Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade) | Page 7933 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

GBP/JPY, GBP/USD

Similar Threads

Auslanco-GBP/JPY Strength Indicator strategy 345 replies

Auslanco 15min GBP/JPY startegy 630 replies

My MT4 indicators for Auslanco's strategy 92 replies

Auslanco 15 minute Strategy Oanda FXManager Updates.. 62 replies

Questions About Auslanco's Trades 72 replies

Attachments: Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade)
Exit Attachments

Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade)

  • #158,641
  • Feb 6, 2009 11:02pm Feb 6, 2009 11:02pm
Quoting jon clogger
This is a FREE forum....

Totally agree with you.

I don't post much but I'm watching all the time. I'm here to learn, and very slowly it seems to pay off. I'm getting more confidence in my trades and have increased profitability thanks to this forum.
Let's try to keep the experienced traders in this forum and just say :"THANK YOU FOR WHAT WE LEARNED TODAY".

Orca

(SO MALCOLM: PLEASE COME BACK)
New voice message: Why are you calling me? If I need you, I'll call you!
  • #158,642
  • Feb 6, 2009 11:31pm Feb 6, 2009 11:31pm
I see this last move up hit a confluence of the daily R1, a 1.62 fib extension, and the high from about 3 weeks ago. The 4H QQE has also moved into overbought territory (above 70). This was the second Friday in a row with a price run up.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 4HR.jpg Size: 272 KB
  • #158,643
  • Feb 6, 2009 11:39pm Feb 6, 2009 11:39pm
On the daily chart I show price closing above the 50ema, and the QQE moving above the 50 line. This is the first time in 6 months that the daily QQE has moved above the 50 line. My daily 100sma is a little higher than Mr. Sabah's, at 147.85. But it's pointing down, and will be lower than that next week.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 1D.jpg Size: 277 KB
  • #158,644
  • Feb 6, 2009 11:44pm Feb 6, 2009 11:44pm
On the weekly chart I show the Gann HiLo at 137.57. The QQE is starting to move out of oversold territory (30). It also isn't too far from crossing up (solid RSI line crossing the dashed "slow" line).
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 1W.jpg Size: 284 KB
  • #158,645
  • Feb 6, 2009 11:50pm Feb 6, 2009 11:50pm
[quote=jon clogger;2522600]This is a FREE forum. People posting their analysis are doing so for FREE for the benefit of those learning. It is hard work to do what some of these more experienced folks are doing on a daily basis.

What is NOT FREE is pissing in the face of those doing the work. That makes them leave and costs the rest of us a valuable asset.




Yes,
you are Right,

I learned a lot of malco and Karmo, I appreciate their position, but I do not want to see them leave the forum for others,

If a person has to leave, I'm sure not malco,
in any case I thank them for their efforts,

they were very useful
  • #158,646
  • Feb 6, 2009 11:51pm Feb 6, 2009 11:51pm
Quoting jon clogger
This is a FREE forum. People posting their analysis are doing so for FREE for the benefit of those learning. It is hard work to do what some of these more experienced folks are doing on a daily basis.

What is NOT FREE is pissing in the face of those doing the work. That makes them leave and costs the rest of us a valuable asset.
.
  • #158,647
  • Feb 7, 2009 1:14am Feb 7, 2009 1:14am
Guys, i somehow saw on the newspapers today that the Senate voted and rejected the original 900+ billion bill. I'm puzzled by this since all i've heard on the net is that the Republicans are just hammering out details on a reformed 780 billion package instead. Is this just a typo by the papers or has something really happened but i just can't find it.

Thanks
  • #158,648
  • Feb 7, 2009 1:28am Feb 7, 2009 1:28am
Quoting Eulogy
Guys, i somehow saw on the newspapers today that the Senate voted and rejected the original 900+ billion bill. I'm puzzled by this since all i've heard on the net is that the Republicans are just hammering out details on a reformed 780 billion package instead. Is this just a typo by the papers or has something really happened but i just can't find it.

Thanks
I didn't catch anything about a Senate vote. I know they were debating it, and that a compromise was reached.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/06/news...ion=2009020622

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1
  • #158,649
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:17am Feb 7, 2009 2:17am
BTW, what's up with Dr.Geppynius and Malcolm today?? Did they break up?
  • #158,650
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:20am Feb 7, 2009 2:20am
Quoting Petefaders
wow! I thought I was was respecting peoples wishes by taking volume disscussion elswhere..Guess I can't win with you. I was not making fun of you AT ALL..I will remove that sentence if it offends you, sorry.

