Snowballing On The Corrective Waves (A Complete Trading System)

oh okay , i just couldnt find the reference made to fti's thread (and still am not able too) ...
i never said its a new invention , or whatever unique development is ...
i recognized the paragraph as taken from fti's thread and failed to see any link to it anywhere ... that is all ...
and in my personal opinion as a user of snowballing and art of war , a usage of the concept needs a greater understanding ... much greater than whatever u have written here ... and such understanding can be achieved only through a thorough reading of the thread and off course experience in using it ...
that is why my persistence in you directing people to the original thread where that paragraph is taken from ...

I appreciate your kindness in wanting to protect the originality and certainly the not comparable knowledge, preparation and experience of FTI's own thread, but what you're saying would make sense if I had claimed to have something in common with the fti thread, or in the worst case if I was suggesting a distortion of some concept!

But this is not the case, just to avoid misunderstandings it should be stated here that there is no pretense of apparently with no one, in the same way as here no one has ever expressed an intention to make comparisons to any one! (This is just a quote that should be taken for what it is, nothing more, in the same way as I took the quotes from The TurtleTrader) ...

I'm sorry but I really really believe that your statements are misplaced, or rather I think there is a risk that these statements may cause confusion!

Paradoxically, a comparison between something that has nothing in common, you're doing exactly what you would like to recommend to me...

Then I ask you to avoid creating confusion, and not to interpret this thread as something else than it really is!

I didnt mean to create a confusion , if your methodology has nothing in common with snowballing - art of war , please do use a more general term for it like probably progressive scaling ...
cause art of war MO is a very specific MO ...

One more thing, let me say that to judge something without having the proper knowledge of what you are judging me seems almost in bad taste
... forgive me!

agree,
just couldnt stand cut copy paste , without knowing what being cut copied or pasted ...

I think we are all the elements to understand what we are doing here, I repeat the concept of the snowballing is not a concept coined recently (with all my respect) but it is part of a broader approach to trading, it would be incorrect to think of this concept as a concept with an unique development ...

This is the main reason why I think that is unnecessary to continue with this discussion!

u copied an excerpt written art of war MO , a very very specific MO of the snowballing concept ...
if u dont use the MO , it is best not to mention it or paste it randomly in your methodology , dont u think ?

please do accept my apologies to the pointless discussion of this reply , and good luck with your turtle + speiler + "snowballing" + Eliott ... (deeply sorry if I've missed any of the additional methodology u may have perused , u see my bad taste doesnt let me read ur whole thread )

I regret for this your haughty attitude, this sounds like a lack of humility ...

I don't like to argue and raise the provocative, please!

yes ,
Im truly sorry for what i've said , didnt mean it that way ... was not my intention in the first place to argue , I got carried away ...
sorry again
good fortune to u

OK OK let Stake explain his strategy by some examples.
We'll see if the method sounds good.
Dear Stake, could you regularly expose in practice your way by posting your trades for a good comprehension ?
Because snowballing or progressive scaling are still for me a little mysterious.
Best regards.

With great regret I must note that a good part of my intention here has been misunderstood.

I'm not looking for consensus as well as the idea of participating in the race to win the title of best trading system is so far from me, but equally I have to justify myself with things that have nothing to do with myself and with my personality!

I'm not interested in submitting something on the table whose genesis and whose purpose certainly were not turning towards this direction ...

About what was said by maheswara, I can understand the misunderstanding and in a certain way I have to admit that I also agree with him, but at the same time I think it is difficult (at least with regard to my training) to find a justification for a free attitude of sufficiency ...

...

Don't worry, Stake.
For one dubitative and awkward person, there are many people who want to understand and learn your method.
The attitude of this guy is not positive and not constructive.
Please go on and don't listen to any more the dissatisfied ones.
Thx.

No I am not surprised by this, in my expectation was also that of encountering one of these masters of the rhetoric of peanuts, these modern jesters of virtual in constant search of their King, someone who can show them the way, someone who can shape their personalities!!!

Just my intentions was to lay the foundation for everyone, through research of their own style, could try to build their particular Complete Trading System ...

This would involve the identification of basic, of foundation, to use a construction metaphor, able to maintain the whole structure ...
Solid foundations of course but also versatile allowing its specific expression and customization ...

In my library will be years from now I hide no more dust to the manual of military strategy by Sun Tzu, and here there are those who, in this forum for the first time have heard of it, take the right to elect themselves to the knowledge holders ...

I am ready to play with my head, the vast majority of these gentlemen has never had the experience of opening a live account!

But perhaps you have reason, good luck to all of you!

If the advance from 1.4699 is an impulse, then the EURCHF should hold 1.4699 and begin a rally that eventually exceeds 1.4988. Coming under 1.4699 would not change the bullish implications from the cycles of higher degree ...

Stake,
It seems that after asking Pipsalot to send you a summary of FTI'S thread, you feel its OK to CUT & Paste direct quotes from fti's material. Your use of BOLD letters in the first post of this thread, proclaming a trading systems, speaks to your large ego and need for attention. Your constant mentioning, that your English is not so good, unless of course ,you need to defend yourself for stealing others material and passing it off as new material, speaks to your character. You are a thief. Please look up the word plagiarism. ps.--you are also a clown.

There are no problems ... thread closed!!!
I don't want even to replay to insults of these gentelemen, I have many other things to think ...

P.S. Attached a further confirmation of my large ego_

I'm really curious as to why the first post on this thread is from The Original Turtle Trading Rules by Curtis Faith, one of the most successful original Turtles, and Mr. Faith has not been given any credit for the content.

The document is at http://www.originalturtles.org and used to be free. I think it actually costs money now, but that doesn't change the fact that the first post is taken from different parts of that document.

I think Curtis Faith should have been given credit when exactly quoting so much of his information, though I did find a reference to The Turtle Trader, thank you, it's just that if you're quoting from someone, that someone should be given credit, at least IMHO.

It would have been sufficient to channel your energies in trying to understand the content, and the reason, of this thread to be able to do a little light on what seems to be your question and thus the reason for your indulgence ...

Have I, never, claimed authorship of what I wrote?

I do not seem to have never claimed anything like this.

Do you think know someone who could claim the paternity of their statements?

Then, perhaps, you are forgetting that an economic education is the result

of what has been learned, not of your own empirical ambitions.

As you would have noticed I have only quoted some concepts that some people have had the merit to show much better than I would have been able to do, the first post sums up simply and clearly, an essential part of knowledge that every trader should have ...

Would not be too difficult to see that, despite their difference and their different origins and training, these experiences were united by the characteristic of leading to a more general tarding approach.

I would have tried to keep together the various components, which alone can confer the status of completeness of a system of trading,

in this sense it was necessary an attemp reconstruct a versatile technique and therefore adaptable to different markets and financial instruments; all this passing simultaneously through the analysis of market movements and the Econometric Analysis which would I have talked later and that I have not had the opportunity to introduce ...

This is a very personal opinion but I believe that together we could perhaps achieve something, because, I want to stress that I never tried to monopolize the thread but, on the contrary, the fundamental requirement of this effort was the contribution and collaboration of everyone who had something to share!!!

Stake.

stake,
nevermind the guys who are trying to ruin your efforts to show to the world what you have or will discover! maybe they think you have a winning method and thus trying to shut you up! Nevermind them! go ahead with your method. i want to hear what you have to say. i just hope you didn't give it up....
gigi

Hi Stake,

I'm glad to read that the thread has not closed and that this trading discussion is going on. Keep it up.

Regards