Elliot wave, Harmonic And Ichimoku in CHINESE STYLE

Aus/Jpy ..

MASTER ANALYSIS

UPDATE EU!!!

GREATTTTTTTTTT !!!

我非常想念你


http://www.jpopasia.com/lyrics/6437/...c.png?v=15.1">


JAY CHOU

http://translate.google.cn/?js=y&pre...l=en&ie=UTF-8#

it help

UPDATE GU!!

I'm using it

can you show me daily Chart

什么是您的邮件编号什

I LOVEEEEEEEE THIS SONG

WISH i could be HERO on that song

OK!

My　E-mail:[email protected]

do you know your 5th wave would be 1.23 level ........
the london 1999 tech bubble Gu dropped 1.6500 to 14000 different is 2500 pips and now the china market bubble burst gu 1.6900 may be 1.2500


... so it is bit can possible But for me now DELTA have another philosophy

Above chart is GBP USD SLTD chart with the last 3 cycles.
SLTD 4 has always been due near green line. The question is whether in the current cycle, SLTD 4 has been due at the question mark place (1.57 on Oct 13, 2009).

If current cycle repeats the previous two cycles (sometimes it does not), then GBP USD is in a very long UP cycle (until SLTD 7).

The length of time from SLTD 1 in Jan 2002 to SLTD 4 in Feb 2002 is 56 weeks.
The length of time from SLTD 1 in Dec 2004 to SLTD 4 in Dec 2005 is 50 weeks.

In the current cycle, if I assume 1.57 on Oct 13, 2009 is the current cycle's SLTD 4, then the length of time from SLTD 1 in Jul 2008 to SLTD 4 in Oct 2009 is 65 weeks. This is longer than the previous two cycles, and thus there's a chance that SLTD 4 was already IN.

Assuming SLTD 4 is still not IN, the length of time from SLTD 1 in Jul 2008 to the current week is already 78 weeks. If SLTD 4 is still not IN, then this cycle's pattern and structure would likely not repeat the past two cycles and we need to do some other analysis.

Now take a look at the length of time from SLTD 4 to SLTD 5 in the past two cycles. It was 52 weeks and 60 weeks. That's 1 year up cycle. 1 year from SLTD 4 in Oct 2009 is Oct 2010.


CMELLON..............


VERY GOOD % o chanse GU

NZD GBP

no no no Mistake

sorry but I just recolonize just now ur Mistake my bad

okay where is the mistake basically the subdivision is good on After (Y) .. but The problem Double Come on x wave why ok basically the x wave is come in any list means the x subdivision from The w .. I mean Sapose W wave subdivition is 3 abc is intermediary so The x Subdivision 3 would be min micro Subdivision

rule

l Wave C of W cannot be a failure.
l Wave X may be any corrective pattern except a Triangle, double or triple.
l The minimum X Wave retracement is 70% of Wave W.
l The maximum price distance of Wave X

okay thats mean It doesn't meant the x wave havn't 3 subdivision as same Level of w and Y have like Example intermediary ... that only Mean If The X subdivision is About of 70% less so it not valid as well If we talk about Y never less the X by subdivision









see the example

Great Vincy!
Thank you for pointing out my mistake, you are very careful and very responsible man! Everyone loves people like you!
Be able to share with you I am very honored!
I would like to continue to work harder to study wave theory and rules!

My poor standard of English!

Hi Vincy, (and Zhou Yun),

I've been away, back now. I like the AUD count. I see on the 4 hour chart a lot of mirroring of the wave pattern. I attach below what wave pattern might result if mirroring continues. What do you think!

no worry Buddy .. i have also poor standard of English

Thanks BTW

Hi peetee ..

Okay good you started Elliot wave .. but peharps of Basic start you should follow Impulsive count 12345, Like I always said to every body ,, IN BOOK NATURE LAW By R N Elliot .. he said the 5 wave is the best wave , but talking about Your Elliot wave count A B okay but in C in Every Proseger C should have 5 Subdivision , that’s mean 12345.. you can count on FLAT , ZIZ ZAG or EXPAND FLAT as well in Arrogated Flat , those All Count the C should have 12345(5) type of Subdivsion You can count in 12345 or abc(W)-x-y , or W-X-Y-XX-Z as well ,, a b c – x – a b c .. the all Just come Count on 5 term and there were some procedure to count and talking about your X .. X have 3…subdivision Not 12345 (5) subdivision , there were many mistake ……..BUT PLEASE DON’T WORRY ……..EVERY BODY HAVE WRONG COUNT .. .. just talking about me yes in My Case I should Count on A B C .. But no I have Triple Flat Corrective you can see below J