi too, maybe have more better result.

i believe this ea still can be optimize with different time frame stochastic and the rsi level value.

thx
  • #22
  • Edited 3:41am Feb 18, 2010 3:21am | Edited 3:41am
Kudos for sharing your work!

Could I please ask about the multiplier & signal_multiplier variables for Quantum Gravity Ind. The defaults are 4.6+2.4 but you are calling it with 5.0 + 5.0. Is this a result of optimization or is there another reason for this change?

Also, Do you know if there is a way to return BOTH frama + signal (red + blue line) from the indy by using iCustom or by other means? If not, which of the two values are you comparing as is today?

Thanks alot again

/ McKeen
  • #23
  • Feb 22, 2010 11:03am Feb 22, 2010 11:03am
Quoting tulipevierge
hi alousios

i check it the testing why is only buy, the old testing there is buy and sell...

is there something in the code that can't allowed to sell or different parameter setup?

i check it both at the new one with stochastic filter both rsi is <40 when opening signal... it look like diffeerent with the standar one rsi is <40 and the other one is >60

i really want to try back testing to change stochastic filter to 15m, one hour and 4 h and change rsi too, maybe have more better result.

i believe this ea still can be optimize with different...
You may change the Period_x line to test with different timeframes. But you have to watch out for overoptimization. The parameters chosen as default worked for 4 years backtest.

You should backtest the same amount of time with your timeframe preferences if you wish to avoid overoptimization.

The buy only is I believe because the conditions for sell only are not met. It does not matter since the results are good even for buy only with stoch filter.

I am working on a new EA right now that I will share soon....
Singularity is near....
  • #24
  • Feb 22, 2010 11:15am Feb 22, 2010 11:15am
Quoting McKeen
Kudos for sharing your work!

Could I please ask about the multiplier & signal_multiplier variables for Quantum Gravity Ind. The defaults are 4.6+2.4 but you are calling it with 5.0 + 5.0. Is this a result of optimization or is there another reason for this change?

Also, Do you know if there is a way to return BOTH frama + signal (red + blue line) from the indy by using iCustom or by other means? If not, which of the two values are you comparing as is today?

Thanks alot again

/ McKeen
The default FRAMA values work good but they are open for optimization. I have not tested optimization for FRAMA as it seems that these values affect price filtering and may lead to much less trades if they filter out too much price action.

If you try to optimize these values please share.

I am using value 1 of FRAMA at the EA. If you wish value 2 then please choose 2 at iCustom like below:

iCustom(NULL, PERIOD_M30, "Quantum Gravity Ind", 16, 4.6, 2.5, 2, 1)
instead of
iCustom(NULL, PERIOD_M30, "Quantum Gravity Ind", 16, 4.6, 2.5, 1, 1)

The value 2 is much more filtered and thus less responsive that 1.

I have tried the signal to be the crossover between the blue and red but there are a lot false signals in sideways market.

When I tried with a sideways filter of type signals=red > blue +- 10
the trade signal came in when too much steam was lost. So I stayed with the crossover between different timeframes to make the EA.

Thank you for your kind words. Please share your results if you test my EA.
Singularity is near....
  • #25
  • Feb 23, 2010 3:58am Feb 23, 2010 3:58am
Quoting alouisos
You may change the Period_x line to test with different timeframes. But you have to watch out for overoptimization. The parameters chosen as default worked for 4 years backtest.

You should backtest the same amount of time with your timeframe preferences if you wish to avoid overoptimization.

The buy only is I believe because the conditions for sell only are not met. It does not matter since the results are good even for buy only with stoch filter.

I am working on a new EA right now that I will share soon....
yes, it is good result even only buy, can't imagine that is profit factor more than 2 for only buy.... well, it will double when there sell i believe...

ok i know what you mean about back test, as long as it is coding it right... with the rule above, i believe, it is have a good result.

thank's, i am waiting your ea release soon...

do you think you will make an ea base on channel overbought or oversold ea?
like using bollinger band but instead of it using MA channel.
i know bollinger band is base MA too, but has too much deviation....

it work like this, because most of it the candle stick in forex is overlapping, that will make that gravity go back to the average center line....

i hope you're interested to make base on this when you have time... atleast it is working in manual this methode.
  • #26
  • Mar 7, 2010 1:15pm Mar 7, 2010 1:15pm
Quoting alouisos
The default FRAMA values work good but they are open for optimization. I have not tested optimization for FRAMA as it seems that these values affect price filtering and may lead to much less trades if they filter out too much price action.

