FPA, PoltekFX, FBS and I | Page 3 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Getting historical data from FBS (instead of MetaQuotes) in MT 0 replies

FBS allows Canadian clients but IFSC doesn't work with Canada 2 replies

Attachments: FPA, PoltekFX, FBS and I
Exit Attachments

FPA, PoltekFX, FBS and I

  • #41
  • Jun 16, 2009 9:08am Jun 16, 2009 9:08am
poltekfx and f-b-s.com is scam
poltekfx and f-b-s.com is scam
poltekfx and f-b-s.com is scam
poltekfx and f-b-s.com is scam
poltekfx and f-b-s.com is scam

http://www.forex-tsd.com/metatrader-...s-scam-14.html
  • #42
  • Edited 9:11am Jun 17, 2009 9:01am | Edited 9:11am
Quoting amirkhanfx
I to produce my documents and to prove that 25645 is my account but you have different excusesto yet?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?
Mr.Eissa, any person with the same name as Yours in his documents could write us and say that he has a Poltek account N25645 (because You have posted these data on this resource) and ask us to transfer money to him. And only telefone password (which he doesn't have, of course) would be able to prove, that he is not an owner of this account.

But as I have said, we are ready to make advances for You. Your funds have been transferred today according to Your latest transfer request form. Please find my letter with all details in Your e-mail box.

Kindest regards.
  • #43
  • Jun 17, 2009 3:14pm Jun 17, 2009 3:14pm
f-b-s transfer only 1824$ of 7896.07$ to my new account at f-b-s!!!!!!!
but I cant to withdrawal this amouunt!!!!!? and I cant login to my personal area!!!!!???? Its funyyyyyyyyyyy!!!
Its funyyyyyyyyyyy!!!
Its funyyyyyyyyyyy!!!
Its funyyyyyyyyyyy!!!
Its buffoon he acted like a boor. he no want to pay my amounts just he want to deceive and to kill or waste ones time.
I say to you please to end this problem and no to protract. you must to be embarrassed!
please to melt this problem as soon as possible. I to get tired really!!!
  • #44
  • Jun 18, 2009 4:50am Jun 18, 2009 4:50am
Quoting Batullina E.
Mr.Eissa, any person with the same name as Yours in his documents could write us and say that he has a Poltek account N25645 (because You have posted these data on this resource) and ask us to transfer money to him. And only telefone password (which he doesn't have, of course) would be able to prove, that he is not an owner of this account.

But as I have said, we are ready to make advances for You. Your funds have been transferred today according to Your latest transfer request form. Please find my letter with all details in Your e-mail...
If I may suggest, you can transfer the funds to the same bank account that they came from and in this way, I believe you would've cleared responsibility regarding the ID issue.
  • #45
  • Jun 18, 2009 6:19am Jun 18, 2009 6:19am
Quoting aminhakim
If I may suggest, you can transfer the funds to the same bank account that they came from and in this way, I believe you would've cleared responsibility regarding the ID issue.
thank you but I havent same bank I can transfer to WM but I cant login to personal area for withdrawal I dont underatand that I what do?
  • #46
  • Jun 18, 2009 9:06am Jun 18, 2009 9:06am
Quoting amirkhanfx
thank you but I havent same bank I can transfer to WM but I cant login to personal area for withdrawal I dont underatand that I what do?
How did you deposit to Poltek?
  • #47
  • Jun 18, 2009 11:52am Jun 18, 2009 11:52am
Quoting aminhakim
If I may suggest, you can transfer the funds to the same bank account that they came from and in this way, I believe you would've cleared responsibility regarding the ID issue.
Sir, thank you very much for this note. This is an exact requirement of our company, which is not followed by Mr. Eissa - the funds can be withdrawn
only to the same payment details, from which they were deposited.
  • #48
  • Jun 18, 2009 12:01pm Jun 18, 2009 12:01pm
Quoting amirkhanfx
f-b-s transfer only 1824$ of 7896.07$ to my new account at f-b-s!!!!!!!
Dear Sir,
let me comment upon the sum we have transferred to your FBS account. It is 1824.34$ and nothing more, because
1) it is the sum which remains on your account after recalculation. This sum = New P/L – Withdrawal. If you refer to the document we have sent, you will see, that New P/L sum = 3631.77$, Withdrawal = 1807.43$. This means, that your account balance = 3631.77$ - 1807.43$ = 1824.34$. You have only this sum available on your account.
2) You have signed and sent us a transfer request form with this sum (1824.34$), which means that you agree with it. If you have any questions concerning this sum, you are welcome with them, but we are not accepting any claims towards it anymore.


