Nav : thanks bro, I hope that helped 
Dave : Welcome back brother
Dave : Welcome back brother
Thank You 
Better-than-the-wormhole 555 replies
DislikedJust stick with what is easiest. You're not here to trade to adrenaline rushes, you trade to make money.
In my opinion it is less risky to trade on larger time frames, and that's the name of the game, risk management and probabilities of a winning trade.
The fact is, price can go any which way, even if one is certain it will go in a particular direction, it could go the opposite. Myself, I prefer larger time frames, as I don't like watching the trade every second.
But the bottom line is, you are a good trader.Ignored
Dislikedthank u ..means something especially when comment like this come from accomplished traders
it stopped me out and went to the target....i think im sticking to larger time frames i notice the difference is u dont need to worry so much about trendlines just the direction...so long as u realise what valid support and resistances are...then just let it do its thingIgnored
DislikedThanks Azim. I haven't really been posting as much on the forum these days. I find most people don't have a clue and are just wanting a direction to trade in.
It's just a blessing to be alive everyday to have the opportunity to have another go at life (on a more theological note!). I hope you're well there.
Ignored
DislikedYou were nearly spot on, on that trade Nav. Just entering in at a slightly different place would have paid many dividends. Over 100 of them in fact!Ignored
DislikedAnyone thinking of buying the pound next week might like to read this first.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/c...l-of-soup.htmlIgnored
DislikedI don't rate Simon Heffer one bit as any sort of economist. I think he's an alarmist, who often spouts populist views with scant regard to the facts or the broader perspective. A prime example of this can be drawn from this absurd insight he provides us with:
"so then the sooner we arrange a takeover by China or Abu Dhabi the better. Otherwise, another few months of the Brown Economic Miracle will have half of us working in call centres and the other half unemployed and sitting in soup kitchens."
Therefore, in my opinion, he...Ignored
DislikedSimon may be alarmist but that doesn't mean he's wrong.
The FT is even more biased in the other direction.Ignored
DislikedHi Stewrigh,
Actually, the FT has been highly critical of Brown in recent months, particularly regarding his management of public finances. Within the FT, there are columnists from the right, left and centre of the political spectrum.
As for Simon, let's look at the below populist, near tabloid, point made by him and judge his views accordingly. There are far better economists and writers out there that we can source, rather than this guy. Well, that's what I think anyway.
[i]"then the sooner we arrange a takeover by China or Abu Dhabi the...Ignored
DislikedI don't disagree he's alarmist and have no idea whether he's a good economist or not.
But its sentiment that drives markets.
People take note of commentators, what they say is normally only a reflection public opinion and public opinion informs sentiment.
Yes the China comment is ridiculous but the last time we had a Labour government the IMF had to bail us out and I don't think a repeat of that scenario is quite so ridiculous.Ignored
DislikedTaking 50% of this trade off the table with the remaining left to work. I'll look to amend the stop before this week's session's closes.
1. long @4649 closed @4752 (50%)
Remaining trade sl remains unchanged for now
1.long @4649 sl @4500Ignored