My Elliott Wave book

Prepare to have your Elliott Wave paradigm revolutionized.

Just completed my new book and there was no point in
putting this info up for sale. It's so easy to spread and just
too important that it only made sense to be given to those
that will use and appreciate it.

I wanted to get it finished in time to be a Christmas Present
but you know Murphy's law so I will just wish you all
a Happy New Rule.
8- )

It brings the First New Rule for Elliott Wave in 70 Years

The New Elliott Wave Rule is being Distributed free online.
This is a Free downloadable 40 Page PDF Book.

http://www.supertradersclub.com/imag...ver-laying.png



The New Elliott Wave Rule

It's free no strings or emails.

This is literally the New Elliott Wave because
it brings it back to what Elliott wanted,
accurate and definite.

If you're into EW you will love it.

Enjoy 8- )

Cheers,
Cyclon

Your link to the eBook is not a proper URL... try again.

Thank you pips4life!

Happy New Rule!

Cheers,
Cyclon

cylon, thanks for the book, will dig into it as soon as possible.

how long have you been trading with EW? have you been successful using EW to trading?

YW.

about 10 yrs.

Yes I have.

Cheers,
Cyclon

HI Cyclon,
I just downloaded your ebook and finished reading it. I haven't clearly understood the new rule , but I'll reread it again until i can grasp the new concept. It does seem to make sense to me. Thanks for the book. I think it's fantastic.
I have been using EW for about a year or so. I haven't been successful with EW but keep learning everyday. I primarily trade Forex. Sometimes Forex is so fast and furious and I often have the wrong counts. Is there anyway to improve my forex trading with EW principles?
In your book, I think you did mention the supertrade system. I think you might be the founder of that system. Is there any link between the supertrade system and the new EW rule that you propose? ( I think you mentioned briefly about that link in your book). Hope to interact with you soon. Cheers

Hi ninohoang,

The whole reason for writing the book is EXACTLY what you have
experienced with EW.

You are not alone in this experience, believe me. The book talks
about the reasons behind the general understanding of EW as
a "Theory" but it is far from it.

Here you are after a year with EW and the right approach has not
come about for you. That is quite typical as you read other's
experiences. There is so much confusion about rules.

As you see the New Rule strips away all the alternate and maybe
and "what it cannot do" stuff.

It strips away most of the things which got added onto the rules
as necessary ways of coping with an "unknown" which is an actual
RULE and is seen in every single solitary wave cycle.

Of course the same thing which has allowed this to go undetected
is just what caused you to have confusion.

We have seen what we were told to look for and when it does not
give a definitive count or ends up just seeming like it "broke" the
rules we do not question the rules and instead question our own
ability.

I was in the same situation but I got a little help which you read
about in the book. Once it is opened up to your eyes as a rule you
just see it.

Don't worry that the confusion lingers because I watched it for a
almost a year to make sure it was real. I've known it is a rule for
over 4 years but went into developing what else it could do.

For you this should clear up extremely quickly because it gets seen
constantly at the very time you need it most and the very time
where it caused the original trouble for Mr. Elliott - at the swing pivot.

As the book reveals there was much trouble for him on this issue and
the trouble has remained until today.

Just be prepared to completely revolutionize your EW paradigm.

This Rule is self evident and self validating once the obstacles
have been tossed. I would not give the confusion caused from all
the former baggage more than a few finished waves before this
becomes automatic.

That Spare Parts list in the book is extensive, isn't it?!

As far as the Supertradesystem goes, as stated in the book, they
are not linked, just built upon the same things and each has
advantages and disadvantages compared to the other.

They are numerically joined at the hip and both of self-similar
fractal nature in application at any degree.

For instance, we have traders using fibonacci-tickframes now and
seeing full application even below 1 tick if you want to be quick.

It is speed and trend analysis using tools. The same method is
used on all timeframes and formations and pairs. The two are not
designed to be used together but you could of course.

It will be a pleasure to talk further. I see you have signed on.

Many pips to you.

Cheers,
Cyclon

Thanks, I have downloaded it and will read this weekend. Where is your STAR system discussed or can you PM me with details ?

happy new year

You are quite welcome, msmarple.