Quoting amirkhanfx
and I cant login to my personal area!!!!!????
You can’t enter Your PA at the moment because of a serious accident at our hosting company, which caused some failures in the work of the PA. To restore its normal functioning, we have asked you to alter the Personal area password, using the link, which you received from us via e-mail. After password change you will continue working in your Personal Area as usual.
  • #49
  • Jun 19, 2009 5:01am Jun 19, 2009 5:01am
Hi sir
I accept that Gasemi is my IB because I thought so that you to pay us all balance account but regretfully you with a wonderful accounting that isnt extinct say to pay only 1824$!!!!??
you must to pay all balance account!! if you to do legally you must to pay all balance no only they that deposit! Is it true or legally that any broker not to pay profit and to pay only deposit????!!!!!
So 7896$ at 25645 isnt profit. if you to calculate for other my accounts(24992-25013-25368)you to see that they is -7232$ loss why dont accounting these accounts??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?
you must this accounting: my amounts over one year is that stay near you if it near me I did can to use the it so now!!
please to be fair and accounting again!!!!
please reply this problem as soon as possible!
  • #50
  • Jun 19, 2009 5:50am Jun 19, 2009 5:50am
Quoting amirkhanfx

you with a wonderful accounting that isnt extinct say to pay only 1824$!!!!??
you must to pay all balance account!!
Dear Sir, let me repeat that we are not accepting any claims towards the transferred sum anymore as this issue seems to be resolved with the help of the recalculation report, which we have sent to you in Excel file via e-mail. If you have any questions concerning this report, quotes used in it or the process of recalculation itself, please feel free to contact as via e-mail, skype or icq. You have also sent us a signed transfer request form with this sum, which proves that you agree with it and with the results of recalculation.

Quoting amirkhanfx

if you to calculate for other my accounts(24992-25013-25368)you to see that they is -7232$ loss why dont accounting these accounts??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?
Your other accounts were deaktivated by PoltekFX, and we don't have any access to them.

Quoting amirkhanfx

my amounts over one year is that stay near you if it near me I did can to use the it so now!!
Please mind that FBS Company started its work only in February, 2009. We can't take any responsibility for a one-year delay.

Kindest regards.
  • #51
  • Jun 19, 2009 6:36am Jun 19, 2009 6:36am
http://f-b-s.com/service_pack/rate_woman_friendly

Lovely company. Woman friendly? wtf?

How many umbrella companies does poltek run btw? I was doing some DD on F-B-S and got lost in a complicated web of sub companies.
  • #52
  • Jun 19, 2009 8:32am Jun 19, 2009 8:32am
Quoting oakmonster
http://f-b-s.com/service_pack/rate_woman_friendly

Lovely company. Woman friendly? wtf?

How many umbrella companies does poltek run btw? I was doing some DD on F-B-S and got lost in a complicated web of sub companies.
Being a larger-in-scale company than PoltekFX, FBS took up the latter about half year ago. The reason why it happened was that the owners of PoltekFX did not wish to continue doing business on their own but venture in a bigger project as shareholders. Thus when the bargain between FBS shareholders and former owners of PoltekFX was concluded, PoltekFX ceased to exist. Nonetheless FBS took on the obligation to handle former PoltekFX clients’ issues including the aforementioned one.

Willing to meet the customers’ needs to the fullest FBS developed a tariff system that splits the services provided into the sets called tariffs. Hence “woman friendly” tariff is addressed to the women who would like to try trading.
  • #53
  • Jun 20, 2009 11:29am Jun 20, 2009 11:29am
Quoting Batullina E.
Willing to meet the customers’ needs to the fullest FBS developed a tariff system that splits the services provided into the sets called tariffs. Hence “woman friendly” tariff is addressed to the women who would like to try trading.
Can I suggest you have a "Blonde Option" too?

