Take my word for it - A Trading Journal | Page 43 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Trading Journal (only my take) 434 replies

Another Trading Journal - Yuhu's Journal 17 replies

Bird is the word - 1 word trading advice 120 replies

Creating a Trade Journal for Word/Excel 0 replies

Attachments: Take my word for it - A Trading Journal
Exit Attachments

Take my word for it - A Trading Journal

  • #841
  • Edited 12:07pm Mar 25, 2009 10:09am | Edited 12:07pm
Really, b/c already played?? Well 1.3577. 13545 and 1.3484 were also played before as support lines the day before. Look here
http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...&postcount=356
So what is the difference b/t not playing 1.3636 again and playing 1.3577, 13545 amd 1.3484 again, other then one was a losing trade (not played hindsight) and the others were winning hindsight trades (played again hindsight) ???? That was and is the question.


Quoting fx.ranger
You guys are dumber than i thought. That level was already played! That orange line is the 3636 level ... just a few 15 min bars before that "circled" image you have there, was the trade taken off that level as a support line ...

Lol, atleast have some DECENT arguements or things to complain about.
  • #842
  • Edited 10:50am Mar 25, 2009 10:28am | Edited 10:50am
Quoting billye
and ps: we all missed 150pips news movement and did not do a power level bounce-off for 25 pips t/p and 4 lots and s/l at -100 luckily....
.
Hey billye, tell him to look at this chart, before the 150 move not after.
http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...&postcount=819
Tell him to make the calls BEFORE they happen and not AFTER. Take a look at the link above, BEFORE not AFTER, ok? You cannot make money after the move OK? After move calls are made to pick up clients for the signal service. Thanks
  • #843
  • Mar 25, 2009 10:36am Mar 25, 2009 10:36am
I abandoned the Wisdom thread, money can be made easily and less risky than that, and I am not assuming that is a real way to make money at all. I gained some hundred of pips out of it anyway, just occasionally traded, but played with just a few coins hehe ... so doesn't count.

I also liked to play a little bit with the naysayers who at last, end always to be the real wisdom.
  • #844
  • Mar 25, 2009 8:52pm Mar 25, 2009 8:52pm
hi all..

well lets see...something is missing..

OH its the Aqua level 1.3614 added by wisdomFX in post #377 but is not shown in his chart posted in # 383

So Fx. Ranger that kind of messes up that amazing idea.... it went through level 4 ... and almost hit level 5
  • #845
  • Mar 25, 2009 8:54pm Mar 25, 2009 8:54pm
EURUSD
sell 1.3607
stop 1.3749
take profit 1.3468
  • #846
  • Mar 25, 2009 9:07pm Mar 25, 2009 9:07pm
chart for above
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eurusd.gif Size: 173 KB
  • #847
  • Edited 11:34pm Mar 25, 2009 9:33pm | Edited 11:34pm
http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...&postcount=845

well looking like it wants to take another shot at the upper band, or maybe it is an expanding triangle,,, just closed for +34 pips....and waiting to see how it unfolds and for more clarity.
  • #848
  • Mar 25, 2009 9:45pm Mar 25, 2009 9:45pm
hi all


No no no.....wwwin you are not allowed to have winning trades...

But that is some nice pippage the last few days..
  • #849
  • Edited 9:42am Mar 26, 2009 9:16am | Edited 9:42am
Well Angler, your buddy seems to be the only one profiting form the PLs, but he is doing some unusual things:

1. Trading PL that according to his own definition should not be traded b/c exhausted.
2. Getting from a narrow range the maximum pips that the range allows, and sometimes a few more. The precision of an eye surgeon.

Of course, this is only possible doing imaginary hindsight trades. It seems that the banning from this thread greatly improved his trading precision...Jwentro, maybe you can start charging people for banning them. ..LOL, too funny.
  • #850
  • Mar 26, 2009 10:05am Mar 26, 2009 10:05am
Quoting smjones
The recent change to allow users to be banned from a thread by the tread starter has had unintended effects. By doing so, Now we have petty flame wars going on between threads. Such as the petty stuff going on with jwentro, angler, wwwinn, jigsaw and shakesfx and a few others from his thread. It really brings down the sense of well being this forum has always stood for and what seperated it from other forums. It is just a big distraction and a whole lot of nonsense.

I would like the posting vouch control to remain with the thread starter,...