If you try to optimize these values please share.

I am using value 1 of FRAMA at the EA. If you wish value 2 then please choose 2 at iCustom like below:

iCustom(NULL, PERIOD_M30, "Quantum Gravity Ind", 16, 4.6, 2.5, 2, 1)
instead of
iCustom(NULL, PERIOD_M30, "Quantum Gravity...
I am forward testing your 2 EA with setting default; I will let you know

Thanks for the great job
  • #27
  • Mar 18, 2010 6:37am Mar 18, 2010 6:37am
Hello there,

I need some assistance on the Venus EA. I'm a first-timer on this EA. The Venus EA is not functioning which I placed everything correctly. Nor the Quantum Gravity Ind does not seem to work. Any help I would gladly appreciate. thank you
  • #28
  • Mar 20, 2010 3:49am Mar 20, 2010 3:49am
Quoting alouisos
Hello,

I 've finally found some free time to post some improvements and suggestions.

I have added Stochastic Filtering in M30 as tulipevierge has suggested.

The result: Less trading volume but has allowed to lessen the SL to 100 pips keeping the TP to 200 pips.

See backtest results for 2006 till today for this change here:

http://www.forexrobotscoach-louizos....tochFilter.htm

Thank you tulipevierge! I am also reading the pdf you attached which looks great as an idea but it will take me some serious time to...
Hi alouisos,There is an error on the last EA version you posted with stoch filter. On some part of the cde you mistyped "Quantum Gravtiy Ind".RegardsPaulo
  • #29
  • Mar 22, 2010 11:18am Mar 22, 2010 11:18am
Please anybody help me on how to back test EA?
I don't how to put it on strategy tester and get it running.
Regards.
  • #30
  • Mar 23, 2010 5:52pm Mar 23, 2010 5:52pm
Quoting kevinflynn
Hello, everyone. This is my first post to this thread. I think I'm at the right place in here, because this seems to be a good place for my EA programming wish!!!

I just stumpled upon a strategy using the indicator Line Of Destiny.mq4 showing just a kind of HMA of the active trend ( GREEN = UPTREND, RED = DOWNTREND)... seems simple as it goes!!!

I'm trading in a H4 timeframe, because the indicator line just repaints several times before the candle closes, but that's not the point unless I wait until the closed candle to take my trading decision...

So...
What line are you indicating? Buy, if line was RED? DO you have a picture sample? thanks
  • #31
  • May 25, 2010 2:45am May 25, 2010 2:45am
Hi There...can any one please help me out...i dont know how can i use expert advisor....can any one please tell me how can i use it in my trading platform....thanks
  • #32
  • Jul 2, 2010 5:59am Jul 2, 2010 5:59am
hello,
i ve been backtesting visually this ea and it seems that it has potential. if the original author is still available, i have a suggestion.

when the indicator is flat line, there seems to be some trading opportunities.
when price candle body is clearly above or below flat line, buy on the up bar and sell on the down bar.

same ea options for tp, sl, etc.

the entry is only changed to the above rules.
hope i made some sense.

anyway, if its possible and not too time consuming for you, maybe we can get an edited ea with the new entry rules??????

thanks for the indy and the original ea. i really like the indy and plan on using it in my arsenal for real trading.
  • #33
  • Last Post: Apr 8, 2026 10:20pm Apr 8, 2026 10:20pm
Hi everyone,

Interesting discussion.

On the FRAMA / signal multiplier point, I’ve also noticed that small parameter changes can significantly affect filtering and trade frequency. In most cases, it’s less about “better values” and more about matching the market condition being tested.

Also agree on the over-optimization concern, especially when combining multiple filters across different timeframes. It can look good in backtest but behave differently in forward testing.
0 traders viewing now