Steve himself has TRIPLED his live a/c so far. I have had success with this one but yet not doubled my a/c. But be careful as this robot doesnt have a stoploss.
The best way to trade this bot is to put it on a dedicated account and leave it alone.
Kang Gun Relative Strength trading - the EA's
- #1,301
- Jan 23, 2010 5:04pm Jan 23, 2010 5:04pm
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2007 | 8,331 Posts
The best way to trade this bot is to put it on a dedicated account and leave it alone.
- #1,304
- Jan 24, 2010 3:26pm Jan 24, 2010 3:26pm
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2007 | 8,331 Posts
Guys, if macman can get it wrong then the rest of you stand to see your accounts murdered. Read, learn, trade manually, then demo the robot, then think about using it live. If you aren't prepared to do this, then forget it.
Just in case you missed it - and only an idiot would miss it - here is a snippet from post 1:
THESE ROBOTS WILL KILL YOUR ACCOUNT QUICKER THAN YOU CAN BLINK IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. GO AWAY NOW, AND DO NOT RETURN IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED FOR A LOT OF PATIENT HARD WORK.
Not entirely sure which bit of this might be difficult to understand.
Some idiot in an earlier post asked me to pm to clear up his confusion. To him I say this: don't be silly. There is nothing I can do about your confusion.
I hope I am being rude enough here to get the point across. Just in case anyone is too dim to take the hint, I will try again:
THESE ROBOTS WILL KILL YOUR ACCOUNT QUICKER THAN YOU CAN BLINK IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. GO AWAY NOW, AND DO NOT RETURN IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED FOR A LOT OF PATIENT HARD WORK.
Just in case you missed it - and only an idiot would miss it - here is a snippet from post 1:
THESE ROBOTS WILL KILL YOUR ACCOUNT QUICKER THAN YOU CAN BLINK IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. GO AWAY NOW, AND DO NOT RETURN IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED FOR A LOT OF PATIENT HARD WORK.
Not entirely sure which bit of this might be difficult to understand.
Some idiot in an earlier post asked me to pm to clear up his confusion. To him I say this: don't be silly. There is nothing I can do about your confusion.
I hope I am being rude enough here to get the point across. Just in case anyone is too dim to take the hint, I will try again:
THESE ROBOTS WILL KILL YOUR ACCOUNT QUICKER THAN YOU CAN BLINK IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. GO AWAY NOW, AND DO NOT RETURN IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED FOR A LOT OF PATIENT HARD WORK.
- #1,306
- Jan 29, 2010 8:27am Jan 29, 2010 8:27am
Yep. Tripled the account without ever being threatened by dd. Trouble with this method is that baskets can get stuck for weeks on end - I have had three stuck since well before Christmas. I just have to be patient when this happens. They can unravel within half an hour, then the bot can spend a week racking in the pips.
The best way to trade this bot is to put it on a dedicated account and leave it alone.
- #1,307
- Feb 2, 2010 10:00am Feb 2, 2010 10:00am
Nice err today: Order send failed with error(134): not enough money 
it is demo at IBFX (get down) BasketReverseNotCancel = false. Another demo at Alpari (get veeeeeeeeeeery nice UP) BasketReverseNotCancel = true. Very, very good work Mr. Hopwood.
it is demo at IBFX (get down) BasketReverseNotCancel = false. Another demo at Alpari (get veeeeeeeeeeery nice UP) BasketReverseNotCancel = true. Very, very good work Mr. Hopwood.
2010.02.03 14:28:30KG RS GROUP V1.1 GBPJPYm,H1: unknown subwindow number -1 for ObjectCreate function
Hey Steve, just to let you know I'm having this message over and over, may be something needs to be fixed on the bot.
reg,
d.
Sorry i am not Steve
- #1,311
- Feb 4, 2010 12:08pm Feb 4, 2010 12:08pm
And Steve isn't helping because someone too lazy to find out about something that has been answered about 50 times in the thread doesn't deserve helping. Only someone who hasn't done the reading brings this silly subject up; that individual's best interests are served by going elsewhere.
I'm afraid I haven't been clear. I wasn't looking for your kind help since I noticed the message doesn't affect the functionality of the robot, which is excellent btw.