Didn't SMJones vouch for Shakes?

http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...70&postcount=6
  • #851
  • Edited 11:03am Mar 26, 2009 10:12am | Edited 11:03am
Quoting Jwentro
Didn't SMJones vouch for Shakes?

http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...70&postcount=6
Yes, he sure did... but that is an old post, in the mornimg of the day shakes was exposed later in the evening as having recruiting purposes. Maybe the stuff was not so "petty" after all. I guess at that time shakes had done a number on him, or in the alternative he would rather not be distracted by exposed fake trading rather than it being unexposed...but that alllows self-promoters easy access to noobs and if they are good, maybe to some not so noob. I guess he feels that a see no evil approach promotes a sense of well being, but that is only temporary, as sooner or later, something got to give. Just like a just don't buy new tires until they blow on the expressway approach. Also, nobody is forcing anybody to read this thread, they can just ignore if it is distracting. If it gets out of hand, I am sure somebody would report to the new mods, so even the new mods don't have to follow it unless alerted to read it. The first page of this thread tells you what it is. I don't read any thread that does not interest me. Just that simple.
  • #852
  • Mar 26, 2009 11:38am Mar 26, 2009 11:38am
here is your channel Mr. chartist~

however I don't think 1.354 is not a price resistance.

Quoting wwwin
chart for above
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: channel.GIF Size: 17 KB
  • #853
  • Edited 12:05pm Mar 26, 2009 11:51am | Edited 12:05pm
Quoting billye
here is your channel Mr. chartist~

however I don't think 1.354 is not a price resistance.
Why do you mention 1.354? That is not a boundary of the channel..and remember sooner or later it will break out of the channel, it has tested the boundaries quite a few times. So if you wanna play the channel now, tight stops and be ready to take loss, and reverse on sustained breakout.
  • #854
  • Mar 26, 2009 11:53am Mar 26, 2009 11:53am
1.354 is the digit that we remember for prevous low... the resistance level.

tested again just now...

Quoting wwwin
What do you mention 1.354? That is in the middle of the channel..and remember sooner or later it will break out of the channel, it has tested the boundaries quite a few times.
  • #855
  • Mar 26, 2009 11:59am Mar 26, 2009 11:59am
Quoting billye
1.354 is the digit that we remember for prevous low... the resistance level.

tested again just now...
Oh ok, but I see prices have been much lower than that in the channel, the low was 1.3418.. I don't place much significance on the 1.354 level
  • #856
  • Edited 5:04pm Mar 26, 2009 4:41pm | Edited 5:04pm
Hi all.

Well just having a read here....it seems there are people on FF that just dont like people debating the legitamcy of trading methods.....And personally its not the debate people should be concerned about....its the fact that this year we have had a flood of people coming on FF claiming some ridiculous trading results that have never been backed up.....I for one do not want this Forum to go the way of others, where any scammer that can type is allowed to post away uninterupted and unquestioned....That for me is what cheapens a Forum......NOT healthy debate....Most of the abuse comes form one side in most of these debates...but I guess that is of no interest to some....but again for me shows signs that there is a problem.....because simple answers in most cases is all that is required....BUT the abuse starts usually when there unable to answer those simple questions..

As I mentioned in a previous post a while back....the one claiming this as a distaction once Openned a thread specifically so a particular thread could be discussed away from the target Thread...no problem there it was a good idea.....oh my...the same thing that is happening here.
  • #857
  • Mar 26, 2009 7:31pm Mar 26, 2009 7:31pm
Wow! Random levels work just as well!!
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: pl.gif Size: 50 KB
  • #858
  • Mar 26, 2009 8:12pm Mar 26, 2009 8:12pm
Hi all..


Interesting chart WWWIN.....did you calculate those levels with your magic calculator...

seems you can pick a time...go back a few hours and find the levels that cause the price to bounce on the 15min chart....and BAM....you have a system....what a innovative idea..

You should open a Hindsight thread....like others here....and some other respected people would rather see...than having a discussion..
  • #859
  • Mar 26, 2009 8:15pm Mar 26, 2009 8:15pm
I have a question, why where the circle trades not taken, and if exhausted, then why at same level the trade in the square taken afterward???..We would like to learn the method and need the answers...Thanks in advance.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: question.jpg Size: 118 KB
  • #860
  • Mar 26, 2009 8:29pm Mar 26, 2009 8:29pm
Hi all...


Oh come on WWWIN...wont you ever learn this method...

Let me explain...

Its exhausted ONLY until another bounce shows a winning trade...then it becomes fresh again...
0 traders viewing now