I may not "have a clue" how the industry works, not claiming to. Just found something that helps my trading, that is a fact, and all I care about in the end.
they base is there from some of your posts i saw, but some just have a little not exactly spot on interpretation, which is nothing bad at all.you have the material i suppose so do some more research or re-read the stuff and it will complete your picture i am sure.
  • #158,651
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:20am Feb 7, 2009 2:20am
Quoting Dr.Geppynius
few misconceptions.
like i often said before, its not about high vl and low vol only...careful.

do u just post in your journal what you've picked up here regarding vol?

and no need to make fun out of my post regarding not posting abut vol that much. it just shows that u have no clue how the industry works and you are pissing against your own leg if u want to use that trading approach...

some dont get it.
do you remember when was your last post that intended to learn us anything? becuase i dont...
I recommend you read something else as this sentence is now concluded.
  • #158,652
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:25am Feb 7, 2009 2:25am
Quoting Dr.Geppynius
they base is there from some of your posts i saw, but some just have a little not exactly spot on interpretation, which is nothing bad at all.you have the material i suppose so do some more research or re-read the stuff and it will complete your picture i am sure.
Yes my friend, I will always continue to learn. I'll re-read MTM now just for you.
  • #158,653
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:25am Feb 7, 2009 2:25am
Quoting Petefaders
BTW, what's up with Dr.Geppynius and Malcolm today?? Did they break up?
lol...we...why?

you can take over the role as monkey king

just not wasting much time to post analysis here anymore. malcolm seems to have made that decision too..
jon clogger nailed it to the point.
  • #158,654
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:26am Feb 7, 2009 2:26am
Quoting Obaidah
do you remember when was your last post that intended to learn us anything? becuase i dont...
is it my job?

remember my post when i said that i stick posting such stuff.
  • #158,655
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:28am Feb 7, 2009 2:28am
Quoting Petefaders
BTW, what's up with Dr.Geppynius and Malcolm today?? Did they break up?
No it seems like a freeforall against Malcolmb and Dr. G...Whats up with that??


  • #158,656
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:32am Feb 7, 2009 2:32am
Quoting Petefaders
Yes my friend, I will always continue to learn. I'll re-read MTM now just for you.
Wow, don't do the Dr. any favors... read for yourself only....
  • #158,657
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:32am Feb 7, 2009 2:32am
Quoting MykeFX
No it seems like a freeforall against Malcolmb and Dr. G...Whats up with that??


Just a joke cause they seems pissed.
no comment, I'll stay out of the drama.
  • #158,658
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:33am Feb 7, 2009 2:33am
Quoting MykeFX
Wow, don't do the Dr. any favors... read for yourself only....
That was a JOKE too..geez. Why is everyone PMS-ing? (that's a joke too)
  • #158,659
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:35am Feb 7, 2009 2:35am
Quoting Petefaders
Just a joke cause they seems pissed.
no comment, I'll stay out of the drama.
  • #158,660
  • Feb 7, 2009 2:43am Feb 7, 2009 2:43am
Quoting PipChick
Malcolmb having a problem with competition? Sorry Malcolmb but from one friend to another, you are being the moron. I havent seen forex lion dis you on here yet .(unless I have missed a post) You really have it in for this guy...maybe you can provide some proof of why we should all suspect him of wrong doing.Its actually getting on my nerves with you constant ridicule of him. Just iggy him and remember, you dont own the forum buddy.You seem to have pushed other good traders out the door.
lol...attention! i like drama
my last drama post here, i promise. then the regular show can go on

here is somebody who has something to say, on a weekly basis. this week we see the pissing-on-malcolm's leg posts.

there is no competition with forexcat, nothing. constantly switching "indicators" and so an, claiming about managing funds. i have gotten some pns of guys who had their acc under his management, asking me to take care of their account after damage. if you just post a few charts and analysis which plays out, you receive such pns. thats where the riks is and how one comes to the other.

so where's your point?

and yes, you would cry if you were as profitable as malcolm. weekly roi would blow your freaking monthly profits i am sure.
there's no need to question that for him to go on posting his calls here.

i really understand why all the good guys which provided valuable stuff quit posting here.

it is for nothing, fills your pn box, not talking about the regular ones, talking about begging or trying to begin biased discussions about the trading approach, just stresses you from time to time to deal with such morons. getting p*ssed on the leg by guys like karmo, lilmoe, piters, pandora and who i might have forgtten is another thing if that was the case, but not by guys who are new and did not contribute anything of value anytime.

i really don't care what you think since i absolutely have no benefits from your weekly post at all. but such things just annoy me.

you can take the crown as monkey king pipchick. thou shall be a good leader to the 10% here who are not lurking, begging and [put verbs of your desire here]
432 traders viewing now