It's terribly sexist.
  • #54
  • Edited 3:30pm Jun 21, 2009 3:21am | Edited 3:30pm
Dear Oakmonster,
we will be surely expanding our tariff set and we are open to all suggestions. Thanks for your ideas.

Could you please comment upon in which way you find this tariff sexist? This tariff was dedicated to the International Women's Day and after a good start of it, we decided to keep it among our basic tariffs. As far as I know, nobody finds the International Women's Day sexist, as well as all those priviledges which women receive from companies due to this holiday.

KR.
  • #55
  • Jun 21, 2009 8:39am Jun 21, 2009 8:39am
Quoting oakmonster
Can I suggest you have a "Blonde Option" too?




Shhhhhhh!!!! You'll start a whole new level of niche marketing in the forex industry.
  • #56
  • Jun 21, 2009 10:34am Jun 21, 2009 10:34am
Wow-seems FBS is on the short list of brokers to avoid. After reading thru this thread I can see why. It is not good business to fill EVERY forum with only complaints. Prospective clients (like me) do read these posts.
FF = Forex Faggots
  • #57
  • Edited 1:11pm Jun 21, 2009 1:00pm | Edited 1:11pm
Your other accounts were deaktivated by PoltekFX, and we don't have any access to them.
what you have excusesto again?
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 24992.JPG Size: 146 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: 25013.JPG Size: 143 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: 25368.JPG Size: 143 KB
  • #58
  • Jun 22, 2009 8:06am Jun 22, 2009 8:06am
Dear Mr. Eissa and all Forum visitors!
Unfortunately, this discussion has left the frame of a constructive dialogue and has become affected by emotional subjectiveness. Therefore we decided to appeal to the third party in resolving of the occurred situation. This third party - FPA - is well-known as a trustworthy and reliable intermediary in the conflicts between traders and brokerage companies. Since we have relevant experience of resolving such conflicts with their services and they have proved themselves as one of the most trusted and competitive organizations experienced in handling this kind of business. After a proper investigation their conclusion will be presented on this resource and considered to be final and indisputable.

Today we presented a detailed report on the situation to FPA. After we have got their response and the hidden Forum thread has been created (in accordance with their practice of negotiation) we will send Mr. Jafarzadeh a link to this thread with access details provided by FPA.
  • #59
  • Jun 23, 2009 8:58am Jun 23, 2009 8:58am
Quoting Batullina E.
Dear Oakmonster,
we will be surely expanding our tariff set and we are open to all suggestions. Thanks for your ideas.

Could you please comment upon in which way you find this tariff sexist? This tariff was dedicated to the International Women's Day and after a good start of it, we decided to keep it among our basic tariffs. As far as I know, nobody finds the International Women's Day sexist, as well as all those priviledges which women receive from companies due to this holiday.

KR.
By having a tariff just for women, you are somehow saying that female traders are somehow different to male traders. I also love the choice of the number 8 in all the figures for the tariff. Having a little joke are we?

:-)8-<

Quoting Batullina E.
Dear Mr. Eissa and all Forum visitors!
Unfortunately, this discussion has left the frame of a constructive dialogue and has become affected by emotional subjectiveness. Therefore we decided to appeal to the third party in resolving of the occurred situation. This third party - FPA - is well-known as a trustworthy and reliable intermediary in the conflicts between traders and brokerage companies.
That is good to know and if it gets the situation resolved then all well and good. However, I fail to see why the company FBS couldn't have settled this issue before having to go to the FPA? From what I have seen with them, the FPA won't accept any funny business and Poltek already has a bad rep with them just like your good friends Instaforex.

BTW, who is Sergey Majsus?
  • #60
  • Jun 23, 2009 10:01am Jun 23, 2009 10:01am
it seem like you look for some faults in FBS (tariffs, FPA, etc), because you not have good arguments. I read conversation and see that they give good arguments, they answer to every accusation and you only show your sarcasm and nothing else. good desision go to FPA, scam broker will not go there.
1 trader viewing now