Besides, I know how extremely busy you are and I also prefer you spend your precious time coding than answering questions.
Please read again my post and you'll see I don't ask for any help or response.
When I wrote the post I was simply trying to help, alerting you of something I supposed could be of your interest.
d.
- #1,312
- Feb 5, 2010 5:41pm Feb 5, 2010 5:41pm
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2007 | 8,331 Posts
When I wrote the post I was simply trying to help, alerting you of something I supposed could be of your interest.
d.
I am often guilty of using attack as the first form of defence. The fact is, there is only one of me and I do a lot of coding. There are many people trying to use my work without trying to make sense of the underlying systems my robots trade, so I could spend a lot of time explaining things. If I did this, I would not be able to spend time coding.
I get irritated when contributors bring up things that have been discussed earlier in a thread. I shouldn't, but I am only human, so I do. This was one of those times.
I have put an explanation about the unknown subwindow error in post 1. Me being me, I have included the usual threats. This looks horrible but try to understand why I post is such a way. One day, you might find yourself in the position of starting threads that attract a lot of attention.
When this happens, you will learn this unpalatable fact: FF is full of readers who cannot even be bothered to read properly the first post in a thread, let alone the more abstruse stuff that often follows.
Sorry to have lumped you in with them.
- #1,313
- Feb 8, 2010 8:51am Feb 8, 2010 8:51am
Apologies for my surly response.
I am often guilty of using attack as the first form of defence. The fact is, there is only one of me and I do a lot of coding. There are many people trying to use my work without trying to make sense of the underlying systems my robots trade, so I could spend a lot of time explaining things. If I did this, I would not be able to spend time coding.
I get irritated when contributors bring up things that have been discussed earlier in a thread. I shouldn't, but I am only human, so I do. This was one of...
Hi,
I have been running both Original and Range EA's on a GBP/JPY 1H with great results over the past week. It's taken a 10K account all the way up to 26K in just under 1 week
. This has been running on an Alpari Demo account.
I am however, unable to run the RS_GROUP_xxx V1_2, and KG RS GROUP V1.1 indicators on my other main account. The main difference is that this other account (Collective) has a symbol with 9 characters. e.g GBPUSD_fx
Is it possible that a fix can be applied to these indicators as the code is locked?
Many thanks
I have been running both Original and Range EA's on a GBP/JPY 1H with great results over the past week. It's taken a 10K account all the way up to 26K in just under 1 week
. This has been running on an Alpari Demo account.I am however, unable to run the RS_GROUP_xxx V1_2, and KG RS GROUP V1.1 indicators on my other main account. The main difference is that this other account (Collective) has a symbol with 9 characters. e.g GBPUSD_fx
Is it possible that a fix can be applied to these indicators as the code is locked?
Many thanks
- #1,316
- Feb 19, 2010 8:37am Feb 19, 2010 8:37am
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2007 | 8,331 Posts
Hi,
I have been running both Original and Range EA's on a GBP/JPY 1H with great results over the past week. It's taken a 10K account all the way up to 26K in just under 1 week
I am however, unable to run the RS_GROUP_xxx V1_2, and KG RS GROUP V1.1 indicators on my other main account. The main difference is that this other account (Collective) has a symbol with 9 characters. e.g GBPUSD_fx
Is it possible that a fix can be applied to these indicators as the code is locked?
Many thanks
Go to http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...85&postcount=1 and download the indicators zipfile - you will find a fixed version of 1.1 there.
- #1,317
- Feb 19, 2010 8:45am Feb 19, 2010 8:45am
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2007 | 8,331 Posts
I realised it would only take a few seconds to fix, so here it is. KG added a fix for the IBFX 'm' suffix; I just adapted it so it will detect suffix's automatically.
- #1,318
- Feb 19, 2010 9:18am Feb 19, 2010 9:18am
Hi,
I have been running both Original and Range EA's on a GBP/JPY 1H with great results over the past week. It's taken a 10K account all the way up to 26K in just under 1 week
I am however, unable to run the RS_GROUP_xxx V1_2, and KG RS GROUP V1.1 indicators on my other main account. The main difference is that this other account (Collective) has a symbol with 9 characters. e.g GBPUSD_fx
Is it possible that a fix can be applied to these indicators as the code is locked?
Many thanks...