To carry the thought regarding correlation a step further, I'm also not convinced that the box size has any correlation whatsoever to the potential TP's for the week.
As I see it, the 4H box serves one primary purpose, and that is just to establish a level to set your entries for the weeks. At times, it may also serve as an indication of trader sentiment for the week, but that's far from a sure thing.
Just to illustrate, as I remember it from back testing, all four trading weeks in January were winners, but check out the disparity in box size for the week as well as the maximum pip gain during each week . . .
Is there a better way to figure targets? Maybe not, since nothing in trading is guaranteed. I'm considering experimenting with ATR based on a Weekly chart. Just for the sake of comparison, consider this . . . the Weekly ATR in January ran from a low of 1100 pips to a high of 1372 pips. Contrast that with September, which has run from a low of 502 pips to a high of 596 pips.
What does that tell you? Well, we already know the answer . . . the market was a LOT more volatile in January than it is right now. Wouldn't it seem reasonable that targets right now should be lower than they were in January?
I don't have a concrete answer to what the best solution is, but I thought I'd throw the subject out there so greater minds than mine could offer some suggestions.
As I see it, the 4H box serves one primary purpose, and that is just to establish a level to set your entries for the weeks. At times, it may also serve as an indication of trader sentiment for the week, but that's far from a sure thing.
Just to illustrate, as I remember it from back testing, all four trading weeks in January were winners, but check out the disparity in box size for the week as well as the maximum pip gain during each week . . .
Jan 5 Box Size: 154 Max Pips: 708
Jan 12 Box Size: 142 Max Pips: 647
Jan 19 Box Size: 209 Max Pips: 1517
Jan 26 Box Size: 254 Max Pips: 843
Is there a better way to figure targets? Maybe not, since nothing in trading is guaranteed. I'm considering experimenting with ATR based on a Weekly chart. Just for the sake of comparison, consider this . . . the Weekly ATR in January ran from a low of 1100 pips to a high of 1372 pips. Contrast that with September, which has run from a low of 502 pips to a high of 596 pips.
What does that tell you? Well, we already know the answer . . . the market was a LOT more volatile in January than it is right now. Wouldn't it seem reasonable that targets right now should be lower than they were in January?
I don't have a concrete answer to what the best solution is, but I thought I'd throw the subject out there so greater minds than mine could offer some suggestions.
Greetings from Guanajuato, Mexico 