Hi Mr Ed;
Are you still using FXDD as a broker? Do you find it reliable?
Are you still using FXDD as a broker? Do you find it reliable?
EURUSD 15min. Heikin-Ashi System 31 replies
Heikin-Ashi 2 replies
Heikin-Ashi Technique 2 replies
Regarding Smoothed Heikin Ashi indicator 0 replies
Trading with Heikin Ashi 9 replies
DislikedHi Mr Ed;
Are you still using FXDD as a broker? Do you find it reliable?Ignored
DislikedOops, that's my bad - thanks for pointing out!
See attached the bug fix, which takes the second last bar instead of the current/last one.
Also I streamlined a bit the filter handling code...
LongbarIgnored
DislikedThanks longBar!
However, there still seems to be issues that results in a lost where the trigger is between -/+.
2/17/09 04:00 GMT+0 a buy resulted in loss as you can see from my chartIgnored
DislikedOops, that's my bad - thanks for pointing out!
See attached the bug fix, which takes the second last bar instead of the current/last one.
Also I streamlined a bit the filter handling code...
LongbarIgnored
DislikedHi hello,
If I am not mistaken your chart seems to have EA v1.5.0 attached - this version does not have the RAVI FX Fish indicator incorporated so filtering would not take place. I guess you would want to upgrade to the EA v1.6.1 for this feature
LongbarIgnored
DislikedHi Longbar,
Do we need to change the settings on the Ravi filter to 4,24,0.12 when we put it on the charts?
The EA has the correct settings but I wasn't sure if the indicator has to be loaded and set on the chart correctly.
When I load it on the chart the default settings are 4,49,0.09
Many thanks,
IanIgnored
DislikedHi Longbar,
Thanks for the new EA. I'll be trying it out for the rest of this week. BTW you must be living on a similar time zone to me? GMT +4
CheersIgnored
DislikedHi Longbar,
Do we need to change the settings on the Ravi filter to 4,24,0.12 when we put it on the charts?
The EA has the correct settings but I wasn't sure if the indicator has to be loaded and set on the chart correctly.
When I load it on the chart the default settings are 4,49,0.09
Many thanks,
IanIgnored
DislikedHey LongBar,
Sorry for the confusion. I'm trading v1.5 on my live acct. I was backtesting 1.6.1. I compare my visual backtest charts with my real charts and they both showed the same. Someone can backtest around the time I posted and see if they get the same results. Most of my losses should have been filtered by the RAVI filter, but they are very close calls(where the target is on the +/- line. Prob should have something where it is < rather than <= ).
Thank you,
Antoine WalkerIgnored
the expression became this
observe the equal sign.
So if you get different results using the different versions then it is likely down to the RAVIFX_Trigger parameter... of course assuming that you get 90% modelling quality for both runs otherwise the results follow more of a random number generator
----
Edited later:
Just to add, see attached my backtest results over the period of Jan 2007 to Feb 2009 at Alpari UK. I see a significant improvement when the RAVI filter is enabled.
DislikedOhh, that explains
In general with MT, 1 pixel on the screen represents a range of values so what may look on the edge could actually be either <, or >, or hmm =
The only way to make a call is to check the Expert log where the IsTradeFiltered function prints the values to, something like this:
[size=1][color=Blue]2009.10.26 12:55:38...Ignored
DislikedWhen I bug-fixed the v1.6.0 to v1.6.1 there was one minor change made to the RAVI FX Fisher indicator evaluation:
Instead of doing this
- -RAVIFX_Trigger < Indicator reading < +RAVIFX_Trigger
the expression became this
- -RAVIFX_Trigger <= Indicator reading <= +RAVIFX_Trigger
observe the equal sign.
So if you get different results using the different versions then it is likely down to the RAVIFX_Trigger parameter... of course assuming that you get 90% modelling quality...Ignored