Happy New Year to you as well.

There is one banner toward the end of the book. It is not obviously a link
but it is clickable. That does have its own website of course, along with
a dedicated traders community.

These are both dear to my heart and I am joined to both at the hip as
well but I don't want to put a link on this thread. The EW is a special
interest group which should have the opportunity to get this new info.

Cheers,
Cyclon

I just uploaded it again and this time there is a text link
which should be a little more apparent than just the graphic.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Cheers, Cyclon

your hard work is very appreciated. thanks.

Can you please point the new EW rule in basis ? Sounds interesting to me

Cylon, Without going to much into detail, can you tell us what the main gist of your STAR method composed of? Does it involve EW? Where can i go if i am interested in the method?

BTW, did you get your name off battlestar galactica?

Edit: nvm, its cyclon not cylon...

hello cyclon,

it sounds very interesting. but i have a little lag of understaning. does the RTB-Rule only be valid if and only if the counted B Wave in a lower degree of the 4th wave higher degree is an irregular correction?

does this mean, if there is not an irregular correction counted, we are possible in the wave 3 and the RTB does not exist?

regards
der stratege

Hi Cyclon,
thank you very much for your great effort. Which i really appreciate. Seems a great and useful stuff
Thanks again

You are welcome and thanks for the appreciation as well.
--------

The basis of the New Rule is that there is a way in which the waves form
which had caused many difficult counting methods and add-ons of waves
that did not actually exist.

It is a hard and fast rule, occurring in all wave cycles.

The extra and difficult simply drop away once it is seen - because it is
what the waves have always been doing.

--------

STAR is built upon the same numerical relationships as EW so it is fractal
(self-similar at all degrees). It is a manual technical analysis but uses
indicators unlike EW. It measures speeds and trend exhaustion but its
makeup has a means of de-containerizing data.

That is necessary to remove the effect of choosing some arbitrary candle
size (timeframe) which separates fibonacci relationships from your analysis
unless you get lucky and hit the speed the waves are running upon in
their current swing.

The market has MANY more speeds it can run at and this is why technical
analysis fails at a high rate. It is taking some arbitrary data chunks and
analyzing them.

A grocer would not expect valid analysis of milk sales data if he arbitrarily
divided up the data into various groupings which had no bearing on
something in the data itself.

Then again grocers don't have a 95% failure rate in selling milk. 8- )

In my book the reasons for the trouble with EW are given, along with the
correct way to count which had previously remained hidden. EW is not
seen as very reliable but that is completely due to the strange
workarounds which were done to account for an unseen rule.

However it is extremely precise, accurate and reliable once done in this
new method. The reason is that once corrected there is nothing in the
way at all from its return to something that cannot be held back by our
arbitrary choosing of candle containers.

EW uses no indicators of course so it cannot be limited the way that
indicator analysis is, by reliance on the closing or other value of the
candle which MUST have an arbitrary grouping of tick data.

Cheers,
Cyclon

I have posted a new chart with the New Elliott Wave Rule
DOW JONES INDUSTRIALS Elliott Wave Count.


This covers up to part of the Primary Degree ( 10 months )
up to today.



New Elliott Wave Rule Forums



Have a good gap, err, weekend, everybody.





Cheers,
Cyclon

DOW JONES Makes its Move Today

I have posted a new chart with the New Elliott Wave Rule
DOW JONES INDUSTRIALS Elliott Wave Count.

Today the Dow turned.


What will this mean for your FOREX Pairs?



Were you aware that today marked a major turn for the DOW?




Check your relative strength, or your whatever you watch.



Go now and see what time history was made:


New Elliott Wave Rule Forums






Cheers,
Cyclon

This dude is just a vendor in disguise pawning off his "100% Accurate Trading System" lololol and only for $300!

http://supertradesystem.com/purchase.html


Why don't you get a real job eh? Instead of praying on lemmings.

This came through and I really got a kick out of it.

The story its wording tells is so like us traders that
it just tickled me.

Regarding New Elliott Wave Rule:


Gotta love that!



Cheers,
Cyclon